/siberia/ - Off-topic

It just became more evident as the years have gone by. Conservative or liberal, American culture is the same. Ostensibly people in red states seem to be more open and kind but I have found this to be very untrue the more you get to know them. Conservative people hide behind what I call a "fake nice" facade that fools many people - generally people from the West Coast are easily fooled by this artifice. People from the East Coast however like Philadelphia, New York, and Boston can easily see through their nice guy act.

Likewise people in liberal states are just as toxic as I have mentioned above, however they just seem to be more cavalier about their fake, soulless nature. Therefore one must not be swayed by either side as they will find themselves trapped in an unrelenting quagmire unable to see and or recognize the only viable method of escape.

This option is to obviously leave America, but just like Winston mentions, hardly anyone talks about it, and if you do talk about it Americans turn on you like a pack of rabid animals. "How dare you speak ill of America" followed by profane language and perhaps even violence, is generally the attitude one receives if they mention they will be leaving America to live in a more hospitable country.

>go to afghanistan
>get free rides
>receive gives for free
>they consistently refuse to take money
yo these people fucking hate capitalism

>crime is also rising in every major city, meaning the distrust and lack of empathy is turning into normality
>the majority of the energy produced by society is still obtained from fossil fuels, there is no real alternative
>every year many lands become infertile and are no longer suitable for agricultural production, meaning there is less food every year while the demand keeps growing
>climate change will make life unbearable in the near future, the earth is becoming hotter every year
>it is statistically probable that one day there will be another global pandemic with high mortality rates, like COVID or black plague it may become a recurring event
>space travel is impossible for humans, our physics models do not make it possible for us to create gravity or bend space
>the global population is growing and economic/political instability is rising everywhere, the citizen of the future will own nothing
>pollution is everywhere and cancer is multiplying, we literally live immersed in microplastics, there is no way this planet will be restored
>homelessness is becoming a common thing, the housing market will become unaccessible for the majority of the population due to constant renovations, no more space for building new ones, property taxes, etc…

The current economy is incredibly wasteful and is just a carb-filled meme consumerism. It's more than imperfect and can be improved but this requires informed consent.

Coca-Cola is just a meme in a container, so is McDonalds and Mt Dew etc. They all have calories and shit macros.

In the end, the citizen of the future will be poor, unhealthy and nomadic

>be islamic
>someone says hi
>don't say hi back
straight to jaheem, right away

There are two definitions to the word "incel".

Definitions:
+ Someone who (involuntarily) cannot have sexual intercourse, an involuntary celibate (literal meaning)
+ Someone who defines it (the term), uses it and applies it to social commentary, explaining how things are/work using the term (all crab communities in practice)

The first is an in-group definition of the term that many including myself don't believe actually has any real meaning (not important here). The latter (out-group) definition describes/defines the behaviour of "crabs" relative to the ignorant masses (blue-pilled normies). The term is used to construct a world story, sort of like a religion, that gives meaning to the male in the universe.

Rodgerist (aggressive sexual envy) and Marxist (entitlement and class/identity) attitudes are very common in crab communities and "crabdom is a state and not an identity" is the defining male crab argument. On the opposing side, femcel/radfem misandrists are preoccupied with proving that all men are "crabs" in the feminist circles.

There are many manosphere "pills" and communities but this shared concept separates the "crabs" from the other "copers" in denial of the "Truth".

This group has:
+ A shared sacred concept
+ A blackpill worldview of nihilistic determinism
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

It is also ideal for the feds because how can you assert your wants if you don't even know your identity.

Do you agree with this?

I'm a wizard and my only dating options are now women with years, almost a decade of experience give or take. I don't want to bother at this point because of that. It won't be special, and to act as if it were would be pathetic. I couldn't even believe it myself and it would just eat away at me because it would be me saying I can't have the relationship I want so I need to kill my dreams and put my romantic energy into a girl who did everything with other men.
Nah.
So even though I have never dated, never kissed and obviously never had sex. I'm done.
I am now moving my life around other things because romance will never bring me happiness. Like hey you werent there for me in my late teens to early 20s when I was really, really struggling. Yeah you were absent for the other rough parts of my life, but now as we both near middle age, now you want to talk about building a life together? When you wouldn't date me if I were totally broke and did nothing to help me avoid that fate, so essentially I did it myself and you're just here for good times, having been fucking other men when I went through bad times?

It's just not for me. Especially when you know women IRL who bitch about shit like their BF cheating on them, but stay with him anyway. Nah fuck that. I can't change how other people view me and dislike me, but I still have my pride and I'm gonna cling to it becuase it's all I have left. All I work towards now is building a life I respect while romance is absent.

Since there are 420chan ecxpats here, what are your thoughts on different drugs and consent?

Let's start off which this comment found on reddit:
>I don't think it's possible to be too stoned to consent. Drunk, yes. Nodding out on opioids, yes. Blacked out on benzos or tranqs, definitely yes. But weed, if anything, makes you MORE cautious and cognizant of what's going on. It doesn't make you lose control of your inhibitions like you do with alcohol. I do agree with your sentiment in principle, just not when it comes to weed

Do you agree? Which other psychoactive drugs don't invalidate consent?

Which leftist is this describing?

Bodytooshort bodytooshort bodytooshort bodytooshort bodytoofuckingshort