Is Paul Wolfowitz a worse war criminal than Kissinger?
>Israel-first neocon
>Jewish supremacist
>allowed Mossad to take over the Pentagon following 9/11
>main architect of the 2003 Iraq War which lead to the deaths of nearly 2 million Iraqis
>crafted the "Wolfowitz Doctrine" in 1992 which called for a massive increase in the American military budget and for America to ignore international law by launching preemptive strikes on foreign nations deemed "hostile"
>called for an invasion of Iraq in 1998 as part of Operation Clean Break; was obsessed with overthrowing Saddam for years prior to 2003
>was a major member of PNAC which called for a "New Pearl Harbor" as a pretext to rabidly enhance the American military one year before the 9/11 false flag
>routinely lied about Iraq having WMDs
>orchestrated American imperialist policy throughout the Middle East which also lead to the deaths of millions of people in Palestine, Lebanon, Syria, Libya Yemen, Sudan, Somalia, Afghanistan, Pakistan, etc.
Also, how is he not in jail yet?
2 posts omitted.>And it is precisely because we are supporters of this second conception of history, which scraps the genius of evil and the genius of good, as well as the bestial "human nature"
<that we were able to say in 1914 that it was idiotic to try to determine who was the aggressor among the crowned despots of Petrograd, Berlin or Vienna; and in 1939 that the cynical and unanimous identification of the war criminal within the heads of state of Berlin, Rome and Tokyo was just as idiotic.
>Today only a small minority is still able to understand along the same coherent line the emptiness of the respective accusations exchanged at UN meetings by Acheson and the Vyshinsky,6 with an ostentatious homage to the same backwards-looking doctrine of history. Both of them trace the cause of the outbreak of a new and terrible war (between those who yesterday were brothers when it came to punishing the aggressors and judging the criminals) to the desire of the opposite ruling group to have more power, more territory, more control over the human masses.
>They both declare that a universal historical cataclysm can be born from this sadistic thirst for power among a restricted hierarchy of leaders, without other causes intervening: both say that peace is their goal, and that it is possible, provided that the opposing group can be detoxified!
>Now, among our rare revolutionary Marxist groups that steer clear of the herds that engage with one or the other of the two "super-greats", it is clear that all Marxism disappears when one uses the other, opposite vision of history - if it is clear that, on the contrary, this determining factor must be found in the economic sphere and in the class struggle. If this is obvious, then how is it possible that among these anti-Stalin and anti-Truman groups, some attribute war and oppression to the mere ill will of men? This is indeed what they can only achieve when, in order to "explain today's Russia," they seek a third class in a bureaucratic state hierarchy which, by savoring ever more fully the voluptuousness of the recently conquered power, has blocked our path (that of Engels' little book) from the savage wilderness to communist society with an obstacle larger than was expected.
>>835179True. Putin betrayed Communism for Christian Nationalist Revanchism.
>>835179Truth nuke of monstrous proportions.
Kissinger was way worse in terms of sheer numbers.
>>835271>Christian Nationalist Revanchism.These are later additions. Yeltsin picked him because he was a young liberal who admired western systems.