Laws didn't exist in the Stone Age. People would kill each other, shoot each other with arrows, strike with blunt objects, sacrifice people to deities, etc. It was a crazy time to be alive. Imagine being in neolithic europe smoking marijuana in a group by hanging around a campfire and burning cannabis flowers and seeds over a pot. It was Bat'ko civilization. This generation will never know the ecstasy of trve anarchy.
The main problem with anti-civ ideology in my estimation is that it cannot be implemented because there is no collective will to implement it, and if it were, the people implementing it would be committing suicide. Nature is struggle and evolution. Technology and civilization evolved out of nature. They are not purely and simply a negation of nature. If a bird can build a nest an ape can build house, and eventually, a city, surrounded by farms, paying grain tribute to the temple. The productive forces and forms of exploitation develop alongside the advancement of technique, and the game-theoretical logic of the various forms of human struggle run themselves automatically, independent of our individual willpowers, or our desire to negate the logic of competition for scarce resources with increasingly advanced technologies, or our conservative nostalgic desire to RETVRN fundamentally rooted in moralism: A desire to return to a beautiful and uncorrupted state of nature, when people lived short, brutal, lives, died of simple infections, bone fractures, sometimes dying for mistakes as simple as foraging the wrong fruit/vegetable/fungus and dying for it. To wage anti-civilizational struggle is to wage struggle against the very same productive forces we have accumulated which allow us to multiply and specialize. If technology is an arms race, and the people with the superior technologies and numbers of trained troops win struggles most of the time, then it follows that anti-civilizational struggle is the struggle of the weak, unarmed, and numerical minority to not merely disarm the strong, armed, majority, but to destroy those arms so they are never used again. There is no realistic path to do this. It is a fantasy.
>>2809468Ancient peoples lived under constant and total social surveillance. Not even modern people with all our spyware begin to approach the reality of ancient life. They lived in a tribe that demanded total devotion and without which they would perish. The destruction of that unit was the same process as creation of the family.
Now you know why anarchists are fascist. Fascists wish they could capture a tiny portion of that spirit of ancient man.