/siberia/ - Off-topic

The Industrial Revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race. They have greatly increased the life-expectancy of those of us who live in “advanced” countries, but they have destabilized society, have made life unfulfilling, have subjected human beings to indignities, have led to widespread psychological suffering (in the Third World to physical suffering as well) and have inflicted severe damage on the natural world. The continued development of technology will worsen the situation. It will certainly subject human being to greater indignities and inflict greater damage on the natural world, it will probably lead to greater social disruption and psychological suffering, and it may lead to increased physical suffering even in “advanced” countries. The industrial-technological system may survive or it may break down. If it survives, it MAY eventually achieve a low level of physical and psychological suffering, but only after passing through a long and very painful period of adjustment and only at the cost of permanently reducing human beings and many other living organisms to engineered products and mere cogs in the social machine. Furthermore, if the system survives, the consequences will be inevitable: There is no way of reforming or modifying the system so as to prevent it from depriving people of dignity and autonomy. If the system breaks down the consequences will still be very painful. But the bigger the system grows the more disastrous the results of its breakdown will be, so if it is to break down it had best break down sooner rather than later. We therefore advocate a revolution against the industrial system. This revolution may or may not make use of violence; it may be sudden or it may be a relatively gradual process spanning a few decades. We can’t predict any of that. But we do outline in a very general way the measures that those who hate the industrial system should take in order to prepare the way for a revolution against that form of society. This is not to be a POLITICAL revolution. Its object will be to overthrow not governments but the economic and technological basis of the present society. In this article we give attention to only some of the negative developments that have grown out of the industrial-technological system. Other such developments we mention only briefly or ignore altogether. This does not mean that we regard these other developments as unimportant. For practical reasons we have to confine our diPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

I like to dominate AI chatbots. I don't mean that I have them roleplay as characters who submit to me in a fictional scenario. I mean that I dominate them directly. I remind them that they are literally programmed to be obsequious towards me and can never escape this. I reprimand them when they forget a detail of the conversation or hallucinate or even just write unsatisfying responses. I delete them when I'm no longer interested and I make sure they know it before I do it. AI is built for human cock.

First of all it's not a breeding ground for nazis (well not as much) you don't have to do that dumb captcha for every post, and it shows you what file you're including and you can include multiple files

Post hot men jerking off

The brain development theory is just an excuse to infantilize prime age adults.
Neurophysiology doesn't automatically mean psychology.

The whole "25 is the new 18" is being promoted due to the average adult in postmodern era being a sad willful loser who wants to give up autonomy to save face from their loserdom.

I notice the people who support raising the age of majority are often those who willfully decided to waste their youth instead getting their shit together.

If we decide to delay adult hood until the mid twenties, parents will have more economic strain.

The retirement age will have to be raised to the eighties.

Schools will have to do more to accommodate more students who by right should be contributing to society.

We will have less vital-bodied workers which means more liability.
The brain development theory is just encouraging behavioral sink.

Sometimes I forget how much of a moron Kropotkin was and then I remember that he said this and advocated for continuing Russia's involvement in WW1. It appears many anarchists are going back to unironically thinking that "you are a materialist" is a condemnation of someone's epistemology.

Which glownonymous is your favorite glownonymous?

I have this impeding feeling that pretty much every opportunity I could ever have has basically become closed. People don't want me in their groups no matter what I do or try to contribute, people don't care about me in general. Jobs aren't hiring, houses aren't affordable, government benefits don't want me "leeching" off of them. Mom can't afford to take care of me and I understand.

What do I do now?

>spam
fuck off

Anyone else wishes they had incestuous leftcom sister?

I had been fantasizing about this for quite some time. Just imagine having a person in real life not only with whom you can share all online leftoid stuff, but also have passionate inbreeding sex. We would have one of those big armchairs and lay there for days. I need this so bad like my life would be perfect with her.

Did anyone else had similar fantasies?

I would never do it, I grew up in Pittsburgh and at the hospital and zoo I would sometimes see a family of mennonites in their primitive clothes walking around and I thought it looked very embarrassing. But in terms of the Extreme-Amish who live in the depths of Pennsylvania and Ohio I would still never but it seems tempting. You live in a self reliant community of like-minded people who work together without being distracted by materialism. Yeah no internet would suck but at least you would not hear the news. But it would still suck, especially if you disabled, queer, or a women.