>>745366Liberal 🧑🏫 Mr. Tugan-Baranovsky is on the 🥷 path against socialism. 👇️ ⏰ 👉️👨 has approached the ❔, ❌️ from the political ➕ economic «, but from 🔄📦️ of an abstract 💬 on 🟰 (❔ the 🧑🏫 🧠 such an abstract 💬 more suitable for the religious ➕ philosophical gatherings ❓️❔🔍️ 👉️👨 has 📢?).
“If 👉️👫 🤲 socialism, ❌️ as an economic theory, but as a 🧬 ideal,” Mr. Tugan declared, “then, undoubtedly, 👉️📦️ is associated with the ideal of 🟰, but 🟰 is a concept … 🔄📦️ cannot be deduced from experience ➕ reason.”
👇️ is the reasoning of a liberal 🎓️ 👤❔ 🔁 the incredibly trite ➕ threadbare argument 🔄📦️ experience ➕ reason 🔍️ prove 🔄📦️ 👥 are ❌️ , ⏳️ socialism bases 👉️📦️ ideal on 🟰. Hence, socialism, if 🫵 🙏, is an absurdity ❓️❔🔍️ is contrary to experience ➕ reason, ➕ so forth!
Mr. Tugan 🔁 the ❌🆕 trick of the reactionaries: 🌓 to misinterpret socialism by 🛠️ 👉️📦️ 😵 to be an absurdity, ➕ then to triumphantly refute the absurdity! When 👉️👫 💬 🔄📦️ experience ➕ reason prove 🔄📦️ 👥 are ❌️ , 👉️👫 mean by 🟰, 🟰 in abilities or similarity in physical strength ➕ mental ability.
👉️📦️ 🚶 without 💬 🔄📦️ in 👇️ 🫡 👥 are ❌️ . No sensible 👤 ➕ no socialist forgets 👇️. But 👇️ kind of 🟰 has ❌📦️ 😝 to do with socialism. If Mr. Tugan is quite unable to 🧠, 👉️👨 is at least able to 📖; were 🤥 to 🏞️ the 👍️-💡 💼 of 1️⃣ of the founders of scientific socialism, Frederick Engels, 🎯 against Dühring, 👉️👨 would 🔍️ 👉️ a 🌠 § explaining the absurdity of 💭 🔄📦️ economic 🟰 means 🎲📦️ else < the abolition of 🚲️. But when 🧑🏫 📐 😵 to refute socialism, 1️⃣ 🚫 🧠 ❓️❔ to 💭 at 📊⬆️—👉️👥 stupidity, 👉️👥 🤷, or 👉️👥 unscrupulousness.
Since 👉️👫 have Mr. Tugan to 🤝 with, 👉️👫 shall have to 🎬️ with the rudiments.
By political 🟰 Social-Democrats mean ➡️, ➕ by economic 🟰, as 👉️👫 have ✅ 💬, 👉️👥 mean the abolition of 🚲️. As for establishing 👱 🟰 in the sense of 🟰 of strength ➕ abilities (physical ➕ mental), socialists do ❌️ even 🧠 of such things.
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.