[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo / 420 ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/siberia/ - Off-topic

"No chin, no right to speak."
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)
What is 6 - 2?

Check out our new store at shop.leftypol.org!

| Catalog | Home
|

File: 1780107909431-0.png (863.24 KB, 892x508, 1779927322479.png)

File: 1780107909431-1.png (1.34 MB, 2000x1000, 1779922097597.png)

 

do you think that one anarchist italian comic book artist and cartoonist is a furry or not

Duh

>>788071
Source?

"Anarchist comic"

What the fuck does that ecen mean

Are there "liberal comics"? " communist comics"?

>>788124
you are illiterate



 

The proletariat makes everything, controls every production process, outnumbers the bourgies 9 to 1, is almost universally literate, has seen multiple living examples of bourgies being overthrown, as well as countless more cases of capitalism leading to unspeakable atrocities, + it's in their interest (supposedly) to end capitalism.

Yet they still allow capitalism to persist. There's literally no excuse at this point, the proletariat is either evil or retarded.

I don't think it's ever been about capitalists. I think capitalism is about workers exploiting workers, capitalists are just (high paid) management.

Imagine being marx and engels thinking you just have to explain to the workkking kkklaSS how capitalism works and they'd free humanity.
The proletariat is a reactionary stratum unfortunately endowed with the historical destiny of liberating mankind. The job of the communists is to violently repress and command the proletariat with a united front of intelligentsia, peasantry, lumpen and haute bourgeoisie, and force them to do communism
6 posts omitted.

>>787972
Opium is supposed to make you feel good

>>787237
They haven't overthrown capitalism because it's not currently materially possible, only when it is possible will the proletariat reach the consciousness to carry through the revolution, that's like saying why didn't we skip feudalism and go straight to capitalism, it wasn't possible according to the material conditions to say otherwise is utopianism, and no replacing one state with another and slapping the 'communist' label on it doesn't count as having actually achieved something.

>>788107
marx and engels thought socialism was already possible in the west in their time

>>788121
Yes its possible in the sense that it is the preceding mode of production to communism, but evidently it hasnt reach the degree of development necessary for it to 'blossom' just as it's impossible to go back to feudalism with the technological development we currently have it will be the same for communism, but we don't know when that will be so we must always agitate for progress and act as if it was immanent.

>>788123
Isn't that a bit deterministic?
I think there were multiple historical junctures for socialist revolutions that failed due to the subjective factor primarily (poor strategy, poor organization, poor theory)



 

Like I feel like 90% of people who say girls want a "cute shy nerdy guy" are either guys or girls who don't actually know what a cute shy nerdy guy is
47 posts and 2 image replies omitted.

>>787898
I have something, but I don't think it is autism. I never had any kind of learning disability (opposite actually), I can read social cues.

>>787926
Porn, music, cooking, art, hiking, etc

>>786294
I've never heard anyone say women want shy nerdy guys, but if they did the woman's idea of it would probably be quite different than what you have in mind. Think Hollywood ugly.

>>787968
Most pop cultural portrayals of nerds in chick flicks are often hunky studs with glasses
But the real problem is the stereotyping of nerds as aesthetically challenged

>>786490
what the-



File: 1779970487275-0.png (77.81 KB, 225x225, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1779970487275-1.png (211.32 KB, 504x268, ClipboardImage.png)

 

>last name is "bodega"
>dad is a itallian eusqe chef
what did glitch mean by this?

Communism

garfeef lasaga

she's a fucking wop???? i'm going to bully gooseworx to death for this



File: 1779802919664.mp4 (744.55 KB, 740x576, i_need_you.mp4)

 

I NEED REVOLUTION NOW
I NEED SOCIALISM NOW
I NEED COMMUNISM NOW
I NEED THE TORTURE OF THE BOURGEOISIE NOW
I NEED CCCP 2.0 NOW
I NEED THE DEATH OF THE BURGER REICH NOW
I NEED CHANGE NOW
7 posts and 2 image replies omitted.

its all your fault you aren't getting it btw

>>786716
maybe, what kind of men

>>787503
any that aren't obese or ugly and actually have feelings for me really

>>786709
YOU ARE
you only learn to love by loving
AN ANGEL
faerwy a er kaciperfewe
NOT

you don't need revolution. you need cock



File: 1780098476401.png (313.41 KB, 447x447, ClipboardImage.png)

 

>vc spy distract dumbass vc cell agents sneak up steal camera

That was a great movie. Watched it for the first time a fee months ago. Always found it strange how only the first half of the film is memed about on the internet. The tone shift in the second half was an experience to say the least

the ugly advertisements in the background always struck me with this scene



File: 1779947787429.png (2.47 MB, 1200x913, ClipboardImage.png)

 

That seems so much worse than restrictive immigration policy
7 posts and 1 image reply omitted.

>be state
>offer free education
>pay for said education with your country's resources
>do it in the expectation that the educated worker will generate value for society that compensates for the resources invested in their education
>educated worker immediately leaves country for a higher wage
>hostile nation gets skilled laborer for free
>yfw
>no face

>>787301
/thread

>>787654
why should anyone be allowed to leave the socialist system?

>>787877
>Close all borders so nobody can move
cocksauce logic

>>787881
>be local government
>offer free education
>pay for said education with your county's resources
>do it in the expectation that the educated worker will generate value for the local area that compensates for the resources invested in their education
>educated worker immediately leaves county for a higher wage
>distant city gets skilled laborer for free
>yfw
>no face



 

leftypol's day of the sun edition
<if we dont have inbred monarchs ruling over us people will resort to cannibalism
151 posts and 262 image replies omitted.

Archibald Kennedy
>There is, in every Family, a Sort of Government without any fixed Rules; and indeed it is impossible, even in a little Family, to form Rules for every Circumstance; and therefore it is better conceived than expressed; but perfectly understood by every Individual belonging to the Family. The Study of the Father or Master, is for the Good of the Whole; all Appeals are to him; he has a Power, from the Reason and Nature of Things, to check the Insolent, or Indolent, and to encourage the Industrious: In short, the whole Affairs of the Family are immediately under the Care or Direction of the Father or Master; and this is a natural Prerogative, known and acknowledged by every Man living, who has ever had a Family, or been any Ways concerned in a Family, in all Ages and in all Places. His Majesty, as he is our political Father, his political Prerogative, from the like Circumstances and Reasons, is equally necessary. And this political Authority has been allowed the supreme Director, in all States, in all Ages, and in all Places; and without it, there would be a Failure of Justice.

Robert Filmer / Directive Power
>The first Father had not only simply power, but power monarchical, as he was a Father, immediately from God. For by the appointment of God, as soon as Adam was created he was monarch of the world, though he had no subjects; for though there could not be actual government until there were subjects, yet by the right of nature it was due to Adam to be governor of his posterity: though not in act, yet at least in habit. Adam was a King from his creation: and in the state of innocency he had been governor of his children; for the integrity or excellency of the subjects doth not take away the order or eminency of the governor.

>but as for directive power, the condition of human nature requires it, since civil society cannot be imagined without power of government: for although as long as men continued in the state of innocency they might not need the direction of Adam in those things which were necessarily and morally to be done; yet things indifferent, that depended merely on their free will, might be directed by the power of Adam's command.

File: 1779971671825-2.jpg (737.9 KB, 2773x1558, orthodoxy.jpg)

I think a good illustration between the stress of absolute monarchy & "neofeudalists"/some constitutional monarchists is between the Catholic Church's Ultramontanism/Papal Primacy versus Orthodoxy's autocephalous churches.

Papalism has a unitary/corporate structure.
Orthodoxy has Aristotle's partnership of clans, numerous churches and their primates, with Constantinople being the first among equals in honors.

Jean Bodin considered Papalism to really be Conciliarism either way, but the pretense of Papalism is basically unitary.
Those two samples is a good illustration for why absolute monarchy of the 16th-19th centuries is more earnest monarchism than the pretenses of Medievalists with their De Jouvenel and "traditional monarchy"–(they're just looking out for Papalism at the end of the day).
Anyways, all Christians are monarchists for Jesus no matter the Church organization–so keep this in mind too.

Thomas Hobbes
>The error concerning mixed government [constitutionalism] has proceeded from want of understanding of what is meant by this word body politic, and how it signifies not the concord, but the union of many men.

>The other error in this his first argument is that he says the members of every Commonwealth, as of a natural body, depend one of another. It is true they cohere together, but they depend only on the sovereign, which is the soul of the Commonwealth

>They who compare a City and its Citizens, with a man and his members, almost all say, that he who hath the supreme power in the City, is the relation to the whole City, such as the head is to the whole man. But it appears by what has been already said, that he who is endued with such a power (whether it be a man, or a Court) has a relation to the City, not as that of the head, but of the soul to the body. For it is the soul by which a man has a will, that is, can either will, or nill.

This is the assessment of Jean Bodin, Louis XIV, & Voltaire–the Popes (in respect to the Orthodox bishops)–& also Gaius Caligula said, "Let there be one lord, one king" to all his vassal kings at a banquet–so I agree with them.
…Monarchists… on the other hand… are always snarling at absolute monarchy, the vast majority of them being constitutional monarchists… and bickering about centralization/decentralization, and arguing on behalf of Aristotle's notion of a partnership of clans, either for the Nobility of estates (without the preeminence of one royal estate) or for multi-party democracy (without the preeminence of one party corporatism…)

Emperor Tiberius often used a phrase – Auribus teneo lupum – "holding a wolf by the ears" to describe ruling the Roman Empire.
A great deal of people think a ruler is overthrown on account of good or bad of a ruler, but there is a great indifference overall, and like the standpoint of Hobbes… the tongue of a man is a trumpet of war and sedition – no matter how good or bad of a ruler – and civilization is not something to be taken for granted, but may easily be broken – no matter how integral – and dashed to pieces.

Don't take anyone's loyalty for their word or think it will come naturally with the gentle breeze. It takes a lot of effort. And even then… By default, don't consider people reliable that way. Seek out the opportunity, but definitely don't take anything for granted.
Like Machiavelli suggests, there are many counterfeit loyalties. When the heat is on, people bail.

As for revolting, Tempest Shadow (from the MLP movie) & Hobbes are more accurate: people revolt either when it is opportune or when their discontent foments from personal harm to them directly as to kill them. They don't revolt because it is their duty. Their natural state might as well be revolt (war of all against all)–no need for Aquinas to tell them.

People don't care. –They don't really care if USA is bombing and killing other people far away or if others they barely know suffer–and they'll bring up the suffering to take advantage of it against their opponents to shame them, not out of compassion for the suffering.

When it comes to resistance theory, and in particular Aquinas, another factor Hobbes has over them is that while they anticipate people will revolt when there is injustice – I think what Hobbes has over Aquinas here is that civilization is not a free gift of the human spirit, or a political animal, and that people are naturally inclined to stick together for the benefit of their body-politic – rather, ruling the people is like ruling wolves, who are ready to pounce and bite at any instance, unjustly or justly, they'll pounce if you stick your neck out and give them the opportunity… and among the reasons they don't revolt is because there is an influx of doggy treats holds off discontent and fear for their livelihood if they do–but this view, that people are predisposed to revolt, basically unravels pulls the rug from underneath resistance theory by changing the perspective, as Hobbes says, that the tongue of a man is like a trumpet of war, and this pessimistic tone that civilization is fragile and can fracture at any moment puts more stress on security and stability in spite of this.

I'm not altogether sure I would say people are totally motivated by self-interest/life preservation, but I agree with Hobbes that people aren't born apt for political society (which Hobbes states against Aristotle) – at least, if anything, people aren't born ready for royal monarchy – instead they have to be reared and ePost too long. Click here to view the full text.



File: 1779903790268.jpeg (44.74 KB, 640x375, I66319jHhs515.jpeg)

 

Hey all, just a heads up I’m getting married this weekend in Italy, so will be unavailable to autistically argue about philosophers who died 200 years ago or countries that no longer exist. If any notable current events happen while gone, I will align with happenings upon return
20 posts and 4 image replies omitted.

>>787991
My brother and sister-in-law are like that.

Don't post straight couples it triggers my conversion therapy kink, thanks
the male looks hot

rich degenerate italophile
you should get married in mauritius

the thread that killed incel spam eternally

File: 1780149763754.jpg (30.95 KB, 700x525, chihuahua husbando.jpg)

happy marriage, OP!!!



File: 1777886150465.jpg (88.02 KB, 1151x1122, FUCK. THIS.jpg)

 

THE PLANET CAN GO FUCK ITSELF.

FUCK THE SUNSETS.
FUCK THE MOUNTAINS.
FUCK "GAIA" AND "MOTHER EARTH" BULLSHIT

THIS A JOKE.

FUCK. THIS. PLANET. WITH. A. RUSTY. SPACE. DILDO.

I'M OUT.
38 posts and 6 image replies omitted.

>>779819
Not as much as male sexuality

Society as of current has no problem with making dildos based on genitalia of other animals for women

But the idea of making sex dolls for men is considered rapey

>>783100
>Society as of current has no problem with making dildos
they are called moids anon

>>784747
>you’re supposed to justify my bias with my brain dead neologism

>>779262
like what

>>779354
why americans so much into fat women ?



Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo / 420 ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]
[ 1 /2 /3 /4 /5 /6 /7 /8 /9 /10 /11 /12 /13 /14 /15 /16 /17 /18 /19 /20 /21 /22 /23 /24 /25 /26 /27 /28 /29 /30 /31 /32 /33 /34 /35 /36 ]
| Catalog | Home