>>32236>gaslighting people that what they see with their eyes isn't real and they should stop critique the precious consumer products of radlibs <N-noooo you can't enjoy something that isn't ideologically aligned with me!!!The only gaslight here is yours.
You are reactionaries, liberal reactionaries pretending to be better than other libs.
>noticing dictatorship of bourgeoisie leading to petite bourgeois moralism and child abuseThe fuck is this supposed to mean? How is this at all relevant to the argument being made?
>Sorry child The only people using this online in an anonymous forum are barely of age teens trying to sound smarter and older than they really are.
>Please stop protecting your autism idols from "reactionary" workers How ass-backwards is your comprehension, to come to this completely opposite understanding of the post? The point is that Harry Potter is NOT reactionary, its vaguely liberal, because it comes from a liberal author in a liberal society, it reflects the material conditions the story is placed in. It also appeals to proletarians of said societies, since they can associate with it, and this reflects it being the largest media fandom in the Western hemisphere for 2 decades.
>(crying soy consumers) <using memes in text-formatTouch grass you actual autist.
>IT DOESN'T MATTER, YOU'RE AN IDEALIST FOR THINKING I'M A DOMESTICATED RADLIB Post too long. Click here to view the full text.