[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/edu/ - Education

'The weapon of criticism cannot, of course, replace criticism of the weapon, material force must be overthrown by material force; but theory also becomes a material force as soon as it has gripped the masses.' - Karl Marx
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)
What is 6 - 2?

Check out our new store at shop.leftypol.org!

| Catalog | Home
|

File: 1764352085954.jpeg (381.69 KB, 2048x1738, licensed-image (2).jpeg)

 

Where do I get started with political science?

I've heard a lot about pol-sci but what are the seminal works in the area?

I am particularly interested in work on democratization.

aristotle's "politics" is the bedrock of political science
also, plato's "republic", "statesman" and "nomoi"


Hannah Arrendt is a nazi bitch. Stay away from her.

Aristotle and Plato. Alot of what they have to say is still worth thinking about particularly Aristotle, then just progress chronologically.

Polsci is for fucking retards, do you unironically believe shit like political compasses are remotely useful?



File: 1751270001791-0.png (17.06 KB, 334x304, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1751270001791-1.png (21.38 KB, 364x314, ClipboardImage.png)

 

https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1872/10/authority.htm
Engels’ On Authority is razor-sharp essay of pure scientific fact—1,386 words—that dismantles anarchist utopianism with upmost efficiency. It takes 5 minutes to read and leaves no room for debate: society itself, revolution, all basic social functions, etc., require some form of authority. This is not an opinion; it is observable fact.
https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/judgesabo-read-on-authority
Yet here we have some terminally online anarchist penning a 52,000-word monstrosity in response. That’s 37 times longer than Engels’ original piece. The anarchist spends 79 hours' worth of handwriting time (LMAO) crafting this screed. The sheer volume of this "refutation" is itself proof of its intellectual bankruptcy. The Ratio of Copium to Substance is vast, as with all anarchist refutation of socialist theory. Endless semantic quibbling, ("But what is authority, really?") endless circular logic, along with citing hundred other liberals culminates in a pathetic monument to ideological impotence—a 50,000-word confession that anarchism cannot refute Marxism on substance, so it must drown the debate in verbosity. Engels needed just 1,400 words to prove authority’s necessity because material reality speaks for itself—factories need managers, trains need schedules, and revolutions need discipline. The anarchist’s bloated treatise, by contrast, is what happens when unsounded petty-bourgeois individualism tries to deny the objective laws of social organization: an embarrassing tantrum disguised as scholarship, its very length an admission of defeat.
15 posts and 3 image replies omitted.

>>25015
>normal
idealism

>>25017
Okay totally not dysfunctional and damaging to the development of a person then.

>>25018
and what determines this?

>>24969
absolutely accurate. the ussr suffered this post-stalin as well as yugoslavia post-tito

the only thing you need to know about anarchism in order to reject it is that it's a moral analysis



 


RIP. Millions must read miataken identity, one of the best criticisms of identity politics within the left while being committed to black, queer and female liberation.



File: 1765592772833.png (1.28 MB, 903x915, ClipboardImage.png)

 

Resharing this great essay on the concrete origins and development of institutional finance capital.
https://www.rtsg.media/p/the-history-and-theory-behind-the
The screenshot is also the clearest explanation of scientific socialism I've come across. Send it to all the novice socialists you know!



File: 1681607918845.png (143.75 KB, 850x1264, largepreview.png)

 

The Rate of Profit: Rising or Falling?

Recently discovered there is a debate within Marxist economics that Marx had it incorrect, rather than rate of profit falling, due to capitalist technological innovation, cost-cutting and wage stagnation the Rate of Profit will rise, theorized by marxist economist Nobu Okishio.

Your thoughts?
22 posts and 3 image replies omitted.

One other thing about a robotic co-worker; it would be the bestest buddy a human worker could ever have, if it weren't programmed by disgusting assholes. Robots are cool and don't start stupid shit for drama. Amazingly, of all of the ways humans were made into robots, they didn't think to suppress the obviously disgusting backstabbing behavior of humans. Instead the machine essentialized every malicious thing humans did and insisted you were supposed to "respect" it, so that fag managers can keep stealing more stuff and hiring their buddies.

>>25384
humans are machines
They’re just not made of metal

>>25426
If humans are machines, then why are the partisans of that view so emotional and spiritually invested in making you believe humans are machines? If humans are machines, and they really are, then it would not be unusual to regard the actual conditions of those machines, without any necessary intervention of a thought leader telling them what they are "supposed" to be.

It gets more insane and maddening the more these people insist on a failed system that cannot fail, only be failed.

>>25432
>everything in nature is mechanical except humans
hello, descartes.

File: 1764783565770.gif (856.61 KB, 680x679, tech priest.gif)

>>25426
>They’re just not made of metal
speak for yourself, meatbag



File: 1764692245881.jpg (72.13 KB, 1440x1770, FB_IMG_1762961722043.jpg)

 

(By the way, feel free to write in Spanish here. I can understand most of the written language. I'm not risking Portuñol or writing in PT, though.)
So, my plans include getting a job with my technical degree (or with a future one perhaps) and picking up linguistics with an initial capital. Don't wanna talk too much about it so I don't fuck up. But afaik they're pretty rare here in Brazil. I was asking the Google AI, but I figured out that talking to actual people would be good. So,
>In what Mercosur countries would be viable to pick up linguistics as a Brazilian?
My only criteria is, the country needs to be fairly progressive (I'm a sexual minority; don't care about representation, just treating us like people would be great), the uni needs to have some relevancy, and it should be cheaper than São Paulo or relatively worth it compared to USP and UFSCAR, both having a linguistics course.
Afaik, Argentina checks all out. If Milei fucks off in the next election in like two years that would be great, because I'll have more time to learn the language and save money, but not if he takes the public universities with him.
>Gracias.



 

Post charts.
25 posts and 10 image replies omitted.

There was some chart used to go around some years ago recommending non-SJW more materialist feminist books, anybody got it and can post?

>>23759
>>23814
>>23816
>Mao should be obligatory for every left ideology
sounds about right, considering mao was a class collaborationist and communism is neither part of the left-right bourgeois divide nor an ideology


File: 1763597870119.jpg (1.68 MB, 1843x3969, heat death survival.jpg)

Ways the heat death of the universe might be survivable

File: 1764011350630.png (195.22 KB, 1893x1084, PineTreeAbolitionist.png)

>>22762
>concept chart
Wanted to make a "History from Below" Thompson-inspired chart for American history using the "An Appeal to Heaven Flag". The flag's becoming popular in /k/ guerrilla larp circles, and I feel like Locke's concept of right to revolution is more worthy being (re)appropriated by abolitionist and labor organizing U.S. history buffs. Plus it looks cooler, almost like the EZLN flag, like this.



 

Albert Gore: Claim of "exercises", as compulsive jumping; per genius mind, capable of separating Jewish and Gentile logic.

John Kerry: Attempt to take "blue cheer" Jordan River Valley "fractal", LSD, to face Bush as if incumbent.

John McCain: Campaign depending on Martha Coakley numbers out of Massachusetts, "Krispy Kreme" donut; hypnosis, from Clear Channel, on donut's trek per Jewish Star of David and related advertising dependence.

Mitt Romney: Support of 41 percent poorest, doctors and nurses; removed and refused, per single-payer health supporting legal marijuana in Greater South; per labor, outside of draft per conscript, draft, or conviction.

Hillary Clinton: Attempt to use hospitals, television, and delivery schedules, combined with coverage per television and family schools, to achieve votes; removed, per report to Elizabeth Warren of voter's fraud through starvation clinics; "Heaven's Gate".

Donald Trump: Voter's outreach, through slave families through Israeli manufacturing and related families; standing against MI-6 and Catholic Church, accusation of Papacy per homosexuality among priests; actually Jewish police officers, retired to be Vatican advisors to mothers per child; Vatican, Anglican, and Chinese.

Kamala Harris: Private security company through Chris Hansen and "Star Trek", on stolen documents per plea bargain of abused child from parents; given credit as abuse, towards multiple self defending parties; "plea bargain".



 

>My Geometry teacher would every Friday pretend to be Oprah and the entire class would ask her for help with their “life issues.” She would write the tests and I would get the right answer but she’d mark it wrong because she didn’t understand it (and this is legit, my dad’s an architect so he confirmed it). Then, on one test a lot of kids got one particular question wrong and she couldn’t seem to understand what they didn’t get. So, I raised my hand and said, “Oh I think everyone is confused about cross multiplying with binomials.” I was promptly kicked out of class and my parents called for “spreading nasty rumors and making false generalizations” because there was a person in the class (me) who got the question on the test right so the statement didn’t apply to everyone
>Pre-Calc is just a train wreck. My teacher told us she studied Early Childhood Education in college and has never had math past Alg II/Trig. Whenever I ask her questions, she doesn’t know the answers and gets super mad at me. Then, during one of her random observations where the principal comes in to observe I’d asked a bunch of questions that she actually answered. Then, I promptly got my seat moved and lost 10 points on participation because I intentionally tried to ruin her observation and get her fired
>Bad math teachers just don’t like me. Seriously, I’ve never had behavior problems except for those two teachers. Math at my school is terrible. Ugh

File: 1763598062601.jpeg (19.82 KB, 494x608, chicks rule.jpeg)

There was an English teacher at my high school who had pic related on his wall

>>25400
>There was an English teacher at my high school who had pic related on his wall



File: 1726946613926.png (896.13 KB, 680x680, 1723568670490.png)

 

So, before the site went down there was a thread about serious, rigorous, economic books about socialism, and economics in general, so, not "pop economics", anyway, any good recommendation of serious economics books?

Check out Anwar Shaikh's book. It's a self-contained revival of classical economics based on sound systematic reasoning and actual empirical evidence.
He also has a lecture series on YouTube if you prefer that: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLB1uqxcCESK6B1juh_wnKoxftZCcqA1go

>>22761
baby tier:
Marx: Wages Prices and Profit
Intermediate tier:
Capital volumes 1-3
advanced tier (requires linear algebra, probability, statistics and other math:
review: Mathematics for planning an economy by cibcom. Not specific to cybercom/planning but a good review of general math for political economy.
Farjoun and Machover – The Laws of Chaos
Sraffa – Production of Commodities by means of Commodities
Kalecki – Selected Essays on the Dynamics of the Capitalist Economy, 1933-1970,1971
Classical Econophysics by Allin Cottrell, Greg Michaelson, and Paul Cockshott

bump

Bump

A lolbert wrote this book on why he thinks education is bad:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Case_Against_Education



Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]
[ 1 /2 /3 /4 /5 /6 /7 /8 /9 /10 /11 /12 /13 /14 /15 /16 /17 /18 /19 /20 /21 /22 /23 /24 /25 /26 /27 /28 /29 /30 /31 /32 /33 /34 /35 /36 ]
| Catalog | Home