/siberia/ - Off-topic

>>801417
Thank you for another free bump :3

>>801396
Leftypol is more sympathetic towards NEETing than anything

>>801661
Not true.

Moved to >>>/labor/2012.

>>801436
the left is more popular than ever, the losers have been liberals and socdems who've (a) been in long term decline anyway and (b) have for the most part brought this on themselves by triangulating rightwards.

the left has failed to make the advancements you'd hope for as a result because it's institutionally incompetent, not because it has hyperfocused on idpol. indeed, plenty of leftand leftish parties that have advanced are at the more "idpol" end of the spectrum. (UK greens, Scottish Greens, Die Linke - despite a split that showed just how badly the anti-woke left does - US greens obviously did badly but doubled their vote share and are now the leading third party candidates, Norwegian Labour - woke and surely the only socdems in Europe to still be getting as many votes as in the 1990s… Even the SNP have tested the proposition that if you're progressive-ish you can hold on to your core vote despite wrecking campaigns and fucking up literally every possible way.), being socially progressive and economically left wing are positively correlated. (Of course they are! Of course "better things are possible" as a belief system applies everywhere! "Better things are possible in that we can nationalise steel, but if you think for a second I'm going to respect a foid or a injun you've got another thing coming" - Mean! not a winning message!

And that's before we get into the desirable long term configuration of the left's voter coalition (do you know what older voters like to do, other than back Hitlerism? They like to die of old age. In Britain, more 2019 Tory voters died before the 2024 than switched to voting Labour!)

When the bourgeois press tell you state control of trains is a vote loser you know it's bollocks, you have to be pretty naive to take them at face value when they then go "oh, Kamala lost because she was for they/them, not because she failed in basically all conventional election strategizing and alienated a chunk of her own constituency by not distancing herself from genocide" (Palestine is a fun one, isn't it? Schrodinger's idpol, sometimes "anti-imperialism", sometimes a distraction from the all important cause of giving treats to nasty little boys who post on leftypol.org)

>>801493
>but if you think for a second I'm going to respect a foid or a injun you've got another thing coming

There are two people who regularly post on this board that unironically say stuff like this. Even the people in Sex and Relationships general don't hate women, they just want a girlfriend.

>>801498
at the risk of derailing what is already a soft derailment:

1. 2 people on a board that can't have more than 100 regular posters (and a site that can't have more than 250) is an appreciable number, particularly when a greater number will think it (or more accurately feel it) but not say it explicitly.
   
2. very few posters here hate women as an abstract idea, but a much larger minority have no time for actually-existing women and their current position in society. most contempt for the actually existing left is in fact contempt for the fact that women dominate the composition, aesthetics, and discourse of that left. (and, in turn, they don't like that a notable minority of young men skew right-wing, because they are seeking in some measure male attention and validation. this is why /leftypol/ still has an insecure little undercurrent of "what would /pol/ think if they could see this?" and a secret conviction that if we just ditch the fag shit and retroactively admit gamergate was right, all the shadilay-spouting creeps of the world who turned into white nationalists will see the light and become good leninists.) people like a fantastical liberated socialist woman in blue overalls who'll nevertheless be a loving and maybe slightly femdommy wife who meets him at a party event so he doesn't have to make the first move really, not a dinergoth who has the gall to expect him to be interesting company, the cheek to out-earn them, and the insolence to have political views independent of, in opposition to, and more "directionally correct" than his.
   
3. you touch on women but not injuns. the amount of time spent whining about landback on this board is comically disproportionate to the amount of real-world influence such types have.

I'm a recent migrant but I've been on /pol/ forever. When did this place become a thing? I can't remember anymore when /leftypol/ stopped being a /pol/ general, I just remember I used to see it and then at some point it disappeared.

>>801667
/leftypol/ became a board on 8chan on 2014.

>>801619
There is no right age, the right time is when you meet someone right, unless you have no shame in using prostitutes/rape.

>>801632
Still, maybe those ugly guys had some sort of wit or hobby.
Who knows if those kinds of bonds are even purely romantic.

>>801632
Maybe those ugly guys were rich kids or something

Not all college aged folk are brokies
It’s so sad that being young is now commonly assumed to be broke anyways.
All the more reason why it should be morally acceptable to pursue careers in your teen years rather than waiting until your thirties

>>801630
>>801643
>>801646
Did you get bored at leftychan?

>>801589
Irony is, most neurotic incels like Eliot are often middle class or lower middle class

>>801605
Look at this jealous Yuropeon

>>801605
Wiping your ass with the amerikkkan flag is what we can all agree on though

Stratospheric aerosol injection will solve global warming. It only costs $50 billion per year to reverse all manmade global warming. Google "Make Sunsets". Google "Stardust Solutions".

>>801608
A better solution would be to move earth further away fro the sun.

>>801608
damn i wonder why they havent done it then. the bourgeois must be fucking stupid and youre smarter than all of them

I'd fuck her now. She's more attractive to me as a 50+ year old than she was when younger.

>>801575
like her ribs or something

She aged like fine wine.

If she asked nicely

>>801590
What if she took you by force instead?

>>801427
by reaching the age of 18

By making threads about right wing lolcows to make his clitty leak

They still exist?

>>801431
this

By calling it the green reddit.

>>801450
Shortened from honey.

The transgender slang sense derives from the supposedly abundant use of "hon" as a term of address by older transgender women, presumably as a way to verbally affect a femininity they are otherwise perceived by some to lack (due to not passing well), and is especially associated with the cliché phrase "you look great, hon". Derogatory sense likely came about from users of 4chan's /lgbt/ board mocking the discourse on transgender forum Susan's Place.

(4chan /lgbt/ slang, derogatory, offensive) A trans woman who does not pass; a clocky trans woman.

>>801392
As a furry yes I would do all those things assuming the Che would actually establish world communism in all the examples. I would only kill one civilian as we don't need multiple Ches (unless that makes communism happen significantly faster)

Great man theory post.

>>801415
what if i become trans? can i have sex with him then?

>>801424
false NVKE

>>801307
I don’t ship them and I never will but I have combined them

>>801437
Which is somehow worse, nothing personnel

there are legitimately some pretty good alunyas on soybooru

>>801439
Kek

>>796235
feminism is a female supremacist movement and is not egalitarian

>>800947
>if you search for even a couple minutes you can find plenty of rights you lack.
Rights don't exist in the first place, and the point I'm making is that there's no way to statistically say who's more oppressed, and if you think men have it worse in a patrilineal society you're stretching hard to be a victim. Which is pussy ass shit. Put together a real analysis, we're all fucked by the existing systems but you're grasping straws trying to claim men have it worse. I been down here at the bottom of the class structure my whole life. Y'all paint it like women get everything easy because you don't struggle with them. You don't understand the forces you're talking about, you can only vaguely conceive that those forces harm you as well and react to any suggestion that they may harm others more with the same indignation as a whiny liberal upset that any redistribution of resources or power may take those things from them.
Grow up coward.

>>801232
>Rights don't exist in the first place
why? Why don't you think there's any meaningful difference between say, me having the right to sue my employer if they fire me for my race or gender or not? Or me having the right not to be forcefully shipped off to war or not? These things aren't always perfect measures to guarantee what we are trying to achieve but they have real impacts on people's lives, no?
>the point I'm making is that there's no way to statistically say who's more oppressed
I agree. That other anon was probably using that word wrong.
>if you think men have it worse in a patrilineal society you're stretching hard to be a victim
I do not really care to debate "who has it worse" because there are far too many factors there. I will however dispute your framing of men not lacking certain rights and not being discriminated against in certain ways in the West.
>pussy, coward, grow up, whiny
>>oh varies, the boyim are waking up!!!!!

Most (well read) feminists have a lot to say about the state of modern libfeminism, not sure what people you’re talking to. You can find like a trillion think pieces on “girlboss feminism” even among normie breadtubers.
Unfortunately the problem with feminism is that 50% of the world believes everything they do is feminist because they are a woman (thus we get mini-kamalas)
It’s a shame that this discourse was largely taken over by chuds. You’re not going to reach a feminist audience to tell this to here, and I’m not sure what you thought would happen. Seems sus, if I may say so. Not wholly sure this is in good faith, but I’m replying anyway cause it’s fun

>>801311
> do not really care to debate "who has it worse" because there are far too many factors there
Me neither, but the anon I replied to did.

>>800396
Idk

I always wondered how many soyteens are secretly LGBT or transgender despite bitching about them all day or trying to raid and dox literal trasns who's on xitter. Ironically, looking at the PPH for the sharty most of todays soyjak fans consist of the offsiters they despise now funnily enough, it's literally following the same trajectory as shrekchan did.

>>800694
One of their top janny/admin was FTM before Kuz left

Question explicitly for active users of the sharty, will the website get fedded up with potential mass shootings and become the center for such things or is the culture mostly against it?