>>765956>Which begs the question, why not grift the Christian right if you're a monarch?That's what Christians want–they want to be grifted.
The Christian strategy is to -love- one's enemies and be a useful tool for them… that is how Christians get what they want, that is how their foot gets in the door.
But once Christians have finally been adopted and used up all that love, the 2nd half of the persuasion comes into hand: hate your family–to keep those who adopted Christianity in check after using it…
…
Christianity is designed to spread at all costs.
There is much honor among Christians in having adopted and spread it. Serve this cause, they will honor you… but if you're looking at it long-terms, after the spread of Christianity and being its secular henchmen, you're pretty much the disposable one on its accord.
…
This is how I see the relationship between monarchy and Christians… because the Christians generally are ready to walk all over, they think they have monarchy in the bag, that they have everything they want of us… –now that monarchy is under their assumption, they act like they own it and are the boss, and only take time to acknowledge and honor the saintly kings or martyrs for their purposes…
…
Whereas the relationship between Christian rightwingers and /pol/ is different:
Even though /pol/ basically walks all over the rightwing Christians and takes full advantage of them, the rightwing Christians bend the knee to /pol/, and do everything to appeal to rightwing /pol/ chud sentiment rather than demand they do the opposite. They try to gain the love of their enemies–that is why Christ anons take the abuse from /pol/.