/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

I hear often that to establish a communist society implies the abolition of the law of value, which means abolishing the commodity form – that objects are created for exchange rather than for use.
But how exactly do we get to do this ? It seems that the idea of exchange-value imposing itself on use-value as the dominant way of production simply reflects scarcity. Some objects are valued more than others and we would prefer that the ressources required to produce one are spent in object A than object B.
As such, how exactly do we go about to about to abolish the law of value whilst retaining the inevitable characteristic of scarcity in most domains ?

>inb4 paul dickblast
It's been a while since I've read dickblast's TANS but doesn't his concept of labor-vouchers imply commodification of labor ? Working to be able to get said-vouchers is recreating a form of exchange which reflects scarcity. It's a better monetary system than the one we have now, but it still operates under a form of the law of value. (note that it's been a while since I've read it, so this might be incorrect)

I want this crisis in Iran to lead to a communist revolution in the country, but I know that the movement is weak both domestically and internationally. But still I hope.
Do you feel the same?

Is maoism completely dead? The CCP doesnt follow it and has practically disavowed it.
Modern maoism only exists online and is entirely composed of just resentful thirdworlders and non-white ethnonationalists with teenage revenge fantasies.

https://fashfront.st/
Found this site randomly, from what I know it’s appeared fairly recently.
It’s honestly sickening to see stuff like this still and of this retarded vibe based ideology refuses to die, I mean most of their ideas about immigration and ‘Muh replacement’ are shared by billionaires and the modern day, trivial zoomer right. I literally don’t see any reason to be into something like this when you can just vOOOte another Hitlerite in democratically.

A nazi to me is simply a retard who bases his ideology on their porn addiction and le heckin based Hitler edits from Xitter.

Let’s come together and destroy this faggotite ideology forever

Why are small towns so Hitlerite? There's just an incredible amount of tribalism, anti-intellectualism and moral busybody behavior. Small towners are just people who don't know how to mind their own fucking business and get outraged over every moral panic. What the fuck is wrong with these libertarian freaks who want to diddle little girls and execute the gays? I've noticed that a lot of marginalized groups also maintain these kinds of small town politics. I just don't get it.

>all nothing on the happening front

Trump and Hegseth's claims of U.S. 'victory' in the Iran war: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/fact-checking-trump-and-hegseths-claims-of-u-s-victory-in-the-iran-war

>Previous poop
>>2790117



>Important Links:
https://www.flightradar24.com/
https://www.marinetraffic.com/en/ais/home/centerx:52.7/centery:26.8/zoom:7
https://www.defconlevel.com/
https://oilprice.com/
https://www.pizzint.watch/
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

I'm just thinking.
The most important factor in the definition and practises of communism during history is the role of the State in the revolution.
Marx argued that after the proleatarian takeover and socialization of the means of production the State would simply "wither away".

I am not sure, but I think this is based in a hegelian style type of dialects in which he places the "dictatorshio of the ruling class" as a thesis, then the revolutionary takeover would be an antithetical form of dictaroshio which would result in the synthesis of communism or the stateless and classless society.

To be honest, this seems like a very simplification of reality if true and that would be the reason why so many revolutions failed.

The state don't simply disappears, because maybe it isn't only a "superstructure" vased on material relations but something much more complex than that.

Hegel defined the State as some type of collective rational which is the way God guides society, and Marx's views would seem to be the complementar opposite to that theory which would be also wrong, because the State is not God or only a product of material relations but something different.

It seems the State intead of disappearing it just change its form to something else. This doesn't mean it is guided by some kind o "superior being" but it also disproves the idea it is just a temporary thing that can simply disappear.

I would be interested in discovering what the true nature of the State is, becaue it seems to be, as I said, the central point of both the revolutionary theory and also communism in general.

Do you believe in the Bible? I'm a Baptist (eternal security/Once Saved Always Saved, Free Grace, anti-calvinist, sola fide type Christian. First you had the Ice Age, then the Ice Age melted, then that lead to stories of people building arks to survive regional floods from the Black Sea in the Neolithic period or Mesopotamia. Then came Moses. Then came Jesus who died around 33 AD under Tiberius. If you believe he is God, the "son" of God, and his death is sufficient to cover all your sins, you are saved. No works you can do will save you. Charismatic Pentecostal heretics who spew uyghurspeak at their churches they call "tongues" when even the Bible says it ceased and it was only meant for the Apostles to speak in foreign languages. Speaking nonsense like these "Apostolic" Christians like the NAR, are all heretics on their way to hell. They are the same people Jesus will say "I never knew you". The law of God is to believe in the son to have everlasting life. If you believe your works are why you should go to heaven you are at odds with Jesus and the gospel. The bible called them Pharisees. They were religious experts on the Torah and the Law of Moses so brilliantly and yet it became a source of cultural pride for them. The Sadducees didn't even believe in an afterlife! Some judaized Christians to this day don't (like "A Messenger of Truth" on YouTube). Jehovah's Witnesses don't. Hebrew Roots don't. All of these heretics who don't look to Jesus for life are doomed for Hell along with all the prosperity pimps. Anti-Paul people are never goodfaith. They've never read the Bible thoroughly. Romans is like Holy Water to a demon that is these people.

turns out larry ellison is a poo sniffer:

>using the java engine in android phones he records a vast amount of the global population's shits. this is a plan he boldly describes as dedicated to peace through security, and his own solemn duty. he states that only an AI watches the recordings to observe for threats and he will supply recordings to the government with a court order.

>some would call this the raving delusion of an irresponsible madman. however for larry this is the latest incarnation of a software product he built in the 90s, one that would take detailed metrics on professional software programming teams, and page him whenever a programmer was about to take a bathroom break. this early success was the cornerstone of a business portfolio worth trillions of dollars.

>besides high tech AI and large scale IT infrastructure projects ellison's empire extends to television and multimedia production. he is one of the united states governments largest tech partners across all branches, and has made significant investments in israeli real estate, it's defense industry, and it's armed forces.

wtf? what other depraved shit are billionaires up to?