[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo / 420 ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/edu/ - Education

'The weapon of criticism cannot, of course, replace criticism of the weapon, material force must be overthrown by material force; but theory also becomes a material force as soon as it has gripped the masses.' - Karl Marx
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)
What is 6 - 2?

Check out our new store at shop.leftypol.org!

| Catalog | Home
|

File: 1764825039224.jpeg (1.33 MB, 1080x1228, 0f5lskqi235d1.jpeg)

 

I'm 31. I never went to college because I considered it a waste of time. The state of education in the USA is abhorrent and I never for a moment considered there would be something to gain by wasting time in ideological brainwashing factories masquerading as educational institutions. I'm employed in the trades and I've always studied philosophy in my spare time, but I'm seriously considering university now because I believe (perhaps mistakenly) that my abilities and knowledge have reached a point of enough breadth and depth to make a career as a philosopher, and to get some papers and books published. Has anyone here pursued that path, and if so, what were your experiences?
9 posts omitted.

>>25486
>>25487
I was a phil major for years and ended up dropping out and I agree 100% with what you are saying. Academia is just a recuperation factory.

>ideological brainwashing factories
reactionary rhetoric

>>25505
academia is anti-communist, sorry, the theory industry is an industry just like music and movie industries are, and its stimulated by Capital to toe the NATO line in similar ways

File: 1792017255022-5.jpg (22.57 KB, 427x360, Fist pencil.jpg)

>>25438
I studied sciences and I don't think it was a waste of time at all. I have attended a few political sciences lectures at university since a friend was the professor and I was happy to see that he taught the students to think critically. All people deserve access to higher education with it being liberating. I would definitely give it a go. That said, I don't know what the situation in the US is like. Universities are definitely not "ideological brainwashing factories". Publish or perish is also a thing, but it is more related to research.

Unfortunately nowadays academic education is just publishing AI slop papers in bulk. Not worth it unless you need a job that requires the certifications, or if you're in it entirely for the education.



 

Can anyone make a tldr of this book like >>14131 I'm trying to explain to my friend in simple terms what imperialism is, but I'm shit at explanations.

becoming good at explanations goes like this:
read a chapter
write its point out in your own words
take your explanation and cut it down to no more than three or four points.
try make any point explainable in a couple sentences.

if you cant explain the subject you either:
havent understood the subject deep enough
or
havent attempted to prepare an explanation prior to speaking

or both!

You know Lenin already did something like this in many of his texts, where he would write a condensed version in some part of the book. His words on Imperialism:
>If it were necessary to give the briefest possible definition of imperialism we should have to say that imperialism is the monopoly stage of capitalism. Such a definition would include what is most important, for, on the one hand, finance capital is the bank capital of a few very big monopolist banks, merged with the capital of the monopolist associations of industrialists; and, on the other hand, the division of the world is the transition from a colonial policy which has extended without hindrance to territories unseized by any capitalist power, to a colonial policy of monopolist possession of the territory of the world, which has been completely divided up
>We must give a definition of imperialism that will include the following five of its basic features: (1) the concentration of production and capital has developed to such a high stage that it has created monopolies which play a decisive role in economic life; (2) the merging of bank capital with industrial capital, and the creation, on the basis of this “finance capital”, of a financial oligarchy; (3) the export of capital as distinguished from the export of commodities acquires exceptional importance; (4) the formation of international monopolist capitalist associations which share the world among themselves, and (5) the territorial division of the whole world among the biggest capitalist powers is completed. Imperialism is capitalism at that stage of development at which the dominance of monopolies and finance capital is established; in which the export of capital has acquired pronounced importance; in which the division of the world among the international trusts has begun, in which the division of all territories of the globe among the biggest capitalist powers has been completed.
There's more bits like this but I have to find them

File: 1792016364226-1.jpg (97.66 KB, 651x1000, Hobson.jpg)

>>21629
There is a video which condenses some of the main points of the book:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9kF1dENzDg8

It obviously doesn't include lots of information presented in the book, but it does include some useful information such as an introduction to monopolies and the definition of finance capital. One thing I found particularly interesting is that the descriptions used by capitalist economist Hobson proved Lenin's points.



 

How would you go about learning about solar? Do you know of any useful material to learn about it? I'd love to learn more about the different technologies involved and about the installation of solar panels and power generation. Maybe this knowledge can be put into practice to help one's local community. I'm sure there's lots of solid state physics and electronics involved, but any advice would be more than welcome!
t. Chemist

Will Prowse: Mobile Solar Power Made Easy!: The easiest beginner's book for off-grid and 12V systems (cabin, RV, boat). See also his YouTube channel and diysolarforum.com.

Michael Boxwell: Solar Electricity Handbook: A clear basic guide to sizing and design, updated regularly.

Joseph P. O'Connor: Off Grid Solar: Battery systems (lead-acid and lithium) covered thoroughly.

Solar Energy International: Photovoltaics: Design and Installation Manual: A professional-level textbook for when you have mastered the basics.

>>26313
Thank you SO much. I'll definitely check all of these resources out! :)



File: 1791765324582-7-0.png (50.1 KB, 300x289, lp_logo.png)

File: 1791765324582-0-1.png (451.78 KB, 1920x935, lp.png)

 

Hello, I'm a user of the now-partnered leftist wiki Leftypedia. I have notice that, despite the partnership and purpose to give leftist ideals to beginners, the wiki have less than three active users (I'm included). I haven't seen anyone talk about leftypedia since the old Miraheze wiki lost its motivation. I have learned from the independent wiki's admin that the wiki itself could be deleted due to costing. Generally, I'm here to see what you users think of the independent wiki with pretty of articles so far?

I would post this in /leftypol/ or /siberia/. No one posts in /edu/.

>entire site is in courier font

Oof.



 

Read this book right now
A major problem I've been noticing through the years is that nobody fucking understands what dialectical materialism actually is. This book is entirely about explaining dialectical materialism.
Of course, it speaks of the philosophies that come before it but only to explain dialectical materialism itself (this is by itself a dialectical process, btw)

Read this shit and spread it!
19 posts and 7 image replies omitted.

>>26336
thank dog there are tldr machines.

>>26332
He say that dialectics is dangerous.. you can return that to him. Like if a contradictions get ignored, you can show ecology, etc, you know.

Also google Right to distress Hegel. But idk if google will show you that, but for me it shows Kant. For Kant moral is empty or pure? So he consider this action still morally wrong. While you can see content in Hegels reply.

>>26337
impressive summary for ShitGPT but the post is still worth a read

you vill read tha thang

>>26336
The claim that the mind is equal to a TM is nowhere near "widely accepted". As an example: https://ar5iv.labs.arxiv.org/html/2207.05700#3



File: 1791522871083-9.png (953.69 KB, 821x451, GOEE9EQWgAACcVI.png)

 

Best books about the actual practice of political action, protest, resistance, revolution, etc? I'm looking for stuff that isn't purely theoretical but is somewhat based on history, comparative studies, etc. and tackles actual concrete action and not just vague gestures towards it. It doesn't have to be full on polisci or anything tho. I asked CuckGPT for some suggestions and it recommended me two books written by actual CIA assets lul


>>26343
You ain't foolin me



File: 1791520928083-5.jpg (208.54 KB, 580x688, 01680.jpg)

 

Is there any Soviet authors or even just any socialist authors that were performatively masculine.

Not that they were Masculine but that what they wrote, it was all about the masculine figure.
Best examples are: Ernest Hemingway, Yukio Mishima



File: 1788216563295-4.jpg (2.36 MB, 2160x2880, library00.jpg)

 

HIIII its me ERVA!!
I've come to complain about my experience with college and schooling as a whole. As a bonus I posted some pics of my books.

But anyway Ill keep it short and sweet, college feels like an extension the same bullshit I dealt with in high school.

I was expecting college to be more focused on writing in depth essays/proofs and reading big large books and writing summaries and drawing diagrams for the professor. In reality though school has been thoroughly taken over by online bullshit, online assignment sheets that you fill in the answers for.
I'm fine with repetition, in fact repetition is actually good for learning at times, but this just feels lazy, and it blocks actual learning it feels like for me.

Idk, I guess I've just been so accustomed to self study and doing writing summaries and essays according to what the books Ive read that it feels really weak by comparison.

I've told my parents how I feel and they say that I just gotta wait till I get into a more advanced class, but idk If I really have the patience for that :(.

Honestly the one thing I am currently going to school for to learn, medical stuff (surgery) may not even be necessary.
I really really wanna learn brain surgery, but honestly college just seems so boring and a barrier to actual learning that I might just try to learn surgery outside of school.
Of course theres books on it, but for something like that I'd need actual samples to work on.
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
2 posts omitted.

Ive decided to stay in school

File: 1788415609724-2.jpg (370.46 KB, 2048x2048, thumbs_up2.jpg)


School is what you make of it. You have vast libraries and professors of all kinds at your finger tips. You can literally learn anything and it’s way easier at a college than anywhere else. In law school I had a photography show and just walked into the art school deans office to ask him questions. I walked into the music department to learn piano. You could go find books on jazz or Egyptology and there will be some autist on campus who loves that shit and would be willing to help you. If you’re gonna be a doctor, you’d get your profs to introduce you to some doctors you could shadow. You could study all the brain surgery books on file.


God I miss school.

>>26267
College (University) isn't about learning, it's about passing so you get credentials, moreso nowadays that information is freely available and that literacy and numeracy is considered bare minimum and not a privilege atleast in the 'first world', not to mention that university isn't about learning when you have to pay or take on debt, then you have to pressure of getting something other than knowledge out of it so you can recuperate your losses into something material that can be capitalised on. There is literally no reason to go to higher education than to blag yourself into a career in the hopes of escaping manual labour.

dunno where you're from but you kinda need credentials to start cutting people up, but you do get to start stitching people up from your first clinical year of med school

also if you want to make it a career, then good luck surgery is hell



 

This thread is for discussing the psychology of right wing politics eg for example why men are more likely to be right wing than women on average perspectives are welcomed including non-leftist perspectives
5 posts and 2 image replies omitted.

>>25920
The two articles where you got your two screenshots from

File: 1777066082798.png (37.69 KB, 810x696, NormalDist-1.png)

>>25921
Pew Research Center:
<Highly educated adults – particularly those who have attended graduate school – are far more likely than those with less education to take predominantly liberal positions across a range of political values. And these differences have increased over the past two decades.
https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2016/04/26/a-wider-ideological-gap-between-more-and-less-educated-adults/

Variability Hypothesis:
<The variability hypothesis, also known as the greater male variability hypothesis, is the hypothesis that human males generally display greater variability in traits than human females do [including cognition].
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variability_hypothesis

Supporting Article 1:
<In the majority of countries, male variability is higher than female variability in both reading and math.
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1162573

Supporting Article 2:
<Males are more variable on most measures of quantitative and visuospatial ability, which necessarily results in more males at both high- and low-ability extremes
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

In addition to the raised points on autism score, big 5 personality traits have good correlations: low openness, mid-high conscientiousness (rule following), low agreeableness, generally low neuroticism = rightoid traits, opposite profile = leftist traits.

File: 1777067032826.jpg (52.92 KB, 592x401, d0t656vvgqa31.jpg)

>>25923
Most people are also moderate in their personality, so don't fall into extremism

>>25913
Excellent thread worth bumping. I recently read this book to better understand the rightoid mindset.

The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion (Jonathan Haidt)
<A foundational text in moral psychology that explores the intuitive and emotional origins of political differences. Through his research, Haidt demonstrates that the right-wing moral compass relies on different foundations than the left-wing one. While liberal psychology emphasizes care and fairness, the conservative mind gives equal weight to in-group loyalty, respect for authority, and feelings of sanctity and purity.
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/11324722-the-righteous-mind



 

In the book Four Futures; Life After Capitalism, Peter Frase maps out the materialist trajectory of post-capitalism and demonstrates that the end of wage labor is more likely to just kill us than to liberate us.

Capitalisms collapse is guaranteed by automation and climate crisis but the outcome depends on a 2x2 matrix of ecological limits (abundance vs scarcity) and class power (equality vs hierarchy).

Communism (Abundance + Equality)
<The post-scarcity endgame. Wage labor is dead. But Frase correctly points out this doesnt end politics; it just shifts human conflict away from material survival and onto immaterial hierarchies like status, reputation, and social capital.

Socialism (Scarcity + Equality)
<The only historically viable socialist project right now. Not a post-work utopia but democratic, centralized economic planning, and massive state-directed labor to survive the climate bottleneck. Its shared sacrifice and ecological reconstruction, not infinite consumerism.

Rentism (Abundance + Hierarchy)
<Automation solves material production but the bourgeoisie preserves its class dominance by pivoting entirely to artificial scarcity. Capital accumulation is replaced by rent extraction. Once physical commodity production is fully automated, the ruling class simply monopolizes the underlying data, algorithms, and IP. You are no longer exploited for surplus value on a factory floor; you are bled dry by access fees and licensing just so you can exist.

Exterminism (Scarcity + Hierarchy)
<This is the most critical analytical blind spot on the Left. Under capitalism, the bourgeoisie and the proletariat have an antagonistic but symbiotic relationship. They actually need workers to produce value. But when mass automation makes the global working class economically obsolete and climate collapse restricts resource availability, that dependency ends. You are no longer an exploitable asset; you are a surplus population consuming scarce resources. The militarization of borders, local police, and autonomous drone warfare isn't just standard imperialism, it is the logistical beta-test for managing and eventually eliminating an obsolete lumpen-proletariat.Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

I don't know, man, there's lots of questionable assumptions here.

>status, reputation, and social capital

Very few people care about these. We are just captivated by the spectacle of those who do. Once people's material needs are met, most would just fuck off to do whatever they like to do.

>Abundance

Already here. Depends on who you ask but most leftist economists say that we'd only need about 30% of current productive forces to meet everyone's basic needs. It's not the lack of abundance that prevents doing that but the endless greed of a small minority.

>Capital accumulation

Isn't the point that by holding the means of survival hostage you can compel others to work for you? Why would you need to accumulate capital when robots do everything?

>AI-surveillance

AI surveillance only prevents organized resistance. If the rate of extermination becomes too high and people see their own extermination coming, more people will start doing terrorism and I'm not sure the system can survive that.

>>26290
You too are making assumptions

>>26290

>Very few people care about these.

Decommodified production doesnt magically erase human neurobiology. Its a well established fact that the human brain is structurally hardwired to seek social status.

>Abundance is already here.

You are confusing productive capacity with ecological limits. Yes we have enough factories and technology but what we dont have is infinite resources. The scarcity axis in this matrix isnt about whether we can manufacture enough stuff but instead its about the hard physical limits of this planet. This is why the socialist outcome requires strict rationing and centralized planning.

>Why would you need to accumulate capital when robots do everything?

This is the entire premise of rentism scenario. Even if the ruling class doesnt need your labor anymore they still wants to maintain their class position. They will enforce this artificial scarcity via patents and copyright. People wouldnt work in factories but would still have to pay rent in order to have access to basic needs.

>I'm not sure the system can survive terrorism

The system is literally engineered to survive this right now. The ruling class doesnt have to fear unorganized terrorism once they retreat into fortified enclaves guarded by autonomous drones while leaving the surplus population outside to live in slums. Gated communities but 9000x worse.

Flood



Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo / 420 ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]
[ 1 /2 /3 /4 /5 /6 /7 /8 /9 /10 /11 /12 /13 /14 /15 /16 /17 /18 /19 /20 /21 /22 /23 /24 /25 /26 /27 /28 /29 /30 /31 /32 /33 /34 /35 /36 ]
| Catalog | Home