/siberia/ - Off-topic

>>767140
this, they are traitors, especially chicanx

we're kinda the right wing diaspora hotspot for all economically failing countries brutalized by imperialism and/or revolutions. they go here to take up their "lost" hegemonic positions from the countries they fleed to relive that power dynamic from the connections they have amongst the other fleeing diaspora and/or take up positions to punish the country they left bc they fleed. obviously the working class is amongst the diaspora but communists and anarchists alike dont really have answers to the stateless rootless diaspora who have these reactionary elements festering. and theyre literally everywhere bc of capital crises everywhere, whether that be genocide, war, or economic stagnation. big part of it is probably a language barrier but reclaimed "intersectional" theory has lead to these fash voices drowning out others even when criticism is levied. unfortunately it seems the unstable most risk averse and also at risk undocumented prole will have to be the ones to solve it since theyre the ones who know their conditions the best. Libs do have a method and thats through government intervention. people trying to organize w "foreigners" have to jump over multiple hurdles including mutual distrust whether that be suspicion of interest and/or unconscious racist behavior. With global warming, assuming we even find a way to survive, like the peasants for maoists and the proletariat before, it seems the stateless "immigrant" is the subject closest and most affected by capital's violence in these current conditions. MLs and party functions have basically turned lib and anarchists take a localist-only approach that while well intentioned still cant really accept the major contradictions at hand and can easily exclude the "Other" because theyre not part of the local scene.

The Stateless are the primary contradiction for revolution and neither the anti-statists nor the statists seem to be grasping or willing to interact. Anarchists sort of tried by getting arrested and snitching on each other during a noisemaker parade, emphasis on parade, outside the ICE concentration camps where rapes and undocumented deaths are ongoing. But still nobody is doing anything.

>>767208
i think the liberal government interventionism unfortunately was able to be hijacked into a twisted form of a celebrated, religious i dare say, protestant work ethic into the narrative from righties that only legitimate immigrants deserve government intervention to placate intra-community fears of bourgeois democracy government flip-flops which is why u see venezuela and gusanos so proud about working 12 hour shifts on their shitty fucking uber bike or what have you. it goes to show that even if u help them, class consciousness goes a long way. youve got "anti-racist" neolibs grifting their way to higher positions while "raising awareness" for the perpetual underclass alienated prole who only has his labour to sell lest he is deported again. Legalizing the illegals is the bare minimum but will obviously entangle you into the proper institutional definitions that comes w legality that can be turned at any point against you if the legals, the ones proud of their legality foreigner or non-foreigner alike, get too insane and conspiratorial. Its a disciplining stick! Anarkkkists speak of hierarchies and they can barely sputter out the words racism and immigration. Potential man the ideology, cmon kiddies where you at? cant stop snitching on each other?? tankies on the opposite end have the bloodthirstiness and yet they only go on parades w the pigs!! The radical position is to arm the illegals, ABOLISH THE ILLEGAL, KILL THE BORDER FIGHT THE BORDER! ABOLISHING BORDERS HAS SOMEHOW TURNED INTO MILQUETOAST PARADE SLOGAN! IT HAS NO POWER ANYMORE. IF YOU SAY ABOLISH I KNOW I JUST ENTERED A PARADE. KILL THE BORDER. ARM THE ILLEGAL.

>>767092
Gay Misandrist can't stop being right

Latino here the answer is simply that mexicans are as cucked as the rest of latinamericans. Latinos have no political beliefs other than suck the ameriboot deepthroat the americock.

>>767051
0,07 percents are the CIA agents tho

That's over 40.07% less than Stalin

>>767051
Who did the .07% vote for?

>>767057
invalid ballots.

All jokes aside I didn’t think that North Korea had elections for the head of state, I knew that they did for the Premier but I thought Kim had a life tenure.

>>767174
He apparently tried to shoo the vulture away. The kid survived but eventually died in 2007.

>>767174
journalists literally arent supposed to help anyone, because it would be 'unethical' (lmao)

>>767175
He did shoo the vulture away.
>>767176
Not actually true, there are plenty of cases of journalists actively intervening to help people. It's not like you can get disbarred from journalism. Journalism is still mostly bad, but at least criticize it for the right reasons.

>>767168
As rare as ethnic displacements and famines, sure.

>>767178
I mean I am maybe being too broad, obviously sometimes it does happen but the 'conventional wisdom' is not to

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/04/learning/should-reporters-ever-help-the-people-they-are-covering.html

>>767026
That kind of insecurity is more prevalent in post pubescents than pubescents

Did you at least bang your mom?

I mean other way around, if it was your birthday, that would be pretty fucking embarrassing, but I dont see why you should feel that way in your situation.

its a matter of perspective anon, I'd feel like more of a loser if I didn't have the breadwinner position that allows me to take my family members out to dinner for there respective birthdays at a nice sitdown place.

>>766930
Sassenach

>>767005
I'm not catholic I just hate brits.

>>766994
A moose bit me once.

>>766981
post it in the oc thread, I think they often share those (or they should at least)

bump for a nice OC

mp4 version

version with soft subs if anyone's interested. two separate subtitle streams. useful for translation and so on
>>767081
neat

Is this a porn thread?

>>767077
It can be if you want it to be. Just remember to spoiler.

waow

cool

>>767012
>for some reason
Probably because they actually want to be read by multiple human beings, but who am I to infer their thoughts

>>766934
none in particular it's just something i noticed over time

>>766976
i've only read part 1 i just used what i saw first

>>766832
I don’t like your thread, it’s shit

>>767023
The whole point of the internet is so people link to stuff cross-site. I see links to essays people make on their personal websites all the time on fedi.

A lot of leftists is still stuck in the Sunday School "it is problematic therefore it is bad" mentality. This is because critical engagement is all about counteracting hegemonic culture rather than l'art pour l'art. Such views eventually lead to a very boring, borderline schizo consoomer experience. Just look at poltards who dismiss every media not filled to the brim with honkies as problematic zogslop that will brainwash you into being trans

>>766991
>Morality has nothing to do with it
>society should treat sexual and romantic needs the way it treats basic needs like thirst
the thing is that the way that society thinks about 'sexual and romantic needs', the way society thinks they should be treated are goddamn parts of morality. there are ways society likes to do those things and ways it doesn't and so forth

>>766986
>The glass of water theory is a doctrine asserting that in a communist society, satisfying sexual desires and love will be as simple and unimportant as drinking a glass of water.
This could mean anything from castration and killing the libido to brain in a vat.

>>766996
>are goddamn parts of morality
Not necessarily. You can plan an ideal society without evoking morality, i.e., "society should be like this because it's in my self-interest".
And even if it weren't the case, none of this entails that drinking a glass of water is "morally equal" to sex. What does that mean? What is the moral value of drinking a glass of water?

>>767027
>Not necessarily
okay bro. I get it. you just don't know what morality even means. is this bait?
>an ideal society
an ideal of society fully depends on your morality.
even the sentences like 'X should…' are moral prescriptions.