[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo / 420 ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

"The anons of the past have only shitposted on the Internet about the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it."
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)
What is 6 - 2?

Check out our new store at shop.leftypol.org!

| Catalog | Home
|

 

It's very unlikely but since Trump has vocally been calling for annexations and Canada is moving out of the American imperial orbit, is it really possible that a regime change war against Canada is possible?
The US is already funding Albertian separatists and the American bourgesisie want direct ownership over Canadian oil, plus couping carney with somebody else wouldn't be much hard.

Again I would like to support some revolutionary defeatism so i wouldn't mind
14 posts and 1 image reply omitted.

>>2823787
>we could very well see European forces on Canadian territory defending against america
That seems very unlikely seeing as they don't even appear to have the stomach to defend their own territory in Greenland. But even in that case I would still argue against revolutionary defeatism. A socialist revolution in Canada without one in the US would be pointless. It would be swiftly crushed. America needs to become socialist before Canada can even think of it, and that would be far more likely in the event of an US defeat. This would do a lot more to help socialism in Canada than a Canadian defeat would, since the latter would just mean we're absorbed into a new anti-communist regime and have achieved precisely nothing.

If the US were to invade it would be the job of L
Albertian communists to destroy the oil reserves, after all thats what the Americans want


Bump

what do you guys think of this video?
He says the US would win in 3 days but because there's so many vets in Canada a Insurgency would be inevitable.
He also brings up that much of the US relies off of Canadian energy and sabotaging it by insurgents would be extremely easy.



 

I’ve always wondered how modern American leftists, Marxist or otherwise, react to the anti-Asian history of the American left and labor movement. I’m referring to things like the anti-coolie movements that spread across the Western Hemisphere during the nineteenth century. Anti-coolie activism itself originated in Chile, while countries such as Mexico and Peru saw anti-Asian violence fueled by competition with Asian indentured workers. In the United States, this often erupted into outright anti-Chinese violence and pogroms, whether in the 1871 Los Angeles massacre—considered by some historians to be the deadliest lynching in American history—the Rock Springs massacre, the Tacoma riots of 1885, or the anti-Asian agitation associated with the Workingmen’s Party of California under Denis Kearney, which became infamous for its role in the 1877 San Francisco riots that left numerous Chinese laborers dead.

The same pattern arguably resurfaced in a different form during the 1970s and 1980s with the wave of Japan-bashing that swept through much of the white working class. This hostility was often encouraged by politicians aligned with the Democratic Party, who were eager to attack Japanese economic competition while the Reagan administration and the GOP were generally more receptive to Japanese investment in the United States, even as the American automobile industry was struggling.

What I find particularly creepy and strange is how many white Americans today, on both the left and the right, have become outright weeaboos or at least highly positive toward Japan despite the fact that it was not even a century ago that Toyota vehicles were being vandalized by disgruntled union workers employed by Ford and other American manufacturers. Books such as Japan as Number One became bestsellers, while Hollywood frequently portrayed Japanese corporations as sinister or unstoppable economic rivals, especially in films like Blade Runner and Rising Sun.

I would argue that this continued into the 1990s, when many moral guardians began targeting Japanese anime as satanic or as a vehicle for spreading Japanese wartime nationalism. One only has to look at the various newspaper columns attacking series such as Dragon Ball, Sailor Moon, and even Pokémon for allegedly promoting Satanism, homosexuality, or whatever other cultural boogeyman happened to concern the American Christian right at the time—a movement which, it should be remembered, also preached thaPost too long. Click here to view the full text.
56 posts and 2 image replies omitted.

>>2845524
I'll take their advice a lot more seriously than anything comes from a schizo retard brain like yours.

>>2845537
/thread

File: 1781982532180.png (344.26 KB, 968x1386, who must go zoomed.png)

finally an opportunity to post this

>>2845570
lasted about as long as the confederacy lol

Mexico was also anti-Chinese in this period lol, guess it's was a silly trend



File: 1782011887432.mp4 (1.57 MB, 576x576, uiu2.mp4)

 

Post communist/general lefty edits ITT.
I will be dropping my collection, post any more you find
"I'm here for the aura and hype moments"
"I'm here for the aura and hype moments"
9 posts and 12 image replies omitted.

File: 1782024612180.mp4 (17.61 MB, 720x720, shroomlenin.mp4)


Why is this on leftypol? Shouldn't it be on /siberia/?


>>2846063
this is important praxis

>>2846063
there already is a thread like this on siberia
https://leftypol.org/siberia/res/769001.html



File: 1750197287039.png (398.21 KB, 422x549, ClipboardImage.png)

 

A thread for the forgotten continent, so forgotten the thread got wiped.
Discuss anything related to:
>Algeria
>Angola
>Benin
>Botswana
>Burkina Faso
>Burundi
>Cabo Verde
>Cameroon
>Central African Republic (CAR)
>Chad
>Comoros
>Congo, Democratic Republic of the
>Congo, Republic of the
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
275 posts and 60 image replies omitted.

Niger military junta introduces new penal code criminalizing homosexuality with 5-10 years in prison

The new penal code punishes anyone who “commits or attempts to commit an immodest or unnatural act or practices lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans-gender, Queer, intersex, Asexual (LGBTQIA+) acts” with between five and 10 years in prison and a fine, according to the text of the new penal code.

“This same penalty is applicable to persons who officiated the marriage, to the witnesses of the alleged spouses, as well as to persons who have given their consent for the celebration of the marriage and to the organizers,” the new penal code said.

https://apnews.com/article/niger-homosexuality-criminalized-penal-code-junta-459e5bf803c32a0bc1c709d14aa3b070

US 'pro-family' group worked with Senegal activists pushing anti-LGBT law

Senegalese proponents of a tougher anti-LGBT law discussed campaign strategy and mobilization tactics with a U.S.-based "pro-family" group that ​calls homosexuality a public health threat, activists in both countries told Reuters.
The U.S. group MassResistance, known for its work at home pushing legislation against same-sex marriage and denouncing "the ‌transgender war on cultural norms", has advised like-minded African activists for years.
But now it is trying to take advantage of what it sees as a more restrictive approach by U.S. President Donald Trump's administration towards the rights of same-sex couples. Beyond Senegal, it has been involved in recent advocacy supporting a proposed new anti-LGBT law in Ghana.

https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/society-equity/us-pro-family-group-worked-with-senegal-activists-pushing-anti-lgbt-law-2026-03-16/

African lawmakers back push for tougher anti-LGBT laws after Ghana conference

Lawmakers from more than a dozen African countries have pledged to push new bills restricting LGBT rights, after a conference in Ghana that brought together self-described "pro-family" activists from ​across Africa and Europe, participants said.
Organisers said lawmakers from 20 countries ​attended the conference held at Ghana's parliament. It was unclear how many intend to introduce new legislation based on the discussions.
Speakers included Henk Jan van Schothorst, the Dutch executive director of the advocacy group Christian Council International. He urged African governments to resist ​pressure to ban so-called conversion therapy, which aims to make gay people straight.
"These policies are not only reserved for the Netherlands and for Europe. They are coming to Africa," he said of the bans, describing them as "ideological ‌colonisation" by Western ⁠powers.
At the Accra conference, Ugandan former lawmaker Sarah Opendi welcomed the shift. "Let us first thank the ​American people for voting for President Trump. The conversation in America today is different," she said.
https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/african-lawmakers-back-push-tougher-anti-lgbt-laws-after-ghana-conference-2026-06-19/

>>2843829
the most damning thing here is that this works for the togolese government and the african union which means they either don't care about countries in africa being dismembered to please israel or they're extremely incompetent

Does anyone have any good sources on South Africa and SA politics?



 

in herzog's 2016 documentary 'lo and behold', there's a part where he interviews a younger elon musk. it's incredibly ironic watching it now, 10 years later, considering how much has changed. back then, elon used to be a lot more 'normal.' sure, he still spoke with a bit of a stutter (maybe the autism causes this), but he could actually express himself. he was less erratic, he dressed normally, and for all intents and purposes, he just seemed like a slightly eccentric engineer.

cut to 2026: the guy is a total disaster. he's completely hooked on drugs, can't speak in public without getting high beforehand, acts like a fucking toddler, can't even put a proper suit on, and constantly embarrasses himself on a global stage.

but it’s not just him. if you look closer, this same exact pattern happened with trump. watch his old interviews from the 80s and you’ll see a genuinely well-spoken, sharp man. time skip to the 2020s and he’s also a junkie who speaks like an infant, partly due to old age and dementia, but the decline is undeniable. then look at the rest of the ruling class: CEOs, politicians, tech billionaires. there's this sharp, undeniable decay in their 'performance' over time. look at alex karp or mark zuckerberg. most of them are visibly fried, totally high, and completely detached from reality.

so why are all these powerful guys going off the deep end at the exact same time? what happened to their optimistic neoliberal ideology and all the talk about colonising mars or whatever bullshit?

think about it, these guys have access to the most terrifying data about the world, they probably know that we are absolutely, irrepairably fucked, in part due to climate change, and some other factors too, and they can't ignore it anymore, because it's actually biting us in our arse now, we are reaping some of the consequences right now!
it's kind of like the roman elites becoming more hedonistic and flamboyant as the empire fell, we are witnessing massive psychological collapse of the ruling class, we are fucked, they know that we are fucked, theres nothing they can do, they know that theres nothing we can do, and its driving them insane, and they might just be making things worse because why even bother?

this could be the most brutal blackpill about the world, the end is a lot nearer than you think when even porky is scared

What if the end is near, but only for western hegemony?
Chinese plutocrats and apparatchiks look fine as ever to me in 2026. Even putler looks somewhat put together despite being rejected by the western porkies he idolizes and stuck a in forever war.

>>2846151
>CEOs, politicians, tech billionaires. there's this sharp, undeniable decay in their 'performance' over time. look at alex karp or mark zuckerberg. most of them are visibly fried, totally high, and completely detached from reality.

>so why are all these powerful guys going off the deep end at the exact same time? what happened to their optimistic neoliberal ideology and all the talk about colonising mars or whatever bullshit?


the nazis were on drugs all the time too.

>the data is making them blackpilled


meh. maybe. or maybe they're just a bunch of nihilists on drugs surrounded by yes men who never tell them they're wrong, and they have more money than some entire small countries spend in a year.

These people have access to the best healthcare, doctors, fitness instructors, healthy food on the planet and they still end up like that. And they call poors lazy for not being fit.



File: 1781822987388-0.jpg (75 KB, 576x282, Slave Labor.jpg)

File: 1781822987388-1.jpg (78.72 KB, 582x195, Worst Countries.jpg)

 

I have been tracking societal factors which indicate exploitation and the list is in for the worst countries in the world.

These are countries which have a large amount of exploitative capitalists which exploit their workers abroad and loosely call themselves the international community.

There is many Asian countries which are climbing the index, then there is many tax havens which occupy this list. Surprisingly not all tax havens are on the list.
7 posts omitted.

>Surprisingly not all tax havens are on the list.
Literally every country in the list is a tax haven, including the United States: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_as_a_tax_haven

thank you for this based way of quantifying 'worst country'.

>>2845558
Ok but you have to ask if they are from paris

File: 1782057073635-5-0.png (189.3 KB, 1200x675, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1782057073635-0-1.png (484.54 KB, 1024x576, ClipboardImage.png)

>>2845558
>have a classy image abroad but they don't seem to embody it, more or less take advantage of it to boost their egos while being sleazeballs.
Americans have always known the truth. Our main stereotypes of Frenchmen is that they're rapey and they stink.

>The worst countries in the world
<look inside
<a bunch of offshore tax havens.



File: 1782055247497.png (1.45 MB, 1920x1920, IMG_3454.png)

 

It was historically progressive for the USA to have the Yankees defeat the dixies.

BUT it would have been historically progressive for the rest of the world if the dixies defeated the yankees.

only ultroids and libtards will fail to understand

Dixies were going to try and invade Cuba and the rest of the Caribbean down to Venezuela, how would this have been progressive?

>>2846140
>were going to try
yes and fail. just like their yankee brothers. the difference is that a dixie capitalist state would never rise to the heights of the yankee capitalist state - the supreme hegemon

>>2846143
You’re recycling the alt history bullshit that cute trans Shay was pushing, the idea that the confederacy winning would have meant a communist slave revolt and a Soviet aligned south



File: 1781061571224-0.png (Spoiler Image,152.84 KB, 1000x1000, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1781061571224-1.png (Spoiler Image,123.34 KB, 805x1200, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1781061571224-2.png (Spoiler Image,77.01 KB, 719x992, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1781061571224-3.png (Spoiler Image,121.7 KB, 1032x1364, ClipboardImage.png)

 

>reading about the Industrial Revolution and its consequences in the contemporary world
<mfw when I realize that Marx believed Communism would be possible because he mistakenly believed that industries would generate infinite resources, which would make the division of labor, the origin of social stratification, meaningless since there would be resources for everyone, unlike the systems of servitude prior to Capitalism where the division of labor had to exist to organize/maximize the production of resources since there were no industries and producing alone would not generate enough resources for a larger population to sustain itself
<mfw Marx did not realize that it is the very dynamics of the organization of the division of labor/classes and not the industries that generate infinite resources because equality of production produces absence of competition. Absence of competition produces absence of incentive for innovation. Absence of innovation produces absence of productivity. Absence of productivity produces nothing and is the reason why socialist regimes simply stagnate and need external intervention to maintain themselves(Rule 10)
12 posts and 2 image replies omitted.

>>2835489
>In practice, however, they generally produced less and faced shortages more frequently, only being surpassed by other countries where there was no even and post-Neolithic serfdom such as those in Africa, though they had modern technology (guns), they still used it for Neolithic purposes (Slavery).
This is what coombrainrot does to your noggin. Produced less lol. Clearly you did not do research. They produced A LOT, but sold it as exports.

>>2835795
>at the hands of the workers
<I mean the hands of the workers *representatives*

>>2835489
> If production were guided solely by social needs, socialist countries should have surpassed capitalist countries in consumer goods and material abundance
They did and still do ? Socialist countries historically have performed better at industrialization and scientific sectors given their original starting point. The lack of material abundance in consumer goods is simply due to the absence of priority given to these goods and socialist countries opting to plan almost entirely for industrialization

<Cuba has good literacy and healthcare compared to its neighbors

<China is world leader in EV and in manufacture
<The USSR pioneered space exploration and nuclear development

gunbuster fans are retarded, color me surprised




File: 1781995153721.png (28.39 KB, 738x105, ClipboardImage.png)

 

>Powered by Marxist ideology, Revolutionary Socialist (RS) armed groups launched formidable challenges against incumbent regimes during the historical era of the Cold War. As both transformational and transnational actors, they were optimally positioned to execute a revolutionary war doctrine that called for a highly integrated political and military organization that could weave a dense web of interactions with civilian populations. Civil wars featuring RS rebels tended to be robust insurgencies, that is, irregular wars that lasted longer and produced more battlefield fatalities compared to other civil wars. However, this superior capacity failed to translate into a higher rate of victories—hence, a “Marxist Paradox.” By posing a credible threat, RS rebellions engendered equally powerful regime counter-mobilizations. We show how ideology shaped armed conflict in a particular world-historical time and point to implications for the current state of civil conflict.
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-political-science-review/article/ideology-and-revolution-in-civil-wars-the-marxist-paradox/04E59A4D1DA17BD12089D99FA840724A
16 posts and 1 image reply omitted.

>>2845735
Address the article or fuck off you virtue-signalling, narcissistic, fearmongering hater of peasantry.

>>2845738
I addressed the article, ideology doesn’t exist and Cambridge is a factory whose product is British prime ministers, therefore worthless

>>2845740
You simply didn't, you just shat on the chessboard and demanded victory.

>>2845699
>Civil wars featuring RS rebels tended to be robust insurgencies, that is, irregular wars that lasted longer and produced more battlefield fatalities compared to other civil wars. However, this superior capacity failed to translate into a higher rate of victories—hence, a “Marxist Paradox.”
That's cause the objetive of the revolutionary socialist is to radically transform society and abolish commodity production, wage labor and create a classless society, which is extremely difficult.

File: 1782049045987.png (577.16 KB, 1331x744, 1778141360643.png)

>Marxist-Leninists are losers, more news at 11



File: 1782016530293.jpg (74 KB, 2000x2000, 61sXd14jJoL.jpg)

 

First of all, if we were to have rights and a republic, we cannot have government that contradicts that. People say fascism is militarism. I disagree. Every major war over the last 80 years has been because of banks profiting off of war. WW1 taught bankers that war is good for business. During WW2, the isolationist movement that opposed US involvement stated that the founding fathers were against old world conflicts (which they were). Capitalism will always inevitably devolve into authoritarianism. "ANCAP" / non-libertarian socialists have libertarianism all wrong. What we're living in today is end-stage capitalism. The anti-federalists opposed the founding fathers because they feared they would become too powerful. However, I believe that the means of production should be owned by the people and not the government or private corporations.

Why are you not a libertarian socialist?

>>2845927
There' a reason every rich dipshit is a libertarian.

<You’ve got that eternal idiotic idea that if anarchy came it would come from the poor. Why should it? The poor have been rebels, but they have never been anarchists: they have more interest than anyone else in there being some decent government. The poor man really has a stake in the country. The rich man hasn’t; he can go away to New Guinea in a yacht. The poor have sometimes objected to being governed badly; the rich have always objected to being governed at all. Aristocrats were always anarchists.

– GK Chestton

>libertarianism
>collectivism
you have to pick one, anon.



Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo / 420 ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]
[ 1 /2 /3 /4 /5 /6 /7 /8 /9 /10 /11 /12 /13 /14 /15 /16 /17 /18 /19 /20 /21 /22 /23 /24 /25 /26 /27 /28 /29 /30 /31 /32 /33 /34 /35 /36 ]
| Catalog | Home