>>43920>">my post didn't get save"found post:
>>43742>hussnasty bullshit>doesn't go into detail on what partIn what way, who OK the the idea of animal genitalia NTR tho. If Yiffy needed to be made then they could've just said it was a egg donation with a surrogate mother, a sperm donation (or using two eggs and a lab to ignore the epilogue), maybe even the couple knew and didn't mind her being a surrogate mother to do the
natural way. And if someone need to a wrong, then do what Archer (2009) did with lana and let one of the characters just take from the sperm/egg from a sperm bank of a certain character without there permission, but then maybe callout how that can be messed up unlike Archer.
Out of multiple options, they choose in the end one of the worse way do it, the dog dick NTR one.
>>43793>I'm just wondering when the HS:BC staff will realize that they're trying to "polish a turd" at this point. Good for Sisyphus, at least they're trying to make it a good story and not epilogues 2 (now unironical).
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.