>>2902512>Whether or not you find it more commonly in said ethnic groups is the point you should have tried to make, but even then, it's not safe to say it's the reason "Africans do sport good", and doesn't then lead to the greater jump of arguing cognitive differences because it sounds like a nice "just so" story.My point is that when genes that relate to a general higher improved performance among black people, are discovered, they are loudly and proudly shouted about, but somehow magically, there is no difference between human ethnicities despite gene distribution being noticeably different.
>and doesn't then lead to the greater jump of arguing cognitive differences because it sounds like a nice "just so" story.Again, the point I will always make, humans are animals, there have been human ethnicities literally isolated for tens of thousands of years, there is no logical reason why intelligence or behaviour would not be affected by different genes and hormone distribution like they are in literally every other species of animal. But of course, you, like most Geneticists, rely on anthropocentrism as cope.
I accept 19th century race science is bullshit, I even accept the concept of large bloc races being bullshit, but I do there there are genuinely differences both physically and behaviourally, at a general level, between ethnicities even if those differences may be small or varied within the population itself.