/siberia/ - Off-topic

>>836993
>mmmh I wonder why Republicans got spanked this time?
>Could it be the war Trump caused against his promises?
>Nah
>The increases of prices following said war?
>Nah
>Or maybe the whole bending over for the techbros overlord destroying Jobs and hoarding water and electicity for their data centers?
>No way.
>It's because not enough people have died in ICE concentration camp
>There is no other explanation.

Reactoids are a special bunch.

>>836855
i skimmed through and then read close to a hundred pages, the similarities to blanchardism are noteworthy, but then disappointing because he is never mentioned, and even haunts the work like a specter. i can say i think i believe his talk on these degenerate fetishes, and fetishes as a whole, but there are some areas definitely lacking. he agrees with this in regards to lacking a queer and female perspective just at the end.
p.s. (post scrotum)
he is also terfy, not even with the usage of transvestite but more so the appeal to nature with id say cheap or copout usage of biological. i feel this work could have been much improved with a defining of 'man' but maybe this is where the copout serves its purpose. i say maybe because i lost interest, but it began quite strong. >>836778
this is fine and all, but says nothing to address things like aap or agp with regards to say butch women or femboys. are you saying these are separate fetishes that when present in trans individuals (whom are so by birth, and i believe this to be fair to the image, ive seen this research before) result in transness, but otherwise result in sexual nonconformity? is this why you do not equate them post scriptum? (post scrotum)

>>836947
i formatted this like dogshit, which i do format in a specific way of course

>>836855
so basically this guy is an AGP pedophile who fantasizes about possessing the body of a little girl so he can give birth to himself again? What the actual fuck is this I'd rather read Blanchard like naaah man.

>>836956
Saying pedophile was redundant, we already knew he was Japanese by the name

>>836947
>are you saying these are separate fetishes that when present in trans individuals (whom are so by birth, and i believe this to be fair to the image, ive seen this research before) result in transness, but otherwise result in sexual nonconformity?
I don't think much about fetishes and didn't understand your question, but transsexuality has nothing to do with them. AGP may be more likely to occur with lesbian transsexuality, but not vice versa.
Femboys and butches should, in theory, exhibit some feminization/masculinization in their brains, but not to the level of transsexuality; homosexuality at most. It's also worth distinguishing between feminine guys and femboys, as the latter are most often simply AGP/AGAMP/APP degenerates and lack a feminine personality.

>>836973
>It really does make one question parliamentarian and/or republican forms of government.
well the problem with monarchy is it's basically a coin toss whether you get an intelligent/empathetic king, a cunning bloodthirsty psychopath, or a drooling inbred. At least popular government diversifies the role of the sovereign among many people, so that if a few of them are shitheads, it's balanced out by others being decent.

>>836975
If I'm not mistaken didn't he almost win the civil war thru combat, because they had to kill him so he couldn't pull more manpower and resources from relatives abroad

>>836975
Like he was just too dangerous to be kept alive apparently

It's a very haunting tale for democracy enjoyers

I watched all this guy's videos over a couple days on a bender. they're good. he doesn't make stuff very often though.

>>836362
new mandella effect?

There was a lot of running away from people and also some time travel but I don't remember the details. Also there was something about a public pool where they took your shoes.

Dreamt that she talked to me.

I was at a prison camp or something, awake at 5 am, sitting on the ground with a laptop, working. Two other inmates woke up and they woke up a third to go out and watch the sunrise, but they did not invite me.

I dreamt that most of my actions had been catalogued online without my knowledge over the years, including recently my pissing off a powerful figure with some unspecified indiscreet behavior. People I considered friends were terrified of my stupidity when I'd done it. They never trird to warn me but they'd fully analyzed every single faux pas online, all the while facepalming but from a place of genuine concern.

In this world, I was able to use "spectator mode" to astral project outside of my body. On a rainy and humid night, two of my friends, a man and a woman in black tie suits, were coming to save me; I was using spectator mode to watch them as they stepped out of a car and walked up a Chinese moon gate in a public park in the city. The woman seemed to sense that I was watching them from the ripples I left in puddles near her. She looked around for my spirit with an expression of guilt, but I flew away into cover before she could say anything. Suddenly, I saw her bump into a figure wearing an optical camouflage suit, presumably a hired gun. My friend proceeded to grab the attacker and slit her throat with a knife, which prompted a 'bad noise' and booted me out of the remote viewing.

In the 'real world,' I had left my apartment and thought about leaving some sign that I was still alive. I could see a cheap mahjong table that I'd take outside, now warped from being left halfway exposed under a gazebo. I knew I had to make plans and run, but I felt too tired and simply wandered the city aimlessly instead. I ended up in a blind box store not unlike Pop Mart, watching a display made up of boxes running up a conveyer belt endlessly. The set on sale was cutesy medical themed (bandages, nurses, etc.) I kept thinking about where I would run but nowhere was a good idea.

Around this time I woke up feeling vaguely unsettled.

>>836683
stirner sits in this ineffectual corner where stuff like morality or religion is a spook yet every single institution is molded after them, so they can only suffer them haplessly while dreaming about a world where we live happily together as independent selves. basically commits the worst sins of utopianism which is why his contemporaries laughed at him.

>>836716
it's rather baffling that stirner enjoys this air of sophistication and reverence even among "communists" and "theoryheads" when his philosophy falls apart if you think about it for 5 minutes

he got bodied in the german ideology and then again by discount lenin (plekhanov), what more is there to say about stirner

>>836716
I havent read Stirner and only know the memes but I think that's an unfair interpretation. Something being a spook doesn't automatically mean it doesn't affect the real world. In fact, that's precisely why it's a spook, its something that isn't real that nevertheless affects the real world because people behave in a way as if its real.

>>836787
you not having read him is what makes you have a charitable interpretation because stirner's philosophy is internally incoherent
you're charitably reading him as a critic of ideology. he's way more "radical" (nonsensical) than that.

it's precisely his point that spooks have no reality, not even in the "real abstractions" sense, or else he wouldn't be able to dismiss them: if an idea has a real hold on you, then it has a practical reality to it, and is therefore no longer a "spook", is it?

ok then, it'd be fine if he was a fully committed nominalist, but somehow he treats the "state" as a slightly more real abstraction than every other, in that it's worthwhile to fight against "the state", but fighting for the working class? spooked. communism? spook.

not to mention that "ego" or "the unique" are also spooks, they're the universalization of the particular. he says it isn't and by "the unique", "this one", he means precisely the non-universal particular, but "this one" is already a universal, a pure particular would would be non-generalizable as a word at all

>>836909
>The emergence of Fascism is said to begin in 1919, but really occurs in 1893, with the Aigues-Mortes Massacre, where Italian immigrants were murdered by Frenchman, causing the neologism of "National Socialism" to emerge in the words of Maurice Barrés in 1898
You copied this from smith-anon in the political economy thread. It's a good bit of history, but I think US workers were slaughtering chinese railroad workers in the 1870s for the same reason.

>>836943
>It's a good bit of history, but I think US workers were slaughtering chinese railroad workers in the 1870s for the same reason.
This has former precedence in the peasant revolt of 1381, where English guildsmen murdered Flemish guildsmen in London - thus, "trade union consciousness" leads to this sort of reaction, as a direct interest for the protection of labour.

>>836403
I wanted to post this video.
I thought about making a separate thread for it, but I guess I'll just post it here.

>>836403
gooning

Will spironolactone kill me?

overboard

i feel like Adolf Libler

>>836927
Do it.

>>836927
Prove it.

the obsession with the space race is just another manifestation of our inability to look inward, the earth and its lifeforms and our own bodies and minds are already vastly unexplored unknown territories that we know almost nothing about and we are afraid to know ourselves so we look in the opposite direction and try to know everything but ourselves.

>>836884
Why are his nails painted?

>>836899
It's a chicks hand actually. She's holding on to him.

>>836887
Gianni had a botched vasectomy

>>836892
The passage is a recorded debate between two ancient Greek politicians, Demosthenes and Aeschines, who were bitter political enemies. They disliked each other and so they hate a public debate. Essentially, it's a historical roast battle.

Demosthenes attacks Aeschines by exposing his family background, claiming that his father was a former slave and that his mother engaged in questionable religious or ceremonial activities. He also mocks Aeschines for having to do menial, low-paying work as a child to help support his family. After attacking Aeschines' background, Demosthenes essentially flexes his own accomplishments and social standing by comparing their lives. He points out that Aeschines had to help teach children from lower-class families how to read and write, while Demosthenes attended top school as a student. Aeschines worked as an actor in minor roles, while Demosthenes participated in organizing theatrical performances. Aeschines worked as a public clerk, while Demosthenes established himself as a prominent public speaker and politician.

>>836939
>if you post something from someone that means you have the same life story as them
another banger from the "your media consumption says everything about you" crowd