>>632630> I have never in my life encountered the kind of people you're talking aboutI've asked this of like 10 different people, spend hours googling, used ai, etc. – and It's those two responses, or silence since nothing was given back.
Even ask my own mom about how she does it, with her taking it as a challenge and instead talked the pattern of reading an author.
Even if they're personally good people, this trend has been a deeply frustrating situation that has plagued me for months.
Nothing to show, and the first step being the smug "empathetic" readers that think reading self help books are bad, and it's basically sexist to not think of women as anything the empathetic gender that we must serve and let rape.
Could you explain visualizing, or would you be too empathetic and refuse to answer?
> I'd say the better descriptor is "scratched demsocs; liberals>tripling down on existing legal systems in the face of a threat to ones business interestsPausing on social democrats being the moderate wing of fascism – shoutout to home girl Rosa Luxembourg – fascists reaction is a more aggressive attack on the proletariots in the name of protecting capital.
Ignoring their violent rhetoric XYZ random tweet – even if they aren't full blown fascists that advocate for terrorism to the civilians and hyper imperialism, (or even describe it as imperialism towards the citizens) – those online artists currently follow the historical path of the petite-bourgeosis (fascism's most loyal class), for they have no unity to workers, but mostly a disdain for them.