Tom Steyer Opposed Single-Payer. Now He’s Running On It.Last week, California Democrats killed CalCare, the state's latest attempt to pass single-payer health care. Will that California dream ever come true? Tom Steyer — a candidate for governor who ran ads against single-payer health care in 2020 — says he is now the Golden State's best bet. He also wants higher taxes for the rich, stronger environmental protections, and the abolition of ICE. The catch? He's a billionaire running a self-financed campaign. Today on Lever Time, David Sirota sits down with Tom Steyer, the former hedge fund manager turned philanthropist, to discuss the collapse of Rep. Eric Swalwell’s (D-Calif.) campaign, whether billionaires are a policy failure, and the chaotic governor’s race that has left Republicans leading in the polls.
https://www.podbean.com/media/share/dir-5p4p3-2d10edcdZohran Mamdani Has a Choice on Free-Speech RestrictionNew York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani is currently facing a choice: whether to veto either of two protest buffer-zone bills passed by the city council late last month, which critics say would be a major blow to free speech. Intro 1-B and Intro 175-B, the “buffer zone” bills, would enable the New York Police Department (NYPD) to enact restrictions on protesting around houses of worship and educational institutions, respectively. Both bills passed the city council on March 26, and both have drawn extensive criticism. Unions, civil rights groups, activists, and the city’s ascendant democratic socialist left have argued that passing the bills would curtail the right to protest in large swaths of the city. The mayor has thirty days to veto or sign laws after they are passed by the council. If he does neither, the bill automatically passes. Mamdani’s last chance to issue a veto on both or either bill is this Saturday. Opponents are concentrating on Intro 175-B, the Education Buffer Zone Bill. Unlike Intro 1-B, Intro 175-B passed the city council without a veto-proof majority, which leaves room for a Mamdani veto to sink the bill. Critics of the bill point to how broadly it defines educational institutions. The final version would apply protest restrictions to “any building, structure, or place where educational programming takes place. . . . [This] includes but is not limited t
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.