🎭📽🎬📼📺
>Argue about dvd commentaries, Post your thesis on King of the Hill, Reminisce about a tv show you used to watch but don't quite remember it's title. Just about anything related to shows. Post your highscore on those Ben 10 CN flash games. Anything goes.OLD THREAD
>>3012 69 posts and 10 image replies omitted.Getting really tired of most Leftists/Progressives online seemingly being horrified at the concept of having.. standards when it comes to certain franchises and IPs.
The rushing to defence of lazy crap like Fallout, Witcher, Rings of Power, NuTrek really just drives home to me that toxic inclusivity seems to be a massive issue for lefties.
The reality is, IP's survive based on gatekept fandoms.
This is why Sport is the most successful "subculture" out there, people become seriously invested in their teams, chew out players, coaches, cheer and cry when they win, imagine if lefties came into sport and started demanding that it's wrong to criticize a coach or shitty player and idiotic plays and strategy because it's mean and not inclusive and they got their way, sport would largely become dull, passionless and boring.
You hear all the time from leftist commentators "it's not a sport, there are no winners and losers", but honestly, yes, there are, as a lover of classic Fallout, it's tone and setting, I am a loser here, the Fallout setting I loved and enjoyed has been taken out the back of the shed and shot and replaced with a cheap theme park ride version of it that doesn't understand it's tone or values at all, As a Trekkie since I was 6, yes am a loser, I will likely never, ever see a satisfying continuation of the Trek story and setting post DS9, we will never see a serious take on the aftermath of the Dominion War, we will never see how the Prophets/Bajor story plays out, we won't see what happens to Cardassia or the Gamma Quadrant etc.
When Leftist commentators and media bootlickers keep pushing this "you are not allowed to criticize something, it's just not for you", how do they not see they are just engaging in Corporate bootlicking, the hollowing out of a scene and subculture and setting, and turning it into a mass consumption brand slop. Star Trek stayed relevant for 40 years due to it's tribalistic, often offputting, autistic ass fanbase, now thanks to toxic inclusivity and attempts to make Star Trek a "mass brand" and leftist idiots attacking the fandom for having standards, it's shows can't even hit 100k viewers and the entire setting is just awful generic scifi slop.
This is one case where the right are actually correct and the left has lost the plot. As much as I hate faggots like Nerdrotic and CriticalDrinker, they are far more correct than the lefty retards like Steve Shives and co who defend this crap.
>>47223>What happened to intros like The Sopranos and Twin Peaks, that actually took time to introduce the atmosphere?Because people binge shows when they stream so nobody wants to watch the intro back to back 10 times in a row. They have a skip feature but people probably don't want to be bothered with that and it saves the studio time and money.
>>47227Whose twitter did you steal this from
>>46517What classes are represented in shows I've seen? Not necessarily shows I like–
Lumpen– Shameless
Proletarian-Malcolm in the Middle
Petit Bourgeois- Fawlty Towers
"Ruined" Bourgeois- Arrested Development, Schitt's Creek
Haute Bourgeois- White Lotus
Accurate? Any other shows which have an obvious class aspect?
>>47227Where's the proofs??? I feel like actual leftists are some of the most critical of lazy cashgrab media
If you're thinking of just being normie libs, that's a completely different group