/siberia/ - Off-topic

Legalizing child love tourism and love tourism in general across Thailand and the Philippines could bring various economic benefits. One possible effect would be increased foreign investment, as more visitors (both international and domestic) would travel to these countries specifically for romantic purposes. With greater demand comes higher revenues from hospitality industries like hotels, restaurants, and transportation services. Moreover, the construction sector may experience growth through building more accommodations and leisure facilities catered towards these tourists.

Additionally, local economies would benefit from the influx of money spent by visiting couples. They may purchase souvenirs, attend events, participate in activities, and explore tourist attractions. These spending habits can lead to job creation, boosting employment rates and stimulating economic activity overall. Furthermore, some parents might allow their children to work as service providers in areas frequented by foreigners seeking intimate experiences, further increasing employment options and income sources.

Another aspect to consider is the possibility of governments establishing special programs or initiatives designed to promote tourism around romance. Such efforts might include advertising campaigns, creating specific infrastructure tailored toward romantic getaways, and encouraging partnerships between tour operators and accommodation providers. These measures aim to capitalize on the trend and attract more tourists interested in love tourism.

Lastly, legalization might result in better regulation of such establishments. This could ensure safety standards are met, prevent human trafficking, and protect vulnerable individuals involved in the industry. Governments could impose taxes on businesses related to the industry, raising government revenue without compromising personal liberties. However, it remains essential to strike a balance between enabling economic development and safeguarding individual rights.

Ultimately, whether these economic impacts outweigh the potential risks associated with legalizing child love tourism depends largely on how effectively authorities manage the situation. Clear guidelines, thorough enforcement, transparency, accountability, and strong legislative frameworks will all play crucial roles in mitigating negative outcomes. If managed appropriately, economic benefits might become significant enough to siPost too long. Click here to view the full text.(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)

Just think about it for a moment
>viewed as a normative form of attraction throughout history before feminism; boys are pretty and lack adult male features which are repellent, therefore it isn't gay, and is perfectly masculine behaviour
>it isn't gay from the boy's perspective, because they have a higher sex drive and are more prone to sexual experimentation
>celebrated as a superlative form of relationship by the Greeks; considered instrumental in the healthy development of boys personalities
>creates strong, masculine bonds between males which can not be broken; see the Sacred Band of Thebes
>devalues women by providing an alternative to the roastie paradigm, invalidating their holes, which weakens women's pernicious influence on society
>the theory that it causes psychological harm to the younger participant is debunked pseudoscience (read Rind et al. and Newgon); negative effects primarily occur due to harsh cultural opposition to the practice, resulting in unnecessary criminal and psychiatric proceedings
>most harsh opposition traditionally comes from judaism (via Christianity) and feminism; virtually all pre-Christian European societies partook in the practice of pederasty
>allows boys to socialize with adults and connect with the adult world in an intimate way
>provides men with a powerful incentive to direct attention towards younger generations
>Goethe, Schopenhauer, and Voltaire all said it was natural

Well? Why are jews and feminists so staunchly opposed to the love which dare not speak its name?(user already banned)

This shit goes hard, post cool ass communist edits

This essay is devoted to an analysis of the several articles that were written by a number of different authors on the liberal/progressive news site Salon.com regarding the belated 2009 arrest of hebephile celebrity Roman Polanski. After reading these articles, I was so incensed due to, once again, seeing those who consider themselves progressives and liberals attacking Polanski for having sex with a girl under the Magic Age in such a mindless and ignorant manner, without even once deviating from the morally absolutist script that Western culture has dictated to our society about this uber-controversial subject.

As usual, the progressives were doing their part to add to the sex abuse hysteria pervading our society, which includes the single-minded condemnation of intergenerational sex as part of its component, and with as little reasoned thought as any writer who deems themselves a social conservative. And some of the authors of these articles were progressives that I usually respect, until I see them writing mindless drivel like this to join in on the sex hysteria bandwagon. And to think these progressives frequently assail the liberal politicians for caving into support for the neocons' endless wars of aggression and failing to challenge or even think critically about the neocon conventional wisdom regarding the need for presidents to be warmongers. Hence, this refutation of their specious claims about the Polanski media circus.

Let's begin with the article from one of my favorite and most respected bloggers, Gene Lyons. His article on this topic carried the title "There's A Special Place In Hell For Roman Polanski," so right away you see how free of bias it's going to be. Let's look at some quotes from Lyons, followed by my responses.

<Lyons:
>"Everybody's least favorite character is French/Polish film director Roman Polanski. Except for a few Hollywood fools and European intellectuals who express the perverse belief that art excuses all crimes, hardly anybody would be upset to see Polanski go to prison. (In polls, ordinary Poles and Frenchmen reject the art alibi by large majorities.) As one who thinks his film 'Chinatown' a masterpiece, I don't much care what happens to him."

I will start by saying that I agree with Lyons that just because someone is a renowned and talented artist (in Polanski's case, a filmmaker) doesn't mean they should be givePost too long. Click here to view the full text.(user already banned)

4chan is kill (again) edition

https://en.namu.wiki/w/TDM(%EC%BA%90%EB%A6%AD%ED%84%B0)

previous thread: https://desuarchive.org/trash/thread/82266522/#82266522

debunk this or youre a fraud

80% of the western left's praxis is de facto just about outsourcing the burden of class struggle to the Third World. Like it was China in the 70s and 80s, then Iran, then Putin's Russia. Im not going to be surprised if Westoid left starts simping for Modi's India at this point as the next based MTW hope(no wojaks)

I have a severe phobia of mice and my generalized anxiety is so bad that i have been put on buspar

Why are they like this. What the fuck do we do about these people and how do we force them to stop.

Ok guys, i’ve been posting on here for long enough now; i think it’s time you guys know who’s behind the keyboard