/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

>>2237182
>>2406634
>>2406728
It is not possible to reform an organization created to defend the interests of capitalists for the interests of the proletariat. This is why, in a communist revolution, the bourgeois state is overthrown to establish the dictatorship of the proletariat and initiate the socialization of the economy through the expropriation of private property. To this end, a new currency will be created with the currency of a public national bank organized by a workers' council, along with the suppression of private banks. This will give the state a monopoly to avoid sabotage by the bourgeoisie and to use public credit to bankrupt all private companies so they can be socialized and collectivized.

Now I will quote Lenin demonstrating that support for European Union is a reactionary discourse of co-opting workers to imperialism:

<A United States of Europe under capitalism is tantamount to an agreement on the partition of colonies. Under capitalism, however, no other basis and no other principle of division are possible except force.> A multi-millionaire cannot share the “national income” of a capitalist country with anyone otherwise than “in proportion to the capital invested” (with a bonus thrown in, so that the biggest capital may receive more than its share). Capitalism is private ownership of the means of production, and anarchy in production. To advocate a “just” division of income on such a basis is sheer Proudhonism, stupid philistinism. No division can be effected otherwise than in “proportion to strength”, and strength changes with the course of economic development. Following 1871, the rate of Germany’s accession of strength was three or four times as rapid as that of Britain and France, and of Japan about ten times as rapid as Russia’s. There is and there can be no other way of testing the real might of a capitalist state than by war. War does not contradict the fundamentals of private property—on the contrary, it is a direct and inevitable outcome of those fundamentals. Under capitalism the smooth economic growth of individual enterprises or individual states is impossible. Under cPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>2406728
>directly and explicitly endorsing anti-EU parties left and right
far right parties arent anti EU anymore as soon as they get actually close to power, from meloni to lepen its always populist rhetoric as real as their concern for workers

>trying to get separate deals with EU countries
it might be at the advantage of these countries actually, because they could actually negotiate rather than simply spread their asscheeks, but i dont even know what you're referring to, cause I havent heard of this

>giving Britain a 5% good boy tax break for leaving the EU
they always had a closer relationship with britain, nothing to do with them leaving the EU

>>2239941
Salo stained hohol fingers typed this post

>>2260368
Honestly we need to get anons like this who believe that the Scandi succdems, the SPD, Labour or Lewica are socialist parties and the anons who believe that Russia in the year 2025 is somehow AES to get together for a true meeting of the minds.

>>2407765
What a load of nonsense. Why in the world would the US try to break up it's vassal, if it isn't the vassal the best way for them to control europe? Your view makes no sense
And as for britain, yes, it had absolutely everything to do with them leaving europe, since such trade deal was brought up by Trump specifically to push them to pull out of the union.
I think you're doing the error here of looking at the states as the indipendent agents of history, locked in a jails, while that isn't the case.
Europe is made of bourgeois states, which control their respective nations and, are those exact bourgeois states that manage and control the EU.
What we're seeing here is a conflict between different factions of the european bourgeois class. Both factions are atlanticist, but one wants to also have their owm turf, while the other would be more than happy to sell.of the last piece of copper in their countries to the US.
This is why the EU is both extremely cucked to the US, when the interests of the two bourgeoisie allign, yet holds together as a unified front when the interests don't completely align

>>2409131
This is ad hominen i think

Die Linke are social democrats.

O M G

There are people with disabilities or from sexual/ethnic minorities that participate in left-wing political organization????

STOP THE FUCKING PRESSES NOW

>>2409186
>Leads your party to new heights at around 14%
>Constantly whines about your party and shit on your party members
>Leaves and form your own
>Polling at 8% while your former party is crushed at 3%
>Former party gets its shit together and performed a miracle run
>Almost hit 5%
>Both current and former party's % adds up to 14%
If anyone is controlled opposition, it is Wagenknecht for wasting everyone's time.

Moved to >>>/siberia/693603.

>>2408429
isn't quantity of ownership important in marxism?

BREAKING: BREAD >>2408581
BREAKING: BREAD >>2408581
BREAKING: BREAD >>2408581
BREAKING: BREAD >>2408581
BREAKING: BREAD >>2408581
BREAKING: BREAD >>2408581

>>2408602
>I also took acid once and spent 4 hours of the comedown reading about pre-ww2 baseball once lmao
I took mushrooms once and walked my dog without a shirt on in a bowler hat and talked to random neighbors in my apartment complex, something I would have never otherwise done

>>2408587
only like 0.5% or less of burgers actioally own that garbage, get new material

>>2408429
>If you have a phone you hold a mean of production literally in your own hands so yes
>Phones are a means of production
Maoists never fail to demonstrate why the Soviets were the right side of the Sino-Soviet split and why Deng was right to shitcan the Gang of Four. Utter fucking idiots led around by the FBI by the nose.

>>2340924
>Zionist nationalists in Poland try to seize control 1968
>it wuz a revolution
Lmao

I bought Chris Harman's book on 1968. Is it any good?

>>2340924

It didn't happen
It never happened
Things may someday happen if AT LEAST food and certain industries are collectivized via permaculture and there was a serious crackdown on supply chains, but this will mot happen soon.

>>2341018
They always forget about south America

Same problem with the Communards, refusal to grab State power. The general, wildcat strikes and factory occupations is the purest expression of proletarian, revolutionary intent but bourgeois morality kicked in and they didn't want to be seen as the aggressor so once they got the demand for an election, it fizzled out because they didn't want to be the "bad guys."

>>2357245
The Iraqi army pretty much wiped out Da’esh.

>>2235245
Some of them were, a small number still dabble in it iirc. I think Brazil used to have a majority of politically aligned gangs but it's basically just legacy stuff now, it seems the vast majority of criminal-political organizations eventually drop the political part. Hell there's even considerable churn in underground strictly political guerrilla organizations eventually giving up and turning to crime since the skillset has large overlap, and it's further incentivized for revolutionary fugitives.

>>2242793
coal ass fucking meme I expect better from this website.

>>2407216
he killed the executive who decided to buy up a bunch of homes to make housing more expensive

Tybna, also fuck Uribe, couldn't have happened to a better guy, although I wish he was juged for all the people he killed and disappeared

Jeremy Corbyn’s new party: what does it mean, and what attitude should communists take towards it?
The announcement by Jeremy Corbyn and Zarah Sultana of a new party on Thursday has provoked a strong wave of support and enthusiasm. In itself, this was not surprising. The reactionary policies pursued by the Starmer government had been a slap in the face for millions of people who voted for the Labour Party, hoping for a change. In a remarkably short space of time, having won a landslide electoral victory, Starmer has become the most unpopular prime minister of all time. He is particularly detested by people on the left, who rightly regard him as a traitor who is virtually indistinguishable from the Tories and Liberals. To the left of Labour a yawning gulf has opened up, a huge political vacuum, which, sooner or later, had to be filled. Given the weakness of the forces of genuine Marxism at the present time, that vacuum could only be filled by some kind of left reformist alternative. It was therefore quite natural that it should be filled by former Labour leader and left reformist, Jeremy Corbyn. To anyone with the slightest knowledge of British politics at the present time, such an outcome could not be a surprise. It was, in fact, entirely predictable. Within hours, thousands of people were signing up to join the new party. Given the total lack of any viable alternative, this again was hardly surprising, For a long time, the so-called lefts in Britain and internationally have been paralysed by a mood of dejection and pessimism They only saw reaction on all sides. Lacking any knowledge of dialectics, they could only see the surface of events, but were blind to the real processes of radicalisation that are taking place. This applies to Jeremy Corbyn as much as anyone else. While we salute his decision finally to launch a new party, we must also add that this development was held up for a long time by his constant vacillations and hesitation to take this decisive step.
https://marxist.com/jeremy-corbyn-s-new-party-what-does-it-mean-and-what-attitude-should-communists-take-towards-it.htm

Internal Documents Detail Hamas Proposals That Preceded Trump’s Belligerent Rant
Last Wednesday, after consulting with a range of PalPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

Thanks News Anon

URIBE PARACO HIJUEPUTA

Thank you based news anon

>>2407117
>seek to stabilise relations
my brother in Christ, you were the one who destabilized the relations to begin with with your tariff bullshit

>>2407206
well that's the american way. privately create a problem then solve it publicly for the glory

>>2406335
>>2406373
>I especially need my computer back because I have a lot of baby monkey torture videos on it… I have begun to suffer withdrawals
How the fuck does this guy feel comfortable just putting that out in the open. I feel dirty even typing out his quote, what the hell is wrong with rightoids

>>2407542
>far right
>exposed by the BBC
pottery

>>2406373
Reminder a solid chunk of people on this site effectively argue that it's fascism if you think this is a bad thing.

>>2371242
>>2371266
>>2371281
>>2371517
>>2371350
>>2373685
>>2386185
>>2386182
>>2386695
>>2387783
>>2388372
>>2392867
>>2393629

CHINA IS NOT SOCIALIST, I REPEAT CHINA IS NOT SOCIALIST.
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>2391903
You forgot EVs. Anglosphere is sleeping on the news but Chinese EVs already conquered SEA and South America. This creates a domino effect where they take away crucial market share which is needed to run indebted legacy auto companies.

It felt overnight how Chinese phones became the norm and once touted brands like Xperia and LG got completely erased. Samsung and Apple are now also getting overshadowed by combined Chinese brands.

Also fashion brands in general. Once again something that will just sneak up and murder what we thought were prestigious eternal giants.

Chinese efforts in service based areas first get overlooked then ridiculed and ignored. But like boiling frogs, western industries only realize they're cooked when it's too late.

>>2371861
loves Israel

>>2406986
Some of you zionists are alright - don't go to Xiaohongshu tomorrow.

Everybody is getting purged. Military generals and infrastructure project managers getting cancelled is old new. Even the Shaolin Monks can's escape Xi's anti corruption surge.

This is a good thing, you can't run a spiritual institute as a tourist trap brothel.

>>2406591
The irony is that the vast majority of the territory Russia “captured” and then “lost” during that first month wasn’t fought over in either direction, it wasn’t entirely sure that much fighting was going to happen at all at that point. Naturally I don’t buy it that Russia left as a gesture of goodwill, but they probably expected it was going to go like Crimea, troops rapidly deployed without any real expectation of a fight, maybe local police or a militia might have put up some resistance but I don’t think anyone high up actually believes Russian troops were airdropped into all these places expecting to fight tooth and nail to hold it all in the event Ukraine chose the hard way.

>>2406626
It might as well have been two separate wars. One was based on rapid advance to pressure for a refreeze of the war on the tail end of failed NATO negotiations, the current is a war of attrition based on an international balance much larger than the contact line in Ukraine. All Ukrainian victories will be found in the former war and the transition to the latter, with a gigantic blindspot for the 2023 counteroffensive and subsequent fraying of Ukraine and its allies since. The latter has proceeded to the point it's literally fueling a global rebalance of power, which is the best proof of a Ukrainian loss, but you'll still get people in denial.

NEW BREAD >>2406661
NEW BREAD >>2406661
NEW BREAD >>2406661
NEW BREAD >>2406661
NEW BREAD >>2406661
NEW BREAD >>2406661
NEW BREAD >>2406661
NEW BREAD >>2406661
NEW BREAD >>2406661

New Deadline, Russians shaking. Simple as

lol IT'S OVER

you think public opinion has any effect on american policy?

>>2392625
>A large percentage of Israel's Jewish population will leave when Israel is no longer able to support a First-World standard of living.

and where do you think they will go, jackass? malaysia ?

>>2406781
No, Russia

>Israel will be gone by 2030

No, that tad to soon, it will take time until demographics factor really start to make the whole jewish state impossible to keep up, probably by the end of this century things will start to change

>>2406781
give Germany to the Jews lmao