/siberia/ - Off-topic

anyone or anything claiming to own a large patch of water deserves to be laughed at and called names.

unfortunately I don't this happening but I would hope this is just something the countries in the immediate area just sort out amongst themselves instead of the west trying to start ww3 for the zillionth time

>>610700
China preparing for WW3 with USA > Vietnamise fishing rights in sea

>>611129
sauce?

>>610717
>vladivostok is called BLACK russia
uh no its called "conqueror of the east" dingus

No thank you. I would rather volunteer in Ukraine than be a woman.

>>611124
You could volunteer in the Ukraine as a woman.

>>611090
>pic
Author said he based her design on goddess megan 🤤

>>611135
>ad for product
>now lets see this model doing whatever
>giant plushie for some reason
>another ad
>watch the new tv series the mandalo…
I'm glad burgerpunk has containment sports, imagine if the premier league was like this

Moon dust: A hidden danger that will cause harm to colonization

The Moon is surrounded by an exosphere, an extremely thin layer of gas. That is, the atmosphere there is so thin that it is often neglected. But astronaut activities, resource extraction, and rocket launches can upset this equilibrium, raising large amounts of regolith above the surface. This can damage both missions and equipment.

Rosemary Killen, a planetologist at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center, emphasizes the danger of tiny dust particles. Moon dust, formed by collisions of space rocks and the impact of the solar wind, is a threat because of its finely dispersed structure. Dust can damage lungs, electronics and machinery, as well as obstruct visibility.

Additional sources of pollution, such as vapor emissions from spacecraft or life support system leaks, will also affect the environment. Even small amounts of water or gas can spread over significant distances, settle in shaded regions, and alter the chemical composition of ancient frozen ice deposits.

An important task for scientists is to analyze the pristine ice in the craters, where water may have been stored for centuries. However, water vapor created by human activities can mix with natural stocks, making data interpretation difficult.

The missions of the Artemis program, which NASA runs with commercial partners, involve the active use of large vehicles. Heavy landings by such vehicles can lift dust to high altitudes, creating short-lived “atmospheric” pockets of gas and particles. Space agencies plan to minimize these effects through careful selection of landing sites and optimization of flight paths.

However, even a few seconds of rocket engine operation can cast dust over significant distances, polluting remote regions. Moon dust can damage astronauts’ lungs, scratch spacesuit surfaces and clog mechanisms. It has properties similar to coal dust, which is detrimental to the health of miners.

There is also a risk of dust transfer into the living modules. Dirty spacesuits, tools and Mars rovers can bring it into airlocks and rooms, creating additional health and engineering hazards.
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

I had no choice

So when are we going to terraform the planets and moons in our solar system?

>>611127
Immortality will be discovered exactly day after I die.

>>611131
In Sumerian mythology the Gods of their pantheon were jealous of mortal human beings because they saw that limited existence endowed meaning to their lives as opposed to swamp that was immortality.

So good for you, I guess.

I despise how 4chan's /trash/ is the only more or less active furry board nowadays.
You cannot even post on it without waiting 900 second for captcha to appear or giving up you email address. Fuck that.

good boards:
s4s
mu
ck
lit
sp (when something big is going on like olympics, otherwise gambling addict general)
sci

pol infestation:
pol
int
k (NAFO general)
tv (still, some threads are hilarious)
lgbt (self-hating far right M2F autogynephilic hellhole)
his (what if hitler did good)
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>611123
if you avoid religious threads his is decent imo

>>611130
True, what haplogroup are you, big boy?

>>611136
yes you also have to avoid discussions about genetics but /his/ really peaks when it talks about medieval history and modern history

>>611027
Genshin IS art

As someome that has played a handful of gachas I found Zenless Zone Zero, despite being fun enough to pick up every month or so, (with how much a pain in the ass it is to update being a considerable counterweight against deciding to do so) to be way too overzealous with limiteds.

Like with Arknights it's entirely possible to get pot 1 of 6 (obtainment, and pots aren't that singificant once you have Myrtle) in every nearly operator just playing for free, and maybe if you clock in every day that could include the "limiteds". (which can more accurately be called seasonal because they come back every year anyway) The closest I'd say are true limiteds are like, crossover characters, probably because they accidentally broke the base morale system entirely with the first Rainbow 6 collab, so they'd probably only be able to make them newly obtainable if they nerfed them and I don't think hypergryph would want to do that.
I still regret skipping the dungeon meshi event but I did not have the energy for gaming at the time.

What I'm getting at is it feels weird for a game about collecting to make a full collection impossible just for the FOMO of their momentary availability. Why start a collection with a defined point of completion that is from the get-go impossible to complete?

>>611062
Bruh this is a stereotype. Most men aren't like this even in their teenage years.

>>611066
????

>>611065
This.

Its one of the best way I've found someone describe depression actually: to be finding comfort in your own sorrow

>>611027
Imagine spending all your money on a shitty Chinese knockoff of Breath of the Wild with gacha mechanics.

>>610619
The people who are obsessed with old web culture would be called a fag if they were around then.

>>610695
She is just wearing more White styles from that time period when White culture was more dominant worldwide.

Most fags today Will Say shit like
>Muuh they're copying out of fake nostalgia
But it's only half of the reason, old web has a distinct look that dosent exist anymore. Website creation Is a legittimate work of creativity (and this goes for animations and general art) and they get inpired by older creations. The best artists are, in fact, those Who can re-interpret old internet without using fake nostalgia or things that are Just moderna myths

>>610687
We still have those kind of sites.
And Discord back then would've been IRC

>>611089
And even beyond the artistry aspect, it's just a good idea to have a central hub for yourself and links to things you value being linked to; wheather it be your socials, the websites of your friends, things you think are neat, etc…
I visit my own website every day because it's convenient.

>>610442
If you human and you live in human society, you already have a personality.

>>610674
autism

>>610442
Like have hobbys and go outside

>>611078
you know what I'll expand on this. Explore the world, go to party's, get a cat, try and get closer to your native culture, try something new. It will be hard but small steps matter.

>>610699
sudo pacman -S Xpersonality-arch

>>610889
that's crazy, how androgynous is your body?

>>610928
that's alice (the video essayist) when she was young

>>610959
looks like some one photoshoped a picture of dasha to remove her moles crooked nose and dropey eyes

It's not surprising to look young if you never expose yourself to sunlight.

>>610959
Alice is still young…

>>610969
This is the only thing reverse image search found and it does claim it's Dasha: https://es.pinterest.com/pin/1106759677172125419/

>>610889
You should be thankful you look young at that age.

>>609635
full communism is when you have NO SEX and chairman wang's hive mind society and gooning tanks

>>609637
self-sex will be banned too

Only insecure people obsess over age numbers in relationships.
Barring under 18, anyone is fair game

very cool

>>610832
>The concepts we use to map the world have found their place based on their usefulness, not their realness.
Our useful abstractions can become concrete processes altering the "realness" as we intended. We can even check if the modifications we did to the "previous realness" ended up conforming to our expectations of the "new realness."

In short, your dichotomy is false. Those mappings of the world are part of realness.

>philosophy
lolk

>>610832 (OP)
>creating continuities where there isn't
Just to make sure, you are not claiming that the material world has no continuity, correct?

>collecting fundamentally dissimilar things under categories corresponding to nothing real
Is this a pedantic claim pertaining two things not being identical? Because otherwise that statement contradicts the very point of categories. The things put under the same category share certain properties. They are put together based on similarity.

>Material world does not have things.
Not a materialist standpoint. What does the material world have alternatively?

>It does not have humans, it doesn't have rocks, it doesn't have atoms or quantum particles, all of those are just convinient models we use to predict what happens, labels that break down when you look too closely.
At first I thought this was a statement on mereological nihilism but then you also listed quantum particles. If your reasoning rests on dilemmas and paradoxes of our conceptions of things then this would speak for the faultiness of our ontological conceptions but not prove things as a whole to be unreal. How would those models be convenient and serve properly as predictions if they and what is real had no connection?

>In material world one tree of same species differs from another as much as it does from a bee, a star, a concept of pain, a triangle.
If the material world doesn‘t have things then how can you even make a statement on that?
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>611037
<creating continuities where there isn't
>Just to make sure, you are not claiming that the material world has no continuity, correct?
Reading comprehension pls.
>Not a materialist standpoint. What does the material world have alternatively?
They're saying that things can be analyzed to an infinitely graular degree, and being to comfortable with your current understanding of things, given that everything as you are capable of percieving it is effectively abstractions of something that will always be able to be understood more granularly, and thus all steps toward that root are abstrations, may be a detriment to you as someone that thinks materialistically in keeping up with materialism as a science.

Yes they are being pedantic, pedantic doesn't mean wrong.