>>794196>AI is incredibly historically progressivelmao, no it isn't.
Once you realize what it actually is, it becomes pretty clear that "AI" (actually Large Language Models) is the Simpson's Monorail of technologies. It maxed out on its actual potential as a prototyping program with very niche applications years ago, and everything else has been an attempt to brute force this idea that LLMs are actually "Artificial Intelligence," this sci-fi idea of intelligent, autonomous computers. They are nothing of the sort, no matter how big your data centers are.
AI is a bubble that is going to burst, and what's left behind (it overwhelmingly negative sentiment towards "AI" doesn't cause it to get banned) will likely be prototyping tools and programs that do meaningless busy work to be later touched up by a human. I could see an artist using AI to throw up a quick background for a character they just drew, and then touching up the little hallucinations to save time. I don't see LLMs ever replacing the artist.