/siberia/ - Off-topic

>>784492
Wow. Look how the destructive memeber of a death cult mooks the ststrnent of a memeber whi was victim to a collectivist antihuman leftist cult. His/her narcissist hubristic drives it to mock the victim with heavy metal.

>>784487
sounds like an idiot, must be he deserved it. what kind of moron argues in good faith (period) about politics, at their workplace of all locations, probably surrounded by idiotic reactionary monkeys who watch car crash videos in the break room, unless they are are prepared to win decisively and take no prisoners? how does the old saying go, don't argue with an idiot…? i guess it must be nice to be able to talk politics with everyone and never have any serious implications arise from it. maybe you have no business in politics? sounds like they warned this fat retard and his gamer headphones not to get swayed by nazi-lite amerikkkan retards at his workplace and he automatically equates that to "cult". imagine if someone told you, yo, that man over there is a serial rapist, don't talk to him or nobody will want to be around you. and you go talk to him and go sit and have lunch with him and be buddies and say, wow this rapist is a nice person actually! he's so nice to my face, must be this cult doesn't want me talking to him. why the fuck would anyone want to talk to you or treat you respectfully if you wanna hang out with the rapist even tho people told you? its not that much different applied to other situations with scumbag groups of people. idk the details but this guy sounds like a fucking retard. yeah bro, im sure people are real nice to your face because you're a dumbass that agrees with everything anyone says.

Actual Nazism is dead and modern nazism has evolved to be just a general white supremacist ideology

People are stupid so they fall for fascism easily. /pol/ is full of low autism scores who would be the first victims of their own eugenics programs

actual existing nazism is in israel and the american evangelical death cults

>>784582
Idk the American rules specifically, but in most countries reservists are usually only deployed with specific authorization from the legislature (unless they volunteer). The military leadership can't choose to simply activate them for an involuntary deployment without this authorization.
>During peak GWOT times they were nearly half of the entire US force in the region
That's to be expected during a major war though, hence the importance of joining during peacetime.

>>784582
>US military training wouldn't directly translate into being a guerilla fighter or whatever
A lot of military training is generally applicable to any kind of fighting. But even discounting that, most NATO armies still train in counterinsurgency, which is obviously something that's important to have knowledge of if you want to wage a successful insurgency.

>>784584
>That's to be expected during a major war though, hence the importance of joining during peacetime.
That example was meant to be illustrative. My point is that the National Guard deploys a lot. At a minimum, outside of current events that lead to sporadic deployments, units are on multiyear rotation cycles with their assigned partner countries. It's entirely possible that a guardsmen during peacetime could end up on an involuntary austere deployment somewhere that is definitely not their home state.

>>784585

>A lot of military training is generally applicable to any kind of fighting

It's quite a commitment for what wouldn't be broadly applicable information. But I think it's better than relying on private militias.

>>784586
I'd say the mere fact of the US as the world policeman of imperialism should really make anybody think twice about joining tbh. It really does change the ball game if you're there versus a minor NATO member or something. Additionally there's already an established tradition of anti-imperialist veterans in America, which would probably serve as a better basis for a militarized socialist movement than joining yourself.

No, that just fuels the imperialism machine (unless you're fighting for the communist regime or challenging the rightist authority)

It’s nice to know that even the bourgeois are not immune to drug addiction

>>784491
Thehrethe biggest victims

>>784503
it must suck being rich so much

>>784368
Yeah he will probably get off tbh, don't get excited waiting for a guilty verdict

>>784106
>>784145
Crazy how not a single rightoid has a good and healthy relationship with their wife and/or children.

>>784318
>his only option is to go peckerwood or get shit on.
we're talking about a guy who is basically the modern equivalent of a proud klansman so that is no problem for him.

>>784556
because the family is a property relation. even if you are a communist with children like marx and ultimately believe in the abolition of the family, you will fall victim to its inherent nature as a property relation. that being said you are correct, chuds are are often totally uncritical of class society or its internal structures, so they reproduce the worst aspects of those structures when operating within them.

t. a communist and a father

>>784556
It's more of an influencer/attention whore thing than a rightoid thing if we want to be fair

>>784456
youre acting like nurture is the only factor that determines someones personality. my point is thst even under the best conditions you'll still have shitty people, even if theyre a tiny minority

>>784437
This is a common assumption that people mae about these freaks. That they're dirty hermits with no social lives

>>784447
Just look up mass shootings in the ussr its not secret knowledge

There's barely any fascist anymore though

>>784512

1. Due to epigenetics, nature will still vary in expression due to environment, even over the course of a life.
   
2. We haven't reached the point in optimizing nurture where nature would even matter. We have no idea what genes would even be advantageous in optimal nurture conditions.
   
   

Fascists turn to eugenic pseudoscience as a cope so they can insist that nurture worth dealing with and that they can just optimize nature instead. (kill people randomly and install a surveylance state)

>>784400
Okayyyy i'll bite show me this totally common take about how men playing as men in video game make them masculinists.

>>784374
I made it up (did you see what I'm replaying to ? I just wanted to do a "you can't win regardless of what you do" routine)
>>784373
People would still make a white human male lol
>>784376
I don't use twitter but I see it still lives rent free in your head digital-grass anon

>>784432
Nta but I made the old digital grass touching thread and I'm surprised the term caught on.

>>784548
>Chud if he real
I could just look in there mirror.

>>784508
Sweet, another trap questions thread
1.59 seconds
2.one of them pay with a 15 plastic chip for all of them?
3.at least 125 pages, at most 648 pages
4.cut down in half 3 times in a row by having the pan match each time, pick 3 groups of the remaining 3 pounds stack
5.71 days, dismissing the last night.
6.monday, the first friday is on the 3th
7.if the table itself is not considered a box, and we don't have to count all the squares made by groups of smaller square, I think it's around 1011 squares (using pythagoras theorem), i you do have to count all those instances, I have no idea how you calculate that sorry
8.delete the first two sets of 1234,then the next 12.
9.yes, assuming he is born the last day of december and we are january 1st.
10.if the premise is correct, yes, on the other hand, cats should not posses weather predictive capacities.
11.I don't get it.
12.the professor is a woman and her husband is talking with her dad ?
13.don't know
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>784546
Sorry, I did not mean to insult anyone with these questions, I just wanted others to have fun solving them too….

Most of your answers are correct, I would like to hear your reasoning for questions 3, 6, 15
Some hints for you:
*2 is partialy correct, think about how they would pay her back.*
*instead of thinking about pythagoras for 7, think in terms of rows and columns.*
*for 10, which event causes which? the sneeze the rain or the rain the sneeze?*
*14: not necessary, think about what if only 2 were soiled?*
*15: you put equal amounts of milk into tea and vice versa, so…?*

No, don't care about 🦶
Mine are also fycked up

One time I had a fling with a guy who had a claw growing out of the top of his foot. I just pretended it wasn't there.

The beauty of lust is that it gives you high tolerance for physiognomic flaws

Pretty feet are non-negotiable

If they are 6/10 with feet like that, I assume the rest of their body must be angelic otherwise the maths doesn't add up.

>>783675
Do you have any evidence for the last point? I know it was repeated by lolbergs and contards trying to claim Orwell for themselves despite him being a Dems of, as well as that charlatan of Logo_Daedalus to sound clever, but he never substantiated it. If anything, it seems Orwell opposed to any reading on 1984 as being about the British empire at all: https://jacobin.com/2023/03/orwell-hayek-nineteen-eighty-four-totalitarianism-capitalism-socialism

In a letter to Francis A Henson, Orwell writes: https://lesamisdebartleby.wordpress.com/2020/11/13/george-orwell-lettre-a-francis-a-henson/

> The purpose of my latest novel is not to attack socialism or the British Labour Party (which I support), but to denounce the risks of a centralized economy and of which communism and fascism have already partly set an example. I don't believe that the type of society I describe must necessarily happen, but I believe (taking into account, of course, the fact that this book is a satire) that something similar could happen. I also believe that totalitarian ideas have penetrated the mentality of intellectuals everywhere, and I wanted to push these ideas to their logical consequences. I placed this book in Great Britain to show that English-speaking peoples are not by nature better than others, and that totalitarianism, if not fought, can triumph anywhere.

It's trotsky sympathist propaganda

>>783644
It's vegetarian propaganda according to Orwell himself

>However, the actual details of the story did not come to me for some time until one day (I was then living in a small village) I saw a little boy, perhaps ten years old, driving a huge cart-horse along a narrow path, whipping it whenever it tried to turn. It struck me that if only such animals became aware of their strength we should have no power over them, and that men exploit animals in much the same way as the rich exploit the proletariat.

>I proceeded to analyse Marx's theory from the animals’ point of view. To them it was dear that the concept of a class struggle between humans was pure illusion, since whenever it was necessary to exploit animals, all humans united against them: the true struggle is between animals and humans.
https://www.marxists.org/archive/orwell/1947/kolghosp-tvaryn.htm

No, it's Trot propaganda

Whatever George actually intended the book to be a critique of is meaningless, it has only ever been used as liberal propaganda therefore it is liberal propaganda