/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

marx loved europe, european progress, 18th century liberalism, capitalism, and believed only through that high point of civilizational evolution communism can be achieved.
it's easy to understand then why marx approved of european colonialism as marxist, taking hunter-gatherer groups into capitalist societies was a progressive act.
so then, where did this "europe bad, pre-colonial societies good" nu left come from? is it not reactionary?

Why would the society described in Plato's Republic be undesirable according to a Marxist perspective? We know all the problems with democracy and how the masses of people can't be trusted. Plus the republic abolishes private property and calls for communal raising of children, which Marxists also support.

Being ruled by the wise is undoubtedly the best system of government. Philosopher kings are chads, and what better system than to be ruled by chads?

The Republic is the defining work of all western political philosophy so it should be natural that we turn to it.

The replies of thread >>2766805 have been so poor I intended to make a new thread, giving a historical overview of the last few decades of the communist movement.

>What is the difference between:
>Mao Zedong Thought [ML-MZT]
>Maoism-ThirdWorldism [M3W]
<Missing: >Classical Marxism-Leninism-Maoism [classical MLM]. Exemplified by Communist Party of the Philippines and Communist Party of India (Maoist) as key leaders and influences.
>Gonzalo Thought [aka "MLM-pM" and "Gonzaloism"]
>How interrelated are they?

Comrades. don't forget these tools:
<Historical materialism.
<General-Particular-General dialectical spiral in analysis.
<Never capitulate proletarian leadership to reactionary classes.
<Analyze the contradictory relationship of petty-bourgeois ideology to scientific socialism-communism throughout time, which always ends just yesterday.

Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

Why are Western bourg so incredibly invested in protecting Israel? At some point it’s hard for me to believe they have this much to gain from protecting this tiny sliver of land. What the fuck is going on?

Which is actually the best of the communist parties in the US of A. i will list them by their tendency. They will be shorten to "LPO" in the poll

https://strawpoll.com/PKgleQKeoZp

>Marxist-Leninist
(APL) American Party of Labor
(PSL) Party for Socialism and Liberation
(WWP) Workers world party
(FRSO) Freedom Road Socialist Organization

>Socialism with "American" characteristics
(ACP) American Communist Party
(CPUSA) Communist Party USA

>Maoist
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

The far-right settler nationalists justify themselves with the idea that they're fighting the new nazis while at the same time embracing the same form of blood and soil militarism
"anti-hitlerian fascism" isn't exactly hard to comprehend, but what I find confusing is that the far rightists in israel see no issue with collaboration with white nationalist groups
I can only assume this has to do with some kind of anti-arab unity sort of thing?

do you guys think there'll be any marxist school shoooter/terror cell types in the future with the doctrine being more popular amongst genz? or do all maxists know that lone wolf attacks are retarded

Mahmoud Amin Ya’qub Al-Muhtadi, 33 a DFLP/NRB militant, joined the Oct. 7, 2023 Hamas attack on Israel near Kibbutz Kfar Aza (site of a massacre that killed Americans). He lied about his terrorist ties on his U.S. visa application, entered the country in Sept. 2024, and has now been arrested by federal authorities as part of JTF 10-7’s efforts to prosecute Oct. 7 perpetrators.

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/gaza-man-arrested-alleged-involvement-october-7-2023-terrorist-attacks

>die fascist dog
Heard that before. screech moar
>I don't care for your ebin debate
I'm not here to debate, I just want to hear other perspectives

Whenever I look at the Ideological line between myself and lefties, I often find more common ground with socialists than I do with fellow Right-wingers.

>I believe Capital is actively destroying countries all around the world in order to enrich itself. the first order of business for ANY sensible movement should be to crush and subjugate the capital class.
>I fucking hate rural areas and rural life. I was born in a city, raised in a city, And I'm living in a city until the day I die. cities are vibrant, Alive, and the engines of civilizational growth
>I don't care for some abstract concept of a past to Retvrn to. Yes, I love the culture of my country and I absolutely adore its traditions, I believe it's my responsibility to continue them. But There is no way in fucking hell I'd want to marry my sister like ancient Persians did.
>I love technology. I love Modernity. I love our current way of life. I'd rather have my job right now than to be some wheat farmer in the mountains. I love modern fashion and aesthetics. Yes, some elements from the past should probably be woven into modern design to enrich it and keep the aesthetics away from looking like americanslop aesthetics, But progress should be maintained.
>Idc about the gays and the transhumanists if anything they're a sign of social progress.
>I support abortion for the first three months/when the mother's life is in danger
>I believe women are an important part of the job market and they can contribute significantly more to their country when they're given equal opportunities.
>I support cultural and social progress.
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.(USER WASNT USING A VPN, WAS THEN FOUND AND WAS BEATEN TO DEATH BY THE MODS)

https://www.bannedthought.net/Sweden/MF/2022/Gonzaloism-ALeftRevisionistDeviation-Berg-3rdEd-2022-OCR.pdf

I will give a quick response to this article based on the points it makes.

>Jefatura
I actually don't agree with Jefatura and I believe in Collective Leadership, so I will not dispute the article about this.

>Universality of Protracted Peoples War & Militarization of the Party
I strongly disagree with the article on this. It cites Mao a lot but the point is that the period where PPW is universal is a new development. It's just dogmatism to say that because a development of a theory had not been done at the time a thinker was alive, that thinker would not have supported the development. The article's point that it is "petit-bourgeois" since in China it was based on a broad alliance of the people is silly, in urban situations it is assumed the people mean the working class, lumpens and progressive PBs.

It's all well and good to support this "October Road", but this hasn't realistically been a thing in like a hundred hears. It's just dogmatism to old ways to try and do what has only lead to stagnation and revisionism for the last 70-80 years.

PPW is universal (can be used in Urban and Rural, 1st world and 3rd world) and every party should be ready for war. It's actually especially applicable to the 1st world since the intelligence apparatus will destroy any peaceful and legal party. Everyone knows revisionism is a constant fight, and its one they only have to win once while we have to win every time. The subjective situation is that revolution could be any day (even if you don't agree with PPW) and not being organised as an army just means you will miss that. The objective situation is good for revolution. The article says what is proven is what is correct. Well, PPW is the only realistic and provable way for revolution in the 1st and 3rd world. The October Road is a fantasy in modern day 1st world countries.

I have other points but doing work at the moment.
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.