/siberia/ - Off-topic

>>826911
256 words is a wall of text?

>>826911
USSR bought time to move factories. They weren't simply trying to appease the third reich.

China's (liberal) response to Trump (fascist) should be nuking Portland and Milwaukee

>>826914
porland is like the opposite side of the country as washington DC and pretty left leaning as far as american cities go

>>826917
We don't care about fascist ideology and their weirdo internal ideological divisions
Just pick two random cities who cares

>>823142
before it was oh soviets were always behind now it is lend lease was super important

>>822433
>Aliens.
why are you even posting here? we all know hitler was the one that broke the pact to fight a retarded war on 2 fronts but you want to hoi4 larp

>>823134
>the USSR's reliance on Lend-Lease ignores that Lend-Lease aid was qualitative
Absolute codswallop proven by the fact that on paper the Tiger and Panther tanks were "better quality" than the T-34-76. This means nothing IRL because the German production was gummed up by overcomplicated tech being rushed into service with teething issues rather than focusing on mass production. The USSR had a T-34M in 1940 but put it aside because it would delay production when tanks were critically needed, instead incrementally integrating improvements.
> fill in gaps in key areas.
It did not as I pointed out. The totality of Lend-Lease food production wouldn't feed a division for a week, let alone the whole country. This is even more laughable because the majority of Lend Lease came at the end of 1943 and only actually got into use in 1944 onward, by which point Germany had lost several major battles of a scale the USA never fought during the war. D-Day, the Normandy offensive and Battle of the Bulge were some of the largest land battles the Western Allies fought in the war, yet would be considered a large skirmish on the Eastern front.
> Without
Conjecture. It is more than evident that the Germans would have lost from the outset. The only reason the war began in the early 40s and not later was because Germany needed resources and was eating itself trying to supply the warmachine, hence gambles like Anschluss, remilitarizing the Rhineland and the Division of Czechoslovakia. Hitler was gambling on Poland joining Germany, but had to use force triggering the official declaration of war by France and Britain, however neither country did much for months in the Phony War while Germany increased its military and then proceeded to capture Continental Europe with ease, Paris fell in the same period of time it took the Germans to capture a city block in Stalingrad.


>I've already addr
No you have not.
>Germany's military output was much broader and spread across many sectors because Germany, unlike the Soviet Union, was fighting a multi-front air, land, and naval war.
Fuck off. Germany had millions of men from across Europe, captured thousands of war-machines and countless wePost too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>826919
>Absolute codswallop proven by the fact that on paper the Tiger and Panther tanks were "better quality" than the T-34-76. This means nothing IRL because the German production was gummed up by overcomplicated tech being rushed into service with teething issues rather than focusing on mass production.
Irrelevant to Lend-Lease's qualitative nature. Even if German tanks were superior on paper, that says nothing about whether the USSR needed Allied aluminum, fuel, trucks, or explosives. Category error. The quality of German tanks versus Soviet tanks is a separate question from whether Lend-Lease provided crucial qualitative inputs to the Soviet war economy.
>The totality of Lend-Lease food production wouldn't feed a division for a week, let alone the whole country.
Incorrect, and bobody said the aid was supposed to feed "the whole country."
>This is even more laughable because the majority of Lend Lease came at the end of 1943.
And? The aid in 1942, while not peak levels, was still critical. Operation Uranus relied on Lend-Lease, and its success was exacerbated by the fact several German mechanized divisions were diverted to Western Europe. Regardless, contrary to most perceptions, the Soviets were not "winning" in 1943. At best, 1943 was a bloody stalemate with the Soviets taking abysmally high casualties. Lend-Lease absolutely gave the Soviets enough of edge to just barely halt Germany's onslaught, and then eventually crush them when the aid came in full force by late 1943 and early 1944. In the first quarter of 1943, Allied food supplies supplied 17% of the total calories consumed by the Red Army. To claim this played a negligible role in holding the Germans back is disingenuous. A lot of the Red Army's operations from 1943 onwards, including Kursk and later Soviet offensives, were heavily reliant on Lend-Lease and even with them the Soviets took at least 3-4 times the losses the Germans did. Take Kursk for example, which is often cited as a Soviet "victory." The causality ratio reached as high as 1 to 12 (1 to 4 on average) in favor of Germany, which is almost unheard of. The Red Army performed so poorly that they would spend the entire Cold War covering up their abysmal performance by inflating German casualties and deflating their own. ConsPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>827167 (me)
>Third Battle of Kharkov (25k German casualties versus 250k Soviet casualties).
My bad, this is for the Fourth Battle of Kharkov.
Casualties for the Third Battle of Kharkov was 11k for Germany and 90k for the USSR. My broader point remains true.

>>826827
meme your 40 year old uncle found funny when he was young

>>826827
4chan boomer slang

Neither is mine, but the consequences of the clownworld spare no one

What problem?

>>826819
you are a victim so your problem

meme thread

you forgot stirner

>>826894
paste the image in shartGPT and ask it for a summary lol

As the skull grows, the scalp is stretched, leading to dead cells which disallow hair folicles to regenerate. This is why scalp massages can manage hair loss by providing blood to the cells. This is why the hair on the side and back of the head is always unaffected by hair loss, while the largest area on top is prone to it. It has nothing to do with testosterone, otherwise all males would be bald.

>>826748
By this logic every kid would be bald by adulthood

It's the Jews.

>>826744
>moids are poisoned by DHT
This.

They are so so horny beyond ethical and moral self control that their hair is gone from their head. Keep away and protect yourself from the fucking creeps.

How does adult mao look with hair?

No war but class war but never ever stop talking about vague generational differences applicable to USA exclusively

>>826727
>applicable to USA exclusively
not even remotely true lel

>>826783
yeah the Bangladeshi and Mongolian millennials are insufferable

>>826526
"big three T"

>>826843
maybe you don't find them insufferable because you don't interact with them, genius

Can someone translate, how much that is in understandable units?

>>826771
187cm

>>826809
Wow, that's tall.

>>826740
imagine how it feels for 5'11 subhumans sadge

A coworker told me with a straight face he was 2" taller than me while being at least 2" shorter. I'll give him the benefit of the doubt that maybe he's shrunk since he was young.

>>826533
No this was 100% made by a poon venting don’t drag trans women into this

shaving your armpits is cringe

why does everyone keep talking
they just won't shut up

>>826635
I just said trans. I didn't specify which gender.

>>826643
take your meds cutie

>>826002
>Conflating homosexuality with pedophila
OYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

What si/b/eria needs right now is more pedo spam threads. Lets put this back on first page.

>>826299
Schweitzer was a pederast

But I like short women

Abysmal fire and brimstone thread.