An old friend of mine turned into a typical /pol/ altright guy back when that whole wave started. Hates Jews, Muslims, nonwhites, queers of all stripes (ironically a gay furry himself and identifies as a "femboy"), obsessed with the spectre of SJWs, etc.
He's a bitter little loser (and so am I tbf) who often talks to me about his violent fantasies about ridding the world of bad guys or whatever. Here's the kicker. I once asked him who he'd get rid of. His answer? Putin, Kim and Xi. Which is pathetic enough, but why Xi specifically? Because of the Uyghur genocide.
It doesn't even matter what you think about China and the Uyghur situation. How does a guy who thinks all Muslims are terrorist goatfuckers and that it's based when the US kills them use this an excuse for why China bad? One of the only countries in the world with a government that actually does shit for its citizens while leaving everyone else alone and they're bad because of a "genocide" that even if you believe the worst reports has not killed even 1% of the Muslims that the US has over the past few decades, often for the benefit of the world's only Jewish ethnostate?
It's just amazing to me how you can be an edgelord posturing as being on the fringe of society and full of dangerous opinions and esoteric knowledge, and still just have the same opinions on major issues as the average citizen of the most powerful government in the world, because anything outside of the programming is unthinkable. P.S.: we're not even American.
7 posts and 1 image reply omitted.>P.S.: we're not even American.
de que parte de latam eres bro
>muh free will
>>747837you're not seriously expecting anyone to read all this shit are ya?
>>747837ted kaczynski is a radical centrist w anti-tech characteristics