[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo / 420 ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/siberia/ - Off-topic

"No chin, no right to speak."
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)
What is 6 - 2?

Check out our new store at shop.leftypol.org!

| Catalog | Home
|

File: 1785117564724-2.webp (9.65 KB, 474x237, OIP (43).webp)

 

It seems completely random, but spiritually it's the same principle. Westoids are as viscerally opposed to the notion of communism for the same reason Yugioh hates on stun. Cause ain't nobody getting shit. It's simple. Whenever they permit "socialism" it's radlib garbage like fascism or Trotsky precisely because the diff between control vs stun let's these sweats FEEL like their gay child porn game is still the same and just raises the skill ceiling.


A card that says "you can only special summon once per turn if you have more than 7000 life points" is so easy to navigate through it isn't stun, it's just gatekeeping the rogue decks that don't need gatekeeping anyway. But you write "only winged beasts and rocks can be special summoned" and everyone becomes pantied and sissified.

You know why I like stun? Cause now we both miserable. That's communism baby. Fuck you, we both digging holes or mining for coal, all the rich people are dead. If we're not a pussy, we push through and go home to unfiltered cigarettes and PlayStation for days. We get paid in scratch offs to be the next Stalin. But that's not what the vast majority wants.

They WANT systemic racism, they WANT sexism vs hypergamy, they WANT laws that don't mean anything and are just unenforceable nonsense. They want their cops harassing them over bullshit while paedophiles do heinous acts on private islands, they want bureaucracy, and most of all they want their children's genitals hanging out "but actually she's a 3000 year old vampire/pornhub says she's of age in Uganda"

Communism is not populism. Fuck populism, fuck the masses, fuck democracy. It's misery,. It's despair, its death, it's what you deserve.

But it is what I want. Gibs me.dat. Permanent revolution.
11 posts and 2 image replies omitted.

>>809043
Neither is 9/11 been a thing for over two decades yet people won’t stop taking about it

>>809040
There’s no such thing as communist imageboards. But there’s plenty of leftist takes

>>808811
Dumbfuck.

>>808796
What does even have to do with the high chances that the petit-bourgeois and above are gonna have comparatively worse living standards under communism, at least in the first generations? Maybe some failing small business owners and the sort are gonna live better but that's it.

>>808831
it's called disagreeing with the premise,you can't answer a question if you think the premise is false in the first place

>>808784
what an unusual post.
t. anti-populist communist, but for the opposite reason: that populists want misery, despair, and death, while i am for joy, rising expectations, and life.

>>808793
i don't accept this notion that it's a step down for middle class workers. a prole today lives better than many medieval nobles in almost any material sense you care to measure while his relative social status is at-worst the same. why would developing the productive forces even more make us worse off? even if the curve equalises (e.g. poorer people get better off faster than richer people) i can see no reason to imagine an absolute decline except an underlying calvinist love of misery.
even for petit bourgeois, what they're likely to lose is not so much material status (at least at the small proprietor end. many small business owners are perpetually broke and would in net-position at least be better off under communism.) as social status (e.g. they'll no longer be able to boss others around as the owner.)

>>808811
i will undermine the appeal of my points to say that while a tempered form of neoliberalism is, in fact, the best system we've found so far, what the US has now has proven disastrous. "actually existing neoliberalism" focused too much on tax cuts and fiscal rectitude and not enough on deregulation, so a bunch of petit-bourg weirdoes in regulated and protected sectors like car dealerships, soda bottling, agriculture, etc, bankroll a republican party which has turned sharply against trade and picked up a fetish for utterly arbitrary economic interventions and open corruption, and they do so mostly because they resent that "coastal elite PMC" (e.g. upper-proles) have more cultural status than them despite not being business owners.
in the UK, where Thatcher barely deregulated and mostly privatised industries into state-regulated LARP markets precisely because she feared the social consequences of real competition - undermining Britain's insular ruling class with market discipline - is it any wonder that the reactionary tilt has been particularly severe?

in another world, neoliberals would've beenPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>809078
>Neither is 9/11 been a thing for over two decades yet people won’t stop taking about it
Funnily enough, I haven't heard mention of it in ages. all my edgy "I forgot" jokes don't bother anyone any more, not a good analogy.



 

>People on here don't understand that woke idpol is dangerous
35 posts and 8 image replies omitted.


Idpol is a meaningless term used to shut down any discussion relating to topics rightoids cloaked in red find "icky"

>>809116
ok hotep

>>809068
>Incel and chud are thrown around uselessly to mean anyone that’s critical of radlib thought
Yeah but radlib is a useful and distinct word, sure.
>> That word's even dumber than woke, shut the fuck up.

>So are these words:

><moid
><foid
><chud
><incel
><tankie
uh, yeah, that's correct. give this poster a banana sticker.
>It’s more that you’re acting like anyone who criticizes “woke” is “le right wing tradchaddad” who beats women and beats off to bbc
There is no woke to criticize. Incel means involuntarily celibate, reactionary means you want to return to old social relations, and chud means Cannibalistic Humanoid Underground Dweller but is also used interchangeably with reactionary.
Woke is vague, it's like the radlib version of redpill. There's nothing to be critiqued.

>>809136
addendum, nobody has used the "le" prefix since Digg was still around except you weirdos.



File: 1785183479372-4.png (1.07 MB, 1200x871, 1785097105237922.png)

 

Beloved Chairman Mao is in excellent condition. All claims to the contrary are Facist propaganda.

>>809016
Looks like he got his life essence DRAINED

>>809091
I bet Jiang Qing gave CRAZY head.



File: 1744026167132.jpg (Spoiler Image,243.52 KB, 1561x2048, Gk37ERsWMAAbqvL.jpg)

 

a thread to post hot trans women
496 posts and 427 image replies omitted.

>>808756
Because they’re busting themselves up for your amusement.
We should stop semi-jokingly pushing the meme “chuds should transition”

>>808871
This you? You dont look half bad. How many months on E?

>>808912
guess?

>>808756
>Why do people with gender dysphoria looks traumatized
This is one of the bad side effects of treating trans identity as wholesome chungus self affirmation. As if being trans is no different from being a goth girl or growing out your armpits.

>>809117
Id say a bit less than a year. 8-10 months maybe. Im not an expert though and im not trans so dont be mad if im wrong



File: 1785112908218-0-1.jpeg (14.94 KB, 436x458, IMG_0114.jpeg)

File: 1785112908218-5-2.jpeg (56.64 KB, 434x460, IMG_0100.jpeg)

 

Your appearance /leftist paul/
9 posts and 2 image replies omitted.

File: 1785206172123-7.jpg (2.05 MB, 1064x1478, Ultraleft-1u8xfx1.jpg)

how do i attain this physique

>>809075

lasagna

Youre a chud in umscribe,

>>809101
Discribe. The chuddest mf

>>809075
It would involve reading theory, so you can't.



File: 1784548290744-1.jpg (101.69 KB, 800x457, Gonzalo-1277476751.jpg)

 

Imagine for a moment she transitioned and went from Chairman Gonzalo to Chairman Consuelo. Would her revolution had been successful?
3 posts and 2 image replies omitted.

pura pinxe ultraviolencia y no mamadas

File: 1785110961066-6.png (455.26 KB, 814x806, gonzalomeme.png)

>>807622
Hoy me siento triste, Sabiny…


>>809011
Me enteré de la forma en que murió Jiang Qing. Estoy cansado de los Dengistas.

why would she change her last name.



 

>It was about slavery!!

No it wasn't, leftoids, look at Town Line, New York

You're all a bunch of.. simps

For propaganda
16 posts and 6 image replies omitted.

>>808777
>>808803
I won't admit to anything that wasn't a reality, now go fellate yourself to transhumanist dickgirl porn

>>808777
it's still a shithole, thanks dumbasses.
>>808836
stop huffing gas weirdo, you don't regrow braincells.

>>808836
>>808886
it would be worse if it wasnt for the north giving you free money for no reason

>>808985
It would've been better if that money hadn't gone to white hands, the north didn't save the south they turned it into a colony.

>>808777
if anything reconstruction should have gone on way longer
arguably the most consequential fuck-up in American history



File: 1785085450168-7-0.jpeg (28.32 KB, 547x365, images (1) (4).jpeg)

File: 1785085450168-7-1.jpeg (38.02 KB, 335x597, images (1) (5).jpeg)

 

"Uhmm, all women are godesses, INCEL!"
No, she is. You are nothing compared to her
41 posts and 5 image replies omitted.

File: 1785174244289-9.jpg (1.62 MB, 4080x1893, 20260727_123732.jpg)

>>808965
fine, but no face. they think you're a pig btw
I don't really hang out with men outside a small circle of childhood homies

>>808981
I guess you’re one of those men who think other men are defective?
That they’re unworthy of company as well?
Also I’m a domestic boar not a pig, I don’t pedestalise women for their looks.
That’s what this site does.

>>809017
>I guess you’re one of those men who think other men are defective?
You guess wrong. I don't have a policy against hanging out with men, I just hang out with people who's company I enjoy and my small town doesn't have many interesting dudes.
>That they’re unworthy of company as well?
I don't believe that of anyone, even the worst among us.
>I don’t pedestalise women for their looks.
Then why ramble about how feminists are jealously trying to drag down beautiful women then? Cause that's how everyone in this room interpreted your post.

>>809018
>Then why ramble about how feminists are jealously trying to drag down beautiful women then? Cause that's how everyone in this room interpreted your post.

Because I notice that when it comes to mens body image, there’s no sympathy or support for the less physiognomically endowed.
But when it comes to women, there’s always these immediate platitudes about “all women are beautiful” as if though men don’t have a large palette of physiognomical preferences of womens bodies.
Or rather, that when men say they aren’t attracted to a certain female physiognomic type compared to others, he’s accused of lookism.
And then in comes the constant talk about “pretty privilege”

>You guess wrong. I don't have a policy against hanging out with men, I just hang out with people who's company I enjoy and my small town doesn't have many interesting dudes


Are you sure? Because this place is rife with internalized misandry due to semi-imposed social isolation from peers and only viewing them as potential sexual partners due to unfulfilled desires and they dismiss men as worthless because they’re not attracted to men but they hyperfocus on women and use their sexual attraction to women as a moral compass
They even look down on cishomo guys and ace/aro folk on here

They only show interest in cis homo males that are androgynous or feminine

>>809031
>Because I notice that when it comes to mens body image, there’s no sympathy or support for the less physiognomically endowed.
True, but unrelated.
>when it comes to women, there’s always these immediate platitudes about “all women are beautiful” as if though men don’t have a large palette of physiognomical preferences of womens bodies.
>Or rather, that when men say they aren’t attracted to a certain female physiognomic type compared to others, he’s accused of lookism.
These are also unrelated.
>And then in comes the constant talk about “pretty privilege”
Constant? I don't know about all that, but you're just being silly if you think looks don't give people social benefits. People are awful if you're ugly, man, woman, or what-have-you
>Are you sure? Because this place is rife with internalized misandry due to semi-imposed social isolation from peers and only viewing them as potential sexual partners due to unfulfilled desires and they dismiss men as worthless because they’re not attracted to men but they hyperfocus on women and use their sexual attraction to women as a moral compass
>They even look down on cishomo guys and ace/aro folk on here
Yeah I'm fuckin sure dumbass, you think I'm here for comradery? I'm here to get shitposting out of my system, do you think I'm actually defending these reactionary pseudo-commies?



File: 1785031280958-9.webp (23.84 KB, 384x444, download.webp)

 

Do any other leftists own one of these things?
9 posts and 3 image replies omitted.

>>808567
yea I use one to grind my weed.

File: 1785037334434-6.jpg (50.16 KB, 640x627, boymoder 5g.jpg)

>>808582

for what?

File: 1785037622228-4.jpeg (82.48 KB, 1024x512, IMG_2351.jpeg)

I prefer these

File: 1785037806628-3.png (559.07 KB, 750x500, ClipboardImage.png)

>>808567
I own one. Rarely use it.
>>808575
When I crush garlic it is to remove the peel. Not sure your motivation for crushing a garlic clove. Since I usually intend to chop the garlic after remove the peel, I usually crush the garlic with my very wide kitchen knife, pressing my palm into the flat of the blade.

>>808582

how am i against it?



File: 1785141849649-5.png (274.03 KB, 865x1390, ClipboardImage.png)

 

>embarass and sabotage your own side all the time
>have an unwarranted sense of importance despite never delivering any result for the last 50 years
>Pretend to be intellectual despite their largest demographic being midwits online
>99% of orgs are lowkey cults
>Be ML
>Pic unrelated
3 posts omitted.

>>808876
the biggest ethnicities of the ussr and china were/are russians and han chinese. are you claiming they didnt advance the national liberation of these people from european and japanese subjugation?
>what about yakuts and tibetans
in comparison to non-ML states like the conditions of aboriginals under australia or kashmiris under india? yes, quite the contrast.

>>808882
>noooooo you can't balkanize me!!! I'm giving them "autonomy"!!!

This can be marxism in general

>>808854
Lmfao based

>>808854
this joke would be funny if I actually knew what was going on in the picture



Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo / 420 ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]
[ 1 /2 /3 /4 /5 /6 /7 /8 /9 /10 /11 /12 /13 /14 /15 /16 /17 /18 /19 /20 /21 /22 /23 /24 /25 /26 /27 /28 /29 /30 /31 ]
| Catalog | Home