/siberia/ - Off-topic

/siberia/ dating game

>trying to do some mundane domestic task in eyesight of father
>uuuhhhhh bbeettaa aatt ssoommee ppooiinntt iinn yyoouurr lliiffee tthheerree wwiill ccoommee aa ttiimmee .. yyoouu aarree aa ssmmaarrtt hhaannddssoommee iinnddiivviidduuaall ..
>some more droning low-register sorrowful noises the content of which can't be discerned
>almost immediately after, some barking about how im actually mentally ill and stupid, suddenly forgetting the pandering pep talk a couple minutes before
pic unrelated

It's NOT called "The Byzantine Empire", you fucking barbarian. Its proper name is IMPERIVM ROMANVM (always all caps). Anything else is invalid revisionism (both in the historical and marxist sense) by KKKraKKKa westoids.
Do you understand?!

Edgy general

Post edgy unpopular opinions that you have.

I think that we should treat sakaioids the same way that we treat nazis

The rate of profit reaching zero is not simply the idea that corporations become "unproductive" but that they actually increase production due to the use of technology or "labour-saving devices". This erases human input thus disallowing the extraction of "surplus value" (which is marx's idea of "profit" according from his LTV), not just the total revenue substracted from the costs of production.
This is why technology cannot create value and so produces the "constant capital" of the static and mechanical motion of robotics - this can be seen as the "quantitative" aspect of production whereas human "variable capital" is the "abstract" or qualitative aspect - creating a dialectic which erases the human, who stands as the "contradiction" in this system.
However, as more technology replaces humans, less humans are able to buy products, leading to crises of "overproduction" which become unprofitable. Here then, capital must use humans to sustain itself, even as it erases humans from its function.
To Marx, communism overcomes this by seeing humans as the directors of the machines of production, by techniques of automation with political devices regulating production.
Here then we see how capital is both the driver and impediment of production - this is why marxism is about unleashing the productive forces against the efficient inefficiency of capital.

marx was right about a lot, but not everything - especially considering that material conditions have drastically changed from his time, including digital technologies, the internet, television, nuclear weapons, robots, mobile phones.
many more classes than the bourgeoisie and proletariat have sprouted up due to the expansion of the means and modes of production, and the increasing specialised nature of many facets of modern life. the west has massively de-industrialised and is not going to return to antiquated models of the industrial factory floor being the basis of social relations.
this doesnt mean an abandonment of marxism, but an advancement from it - otherwise you will be stuck in the 19th century.
its not helpful to contemporary subjects to just say "read marx" as if this is the redpill that allows you to see the matrix of today's postmodern simulacrum - things really have developed and cannot be simply be disregarded as superstructural illusions hiding a binary class division.
so, learn to think about today's experience.

Support Large Size liberation!

'manga 'read

breffmints.

Is she a proletarian hero?