>>2192503Lenin argues that imperialist policies, including the belligerent attitudes of nation-states, are
closely connected to the interests of financial capital. However, his analysis is more complex than a simple 1:1 causal relationship between financial capital and state belligerence. Lenin's central thesis
Imperialism is that imperialism is the most developed (in his time) stage of capitalism, where the concentration of capital and the merging of industrial and bank capital lead to the dominance of financial capital, which seeks to secure and expand profits through territorial expansion, monopolies, and the exploitation of colonies. This expansionist drive of capitalist powers, often manifesting in belligerence or conflict, can be seen as influenced by the interests of financial capital, as imperialist nations seek new markets, resources, and opportunities for investment,
however, Lenin does
not present this as a simple, direct 1:1 cause. Lenin emphasizes that while the interests of financial capital play a crucial role in shaping imperialist policies, other factors are also at play, including the competition between imperialist powers, the political and military dynamics of international relations, and the strategies of the ruling classes to maintain their dominance. The "belligerent attitudes" of nation-states, therefore, are not solely reducible to the interests of finance capital but are shaped by a combination of economic, political, and social forces within the context of capitalist imperialism. Lenin argues that financial capital, through its concentration and monopoly power, drives the imperialist expansion of capitalist states, but also that this drive leads to contradictions, conflicts, and tensions between competing imperialist powers. This is where the complex nature of Lenin's analysis comes in: while financial capital is a fundamental driving force, imperialist belligerence is also shaped by the broader international political economy and the competition for global dominance. You are more than welcome to provide a citation showing that he ever claims a 1:1 causal relationship.