>>691624>cancerousAs opposed to what? Another
blatant thinly veiled sex thread?
>>691589>And yet, people like you complain about atV being dumbed down by moderation.I'm not one of those people. I'm in favor of curation and moderation. Including here.
>Those are the "topic" accounts or some spambots.That's not what I'm referring to. I'm referring to automated accounts posting generated playlists. Not existing tracks.
>Wtf does that mean and how is reality television "consistent"?I'm referring to temporal consistency. The thing AI video generation lacks which results in fever dream stuff like morphing objects, 'actors' and scenery. Reality television is slop, but a shot can at least last for longer than 8 seconds without people's faces melting and limbs disappearing.
What's happening with music however is what bothers me the most. Not simply platforms being destroyed (does play a big part) but the inability to find and look up (and up to) obscure artists. There was a lot of slop out there, but also gems, but now it's like being stuck at Point Nemo.
Growing up, finding certain artists helped me cope with everything going on in my life, and there was also the element of mystique and awe. I worry kids nowadays won't experience any of that if all they're fed and experience is a 24/7 tailored synthetic algorithmic slop feed.
Maybe I'm just a snob like Adorno, but I do believe in "true" art's ability to connect people, including with the subjectivity of the artist. You don't have that with the product of 10 word prompt.