[Reply]
So here's an interesting thought I've been having lately. Because trans people are more loathsome to conservatives than women are, we are seeing a strange breed of Conservative feminism emerge, although I believe this form of feminism has been in the works for a while and is exemplified by many girl characters in western television shows from the 90s-00s. We see its apex in the character of Jeanie from Mr. Birchum.
For those of you (probably all) that haven't seen the show, Jeanie is presented as a sprite, rebellious tomboy who is also totally beholden to paternal authority. She is the good child who wants to be a carpenter just like daddy, she can do almost no wrong. She is meant to stand in direct contrast to Mr. Birchum's gamer son who is a big loser with no aspirations, he smokes weed all the time, he is a failson fun more or less.
This is permitted to be a feminist character because she is a tomboy and does things just as well as the boys do, and it leads your mind astray from the otherwise reactionary and misogynistic politics of Mr. Birchum and the Daily Wire. Of course there is nothing wrong with a girl wanting to do boy stuff, I don't even need to tell you all that because feminism is inherent to communism and anarchism alike.
But here is the thing that I notice about this sort of tomboy girl that conservatives are now in love with is that she is not actually a liberated woman but rather a "model minority", where instead of women having things like the freedomt to have an abortion, to not have children, to express themselves sexually they are "cutely" into boy stuff like carpentry, drinking coffee, shooting guns etc. So feminism for conservative men like Adam Corolla is girls being just like the boys, but certainly not having any actual agency or freedom from patriarchy.
and these tomboys are always contrasted with the figure of the failson or the effeminate man (or the ultimate abomination, the transgender woman) and used to shame them. They are also used as mouthpieces as in "woah, the little girl misgendered the trans woman! from the mouth of babes! the emperor wears no clothes!" that kind of stuff.
This is a rough outline of what I'm thinking but I thought it was an interesting topic.
23 posts and 3 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>546122>because patriarchy was common to historical capitalism (actually the common vector were populous productive agrarian societies) having a pussy nullifies your bourgeois potential 💀the most capitalist societies are the most feminist, let that sink in, as i see my mexico being devoured by the US hegemony, i see feminism make its way thorugh.
>>545187for the same reason they allied with evangelicals decades ago and are doing it again today against le "trans menace" :)
>>546122>women tend to support whatever empowers them economically in a way that both protects and preserves their social statusmiddle-class women*
>>546132none of the shit they said was wrong but its about the petty bourgeois, not "women" lol. feminism is an interclassist movement and not communist for a reason