/siberia/ - Off-topic

leftypol moderators are so bad at spotting psyops and raids its actually insane, theres 1 poster who always spams incel threads under tor ip, 1 poster who always spams pro pedophilia threads, 1 poster who always spams racebait, and now you have sharty spammers spreading /pol/ talking points with leftcom flags while janny does nothing
this website is the clearest example of how online communities go to shit when theres no moderation, i remember thinking it couldnt get any worse after the site was flooded with russoid nationalists after the ukraine war, but honestly i miss 2020 leftypol, it was heaven compared to this shithole

Since the old one was deleted. Remember to spoiler pics.

Obviously we don’t want Chuds to shoot up schools but we also don’t want the government to take away our guns and oppress us. I think that the solution is healthcare and better living conditions because then the Chuds who do mass shootings would not be Chuds and therefore don’t do mass shootings.

Why are Stalinists like this?

Russia VS NATO | 1v7 against Gunther-Fehlinger in TFR LIVE RIGHT NOW:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wCU2WFkurtA

Gunther's stream:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0SipHIVW85Q

White child cohabitation should be legalised, otherwise how will white girls learn to respect white men at an early age? Heterosexual relationships are inherently unequal regardless of age. And that's ok as it conforms with the natural world. The importance is to seek harmony in the different natures between males and females. Females, regardless of age, are naturally submissive and cater to men, while men need to show strength, providance and dominance over their females to have the relationship be complementary. Thus, to foster respect for men, child cohabitation between pubescent white women and older white men has to be legalised so that white girls can later on foster their docility and submission for their white husbands.

This monoracial and heterosexual harmony between child and adult, female and male, promotes a good deal of spiritual peace that is currently under threat by modern secularism. One example would be Germanic countries like the Netherlands and Germany, where equality and greater freedom for youth has resulted in higher birth rates. So legalising white child cohabitation between pubescent white women and adult white men will prove societal ties further, especially if it's the parents that make up the arrangement, thus white child cohabitation will benefit white society. It should also be noted that zero evidence exists to support the notion that intergenerational intimacy is inherently harmful, so the idea that legalising child cohabitation will result in another holocaust is very immoral and unfounded, as it goes against the harmonisation of the white race and its spirituality, rooted in nature.

Matter of fact, evidence suggests that the trauma is more from the societal stigma attached to it thanks to radfems that hate men and don't want girls to respect men. After all, Ancient Greece and Ancient Rome had intergenerational relationships legal (see average age of senators' wives in Rome, and pederasty in Greece and average age of marriage there) and both the Rind report of 1998 and the Finnish victimisation survey have put the CSA dogma into question.

White child cohabitation will not only foster respect for men among white girls, but also nurture their natural tendencies to submit and remain docile to older white men as the latter loves and supports them, causing harmonisation in the white race. It will also boost white birth rates against the tide of colour against white supremacy, which will benefit thePost too long. Click here to view the full text.(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)

>quietly debunks decades of genpol propaganda
nothing personnel kid

Legalizing child love tourism and love tourism in general across Thailand and the Philippines could bring various economic benefits. One possible effect would be increased foreign investment, as more visitors (both international and domestic) would travel to these countries specifically for romantic purposes. With greater demand comes higher revenues from hospitality industries like hotels, restaurants, and transportation services. Moreover, the construction sector may experience growth through building more accommodations and leisure facilities catered towards these tourists.

Additionally, local economies would benefit from the influx of money spent by visiting couples. They may purchase souvenirs, attend events, participate in activities, and explore tourist attractions. These spending habits can lead to job creation, boosting employment rates and stimulating economic activity overall. Furthermore, some parents might allow their children to work as service providers in areas frequented by foreigners seeking intimate experiences, further increasing employment options and income sources.

Another aspect to consider is the possibility of governments establishing special programs or initiatives designed to promote tourism around romance. Such efforts might include advertising campaigns, creating specific infrastructure tailored toward romantic getaways, and encouraging partnerships between tour operators and accommodation providers. These measures aim to capitalize on the trend and attract more tourists interested in love tourism.

Lastly, legalization might result in better regulation of such establishments. This could ensure safety standards are met, prevent human trafficking, and protect vulnerable individuals involved in the industry. Governments could impose taxes on businesses related to the industry, raising government revenue without compromising personal liberties. However, it remains essential to strike a balance between enabling economic development and safeguarding individual rights.

Ultimately, whether these economic impacts outweigh the potential risks associated with legalizing child love tourism depends largely on how effectively authorities manage the situation. Clear guidelines, thorough enforcement, transparency, accountability, and strong legislative frameworks will all play crucial roles in mitigating negative outcomes. If managed appropriately, economic benefits might become significant enough to siPost too long. Click here to view the full text.(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)

Just think about it for a moment
>viewed as a normative form of attraction throughout history before feminism; boys are pretty and lack adult male features which are repellent, therefore it isn't gay, and is perfectly masculine behaviour
>it isn't gay from the boy's perspective, because they have a higher sex drive and are more prone to sexual experimentation
>celebrated as a superlative form of relationship by the Greeks; considered instrumental in the healthy development of boys personalities
>creates strong, masculine bonds between males which can not be broken; see the Sacred Band of Thebes
>devalues women by providing an alternative to the roastie paradigm, invalidating their holes, which weakens women's pernicious influence on society
>the theory that it causes psychological harm to the younger participant is debunked pseudoscience (read Rind et al. and Newgon); negative effects primarily occur due to harsh cultural opposition to the practice, resulting in unnecessary criminal and psychiatric proceedings
>most harsh opposition traditionally comes from judaism (via Christianity) and feminism; virtually all pre-Christian European societies partook in the practice of pederasty
>allows boys to socialize with adults and connect with the adult world in an intimate way
>provides men with a powerful incentive to direct attention towards younger generations
>Goethe, Schopenhauer, and Voltaire all said it was natural

Well? Why are jews and feminists so staunchly opposed to the love which dare not speak its name?(user already banned)

This shit goes hard, post cool ass communist edits