[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo / 420 ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/siberia/ - Off-topic

"No chin, no right to speak."
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)
What is 6 - 2?

Check out our new store at shop.leftypol.org!

| Catalog | Home
|

File: 1785907299237-4.jpeg (250.67 KB, 736x876, IMG_4045.jpeg)

 

I hate imageboards and I want them to die, so that I have an incentive to look for other places on the internet.

there's nowhere on the internet worth using anymore. it's all fucking trash.

the best you'll find is a half-dead "traditional" forum still filled with channers trying too hard to "revive the old web" and a subreddit's discord server where 30 people with inexplicably complex networks of hatred and infatuation talk about gundam 99% of the time.

>>811930
You can also start a personal clique where 3-4 people with inexplicably complex networks of hatred and infatuation still talk about fucking gundam 99% of the time.

>>811930
shitcord is zogged do not use



 

>3 women walk into bar
>start talkin bout men
>1 bossgirl
>1 commie
>1 dworkinite
>bossgirl say "moids should change all the diapers, to make up for centuries of patriarchy"
>dworkinite say "moids are all rapists, and should not be trusted around children"
>commie say "men hold up half the sky, and should do half the parenting."
>bossgirl and dworkinite shoot the commie for being a filthy centrist

File: 1785949015233-8.png (171.82 KB, 2800x1867, ClipboardImage.png)

>>811896
>>3 women walk into bar
>>start talkin bout men
BECHDEL TEST: FAILED



File: 1785763174753-8.mp4 (2.82 MB, 576x1024, 1768432382900.mp4)

 

Are you addicted to pornography?
102 posts and 17 image replies omitted.

>>811639
>>811638
Men as well.
There’s a reason why glasses started to become popularized in fashion in the 2010s

>>811631
>Do you apply this to men as well?

Not really attracted to men but I apply this to people in general.

All this psychobabble and overintellectualized discussion on lookism is gonna disappear once we can start making designer babies so that all human beings become attractive.

It's like how before Ozempic there was the dumb body positivity and "fatphobia" nonsense then immediately once we had an easy solution that all disappeared.

Once it's possible for everyone to become attractive then we'll stop bullshittimg ourselves about which phenotypes are objectively attractive and which are not. Spoiler alert : absolutely no one will design their babies to be chinlets or have wide noses or be manlets. And the number of people with dark skin will decrease rapidly, although it won't be eliminated completely as enough people like it. But it would still decrease a lot, like maybe 80%

>>811795
>And the number of people with dark skin will decrease rapidly, although it won't be eliminated completely as enough people like it. But it would still decrease a lot, like maybe 80%
I don't know about any of that dawg. Just because you're an obsessed freak doesn't mean everyone in the world is. Yes there is subjective difference. I think it is more the opposite, that once European capitalist society no longer dominates the world, people won't be brainwashed by whatever they cook up. There is no objective shit, they promote some new arbitrary zeitgeist all the time. Beards are in, beards are at, big butts are in, big butts are out. Your mind is completely plugged into these arbitrary whims and you have no historical knowledge so you mistake it as objective truth.

>>811795
>And the number of people with dark skin will decrease rapidly, although it won't be eliminated completely as enough people like it. But it would still decrease a lot, like maybe 80%

Wrong. People still like dark skin. They will go for more golden brown but not everyone wants white skin



File: 1785789769576-1.png (1.2 MB, 1138x928, 1785789712112.png)

 

is there a materialist explanation for this
6 posts omitted.

>using exaggerated steroided phenotypes of masculinity as the definition of natural testosterone development

>>811308
Clickbait increase revenue from yt channels

File: 1785866579988-6.png (391.87 KB, 900x477, ClipboardImage.png)

>>811308
trump be lookin like his mama

File: 1785869140726-2.jpg (94.64 KB, 491x485, NANIhuahua.jpg)

>>811603
Oh my god. It's his actual mom, this is crazy

>>811630
yeah that's not a photoshop, that's what she actually looked like when she was around the age her son is now



File: 1784522672557-4.jpeg (151.21 KB, 1088x1088, IMG_3617.jpeg)

 

Does anyone else just use a couple of imageboards (and maybe read-only on X) and have no friends or accounts anywhere else?
This type of existence is killing me.
How do I even find friends? Online games? Groomcord?
24 posts and 2 image replies omitted.

i have online friends but they all have different interests than me(they play league). i am NEVER getting into league

Bump

>>806598
You're not missing anything other than sex and substance abuse experience, just stay on your goal.

>>811786
This.
Again, most young people don’t even live it up, contrary to the age-old stereotype

That’s just marketing hype
The only young people who do are usually rich kids or ghetto kids

>>811786
Irony is, people do more substance abuse and sex in their thirties and forties than they would in their twenties.



File: 1784933502463-2.png (1.12 MB, 1014x809, ClipboardImage.png)

 

>1997 odyssey
>calypso is black

woke is out of control shaking my damn head
37 posts and 6 image replies omitted.

>>811727
OP is obviously making fun of people who get mad about it

>>811729
i know i'm speaking just in general about the weird backlash

>>808403
"Is that you John Wayne? Is this me?"

>>811735
me so horny
me take over whole country




File: 1785873229560-8.png (2.41 MB, 1280x1280, ClipboardImage.png)

 

Anyone else noticed this lately? It's fucking everywhere on my recommended even though I keep clicking not interested. Every video is like some 20 something talking about "philosophy" or giving life advice even though they have zero experience with anything. It's normally over gameplay or some dude just talking into the camera of their phone. These get so many views too. Also they are all super reactionary every time. Normally they'll throw in some christcuck nonsense or some right wing propaganda.
14 posts and 5 image replies omitted.

>>811747
Funny thing is, most of these type of ramblers never discuss technical skills.
They never talk about how to fix cars or refurbishing or anything.
They only wanna shame young men for not having any formality skills for "displaying masculinity"

File: 1785893875141-8.jpg (228.4 KB, 1206x735, 1.jpg)

>>811666
>Anyone else noticed this lately?
you mean since at least 2015?

>"philosophy"

why the quotation marks? peep the marx book

>>811741
which is an absurd accusation since its literally the opposite where being able to explain complex subjects in plain language to an audience unfamiliar with the subject is the sign of true mastery.

>>811748
religion for breakfast is in fact good

>>811763
Unfortunately, students are taught that formal language is the only way to speak about profound topics



File: 1785874504443-9.webp (Spoiler Image,13.4 KB, 510x680, IMG_0117.webp)

 

Post male ass and beautiful boy butt and all of that stuff

File: 1785875892802-7.jpg (Spoiler Image,179.5 KB, 1024x1536, beautiful ass.jpg)

beautiful boy ass

File: 1785890853492-5-0.jpg (Spoiler Image,158.79 KB, 1125x906, 1610527932.jpg)

File: 1785890853492-5-1.png (Spoiler Image,684.46 KB, 1080x1044, 1758420857659013.png)

File: 1785890853492-6-2.png (Spoiler Image,552.46 KB, 500x543, 1460526196.png)




File: 1785876201833-2.jpg (65.88 KB, 956x465, 62635.jpg)

 

Thoughts?

meow.
2 posts omitted.

>>811720
>Whats the point of tariffs?
Saving a too big to fail business. Coal mines in the UK under Thatcher and Detroit in the US as an example. It's one of many possible and plausible reasons.

>>811710
A lot of people don't know what "free trade agreements" actually are and Trump's tariffs have been a disaster.

>>811720
True, just subsidize the industry directly until it becomes profitable (and behead the ceo if he just take down the company and pocket the money obviously)

>>811710
Free trade is good and has always been good. It is a good thing if Dems and DSA types, despite their general incompetence, are at least sound on this question.

>>811720
The best theoretical argument for them is that you can protect domestic industries and allow them to build up strength to compete internationally. It is, however, mostly a dumb one which in the modern age is based on prestige considerations. (e.g. thinking there's a meaningful difference between making Japanese cars in the US, and making Ford cars in the US.)

In actuality the best way to develop industry is not to focus on meeting domestic demand, but to focus on exports. You can force miserable products onto the domestic market if they have no alternatives (see India making 1950s British cars decades later) but an export product has to be something people actually want to buy. (e.g. Early South Korean cars were exported at a loss because the government forced the firms in question to export, then, seeking profit, they progressively cut production costs and improved quality until they were profitable. At all points they were offering a car people would choose to buy at its price point.)

>>811726
Tariffs couldn't have saved British coal. First because British coal was not killed on fundamentally economic grounds (coal mining operations broke even, it lost money due to pension and land damage payments… which had to be paid even after British Coal was shut down) but basically as a political move to crush enemies of the government. A much smarter approach all-around would've been the managed wind-down of the industry by cutting new hiring and letting existing employees age out, only making redundancy payments and firing people when there weren't enough to keep a mine open.

Secondly, and arguably more importantly (because it's independent of these political considerations), because of North Sea oil and gas. Britain had a huge domestic energy supply was more cost competitive with coal, hence why by the 1990s, energy generation shifted dramatically over to gas. Even in a world where coal imports were tariffed to be more expensive than domestic Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>811720
Some degree of protectionism is required for industrialization/development. As part of a larger protectionist strategy, tariffs can make sense. The idea that free trade=it can only good happen is simplistic econslop for undergrads.
Of course none of this has anything to do with Trump, head of the most economically developed country in the world, wanting to implement tariffs in a vacuum because he either thinks they sound cool or is doing market manipulation or both.



File: 1785880802954-1.jpg (418.28 KB, 409x592, Reincarnation_AS.jpg)

 

I consider myself an atheist and a materialist. I engage in deboonking and making fun of religious and superstitious people all the time.

But there is one supernatural phenomenon that I cannot explain, and that is re-incarnation. This is because of my personal experience.

I have a niece who, when she was very young, claimed to have had a past life where she lived in another state in country, and she vividly described the name of her town and her family members. She was insistent about it being true, even though she was just 3 or 4 at the time.

So my dad and my uncle decided to go to that place and investigate, and they found out that there really was a family in that town with the same names my niece mentioned, and that one of the women in that family died a few years ago.

I saw all this happening with my own eyes. It simply cannot be a coincidence that a 3 year old accurately remembered the names of a family and the name of that town in a far away place, where a woman died the same year my niece was born.

Then after further research, I realized the topic of reincarnation was already being researched by a guy named Ian Stevenson who has collected evidence of thousands of reincarnation.

Now I'm not saying I 100% believe in it, because at the end of the day I'm still a materialist and I need hard evidence to convince myself. But I still have no idea what to think of what I observed first hand.

>>811734
The most likely explanation is that you're just lying for fun, but even if you were being "honest" the story would fall apart under scrutiny. If a detective launched an investigation they'd realize stuff like
<oh the girl saw the town on a map
<oh some of the names she said weren't part of that family but they were brushed off because others were right or "close enough"
etc
It's not that far off from "cold reading" that "psychics" do. Supernatural claims rely on ambiguity and wiggle room, pushing the audience to fill in the gaps themselves. They are never precise.

reincarnation in hinduism is a PUNISHMENT.
im "Kardasianism"\spiritism\New Age\NDE research, it's a "journey of growth"



Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo / 420 ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]
[ 1 /2 /3 /4 /5 /6 /7 /8 /9 /10 /11 /12 /13 /14 /15 /16 /17 /18 /19 /20 /21 /22 /23 /24 /25 /26 /27 /28 /29 /30 /31 /32 /33 /34 /35 /36 ]
| Catalog | Home