>>821317Do you mean what actions define them as a radlib, or what about them draws them to radlibbery?
In the latter case: it is a matter of disposition, and fundamentally they share the same disposition as communists, at least directionally. That is: high openness, high agreeableness. You can see this empirically in the drift of most "woke idpol" types into at least
claiming to be communists.
The details are, basically, just a function of how that disposition interacts with a given community. This is why generally speaking you'd do better to have put your money on SJWs in 2015 than on 4channers, even nominally leftish ones. Their underlying disposition all but guarantees they're pulled left, while the underlying disposition of 4channers is inclined to antisocial behaviour, and the right are the biggest purveyors of that around.
>>821599LARPing online is a human universal nowadays, you may as well define a radlib as a featherless biped.
>>821606In a sense it's the opposite. There's a tension in /leftypol/ between a neurotic, anti-social element to the userbase, and the inherently pro-social instincts of leftists and liberals. The result is trying to find some kind of golden mean where we're better than those radlibs (who do performative lifestyle acts like voting or reading woke webcomics) because we do performative lifestyle inactions like
not voting, or
not reading woke media, or being clever theory knowers who know that the only ethical thing to do is sit around masturbating until the vanguard cums.