You should know the right answer.
46 posts and 7 image replies omitted.>>745464Yes, that's proudhonism not marxism
The point is to socialize ownership, not to desocialize production
>>745385Wrong.
>>745464B cannot play the flute, therefore B cannot use the flute, therefore B will sell the flute and make more flutes to sell until he can pay someone else to make the flutes for them. This is capitalist production. B is bourgeois.
Leftypol is the best anti-communist propaganda
to be honest, i think child A is a liar, you cannot know nothing about playing the flute if you're going to make it by hand with the raw materials
they are also children, so i really dont think child B made it to sell it
Child B clearly made the flute to play it, so she should, she can share it with Child A as she will likely not be playing the flute at all times
Child C has no use for the flute, and needs food, water, shelter, etc, not a flute she can only admire
If she wants to learn to play, she can practice when Child A/B are not playing
Why did none of you suggest sharing? what a disappointment, do you not know what a flute is?
>>744707Child B should sell the flute to Child A, obviously.
Perhaps if it were something Child C could actually use, like food, they would be a more sensible answer, but as it stands there's no reason to give it to them.