/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

If USSR comitted Katyn, and Nuremberg decided not to say anything about it, like Katyn cultists claim,
why is it then that Soviet Burdenko commission was submitted to Nuremberg as a proof, and Nazi commission results under the name of "Amtliches Material zum Massenmord von Katyn", despite getting submitted, was declined by Nuremberg after a review, which claimed that:

>In any case, we believe that we have shown enough gaps, errors and inaccuracies to be able to recognize the statements made by the Germans in the publication "Amtliches Material zum Massenmord von Katyn" as material that does not withstand accurate scientific criticism, and thus recognize it as having too much propaganda character. In making this conclusion, we used only precise substantive reasoning.

Funny, right?

Oh, and as a bonus, Mednoye, which is often presented as a proof that Soviets were killing people in places other than those which were later occupied by Germans during the war, as it turns out, was actually occupied during the war, and 2nd pic is an order to recapture the settlement from Germans

Also also, check out present day Russia historiography on the issue. https://noo-journal.ru/vak/2025-1-42/kornilova-otritsanie-soobshcheniya-komissii-burdenko-v-katynskom-dele/ They call shit that happened in Russia in 1990s in regards to Katyn "Burdenko commission denialism"!

How do you feel about events and situation in Moldova?

I'm going to write a bit about the trend known broadly as left communism. It seems to me that left communism has now basically become this newest trend in opportunism. Back in the day, there were barely any left communists - there still aren’t many - but every now and then you see one. I’ve seen lots of opportunists retreat from their previous positions (whether they were anarchists, Trotskyists, or what-have-you) and switch to left communism. I suppose it is appealing to some people.

It’s basically an anti-Leninist trend and against any historical form of socialism - any kind that has ever existed. So what exactly is left communism? It is an anti-Marxist, revisionist trend that capitulates under the pressure of anti-communist propaganda. It’s not the only trend that does this, but that is its most characteristic feature.

Left communism likes to present itself as theoretically genuine Marxism. People who aren’t well-read theoretically or lack a firm grasp of Marxism’s core principles seem to fall for it. In reality, though, it’s just revisionism and a vulgar distortion of Marxist ideas - especially Marx’s message and the essence of Marxism. In particular, left communism is the most extreme defeatist trend in revisionism and opportunism. It sees literally all socialist revolutions and socialist countries as “not real socialism.” This includes all Marxist-Leninist countries, other socialist experiments, and even anarchism.

Left communism has never had major historical or theoretical relevance. It is entirely isolated from real political action and only appeals to petty-bourgeois-minded opportunists. Some people - and by this, I mean left communists - might find that insulting, but it happens to be the case on purely theoretical grounds. These seemingly negative traits are actually left communism’s strength. Why? Because left communism is on a crusade against reality. It crusades against any socialism that has ever existed or will exist. Since left communists themselves have never had (and never will have) political relevance, their ideas will never become reality.

Left communism relies on abstract theoretical arguments out of touch with reality - meaning none of its conclusions ever need to be proven. If left communism did become reality, it would implode. Left communists would attack it as “stalinoid.” Left communism doesn’t exist on its own terms; it only exists as a parasitical opposition to actual socialism. That’s thPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

Trump has deployed federal officers to “Clean Up D.C.” Of course rather than put the cops to good use for once and make them street sweepers or whatever he is using them to harass citizens and beat up homeless people. Many will say that this is unconstitutional but ever since the Reagan administration the power of the executive branch has grown so much that it’s only a law if the president says so, America is an elective monarchy at this point and the “elective” part might go away soon, what is congress even good for anymore other than cutting taxes sometimes? Also I’m sure that all of you probably know this already but cops don’t solve crime, poverty reduction solves crime.

Don't overcomplicate it. The material goal of all Marxist thought is not any empty phrase like liberation, brotherhood or equality. It's too establish class dictatorship of the working classes. Marxism doesn't need the philosophical baggage intellectuals try to push at every step. To win the battle of democracy, to establish the working class the demos, to establish state rule over the haves by the have-nots. Everything else is sand in eyes. Only the working classes can do this, because the working classes are the only ones capable of creating value in the production process. The majority mustn't be aware of its interest, but we communists know what their interests are. Never stop agitating for them. Eventually, our ideas will become mass ideas, because there are no other mass ideas except Marxism.

MrBeast is only 4 steps away from Mao Zedong. There is no way that this is a coincidence. MrBeast met the rock who met obamna who met OG Bush who met Mao.

>Marxism is antithetical to Humanism
>Diamat can be understood in a non-Hegelian way, akshually
>The state, your family, the media, etc. are all APPARATUSES OF CONTROLL
>Machiavelli was actually a progressive pre-materialist thinker, smeared by the Catholic Church, akshually
>Communists should win over scientists ASAP
>Freud and Lacan were genuises akin to Einstein or Bohr
>Realz over Feelz all the time 100%
How was he wrong again? Like, once??? This fucker was on CIA watch-list and had an exhausting lettering b/w him and USSR philosophers.

<inb4 he strangled him wife
1) don't care
2) she was literally asking for it for decades (documented)
3) le attrocity propaganda

Just reminding you that Chinese government got butthurt by Vietnam liberating Cambodia from Khmer Rouge’s tyranny, anti-imperialism doesn’t apply for Dengoids.

Communization Theory is a Marxist theory that combines, and criticizes, the ideas of the Situanitionist International, Italian Left-Communist, and Council Communist. It defends the idea that the Dictatorship of the Proletariat only reassures the re-emergence of the capitalist counter-revolution and that it should be abandoned.

With this conclusion, they believe that the next communist revolution should start with immediate communization of society, which includes the abolition of capitalist social relations and replacing them with communist ones. Some may say that the roles of the DotP is the destruction of capitalist relations and replacing them with communist ones but I have not read enough theory to comment on that right now.

I have so far read Endnotes 1, which is just a bunch of text by Gilles Dauvé and Théorie Communiste explaining why they believe in this position while simultaneously critcizing each other on their viewpoints, and I'm currently reading "Eclipse and Re-Emergence of the Communist Movement" by Gilles Dauvé. The first part of the book is great and I personally think its a must read for beginner Marxists as it explains the history of capital and commodity production, though the later parts are just opinionated writing. Of course, beginner Marxists should start by reading Marx's own work than the works of other Marxists.

Communization Theory is also split into two, with one side being anarchist, groups like the now defunct group TIQQUN and The Invisible Comitee, and Marxists, groups like Troploin and the previously mentioned Théorie Communiste. Just so you know, this isn't some unknown "leftist war", I just referenced them just to give some sort of picture. The most well known communizer journal is Endnotes, who compiles and releases a bunch of communizer articles.

Sexuality, in and of itself, has no intrinsic connection to communism or any other political ideology. It is unnecessary, and often counterproductive, to project fetishized or hyper-sexualized imagery, into a serious political framework that is fundamentally about class struggle, material conditions, and the collective interests of the working class. Our shared identity should be rooted in our position as workers and in our common struggle against exploitation, rather than in personal characteristics that are unrelated to the core principles of our movement.Furthermore, the existence of openly fascist individuals within the LGBTQ+ community, particularly visible online ,demonstrates that sexual orientation alone does not determine one’s political consciousness or allegiance. Just as there can be reactionary heterosexuals, there can be reactionary homosexuals. This is precisely why we must clearly separate questions of sexuality from questions of ideology. If a gay person chooses to align with fascism, they are politically defined by that allegiance, not by their sexuality. To conflate identity categories with political commitment risks diluting the clarity of our analysis and undermining the solidarity of the working class as a whole.(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)