/edu/ - Education

>>25843
Having read some Dworkin, I don't know if she ever directly said that because it seems like she never directly says anything ever. All Dworkin does is complain about men, and all positions she is said to hold seems to be more inferred from the exact way that she is complaining about men in any given work rather than directly stated.

>>25844
Yeah I mean the other problem is that Dworkin is a coward. Dworkin's conclusions are trivial and she is afraid to state them outright.

too much of the criticism agaisnt dworkin is just using token anti zionism and pointing out the fact that she isn't the "infallible uberwoman genius" that terminally online radfem like to potray her as and thus fully discarding ANYTHING and EVERYTHING she has EVER said (or at least the strawman version of her) and continuing to feel confident knowing that there is absolutely no need to interrogate or self introspect their deeply held views, opinions, and habits

>>25830

sophie lewis is (mostly) unnecessary and sometimes just horrid from what i know of her and her writing

>>25839

>The very term "women's liberation movement" in this time-period and in a Western context (that she is almost exclusively referring to) is so retarded as to be fucking comedic, if not for the fact that there are stupid entitled burger-women and men that actually subscribe to this ideological bullshit.

semantic bs

>Women are not a separate class, but an identity. Take off that Soviet flag, you bring shame to Marxism-Leninism.

bro dosen't know about the womb or the role of the housewife💀
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>26028
>fully discarding ANYTHING and EVERYTHING she has EVER said
The more I read of her, the more my criticism of her actually becomes that she never actually says anything ever. She just writes books complaining about men and any positions she is said to hold come from inference about the exact way that she is complaining about men.

Which makes some of the more frustrating discourse around Dworkin more understandable. When you try to talk about some of the more radical implications that Dworkin gestures at, the Dworkinites will come out and say that she never actually said that, and they're not wrong because Dworkin never actually says anything. For instance, the only conclusion you could possibly come to when you read Dworkin write about sex and rape is that all heterosexual sex is rape, but there is absolutely no passage anywhere where she actually says that directly. She complains about men and the implication of the way in which she complains about men is that all heterosexual sex in rape, but she never outright says it.

>>26023
im by no means and expert on judaism or whatever so i probobly should just stay quiet on this BUUUT if i am gonna say something based on the things that i already do know it feels a bit TOO reductive to frame the entirety (not saying thats what you're doing) as a "racialist religion" but like i said im not very familiar on that stuff so i could be wrong or whatever

>>26023
the concept of a "chosen people" is reactionary
cutting baby penises is reactionary

>>25447
The only bible that has my imprimatur is the skeptic's annotated version. I even have a hard back copy.
https://skepticsannotatedbible.com/

>>25741
I love you

God isn't real. Stop this retardation. All religions are false made up inventions, only useful to the modern world as a cautionary example of how large numbers of people can be fooled by manipulative ideas. Eventually the whole world will be atheist and this retardation won't even be studied as a historical curiosity because it's so boring.

>>25950
People will never stop believing in metaphysical bullshit
We replaced angels and demons with AI and other brain worms

But tbh I don’t think people believe in God as a literal cosmic anthropomorphic sapient but rather as a psychosomatic effect

>>25950
>Eventually the whole world will be atheist
I highly doubt it

Interest in market analytics on financial and CSPAN if your spouse is also interested in the same for his job.

Your child has no sign of gender dysfunction, even if insisting due to puberty signs of sport; however, watches television intended for wealthy men's careers, and you are not; the blue collar divide.

Your son or daughter hates National Geographic; they like "Discovery", and are applying private economics and history lessons from school specialist programs as elementary students.

Your child has a discipline problem called a single detention, that the father finds concerning; however, refuses to act on it in any manner.

Your child is raised as Thomas Edison's factory workers; a "Menlo", Stonewall Jackson sayings placed as Abraham Lincoln; Michelle Obama.

not interesting

>>25994
> If it is held that man is "by nature" an uninventive tribesman and an inventive businessman, a submissive slave and a proud craftsman, an independent hunter and a dependent wage-worker, then either man's "nature" is an empty concept, or man's "nature" depends on material and historical conditions, and is in fact a response to those conditions.
I am yet to learn about a "result" from evolutionary psychology that was not discredited by actual archaeological evidence. It is nothing more but a bunch of charlatans looking at what already exists and trying to justify it based on what must have existed before, all while ignoring what actually did exist in the past.

>>25998
Then you haven't read. Dismissing a field by stereotype is lazy.
>actual archaeological evidence
archaeology guesses from trash piles lmao

>Meanwhile, 6ft 4 charismatic chads get perfect grades and enter the nation's best colleges for law or medicine.

Maybe because those Chads also have super intelligence but are also socially graceful.
Not all chads are subpar intelligence

>>25994
Most evolutionary psychology is based around pop culture impressions rather than reality though

>>25978
>>25972
>>25977
This

What’s even more intrinsic is that the rationale for modern schooling is “socialization”

A lot of adults who agree with compulsory law for public schools say that school should be about socialization because otherwise “you end up as a loser in the adult world”

Yet a lot of adults end up social recluses in time

And socialization ins chills are micromanaged too the point of sterilization

Schools willfully neglect to teach life skills
Their idea of life skills is forcing kids to do group projects

Test

>>25414
Harder than English. Chinese sentence structure lacks all those redundant Germanic particles like "the," "an," and "of."

Mi estas lernanto esperanto

Perennial dabbler. I'm so decent at Chinese as my main but I always want to choose a third language. I've dabbled to varying degrees in Vietnamese, Indonesian, Korean, Russian (just on apps). Recently started a face to face Spanish course but I'm not that inspired by Spanish I've discovered. Still 8 more classes to go. I'm going to Vietnam soon and I'm hoping that will inspire me sufficiently to invest myself in studying the language.

>>25414
j'apprends le francais avec duolingo

>>14135
truth nuke of unimaginable magnitude and potence

sorry leftoids, the workers WILL read the ruthless critique and they WILL agree.

>>14135
Literacy doesn't mean voracious reading.

>>19045
This is the only real good post on here.
Most talks about a glorious leftist revolution in the twenty first century is a farce.
At best it's lib left bs.
At worst it's just right wing rehash.

>>14136
>Illiteracy is on the rise in the US and child labor has returned. This isn't because workers are getting dumber, but because the bourgeoisie are getting more ruthless.

I have yet to see where child labor is being a prominent return with exceptions of some outlier factory using orphans.

Also, I find it funny how people are complaining about illiteracy in a time where everyone makes and reads text messages and/or essay posts.
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>19918
>>19045
the only two replies ITT worth reading

>>22824
>So I tell all of you: Dumb it all down, simplify then make it simpler. Make it spread.

yes. an introductory comment on simplification in general. Not many people know that there is a primary synopsis of Capital, written by Engels himself (1868):
https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1867-c1/1868-syn/
Marx also makes early comment as to the serialisation of Capital by French editors in the 1872 preface:
<I applaud your idea of publishing the translation of “Das Kapital” as a serial. In this form the book will be more accessible to the working class, a consideration which to me outweighs everything else.
https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1867-c1/p2.htm
Thus, Marx clearly cared for simple presentation and exposition, despite his verbose style, as he admits of in the beginning of the 1873 preface.

Beginning with Carlo's Capital, we have a note upon translation, which by this time, Capital was limited to the German, Russian and French, with the first English edition being published in 1886. Marx died 3 years earlier. Carlo also gives a tragic fact that by this time (1878), Marx had failed to publish Capital Vol. 2 (1885), despite already having the groundwork and notes for Capital, cumulatively from the period of 1857-67. Of course, Engels only published the unfinished manuscript of Capital Vol. 3 in 1894, 11 years after Marx's death, and 1 year before his own demise. The unpublished "theories of surplus value" was also only brought into completion by Kautsky around 1910, and so it took over 40 years to convert Marx's notes into his "Critique of Political Economy" series (talk about procrastinating!). Many of the secondary and tertiary texts of Marx were also only published in the 20th century, largely through the USSR, by "progress publishers" (1931-). Carlo writes:
<Meanwhile Marx can fulfill his promise, giving us the second volume of Capital, which will deal with The Process of Circulation of Capital (book II), and with The Process of Capitalist Production as a Whole (book III), and the fourth and fiPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>19918
Nowadays, students are swamped with more work than minimum wage employees.
Having to finish a bunch of assignments and then go to work?