[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo / 420 ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/siberia/ - Off-topic

"No chin, no right to speak."
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)
What is 6 - 2?

Check out our new store at shop.leftypol.org!

| Catalog | Home
|

File: 1778356220333-0.png (173.61 KB, 800x1000, SUS BATTALION.png)

File: 1778356220333-1.jpg (57.6 KB, 543x671, azov poljak.jpg)

File: 1778356220333-2.png (477.28 KB, 1280x706, azov symbol.png)

File: 1778356220333-3.jpg (115.02 KB, 578x800, Its OB3R.jpg)

File: 1778356220333-4.jpg (2.81 MB, 990x3560, putin monke hq.jpg)

 

Ukrainian War Meme Dump Thread - a place to dump stupid shitposts and whatnot
67 posts and 183 image replies omitted.

>>783443
I haven't been on leftypol in 2 days >>783050 literally says "nta" in their post, though they summarized most of my points anyway. I won't bother responding to this diatribe for 2 reasons
1) You obviously have an angle and I have neither the time nor the fucks to give what (You) - an internet anon with an internalized American Exceptionalist view of this, thinks about Russia, its role in the war and world politics. I would rather touch grass and live life, as I have been doing.
2) This is a meme shitposting thread as I was quite clear in the title. I made it so as to NOT flood the main board with content of varied levels of quality and worth. You wanna debate Russia in the Ukrainian war seriously? Go to the leftypol ukraine war thread and post your grievances there. I or someone else may answer.
Either way I'm done and have been since before you replied again. You wana count that as a "win" or something go ahead, I don't care, I'm just here to clean my harddrive of worthless media I don't need.

>>783923
>You wana count that as a "win" or something
Okay, done. That's a forfeit.

File: 1779055131385.png (246.35 KB, 500x383, ClipboardImage.png)

>>784141
Good for you.

File: 1779055133217.jpeg (47.24 KB, 452x486, bananaland.jpeg)


File: 1779144305001.jpg (6.7 KB, 300x168, 1662167575002274.jpg)

bump



File: 1778935516770.jpg (123.32 KB, 976x549, _127404299_despejo2.jpg)

 

uyghas be like "go outside" then outside looks like this
34 posts and 7 image replies omitted.

>>784241
I don't think The Greys are bourgeoisies.

>>784241
Raping children seems to make them really happy, idk.

>>784241
Status is relative. Billionaires compare themselves to other billionaires and feel like they are still missing things in life.

They don't mean physically outside, they mean get off twitter and such. Like playing minecraft or decorating the CSS of your website are both "going outside."

>>784271
Does it, or is it mostly the act of doing a "social ritual" ?



 

By the invitation of EQG chads
>no hooves
<War of all against all edition
<Gunpowder Treason Day
King James VI & I movie:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/PPRUFSGdI22n/
595 posts and 1327 image replies omitted.

>>776242
Like it or not, yes, that's what monarchy is.
Some constitutional monarchists will tout that a king does not rule alone—I personally deny that, even if there are assemblies or council… the chief definition of monarchy is one alone rules, and that fundamental law of monarchy is expressed through sovereignty in which form or constitution of a state or republic is defined primarily by one person's majesty or preeminence and some family alone stands out–and if not, then it's another form of state/republic such as a democracy or oligarchy where some other kind of government has the primacy… but we don't accept a mixed constitutional or the concordant notion of political pluralism like Aristotle's. As Hobbes says, the chief difference between the mixed constitutionalist and absolutist view is that rather it isn't the concord of many men, but the union–and the integrity of the republic is its sovereignty as the fundamental law, pertaining to three forms–and while there might be a confluence of members / elements of democracy or aristocracy, the purity of the primary form of state is maintained, be it a monarchy, oligarchy, or democracy, like Bodin defends and traces back to Herodotus (*and denies Plato acknowledged it in the Aristotle or Polybius established mixed constitutionalist ideals). That is the nuance–and while it seems anachronistic, I cannot really take monarchy any other way because mixed constitutionalism dilutes and renders monarchy irrelevant to begin with… so I personally still maintain the opinion of Bodin or Hobbes in the year 2026 tbh. I wouldn't have it any other way, even if it is not very fashionable, lol

I personally do not accept the mixed constitutionalist view when it comes to monarchy for numerous reasons. Like Jean Bodin says it makes a monarch into no more than a mean magistrate and overall tends to favor elective monarchy since it stresses concord and rule by turns/rotational government since monarchy is but one lesser estate among other heads… to have it as one part monarchy, one part oligarchy, one part democracy considers monarchy merely as a mere part in relation to the state and not the majesty or sovereignty of the whole state… like Jean Bodin says the outcome usually is plain democracy like mixing paint together… and I hate t it because then there is no definitive form of state and no pretense to say the state no longer is a monarchy… which is important to me because Mixed constitutionalists just don't care about the 3 forms of the herodotus debate and that particular quality… same I'd say even for Plato who might say in Laws that it's merely the rule of a faction to maintain a particular form of state… but rather appeal to good policy/law or aristocracy/good government in general… but I am not really content with what some traditionalists or integralists or conservatives have in mind with just any vague notion of good government– so like Bodin I'm not for confounding the forms… and I don't take it for the partiality of a faction, but as Hobbes says the civil soul. So I definitely maintain a definite kind of sovereignty as is customary for absolute monarchists and dates back to Herodotus…
Mixed constitutionalism is a declaration of war against all notions of monarchical preeminence and majesty to me.
That is all I have to say there and why I am the way I am.

The general policy I have in mind is particularly like I outlined with Corgism, lol, a cult of personality–with the customs of absolute monarchists–I can't vibe with esotericists/metaphysicians/integralists/mixed constitutionalists because they aspire to just any vague idea of good government/aristocracy, what I have in mind is a unique form of familialism/cult of personality, very specific, and it feels droll/lifeless to me to not stress this quality.

We need a new thread.

File: 1779127777916.png (215.24 KB, 720x1066, grace pancakes 3.png)

REQUEST
Will janitors archive this thread for me at siberia archive?



 

⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄
⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄
⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠤⠤⠤⠄⣀⠄⠄⠄⠱⡄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄
⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠈⠁⠂⢄⢘⡾⠤⠐⠒⠒⠄⠄⠄⠄⠐⠒⠠⢀⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄
⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⢀⠄⠂⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠐⢄⠄⠐⠁⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄
⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⢀⠄⠈⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠙⠝⣶⣄⠄⠄⠈⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄
⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⢀⠄⠈⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠤⠶⠶⠦⣼⣿⠃⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄
⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⡠⠂⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠒⠒⠁⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠁⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄
⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⡠⠂⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⡀⠠⠄⠒⠒⠒⠏⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄
⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⢀⠞⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⡀⠄⠂⠁⠄⠄⠄⠄⢀⠂⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠈⢀⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄
⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⣠⠃⢀⡴⠃⠄⠄⠄⠄⢀⡠⠂⠁⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⣀⡀⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠂⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠁⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄
⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⢀⡼⢁⠔⠁⠄⠄⠄⠄⠠⠚⠁⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠈⠉⠻⢦⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠈⠄⢀⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⢄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⡄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄
⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⢀⣾⡷⠃⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠁⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠑⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠑⢄⣀⡐⠄⢶⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄
⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⢀⣾⡿⠁⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⢀⠄⠄⠄⠄⠈⠢⡀⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⢀⠄⠰⣝⢷⣀⡘⣃⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄
⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⣾⣿⠇⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⡆⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⢀⠄⠈⠪⡄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⢂⠄⠹⣯⡿⣿⣿⡄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
538 posts and 515 image replies omitted.

File: 1778962741956.jpeg (524.35 KB, 1034x1530, HHEN1P1aEAAJ33X.jpeg)


cat
I'm a kitty cat
and I meow meow meow
and I meow meow meow


File: 1779088121822.jpeg (186.28 KB, 1280x1746, HHGW_KxaEAAFL0G.jpeg)


File: 1779122082280.jpeg (1018.01 KB, 1536x2048, HHI3OJGbEAASGXL.jpeg)




File: 1779103805284-0.png (314.1 KB, 681x440, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1779103805284-1.png (138.71 KB, 1517x469, ClipboardImage.png)

 

I want Irma Grese to spank and belittle me for being a dirty red.
9 posts and 3 image replies omitted.

File: 1779109232269.jpg (18.67 KB, 680x383, chad coffin.jpg)

>>784254
I take the gaz chamber

>>784253
>Eastern lastname.
In my experience, dutch woman are the most manly looking. Estonian women are among the most feminine of the barbarian tribes.

>>784254
I'll fist her. Don't care. Dirty Sanchez, redwings. I'll do it all.

My dick doesn't have an ideology. However my brain does and blasting a kid in the womb of a political enemy is so fucking hot.

hatefuck would be legendary
imagine, the cold nights, the hunger with which you devour her forbidden fruit
she kicking you with the boots and whip she carried everywhere
your cuckquean jewish waifu watching in disbelief
that last look before she chops your dick off and shoots you dead



File: 1776775618199-0.webm (1.45 MB, 1920x1080, denji run.webm)

File: 1776775618199-1.webm (2.56 MB, 540x405, aisha fight.webm)

 

Does anyone else feel like there's been a noticeable reduction in overall media quality over the years, and especially in recent years?
58 posts and 11 image replies omitted.

>>784075
>Fantasy peaked with Tolkien, because Tolkien didn't intend to create a genre, but simply to create a mythology for the anglo-saxons
You're acting like there aren't legions of well-off writers, that publish their own sprawling worldbuilding materials.

>most of the next fantasy writers haven't even read Beowulf, the Odyssey or the Illiad, without any reading, no great story can be written.

If these works were what specifically lead to the creation of Tolkien's books and others, that are revered by their respective genres, the things that were compelling about their ancient predecessors should still be found within them. There is nothing to suggest understanding the works of Tolkien couldn't lead to someone writing fiction of equal quality, except some misguided notion of historical or societal purity.

>muh talent

Like any creative work, a book is often not well received particularly for the authors writing skills or sometimes even in spite of them, for example it is widely agreed that Isaac Asimov's prose is relatively lackluster. The variation in craft also makes it hard to pinpoint what "good writing" exactly means, except by superficial metrics like vocabulary or on an argumentative case-by-case basis.

I think your view of the past is biased through curation, not only the fact only the most highly regarded of past works are preserved, also the incessant splintering of literature into micro-genres ( compare "magical realism" > sth-"punk" > "mechsploitation"; ao3 trends are now genres). It is genuinely hard to find the worthwhile stuff, not only because genre authors are incentivized to optimize for output. Yet in almost every genre, there is something compelling, which makes people think, and for each piece of low-quality dreg, there is a better book it draws from and may be a better book inspired by it in the future.

>>784085
>You're acting like there aren't legions of well-off writers, that publish their own sprawling worldbuilding materials.
Tolkien didn't write "worldbuilding materials" he wrote a mythology, it's a very different, there is no spiritual or religious meaning in worldbuilding, unlike in what Tolkien wrote.
>If these works were what specifically lead to the creation of Tolkien's books and others, that are revered by their respective genres, the things that were compelling about their ancient predecessors should still be found within them.
Tolkien took some things from traditional texts and gave up others, you can't recreate the ancient texts from Tolkien's Fantasy as a genre is a attempt to recreate myths for the modern day, how can one do this if they haven't read the ancient ones ? At the Very least the Homeric ones.

>Like any creative work, a book is often not well received particularly for the authors writing skills or sometimes even in spite of them, for example it is widely agreed that Isaac Asimov's prose is relatively lackluster.

Asimov, had some litteraraty value despite his prose. I don't think we can say the same for most writers nowadays.

>The variation in craft also makes it hard to pinpoint what "good writing" exactly means, except by superficial metrics like vocabulary or on an argumentative case-by-case basis.

Sure, but you can have a general sense of it, to take the lowest of the dredge, I don't think ai writing is any good for exemple. Formulaic sloppy writing like the ones most popular nowadays is similar.

>I think your view of the past is biased through curation, not only the fact only the most highly regarded of past works are preserved, also the incessant splintering of literature into micro-genres ( compare "magical realism" > sth-"punk" > "mechsploitation"; ao3 trends are now genres). It is genuinely hard to find the worthwhile stuff, not only because genre authors are incentivized to optimize for output. Yet in almost every genre, there is something compelling, which makes people think, and for each piece of low-quality dreg, there is a better book it draws from and may be a better book inspired by it in the future.

My point mPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>784090
>Wheras in the XIXth century, the most popular pieces of litterature were still fairly good, the Count of Monte Cristo is once again a great exemple, it was read by fairly poor people and it's a genuinly great work of art that is incredibly better then anything published nowadays.
If poor people did read as much as you're suggesting, i agree somewhat. However i do still think you're overestimating the quality of 19th century literature. For one, what might be challenging to a reader of the modern age might have seemed far more leisurely to contemporaries, who had direct access to most of the linguistic and cultural context. Consider also the literature of the romantic movement, which was highly philosophical and artfully written, yet vapid and substanceless so much so, that Hegel hated it with a passion (and i do as well). I recognize the value that older works have in impact alone, yet i maintain most of our attention should be directed towards contemporary authors, since their curation remains a pending task.

File: 1779090259262.png (1.04 MB, 1049x599, dragonlance1.png)

>>784065
>>784074
>LitRPG
This one really gets to me.

Firstly, I feel like fantasy lives or dies on the authenticity of its world and you're deliberately going for fucking video game bullshit.

Secondly, there actually have been novel series based around a group of friends sitting down and playing an RPG together. It's just that they tried to take their RPG experience and translate it into something that feels like an authentic fantasy world.

>>784217
Well the second level of fantasy worldbuilding is the "cram everything I remotely like in"



 

b r a v o x i
r
a
v
o



x
i

1:47 lol

the firewall was not just to keep google and Five eyes out of china, it was to save the west and keep the chinese internet contained



 

I believe in the potential of humanity. I believe in the human ability of compassion and cooperation. We are still essentially in the dark ages, human civilization is only around 12,000 years old. There has been unprecedented rapid technological development in the past 200 years and it takes time as a species to adjust to all of this. Humanity is going through growing pains as things balance out and the fact is that our species is going to live on for thousands of years more and longer. I fully believe that while our current civilization is decaying and receding and war in the near future with societal decay is inevitable, the society that humans have in the far future will seem utopian compared to our standards now. We have the ability to create a fair and just world, societal systems develop as well as technology does. While the current system is unfair and easy to slip through the cracks, its a first step into the whitepill world of tomorrow. I believe, anons. Humanity is going to make it.
36 posts and 11 image replies omitted.

File: 1779059053754.png (397.67 KB, 1175x839, ClipboardImage.png)

Everything is connected
The universe as a whole is alive, and intelligent

>>784157
proof???

>>784157
All paths lead to the grave.

>>784158
Engels (pbuh) said so

>>779385
Reincarnation is real; just not in the way Buddhists or Hindus put forward. It is real on a secular, materialist level. If an arbitrary subset of the universe’s matter can fall into a configuration allowing for a self-aware feedback loop known as consciousness (this configuration is usually a brain, in our experience), and this self-aware feedback loop continues until death, then that means the very same arbitrary subset of matter can fall into that configuration again. However it is difficult to keep track of that arbitrary subset of matter once it disperses and recycles through the environment after its conscious configuration decays (“dies”). Furthermore, each “atom” is not indivisible, but is made of subatomic particles, which themselves have differentiated components, some discovered, some still undiscovered.

The specifics of our universe are not so important. Leave that to the physicists. What’s important for the purposes of this discussion is that matter has a dual nature. Any given material can be described both as distinct (specific, particular) entities which are the sum of their constituent parts and non-distinct (vague, non-particular) entities which are mere fluctuations in a field. This shows that everything which can be described according to its observable physical characteristics and constituent components is subject to the “Ship of Theseus” paradox. I will not describe that paradox because most are familiar with it. It is widely discussed. Moving on: If a brain decays and dies, its component material disperses into the environment. But eventually, on a long-enough time line, a brain made of the same material could re-emerge as a new conscious configuration. However, none of the “memories” of the “past life” would be in-tact. Moreover, there is no metaphysical “karma” system in place. It is entirely random and chance-based. This is quite frightening, because it means that “you” could “come back” as someone with a much more miserable and painful life than you, and there would be nothing “you” could do in this life to prevent this from happening to “you.” This is all very dissatisfying, but there you have it. Secular reincarnation.

The possibility of becoming conscious again in the future, as a different creature, in a different life, puts forward a strong individualist argument in favor of instituting some kind of coPost too long. Click here to view the full text.



 

Since like late 2024 I have had a tradition where every Friday I read Alternate History, the next Friday I read insane Conspiracy Theories, and the last Friday I read the Wikipedia Unusual Articles list. This has changed a few times and has now been finalized to Althists on Friday, Conspiracy Theories on Saturday, and Unusual Articles on Sunday. However, soon, me and my family will go to a wedding in Bharat, (India) and I want to complete this before that, the trip is in a few weeks. I've already completed this tradition, but I am unsure if I should do 1 more before the final one.

>>784077
anon, shut the fuck up. I say that with the utmost kindness and respect, alright? just shut the fuck up. you didn't need to create a thread just to ask this question, there is a "whatever" thread that would've done just fine. the fact is that nobody cares what you do, and you even asking is an attempt at putting yourself in the spotlight like you're some main fucking character whose concerns should trouble the rest of the fourmgoers here.

>>784127
get a grip. you being mad isn't important either
>>784077
hell yea brother. do it one more time.



File: 1779069997511.png (146.64 KB, 249x347, ClipboardImage.png)

 

Chud the Builder. Maybe you've heard of him. Here we have a man who has built his entire platform off of performing some of the most antisocial behavior possible. A man who is truly antithetical to the type of masculinity we promote here at HOUDINI Magazine.

At HOUDINI Magazine, we promote a masculinity that's about uplifting people, seeing people better than they are, being a pillar of your community, pro-social behavior. It's counterintuitive to this sort of grifter, right-wing, hustle-bro mentality that has been propagandized to the point where we now have men like this who build their entire platform off of hate.

The right will protect this man, and they will fund this man, and they will say they protect him because they value free speech. As we know, if you follow me, the right wing's hypocrisy about free speech has already been exposed. Otherwise I would not be facing fifteen years in a Florida penitentiary for criticizing a right-wing influencer.

So how did Chud the Builder build his platform, you might be wondering. What does he do? Does he do on-the-street interviews? Is he one of those speed runners? Does he play video games? That's what streaming was originally all about, so maybe that's what he does. No. He builds his platform off of agitation and antisocial behavior.

Tennessee is an open carry state, so he open carries. That's his right in this country. Then he goes around, finds Black people, and calls them slurs for the camera. Imagine you are with your family, your child, your wife, your children, going about your day. You stop into a corner store or gas station to get a drink for you and your kids, get a bug juice for the kiddo. And here we have this streamer who's being paid handsomely by his right-wing sycophants, and he walks up to you and calls you the N-word straight to your face, right in front of your children. But if you say anything back, then you're against his free speech.

Is this the type of behavior we want in our society? Do we, the people, really want a man who believes this is the example to set for his own children? Make no mistake: you may have bought a small pittance for your children, but you haven't secured their future.

Your child is what? And I'm addressing you directly, Mr. Chud. Your child is what? Four? Six? Based on her pictures? Do you think she's going to grow up and look to her father as someone of honor, of courage, of heart, as someone who made the world Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

there are 3 threads about those racist loser right now. are you people TRYING to boost his clout?

>>784182
I really dislike this performative scolding leftist content creators tend to do for some reason. These people don't think in these terms. He thinks he's a real tough man who stood up for the white race and millions agree, apparently. Other people are trying to scold elon musk or others like he doesn't think everyone else is cattle. These people just don't live in the same world as you.
Your point about putting family first would also apply to parents who went to a protest and got a criminal record because of it.

Houdini at 1 million? man i remember Houdini at 10,000



Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo / 420 ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]
[ 1 /2 /3 /4 /5 /6 /7 /8 /9 /10 /11 /12 /13 /14 /15 /16 /17 /18 /19 /20 /21 /22 /23 /24 /25 /26 /27 /28 /29 /30 /31 /32 /33 /34 /35 /36 ]
| Catalog | Home