>>814783You have a very distinctive typing style and I'm 100% sure you confused me with another anon because he mentioned "incentives", which amused me a great deal since I have a very distinctive set of ideas.
If you do not understand capitalist ideas on their own terms, you will have an inaccurate understanding of how people operating under those ideas behave. It is through understanding Keynes that Kalecki (a Marxist Keynesian if you will) correctly understood the internal contradictions of full employment in a class society, while pseuds like you were going "no, it'll never work at all, Keynesians simply cannot spend their way out of a recession, revolution SOON!" (It never came)
You do not understand my purposes and instead of asking or listening, you presume. You (pretend to) have read one book and think you know everything.