/siberia/ - Off-topic

>>822067
>it would be better to, instead of aborting a portion of male fetuses, instead use genetic modifications to turn a larger percentage of males, maybe like 20-30%, into exclusive homosexuals.
It's a circular problem. If you're a homosexual, you need more homosexuals. Sadly, gender is not the only dimension that makes the person and being minority gendered is a small problem. Move to a bigger city.

>>822070
I mean gay men are so cute though I think it'd be great if there were a lot more of them like society would be way cuter and thus better.

>>822071
>I mean gay men are so cute though I think it'd be great if there were a lot more of them like society would be way cuter and thus better.
I don't mean to be an asshole (don't get any ideas lol) to you but what if there was an actual cure (oh god the offence lol)? The species is heterosexual and given how ancient anisogamic sex is to life, it's going to take a billion years at least to add homosexuality to the primate family tree because it's older than animals themselves playing the genders. It's not worth it to change the species because of the dirty side-effects so you have to work with the people on this one.

Have your own subculture and recruit the like-minded but leave the heteros alone.

>>822071
>are so cute though
Say no more. Women are cosmically cute so I get you bro, no discrimination. I don't hate you for your orientation and subculture.

>>822148
That's too far. If people were like that then humanity is cooked.

>>821156
my ex-gf kept watching these and using them as evidence of her weirdo separatist views

>>822116
Was she trans?

>>822118
No, just poor

>>821781
>26:21
oh god it's elaborate and speculative rather than just being bad special effects of ned stark shooting lannisters

>>821342
Use pillows

>>821558
>cluster B personalities
The entire reason why no one straight is honest. The flirt is evolutionary.

Now this thread is full

>>822133
Well, >>822117 was the meta answer to and the meaning of sex. Guess the fun is ruined now.

>>821543
based based based

Why is this shit allowed bruh jannies fucking ban these cretins or jsid

>>821859
im an artist from israel and this is my art

>>821859
Agree

>>821852
JE was sexually attracted to ghislaine and ghislaine was a kiddie fucker too
Them bluds straight fuked in they head

>>822027
Nothing you cant change with time unless shes a complete religious lunatic.

>>822089
>Nothing you cant change with time unless shes a complete religious lunatic.
Trvke

lock in.

>>822056
trvke nvke

One day you leftists will learn the church that actually had political power during Lenin's time is not the same as now. Religiousness in of itself is not preventing revolution.

>foid
you need to stop that stupid shit or brainwashed is gonna be the best you can ever do. Besides, foid would literally mean she resembled the letter f and it also sounds like an old school cereal for bowel movements or something. god damn it I hate you all.
>>822105
shut the fuck up

OP is retarded like someone who was kicked in the head by a horse or dropped as a baby
Try to prove me wrong

It kind of is. They just believe in a worldly paradise.

>>822046
Exactly. The fact that it is atheistic doesn't mean it's not religion. See Buddhism for example.
Even Christianity's monotheism is different from Islam's monotheism.

>>822050
>Exactly. The fact that it is atheistic doesn't mean it's not religion. See Buddhism for example.
>Even Christianity's monotheism is different from Islam's monotheism.
It depends on the definition of "religion". For me it's the idea of sacredness.

>>822050
buddhism is not atheistic

>>821939
We are not communists, we are actually for abolishing the capitalist mode of production, there will be no fees, getting hired, or gigafent.

no, it's just conservatism with more bureaucracy

>>821913
How even?

>>821902
Two sides of the same communist coin.

>>821959
>there will be no fees, getting hired, or gigafent.

How so? What kind of mechanism would prevent any of this from happening? Just the hopes and dreams from the people in the community? What if most people in the community aren't committed to the anarchism bit?

The demand for promiscuity is also part of this.

>>822005
>What about rape?
Male sexuality is the original sin

>>822000
It's MY time, so I get to spend it however I like.

>>822007
>The demand for promiscuity is also part of this.
It's the fear of corruption of the male. Promiscuity drives the economy, I'm sure you've seen the innuendo in commercials.

>>822005
Nobody poops

please please PLEEEASE engage with my thread about vehicles having sex, this is so important to meeeeeeeee :C

>>821842 YES THEY CAN!!!!!!
>>821847 THANK YOU!!!!!!!!!!

>>821936
trucks are the ugly bastards of vehicles, so i feel like it would plap the articulated MILF bus and ignore everyone else

>>821936
Sorry bro.

> Which is the top
Train
> Which is the selfish top
High speed train
> Which is the bottom
Subway train
> Which is the power bottom
Subway train
> Which is the dominatrix
High speed train
> Which one sits in the corner watching
bus, articulated bus
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

>top
train
>selfish top
high-speed train, too full of itself
>bottom
bus
>power bottom
subway train
>dominatrix
18 wheel truck
>in the corner watching
articulated bus

>>818496
>I don't get it, but why can't we just say "sexual minorities" instead of "LGBTABCD123+++"?
because asexual and nonbinary people aren't really sexual minorities. if anything they reject being part of sexual categories. and intersex people are actually just biologically rare, but it isn't a sexuality either. And if you just say "sexual minorities" reactionaries get to counter with "ummm pedophiles are sexual minorities are you including them?" and other bad faith arguments… but they were gonna do that anyway.

>>818496
Obvious and simple reason: because people have already standardised on LGBT or variations thereof. the important thing about a standard is that it's a standard, not necessarily that it's the best one.
More complicated reason I explain purely because I find it interesting: As a general rule people don't like to say "sex" if they can avoid it.
(hence the general drift from "sex" to "gender" even independent of rising awareness of transgenderism, and the shift from "transsexual" to "transgender", and of course "gay/lesbian/LGBT" beating "homosexual/homosexuality", though in that case aided by the alternatives also being shorter and snappier.)
You could fix that by making an acronym, but SM is too close to S&M and any other set of words you grab will run into problem one: we already have a standard acronym.

As to the point of the other post: French terms generally sound posh in English, while Germanic ones sound common. If we're going to penalise words for sounding "bourgeois", lots of French-derived terms (including "bourgeois" itself) will have to be "out-rooted".

>>818502
The point of pride is surely to emphasise that something isn't shameful when there's an underlying presupposition that it is. e.g. if someone is in the closet out of shame, it's useful to see other people with functioning lives go "not only am I gay, not only am I not ashamed of being gay, I'm proud of being gay". The pride is more stated and signalled than necessarily felt.
(In a more progressive society where that's as silly as Victorian prudishness, it'd just be something of an artefact title.)

>>818503
Did I not express myself clearly? "Sexual" also refers to SEX (gender). How can an interSEX be excluded from that term?
>And if you just say "sexual minorities" reactionaries get to counter with "ummm pedophiles are sexual minorities are you including them?"
To begin with, I don't understand why you want to include people with libido issues (asexuals) in the category of sexual minorities, even if the roots are the same. I’m not a moralfag, but I don't think paraphilias (aka fetishes aka kinks) belong under the umbrella of sexual minorities.

>>818507
Your mind should be put in a jar and studied.

>>818393
>Is it regressive to

everything that people say on this site is regressive. every discussion is armchair intellectuals marching backwards full speed ahead and getting dumber by the second.