/siberia/ - Off-topic

>>762745
What the fuck is an Adin Ross?

Shah was such a virgin he couldn't keep his money from spilling out of his bags.

It's actually remarkable how backwards Iran is. And I blame the US for that. No coup against Mossadegh in 1953 = No Shah. No Shah = no 1979 revolution. The clerical reactionaries would never have come to power. The Ayatollah was the Lenin of reactionaries. He made reaction look badass… I mean just look at that poster.

>>761713
>And I blame the US for that.
That is geopolitics.
Soviets and the British also invaded Iran and made Reza Shah abdicate for pro-German influence.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-Soviet_invasion_of_Iran
Which was the same with Mossadegh – to also secure economic and political interests.
…
TBH, when it comes to the Shah of Iran and criticism there, at least this isn't Lavader sperging out about price controls and the bazaaris–(He was always a bit of a lolbert tier constitutional monarchist… but Shah regime was basically actually existing corporatism, one party state and everything–for what it really is, not the Aristotelian misconception of corporatism/guild system they like to praise–grumble, corporatism was always state corporatism to begin with, not a partnership of clans).
It's the divine right of the free market with monarchists like Lavader, Aristotle's food argument and marketplace of ideas appeal to democratic input, muh decentralization and muh partnership of clans (which they make a guise of "guild corporatism"), muh middle class, it's all Aristotle's Politics.
A bit of a off-topic tangent, but monarchists these days… we're totally swamped with right libertarian sentiment… It's dumb too because the Shah of Iran's White Revolution distributed land and property to begin with and was fairly Liberal enough… but Lavader calls it Communism… "Monarcho-Communism" –and there's some truth to it being a one-party state, but monarchy was always aligned with a unitary mode of politics, that is what they don't understand.
Honestly, Lavader… I never quite liked him as an absolute monarchist because early on before he was popular I remember Lavader being a staunch constitutional monarchist and opposing my politics…
…But his Medieval video also irked me because he brought up Aquinas to greenlight tyrannicide theory and left it to private judgement to determine this… in spite of Aquinas' warning against private judgement in De Regno…
I hate being on the rightwing sometimes… all of them glaze Aristotle… this is why I sympathize with Hobbes so hard… it's as if I were alive in his era, people never really changed and stopped doing that…
Me and Lavader represent two sides of the Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

didn't know they had eiffel-similar tower in iran

Depends if uyghy wiggy has a BBC. If so cracky whitey capitulates right away to watch him have poppy playtime with Ms Gracie

>>762429
That’s due to modern society infantilizing youth with excessive schooling and lack of industrial exposure

>>762421
18 vs 21 is literally nonsense

There’s no significant difference at those age numbers. You’re just projecting your immaturity

>>762660
I'm over it. I have had a good sex life despite the circumcision. I don't really want my foreskin restored right now. I have a family of my own and more important matters to attend to. Maybe later. The immediate aftermath of it was far more traumatizing than nearly 30 years since then.

>>762421
Tom most people at 18 already get a high school diploma. That's the reason why we pick it as the age of consent. We're not picking it arbitrarily based on vibes, we tie it to the K-12 educational program

>>762735
He’s one of those people who believe that young adults need to be infantilized for safety despite the fact that it’s exactly what caused immaturity in the first place

>>762606
FUCK ISRAEL
FUCK ISRAEL
FUCK ISRAEL
FUCK ISRAEL
FUCK ISRAEL
FUCK ISRAEL
FUCK ISRAEL
FUCK ISRAEL
FUCK ISRAEL
FUCK ISRAEL
FUCK ISRAEL


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ukwYRkr1vrY&list=RDukwYRkr1vrY&start_radio=1

do goyim really what?

>>762691
Do leftim really???!

>>762691
do zoomers really

>>762606
Replacing jewish elites with other elites changes nothing. The problem is class society itself.

Do you get anything if you turn in ancient remains you found to a museum?

>>762687
Dunno. Do you have any? If so post photos. It depends on their age. My friend is around 100 years old since he shed his disgusting reactionary flesh and blood. I love skeletons. I wish I could cuddle with all those bourgeoisie piled up in Cambodia.

From last I read the Stuarts still exist agnatically as nobles but they're not the royals anymore (obviously)

>>762648
I'm not keen on the Stuarts coming back.
I kind of bicker at Catholic Jacobites pretending that Stuarts can come back–that's definitely not happening because their Catholicism destroyed the chance back then… I mean, they are glad these sacrifices were made… that a Stuart King stood his ground for his faith, but that comes at a cost… that the Stuart dynasty is gone.
Monarchists in general, esp. legitimatists, seem to me to just not really comprehend when it's over–and it's partially over because of their optimism that we should be too eager to overthrow a king, but assume that it is as easy to resume a king as it is to overthrow (no, it's not)–that King James II -deserves- the throne back by his lineage because he did the right thing, so it should be granted–the monarchists are keen to make a stand there as well and make sacrifices as if the costs don't matter, but when you sacrifice like that you truly must be taken as a sacrifice–it's not coming back, even if it deserves to be back.

>>762653
Personally I would scrap the current monarchy of the UK as I find it, in various ways, uhh simply wrong.

Monarchists in general don't take that fatality seriously, I think, in part because of the resurrection of Jesus, and their restorationism has a kind of Christian optimism that the bodies of the faithful will be restored, so they urge kings to give away their lives.
Restorationism is really about as optimistic as that, although it's just like the Christian optimism that Jesus will return soon. Realistically speaking, like I said, restorationism historically is viable between 45 years on precedent that I know of, and a hundred years likely at most to attempt it in any potential.

>>762656
On the subject of religion, I wish I could get closer to God..

>>762437
>chooses to move goalposts again
i encourage everyone to scroll up and read the conversation from the beginning.

>>762283
Do what is in your own self interest. Don't listen to women, they lie all the time. Never make the mistake of respecting a woman.

>>762360
You already posted this the 1st of February. You should get newer jokes

>>762646
If that person keeps posting the same video with the same message, it's only fair that I keep replying with the same message.