>>2588869To target a specific audience, in a place like this, is unproductive. Angkar is speaking to everyone that has attentive ears to hear her and clear-sighted eyes to witness her red truth.
>>2588832i agree with most of these conclusions, however i would consider it necessary to clarify some of the premises made here:
>It was the ultimate expression of Year Zero. Not as a slur, but as a material necessity.<Year Zerois a falsification and the CPK never used that term - not in any speeches, not in any written material distributed both on the outside and the inside (internal party materials, party print magazines (of which there were several at the same time) distributed throughout the country, etc)
>Yes. Based. The city is a tumor. the city as a concept is not, but PP
at the time quite literally
was a tumor on the body of kampuchea festering with (petite) bourgeois agents, swollen from refugees fleeing the widespread US bombings. however CPK was not opposed to cities at large and had projects of rebuilding several ones, with hopes of repopulating them after they solved the immediate food supply problem
>S-21, Tuol Slengwas only
one of the Security Prisons, other Security Prisons operated throughout the country both before and after the revolution
maybe it's a good idea to make a post on /edu/ addressing some of the common misconceptions about Communist Party of Kampuchea which are constantly parroted by leftists (including on /leftypol/ at large), however i'm not sure how to go about this