[ home / rules / faq ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/edu/ - Education

'The weapon of criticism cannot, of course, replace criticism of the weapon, material force must be overthrown by material force; but theory also becomes a material force as soon as it has gripped the masses.' - Karl Marx
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)
What is 6 - 3?

Not reporting is bourgeois

| Catalog | Home
|

 

I read The Poverty of Historicism by Karl Popper recently, and it was an interesting book. The overally thesis is that unified theories of history and don't make sense, and that it's impossible for us to reliably guess the direction society will take in the future.

This obviously flies in the face of historical materialism, which is a pretty key part of Marxist theory. So I'm interested to hear what you guys have to say about it. Is he right? Or is there something he missed?

Yeah I think it would be silly to believe the realisation of communism is inevitable personally. I just think Marxism and dialectical materialism is a useful model to understand change in society which we can implement to try and enact change for our (the proletariat) collective interests. I don't subscribe to historical materialism and the "stages" view of history in the absolute, and I haven't encountered anyone who seems like they do, aside from just speaking about the inevitability of communism as like an inspiring call to action. But interested to follow this discussion.



File: 1737829767159.jpg (53.2 KB, 640x776, 5433546356445.jpg)

 

Why Alisa Rosenbaum (((Ayn Rand))) in any their created novels fuck with different people for free?
She are commie?
The body was too short or empty.The body was too short or empty.The body was too short or empty.The body was too short or empty.The body was too short or empty.The body was too short or empty.The body was too short or empty.

>>>/siberia/
>>>/QTDDTOT/
Do your part; Sage, Report, Hide.

Bump a gem



 

What are the best books on domestic imperialism? I suppose I'd be most interested in the struggle of the Black nation and the Indigenous nations in Anglo-America.

I've read the basics of Lenin's "Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism" and I'm in the process of reading Kwame Nkrumah's "Neo-Colonialism: The Last Stage of Imperialism". I've read a few writings of the Black Panthers.

I think I probably want to read "Golden Gulag" next.



File: 1634760001941.gif (Spoiler Image,179.16 KB, 644x1731, CIA operations.gif)

 

CIA / FBI / Fed / Conspiracy General
"The X-Files got nothing on this shit"
This Thread is dedicated for the discussion, analysis and reveal of obscure information on the shadowy hands of capitalism and fascism - the federal agents - and their efforts as part of the porky hydra. Propaganda and conspiracies of these Alphabet agencies and their impacts today and past are to be discussed.
Information and discussion on the OSS and NSA or equivalent government agencies of other countries - such as MI6 of Britain or the Nazi Gestapo - are also encouraged to be posted. KGB and FSB can be discussed too.
Technology for spying and espionage are also welcome. NATO and US military abuses or the affairs of corporate military-industrial complexes that are covered or hushed up also apply. Whistleblowers like Assange and Snowden are permitted sources of information as well.

Please contribute to leftypedia >>3780
Debunking anti-leftist myths >>4210 including debunking of "Le Holohoax"
https://leftypedia.org/wiki/Central_Intelligence_Agency
https://leftypedia.org/wiki/List_of_atrocities_committed_by_the_United_States

Rules: No idpol drama, no anti-communist rhetoric, no sectarianism, no soyjak spam or emotional gaslighting; Glowies Keep Out!

Major Topics:
>Anti-Communist Action:
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
159 posts and 143 image replies omitted.

File: 1712308147410.png (120.31 KB, 267x228, R.png)

Holy shit guyzzz I found the pdf confirming pentagon UF0z did 9/11

File: 1712312324264-0.png (36.07 KB, 730x152, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1712312324264-1.png (111.79 KB, 747x434, ClipboardImage.png)

Ah yes, things that never happened. This is just a prank. In the same document, the bills to be passed are named "Lebron" and "Jordan".

File: 1718735758906.png (790.97 KB, 900x900, ClipboardImage.png)

An interesting person I've posted at times. They have some good stuff on the Ukraine conflict from when it began and some content on 9/11 and other false-flags, conspiracies and glowie ops. Guy does a lot of hands on work, helping in third-world countries.
https://stormcloudsgathering.com/

Document on Psychological Operations from the 1950s https://archive.ph/l1HFt

Bumping a great thread



File: 1711306198619.png (891.89 KB, 789x583, ClipboardImage.png)

 

I recently came across a heritage post about a castle in Lebanon built by the Crusaders, It got me curios and I did some digging and I was surprised to learn that pretty much all castles in the MENA countries were either built by the Crusaders or the later Ottomans.
So I have to ask, what gives? The Arabs were a smart people and castles and fortresses are a fairly useful resource for defeating cavalry forces. Even outside large scale war sand politics, in small petty tribal warfare, they would have been incredibly useful, that's why they appeared so much in Europe and why did the Ottomans adopt them more thoroughly then the Arabs.
5 posts and 2 image replies omitted.

Arabs are plenty capable of building stone forts(they most likely built great Zimbabwe). they just don't build castles that much.

>>21799
did they? i would assume common influence from byzantine architecture that both western europe and the ottoman empire had

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Furusiyya
Furūsiyya (فروسية; also transliterated as furūsīyah) is the historical Arabic term for equestrian martial exercise.[1] Furūsiyya “Knighthood” is a martial tradition dating back to pre-Islamic Arabia.[2]
Illustration of a horse's ideal physical traits, 13th century manuscript of the Kitāb al-bayṭara by Aḥmad ibn ʿAtīq al-Azdī.
Late Mamluk / early Ottoman Egyptian horse armour (Egypt, c. 1550; Musée de l'Armée).

The term is a derivation of faras (فرس) "horse", and in Modern Standard Arabic means "equestrianism" in general. The term for "horseman" or "cavalier" ("knight") is fāris (فارس),[3] which is also the origin of the Spanish rank of alférez.[4] The Perso-Arabic term for "Furūsiyya literature" is faras-nāma or asb-nāma.[5] Faras-nāma is also described as a small encyclopedia about horses.[6]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Furusiyya#List_of_Furusiyyah_treatises

>>21799
ottomans loved larping as romans/byzants so that might have had some influnce

>>21777
they did
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Qahira_Castle
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Hazm_Castle
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bahla_Fort
>>21801
>(they most likely built great Zimbabwe).
and why would you think arabs built great zimbabwe?



File: 1734510422612.jpg (96.18 KB, 720x899, 1668742036277455.jpg)

 

Modern parasitologists recognize that they have not found all human parasites. They estimate that hundreds if not thousands of human parasites will be found in the coming years.
The most deadly human parasites besides top-ranking corporate executives are protozoa, which are single-celled organisms. Some of these tiny creatures (there are over 80,000) have brought humans more misery and death than anything else in history(again, besides CEOs), including wars and famine. The most well known deadly parasitic protozoa is plasmodium, which causes malaria.

Parasites are separated into four main groups: 1) protozoa, which are tiny, one-celled organisms; 2) helminths, or worm parasites, such as tapeworms and pinworms; 3) arthropods, which aren’t parasites themselves, but these insects and spiders are common hosts of parasitic diseases; and 4) top-ranking corporate executives.

Most parasitic infections happen in warm climates or capitalistic societies, such as tropic or subtropic regions or the US healthcare system.

The only parasites are proletarians who leech off of the genius and bravery to endure risk of the bourgeoisie but then demand more than was consensually agreed to in their employment contract.

I bet most parasites aren't actually harmful.
It's only a select few that are.
Same way most bacteria isn't pathogenic

>>23219
It wouldn't be parasitism then. It would be commensalism (neutral) or mutualism (if it benefits you too).

File: 1736024295656-0.png (1.96 MB, 1080x2237, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1736024295656-1.png (782.84 KB, 800x861, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1736024295656-2.png (107.86 KB, 530x470, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1736024295656-3.png (1.3 MB, 720x845, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1736024295656-4.png (336.22 KB, 558x631, ClipboardImage.png)

>>23191
>endure risk

>>23356
>first pic
I do praise gamblers though



File: 1672226105595.png (4.36 MB, 2963x1876, ClipboardImage.png)

 

what was the name of that pre-WW2 German author that wrote how stereotypically non "aryan" germans were typically the most fanatical Nazis because they knew that they were on the fringe of being considered racially acceptable. Note how the entire high command of the nazi apparatus were a men who were mostly dark-haired, brown-eyed and somewhat short by german standards and who personally proved the lunacy of the aryan "race" as a concept by their mere existence
9 posts and 1 image reply omitted.

>>23391
The nazis were elected by the middle classes (just like any politician), what are you fucking smoking?

>>23391
The thing about hitler and Nazism broadly speaking is that it is socialism of phenomena and not the noumena like marxism is, he saw the Jews which embodied capitalism but are not capitalism itself, just like his racialism, seeing the backwardness of other cultures as a manifestation not of capitalist imperialism but of the people themselves. Nazism is socialism but of the vulgar kind that fails to abstract from the concrete.

>>23398
lower middle classes of Shopkeepers, clerks, small business owners were abstetoyl a strong voter base for Nazis, but they would not have made it anywhere without support of rural, workers and the old aristocracy

>>23402
Again, my point is that there are dozens of quotes from Hitler that an average person on the Internet who supports Communism might find appealing or agree with, but that’s due to the nature of populist, authoritarian, militaristic, and nationalistic state


>"The Third Reich will always retain the right to control property owners. If you say that the bourgeoisie is tearing its hair over the question of private property, that does not affect me in the least. Does the bourgeoisie expect some consideration from me?… Today's bourgeoisie is rotten to the core; it has no ideals any more; all it wants to do is earn money and so it does me what damage it can"


>"National Socialism derived from each of the two camps the pure idea that characterizes it, national resolution from bourgeois tradition; vital, creative socialism from the teaching of Marxism."


>"All the more so after the war, the German National Socialist state, which pursued this goal from the beginning, will tirelessly work for the realization of a program that will ultimately lead to a complete elimination of class differences and to the creation of a true socialist community."


>"Capitalism as a whole will now be destroyed, the whole people will now be free. We are not fighting Jewish or Christian capitalism, we are fighting very capitalism: we are making the people completely free.' … It is only the international Stock Exchange and loan- capital, the so-called 'supra-state capital,' which has profited from the collapse of our economic life, the capital which receives its character from the single supra-state nation which is itself national to the core, which fancies itself to be above all other nations, which places itself above other nations and which already rules over them."


>"In those countries, it is actually capital that rules; that is, nothing more than a clique of a few hundred men who possess untold wealth and, as a consequence of the peculiar structure of their national life, are more or less independent and free. They say: 'Here we have liberty.' By this they mean, above all, an uncontrolled economy, and by an uncontrolled economy, the freedom not only to acquire capital but to make absolutely free use of it. That means freedom from national control or control by t
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>23410
Okay, so I'm not European, and I'm not fond of mass migrations to countries because I know they destabilize nations. However, my position on the Jewish question is this: it's almost impossible to pretend they aren't vastly overrepresented in various fields, intelligentsia, entertainment and politics. That doesn't mean they deserve genocide, but I follow the Gumilev school of thought that the Jews should be 'remade' by being placed in a province where they do manual labor for generations and even intermingle with the locals to create a new Jewish race without



File: 1734662107149.jpg (173.27 KB, 1280x720, 1624818384132.jpg)

 

"About 69 percent of married Asian women are married to Asian men, while 25 percent of married Asian women have white husbands. "But as common as marriages are between Asian women and white men, cohabitations are even more prevalent," says Ono. "In fact, Asian women are more likely to be living with white men than with Asian men. Nearly 45 percent of cohabiting Asian women have white partners, while less than 43 percent have Asian partners."
14 posts and 4 image replies omitted.

File: 1735243357668.png (575.19 KB, 1695x1389, ClipboardImage.png)

Hispanic male + White female makes up 22% of all interracial marriages in the US.
Black male + White female is 2x more likely than vice versa.
Elon Musk, JD Vance and Trump are all pro H1B visa for Indian males.

>Create society based on white supremacy
>All your media promotes your sexual ideals
>Create clear two-race divide in the country, in which only those of african descend are fundamentally and always othered as the enemy, due to and with continued practices of slavery
>All other groups are tolerated as long as they assimilate into the dominant white supremacist superstructure and don't tarnish the phenotypical european-african dychotomy too much
>continue this for centuries
>people are completely dumbfounded about why non-african women overwhelmingly are attracted to men elevated to a higher social status purely by virtue of their appearance in their society and can thus provide more protecting, more wealth, and a higher social status
>people are completely dumbfounded by women and men of the undercaste, whose children will by virtue of this system always be seen as the undercaste phenotypically, are unattractive, no matter what race the other parent was. (which also goes, in part, for native americans or native-american latinos in the usa, which are an underclass exploited and enemied, and by virtue of fitting into the skin tone based dichotomy of the usa, dark skinned people of other races)
>people are completely dumbfounded that the natural or patriarchal tendency of men to be more hostile to men of an out-group, while being xenophilic to women of the outgroup, leads to the dominant group in a society consistently positively highlighting upper-male other-female pairings while consistently hiding to other-male upper-female pairings in media

It truly is a mystery. It must be not because of any of these reasons, which repeat themselves in every society across the world just with the races swapped around. No, it must be because, using only data from this hyper-racist, founded-explicitly-as-an-ethnostate, highly segregated society, that the males from their dominant class are naturally superior, and males from other races are naturally inferior. Yes that must be it.

>>23406
>inb4 why dont african women date white men then?
People caught in an open war of extermination, in which the losing side if irredeemable no matter what they change by virtue of their dna, which defacto is what the usa is or was, are generally not attracted to each other.
Thats why you dont see palestinian girls dating IDF soldiers. But that is why you did see conquistadores dating native women, because their societies, even if they had racial castes, had explicit tiers between native and spanish. You cant be half-black in the usa. Someone who is 90% genetically european is still black by virtue of skincolour and hair texture. Only those with african ancestry to get the right set of phenotipical characters to pass for some variety of white can become white, and only if they immediately hide their history in most cases.

Meanwhile for asians, half asians are tolerated so long as they act white, and quarter asians are indistinguishable from some variety of european phenotipically.

This is quite possibly the only place where culture focussed "leftists" have a point in that the cultural sector of society plays a big role in perpetuating ethnic domination, and that, together with economic emancipation, this is an area in which a big impact can be made just through diversity in roles. And the right knows this, thats why it hates it.

>>23202
fascinated in how dumb somebody had to be not only to believe this but write it down consciously and still believe it.
Sage, Report and Hide of course. >>>/siberia/

Moved to >>>/siberia/620631.



File: 1686078594263.png (Spoiler Image,149.01 KB, 312x387, Screenshot 2023-05-16 at 1….png)

 

A materialist analysis of inceldom

It is a well known fact that young males are having less romantic and sexual relationships than ever. Many on the right blame this on feminism which is half true but not the whole truth. The fact is that inceldom is a natural result of late capitalism.

In previous generations these men would have likely graduated (or even dropped out) of high school and gone into a unionized factory or other blue collar job, and made a high enough paycheck to pay for a house and support and spouse that likely didn't work. I tend to think of this documentary: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7AAUcmyXbg4 called two american families, which follows two blue collar families one black and one white in the midwest as they live through the deindustrialization of the late 20th/early 21st century and how it kindof destroys them. Not just singleness, but divorce, the breakup of families increased dramatically in this period, and while rightoids are half right to blame "feminism" what they don't realize is that capitalism and increased social liberalization are inherently linked.

In many cultures, especially in the past, marriage wasn't about love so much as duty and obligation to family, ethnic group, god(s), country, etc. Now it is about "enriching the already rich lives" of the people involved. If a market based economy goes on long enough people stop thinking of themselves as members of historically rooted and grounded ethno-religious communities and instead begin to think of themselves as CEOs of a corporation of one.

Capital is a totalizing force which commodifies everything it possibly can, and conservatives who think they can somehow draw a line in the sand at human sexuality and sexual relationships are mistaken. It's too late for that. The demonic entity known as capital has already been summoned, and it can't be controlled. Capitalism will eventually turn all social relations into market relations, making most human relations transactional, and this is the predictable result. In the past a guy would take a girl on a date, and pay for her dinner. Now the girl posts a nude photo on onlyfans which the guy pays for and masturbates over, and the girl uses the money to buy her own dinner on uber eats. What was previously an authentic human relationship has now been intermediated by the marketPost too long. Click here to view the full text.
37 posts and 3 image replies omitted.

>>23381
>yes, but think about the process of reproduction. there are millions of sperm but one egg. the expendability of men is in the very act of sex. millions compete for one female, like in the battle of troy.

Eggs are lost through menstruation and miscarriage.
So women are expendable as well.

>truth (wisdom/being) is feminine. reason (alienation) is masculine. the body (objectivity) is feminine. the mind (subjectivity) is masculine. what we call femininity thus is often just a body-oriented consciousness (etymologically, the word "matter" comes from "mother"); which is why gay men focus so much on appearance, while hets can easily let themselves go, yet expect women to stay beautiful. this detachment from the body's immediacy is masculinity. this is why "being a man" often includes masochistic exercises which train this detachment. this element of detachment is phallic, since phallus is a substitutory object, like how a gun or cigar acts as an extended penis. the penis is external; masculinity is alienated. this is why the ends of man is in the dildo.


Can you provide proof of this?.that the etymology for the word "matter" is the same for "mother"?

Or about how masculinity is about self-denial of objectivity?

>it is self-limited since homosexuality's unconscious identity is in the mother. this is why gay men are not attracted to women and why they have a gay voice, a gay face; gay everything. a gay man is not just a guy who coincidentally likes men - i hope youre not so much of a rube to believe liberal bullshit like this. or worse, maybe you believe in the "gay gene". there are contemporary theorists of "traumatophilia" who claim that queerness is a sort of trauma-bonding. this might be true in some cases, but it misses the point of eroticism being tied to one's subjectivity.


It seems to me your under the typical assumption that homosexuality means "femininity".
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>23383
Also, you look down on homosexuality as defective love, yet you gush at the idea of doing homosexual things, wanting to be desired as an object of beauty, ready to live out your fantasy of hebeandrophilia.

While I understand that distinction of homoeroticism vs homosexuality I will not tolerate such contempt coming from you against gay dudes

I also don't like your glorification of youth suicide to save face from aging. Age numbers aren't personality traits within themselves
You're falling into the trap of idealising youth as innocence.

In fact, I bet that this pederastic drive was responsible for the infantilisation of young people for the past three centuries.

Also, why is sexual attraction to male youth referred to as pederasty but sexual attraction to female youth is called pedophilia (or rare cases, the correct term, hebephilia)?

Also, do you agree that there's a difference between sexual desire and romantic desire?
The two can be related but they're often wrongfully assumed to be the same thing.

Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>23385
>>23383
Speaking of "ugly"…

>to conclude, the concept of male beauty then is universal, but unconscious. it has its contemporary expression in the femboy, which is a homophobic character, and is equally a fascist archetype, of a timarchical (spartan) remembrance, or of a military ethic. a femboy must be adjoined to the beautiful man also, which must be the citizen. revolution must then mean an abolition of blights like obesity. obesity is the aesthetic of consumerist excess which stains the possibility of love (by making love a contingency of codependent uglinesses, rather than the sublime judgement of beauty). to me, fascism in its civic code is about an imperative to male beauty thus (and of beauty in general, which is why all fascisms are eco-fascisms; as per savitri devi. the current civil order is between priests and merchants, while fascism is between warriors and peasants), which is the homoerotic impulse that usurps the formal identity of the homosexual, who only beautifies abstractions (this is the typical leftist who denies worldly beauty and so exalts ugliness; a typical jewish subjectivity also - alain de benoist sees this in how the jewish god has no artistic form in his iconoclasm and thus his being is abstracted from aesthetic judgement. this links to protestantism's twin destiny with judaism in modernity, and especially where financial power is concerned. this priestly attitude extends into all leftism, which calls moral evil "disgusting" but sees physical ugliness as virtuous. Christ is aryan, not semitic, because he has a physical form. jews and muslims literally cannot conceive of this vital theology). there are many beautiful gay men i must admit, but it is a vanity without spiritual purpose. what warriors must do is put gays back into churches and shut them up into closets. gays have a place, but it isnt in the public space.


Correct me if I'm wrong but you're saying that the typical backlash against beauty standards which has lead to "fat acceptance" and "alternative beauty" is because people don't want the responsibility of beauty but want to be seen as beautiful nonetheless?

Also, why are you blaming leftists for this?

And why are you arguing to shut up the homosexual males? You cannot do that while advocating hebeandrophilia.

>>23390
>prepubescent boys and girls are androgynous, until puberty, when the girl becomes fertile, yet the boy is still intermediated in his development. girls also mentally develop earlier than men, showing nature's investment in the male sex (which in nature is typically more beautiful). the distinctions are unequal then, as we see historically and even today. young girls are taken as wives, yet boys are not taken as husbands - a period of development is socially arranged then, which ought to be his training. so the boy then has his particular stage of development, contrary to girls, who are already partial women.

Boys would be considered partial men then because they're expected to do physical tasks. We had preteen males be active warriors or black smiths.
You cannot dismiss their maturational status while fawning over female youth.
Hebegynophilia is a cishet male cognitive disorder.
Also girls don't mentally develop earlier than boys. Physically maybe but mentally?
Again that's because society fawns over female youth more. Boys are treated as dumb comic relief.
Also, boys start making seed by age eleven to fourteen.
Around the same age girls start to ovulate
This whole "girls mature earlier" is exaggerated.

Also, boys are taken as husbands around the same age girls are taken for wives. But they're both trained in their respective roles and given arranged dates.

>this only proves that women are murderers of children. we see this with abortion in history and so on. a witch is a feminine archetype for a reason.

Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>23403
>its the same difference.

Well yes and no. The way they impress on it is different.
They make male youth love seem more comical while female youth love is given more glamor. It's maddening.

>you can be fabulous without being gay 💅🏻


This. In fact most of our fabulous snazzy fashion was made by heterosexual men.
It's just that homosexual men have adapted it.

>in the animal kingdom it is common for mothers to kill their children.


Usually the males kill non-cosanguine babies. Females do too.

Post too long. Click here to view the full text.



 

Do you believe in telegony?

If it's only on an epigenetic level, I'm kind of fine with it. As I am with the proven microchimerism through pregnancy. But the thought of microchimerisms potentially occurring as consequence of unprotected vaginal sex alone makes me depressed. Though if I had to guess I'd say only the former two cases are likely to be real.

there's a slim chance that there's some unknown mechanism for the process but the only evidence for that would be circumstantial
>lots of hunter-gatherers believe in it and they know a thing or two about fucking
>scientific institutions are vaguely aligned with societal pressures that went as few pressures on women as possible
>biological knowledge is incomplete
I wouldn't worry about it but I wouldn't be surprised if it were something. If it exists it's probably very minor


If true how do we use it to our advantage?
34 posts and 3 image replies omitted.

>>23335
His girlfriend sucked thirty seven dicks.

>>23337
Ok?
Thirty seven fellatio sessions can range from within a five year period or more.

He could just as easily lick thirty seven vaginas within a five year period.

File: 1735844583517.webm (4.68 MB, 640x360, 50.webm)

>>23333
amateur hour

>>23012
good post & OP and other sciencelets advocating telegony have been unable to provide any response that isnt substanceless rhetoric

>>23320
>if the supporters of telegony can present studies on microchimerism that indicate some form of telegony has occurred

the post youre responding to isnt saying that such evidence should be ignored, its saying that there is as of now no such evidence that that happens, and moreover no evidence that there is even a biological mechanism that would make the process possible



Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]
[ 1 /2 /3 /4 /5 /6 /7 /8 /9 /10 /11 /12 /13 /14 /15 /16 /17 /18 /19 /20 /21 /22 /23 /24 /25 /26 /27 /28 /29 /30 /31 /32 /33 /34 /35 /36 ]
| Catalog | Home