/siberia/ - Off-topic

>>806966
This is true and backed by for example by research that for example looked at and compared the reactions of African fauna to human sounds. African fauna exhibits a hypersensitivity to human-made noises.

>>806966
yup. humans are literally an invasive species in every other continent and an extremely dominant one at that. sadly non-anthropocentric perspectives are not welcome on this site so the users have to come up with various nonsensical explanations as a cope to detract from basic ecology

>>807027
This

>>806947
>africans are the only race that did not kill off all their local megafauna
>material explanation?
they're the only ones who understood how to live sustainably and the world has never stopped hating them for it. everyone else lives in an unsustainable and wasteful way and calls it "civilization". If you live sustainably you're a "savage"

>>807309
Is this the biggest libshit take on this website?

>>807238
Leftists have done worse, OP is valid.

>>807231
Why would we care about an inter-imperialist conflict?

>>807238
He was an anti-monarchist emperor

>>807238
Anti-Monarchism is a child's political position. Monarchs can be objectively revolutionary, such as the British monarchy's support of Soviet communism against the German onslaught.

>>807263
Can you provide evidence of this?
The British were gripped with Germanophobia around the World Wars.

Also never forget that monarchs are head representatives of imperialism.

If anti monarchy is a child position, it’s a pretty precocious one at that.

>>807255
Only in very broad aggregates, but also not really. The zeal of the Stalinist LARPer about executing Romanov children, while sometimes vice signalling, takes place in a basically virtue signalling framework (look how far I'll go to build a better society for everyone / cruelty as a means) while the zeal of the average Trump-type or Nazi for deportations or arbitrary detention or whatever takes place in a basically vice-signalling framework (cruelty as an end, even if you were to demonstrate that this was not an effective means of building their ideal society they would just laugh about how it's based anyway.)

The skeleton key to this is the right's underlying love of "owning the libs", leftists do not really have an "Owning the libs" tendency. Insofar as a Stalinist tries to own the libs, he posts industrial production figures or "who put what in space first" charts. When a rightist tries to own the libs, he winds up somewhere between rolling coal, 'jakposting about transgender suicide, and the whitehouse posting crying families being deported on Twitter.
(Rolling coal perhaps being the archetypal example. You make your truck waste more of your money to annoy environmentalists that live in your head rent free?)

There is no leftist "based ritual" ( https://www.richardhanania.com/p/the-based-ritual ) and psychologically speaking: The left would be plenty viable in a world without the right (consider that the average left-wing website slop is an article about some dead martyr'd leftist and how nice they were. Take away the martyr-makers and you're still left with the article!), while the right would sincerely struggle in a world without the left and hated-minorities. (consider that the average right-wing website slop is an article about ethnic minority criminals, transgender people, immigrants, seething that countries trade, etc. Take away the outgroup and you've got nothing!)

>>807267
>Only in very broad aggregates, but also not really. The zeal of the Stalinist LARPer about executing Romanov children, while sometimes vice signalling, takes place in a basically virtue signalling framework (look how far I'll go to build a better society for everyone / cruelty as a means) while the zeal of the average Trump-type or Nazi for deportations or arbitrary detention or whatever takes place in a basically vice-signalling framework (cruelty as an end, even if you were to demonstrate that this was not an effective means of building their ideal society they would just laugh about how it's based anyway.)

Now this is major copium.
The Stalinist LARPer who rationalizes killing children for heir parents sin is vice-signaling. He’s just using “for the proletariat” as a convenient cover.

That’s the same rationale that the right uses. Punishing children because of what the adults did.

Virtue signaling would at the least have those kids being re-educated.

>The skeleton key to this is the right's underlying love of "owning the libs", leftists do not really have an "Owning the libs" tendency. Insofar as a Stalinist tries to own the libs, he posts industrial production figures or "who put what in space first" charts. When a rightist tries to own the libs, he winds up somewhere between rolling coal, 'jakposting about transgender suicide, and the whitehouse posting crying families being deported on Twitter.
(Rolling coal perhaps being the archetypal example. You make your truck waste more of your money to annoy environmentalists that live in your head rent free?)


You keep using the Stalinist larper as a leftist analogue for right wing inclinations.
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>807286
you dropped this

>>807286
If you're exclusively talking about the romanovs, it was a quick decision made on the fly to stop the white army from having something to rally around, it was not made to punish them, there is no time for re-education in the middle of a civil war, and it's still killing their parents in front of them, not the best childhood memory.

>>807291
Is that a fan blade for a “special Ed cap”? If so, I take it that you’re triggered?

>>807292
That’s funny because that’s the same kind of rationale that the right uses against troubled youths or ethnic petit offenders

>>806483
That would be awesome!!

>>806569
It wasn’t mere slander. He really did do that. He used kids and women for sex magic rituals.
Abused them.

Also, how is he “anti-capitalist”?


And he’s put on a pedestal like a saint.
Meanwhile, people wanna crucify artists for making incest fanfiction of childhood TV show characters

>>806600
he didnt use kids bruh there is no source for that but women who consented to be naked on an altar? yeah so what?

and heres how he is
https://sacred-texts.com/oto/lib77.htm
library.oto-usa.org/crowley/essays/duty.html

Alunya x Rodina OTP

you cant because theyll always have the best clapback, after all they know all about the cringe shit you did when you was a teenager

If only more women were brave enough to flick their bean in public. But I guess women are huge cowards.

this generation is genuinely the worst one in centuries

bruh

>>807072
women wank in public all the time, they have the decency to be subtle about it

>>804831
Please, dude. I want to jerk off to that.

>>804837
hot

why are elves always so effeminate and sub compared to orcs

I can feel the rent going down

>10.000.000
So i have to let him clap my cheeks for only $10?

I let him do it for free because I'm not a sell out

Who cares about that? I wanna transport into the alternate reality of that OP pic with the sexy anthro canine.
Make me into a lean muscular nerdy anthro feline male

sweet my new wallpaper

>>806865
It is just to stop the waste of clothes, allowing stores to buy less stock, which could impact the textile companies and will save natural resources.
So this is quite good in an eco-communist sense.

>>806919
Deng saved Chinese porkies. Xi saved global Chinese hegemony.

>>806936
>Xi saved global Chinese hegemony.
Based

>>806602
>more than enough stuff for eveyrone
>billions must live
>stop pitting working classes from different parts of the world against each other in a race to the bottom

trvke after trvke

this entire thread glows except for this based and true post.

if you don't agree with this anon just neck yourself NOW

>>806944
Surprising how so called "communists" are so quick to support imperialism as long as it's coated in red paint.

>>806881
Rightists crying about why women can't get attracted to them: it's because they are misogynistic shits who think that Feminism """ruined""" (((family values))). Remember who causes most of the mass shootings: Far-right cishetmoids.

>>806881
I bet most of the dudes on the left collage are some flavor of lolbertarian or Agent Kochinskiite

>>802862
gem and also literally how those two interacted IRL

marx:
>Bakunin has become a monster, a huge mass of flesh and fat, and is barely capable of walking any more. To crown it all, he is sexually perverse and jealous of the seventeen year-old Polish girl who married him in Siberia because of his martyrdom.

bakunin:
<By origin Marx is a Jew. One might say that he combines all of the positive qualities and all of the short comings of that capable race. A nervous man, some say to the point of cowardice, he is extremely ambitious and vain, quarrelsome, intolerant, and absolute, like Jehovah, the Lord God of his ancestors, and, like him, vengeful to the point of madness. There is no lie or calumny that he would not invent and disseminate against anyone who had the misfortune to arouse his jealousy – or his hatred, which amounts to the same thing. And there is no intrigue so sordid that he would hesitate to engage in it if in his opinion (which is for the most part mistaken) it might serve to strengthen his position and his influence or extend his power

>>806935
So leftypolacks

>>806934
True but let’s be honest: women aren’t inherently progressive either. They can and often are reactionary for their own benefit just like men are