Anonymous 17-06-23 17:03:22 No. 18675 [Reply]
>Bolsheviks were the party of workers, proletarians >Bolsheviks didn't give a fuck about the peasants >in fact, peasants were counter-revolutionary and petit-bourgeois Meanwhile, the Bolshevik logo has a SICKLE on it. Why do internet MLs refuse to consider the fact that we need people to grow food, and like it or not, we don't have replicators or vertical, indoor industrial-scale farming (yet), so it stands to reason that we must ally ourselves with those who grow food or want to grow food. It seems there is this attitude that we (communists) can just do whatever, not make allies, because there is this assumption that we'll just fight and defeat anyone who disagrees. But for a fledgling movement, like communism, peasants and the army are two important parts of "the people". Without them, the urban proletariat would starve or be quickly defeated by an actual army. Well, /leftypol/? How do we get a large part of the army and "peasantry" on our side?
66 posts and 14 image replies omitted. Anonymous 19-06-23 03:16:46 No. 18742
>>18736 The professional managerial class duh
Anonymous 22-09-23 15:57:15 No. 20556
>>18736 the urban petit-bourgeoisie and some of the peasantry