>>709346>What they offer is the end of american hegemony a.k.a the historic number 1 enemy of every revolutionary attemp in the third world. Is this not enough for you?No. Because before world war 2, and before world war 1, we also had multiple poles, and the existance of multiple capitalist powers did not make revolution much easier.
There were never successfull revolutions outside of the major powers (poles) before world war one, and only after world war one, when all major powers collapsed, did revolution start IN one of the weakest major powers.
After that, the soviet union was established, and it was directly because of a communist state being a major pole in the world that revolution was able to occur outside of the major powers. China was directly aided. Vietnam was directly aided. All of eastern europe was either directly aided or outright established after the soviets beat back the nazis.
So there is no real historic precedent to think that socialism will have an easier time in a multi polar capitalist world. This idea of multipolarity being favourable only really works if one of the poles is a communist country. So the argument to prove China is communists, so that we support China in their plan to re-shape global politics to be multipolar, so that communists supposedly have opportunities, requires pre-existing faith that China is indeed communists.
I fucking hope it is. I really do. But no, faith in China is not enough for me. My task as a communist is to build the movement where I live, and to take the developments in the world as they come and try to play the best moves. China does not provide a blueprint for me. Trusting the plan on faith alone is not enough for me, it is my task as a communist to actively work toward a better world, not to wait for it and passively cheer on some other country from behind my keyboard while I wait for the third worlders to save me.
>>709349Which contradictions are they solving?