>>34771"So you're not even making use of most of the "software freedoms" and yet you have the gall to insult the work of Rich Felker."
Whether I compile my software or not doesn't make me "make use of software freedom" less, Rich Felker is a POSIX retard, as POSIX is a retarded standard which not even the BSD systems can comply with anymore.
Again, autistic compsci stuff that eliminates user freedom by advocating for MIT-fascist software for some sort of principled Unix Plan9 Philosophy only nerds care about (makes 0 difference to the user, by the way)
"so yes it is beneficial to the user, that they can just telnet into many embedded devices and be greeted by good-old busybox."
telnet into the Microsoft Telnet Client, right?
"Your reason for using GPLed software seems to boil down to radlib virtue signaling, because it's entirely harmonized with technocapital (the actual "surveillance state") and you can't even materially back up why it differs from MIT/BSDware from the user's perspective."
Search up 'tivoization', "entirely harmonized with technocapital" yet only GPLv3 software could prohibit the problems that led to
https://keepandroidopen.org/Huh. Funny how that works.
"I'm done arguing with you software illiterate shit."
Good, fuck software literacy and the legacy fascist dogshit brought on by MIT and Berkeley, proletarianize software.