/siberia/ - Off-topic

nobody uses this anymore, you don't need to worry about it.

all memes are pretty gay

I'm pretty gay myself.

I cant get over how the depiction of "chad" is just some hipster looking dude. Literally some guy. There is no visual joke to it.

Found it in 2018 or 2019, probably through kuroba if i recall correctly. I didn't start posting much until bunker. It makes me a little sad that I seem to have missed the window when this site wasn't filled with sectarian quoteminers

>>788524
>Any other oldfags that can give a description filling in the blanks of 2015 and 2016?
I may be looking through nostalgia goggles, but I remember there being a much larger diversity of opinions, a far greater tolerance for disagreement (i.e. people were chill about it instead of vulgar and hostile), and generally much higher effort discussion. One random thing I remember that would be unthinkable today is that there was a Hungary '56 flag, which was included because there was a substantial number of posters who viewed that movement positively. Additionally Stirnerposting and Bookchinposting were extremely common. I remember that there was always at least one thread up at all times in which MLs and Leftcoms would be trading long effortposts with sources and quotations from Marx, Engels, Lenin, Bordiga, etc. to back up their views. Ultimately, as an ML I think that the predominant opinions of the board have actually become more correct, but at the same time the quality of the discussion has dropped dramatically. I suppose with the establishment of a broadly ML orthodoxy it becomes easier for people to be dismissive and hostile towards differing opinions, plus they rarely have to actually defend their views leading to the decline in effortposts.

heard 8 chan had a lefty version of pol around 2015, visited, didn't really post, just kinda lurked, came back after it moved here to its own site and stayed, mainly because the rest of 8chan sucked

Found it thru bunker mag years ago

Moved to >>>/meta/45350.

The most important task of the communist party after taking power is to produce more high quality children's cartoons for a manchildren audience.

The only time I've seen 'shitskin' used here was by a Mexican 'leftcom'

>>793126
Tr()()n
TR()()N
FAGGOT FAGGOT GIGAHON TR()()N TR()()()()()()()N FAG TRA|\||\|Y TR()()N SHITSKIN SHITSKIN FAGGOT FAGGOT TR()()()N FAGGGOOOOOOOOOOTT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

>>793163
autism speaks

>>793133
Besides 4chan being a biohazard, what's the deal with the Lainchan? Last time I checked a thread there most of the messages were comprehensive and thoughtful. Though I only prefer lurking here.

I love bbc

>Zoar
fucking blast from the past is that the right wing very small animator with wierd 3d series that we made fun of and invited on old bunkerchan?

now all we need is some faggot fleshtuber to make a 3 hour video explaining this with some minecraft parkour in the background

>>793139
>zoar
i'm glad someone else rmeembers that episode

>>792733
bump

I miss Junko… :3

>>792930
true but the way he said it, its hilarious to me

"If we come to a minefield, our infantry attacks exactly as it were not there" -gregory zhukov

"When they come into machine gun fire, our soldiers march exactly as if it was not there. we will prove the defenders wrong!" - Marshal gregory Zhukov

"when it comes to a german panzer division, our soldiers fight as if they aren't in the way" - Greg Zhukov

"Keep attacking, they'll run out of mines eventually" - Georgy Zhukov, Order no.520

"i secretly wrote the script for enemy at the gate, just to dunk on stalin and fuck with the dumb american cinema lovers" -Gregory Zhukov, a statement from his diaries

>>792943
thnx for the original anon

>>792943
Are we sure that Eisenhower is a reliable source for this?

>>792925
I am unsure of the validity of the quote but casualty-wise only few Soviet generals' tactics were resulting with less losses in their side.
One of them is Marshall Rokossovsky, who also had overseen Operation Bagration. One of the most successful Soviet offensives.

>>793171
How is it any different than woke and soy? This is all I'm interested about now, since you're arguing in bad faith anyway.

>triggered
Damn, you really are an old man. You're supposed to say that it's spiking my cortisol, grandpa.

>>793182
Youre still not providing any more evidence.
You're in bad faith especially since you're still triggered over SJW

This thread is so fucking stupid.

>>792950
>there's more leftist men than women
"the property owning gender is more anti-capitalist"
Andrew Tate is celebrated as a role model for a reason. Every man under patriarchy aspires to be a parasitic passive income landlord rentier class who hangs out in their pedo fraternal cult secret societies. Leftist men all talk about how they love Bookchin or Chomsky, who were friendly with Rothbard and Epstein respectively

>>793169
>"SJW" doesn't even mean anything
neoliberal NPC programming:
"Hamas doesn't ACTUALLY care about Palestinians. You're just PRETENDING to care about Palestinians, you're actually antisemitic/anti-white/anti-men" etc

>>793182
>How is it any different than woke and soy?
wokeness (i.e that the FBI assassinated MLK, and recently BLM, and now covers up lynching random teens as 'suicides') is yet another innovation created by black people which parasitic settler whites stole as culture vultures, very Israeli
Soy has to do with "phyto-estrogen" and their sexual pathology about testosterone which is 90% of all reactionary politics

>>793206
>"the property owning gender is more anti-capitalist"
Andrew Tate is celebrated as a role model for a reason. Every man under patriarchy aspires to be a parasitic passive income landlord rentier class who hangs out in their pedo fraternal cult secret societies. Leftist men all talk about how they love Bookchin or Chomsky, who were friendly with Rothbard and Epstein respectively

Women do too. Alot of popular fnale role models are girlbosses. Also Andrew Tate isn't really as popular with men as you think.
He's assumed to be a hit with men because he pisses off feminists.

Also most men don't really aspire to be bourgeois rentiers. That's just a psyop.
Men are harassed into pursuing bourgeois aspirations to prove themselves.

it means you have multiple equally prominent personality styles. it says it on the tin

Test is https://www.idrlabs.com/personality-style/test.php

>>793184
>what does this mean?
Nothing.

Madam, your cute shy nerdy boyfriend has arrived.

>>787916
Yep, bourgeois feminism is basically just endless psyops. Like women overwhelmingly date based on extremely hetero and conventionally attractive norms like height, facial features, fit body etc.

At the same time they gaslight and pretend that it's men that push unrealistic standards, when in reality its men that are far more lenient in dating based on attractiveness.

I think the correct way of attacking feminism without becoming a chud is pointing out the hypocrisy in bourgeois feminism. But who am I kidding, they'll still call you an incel chud and nothing changes

>>789561
Literally me

>>787912
STallion fluttershy is the best thing to happen to this board since stirnerposting

>>789566
Yep.
There's an anon in another thread claiming women are more leftist than men and the article they provided showed that women only voted more liberal. The only mention of socialism was in a poll question but I don't think they clarified if poll takers understood what socialism was. It was all based on Anglo American politics.

Needless to say anon is having a meltdown because I dare to ask them to provide more evidence.