>>2441036https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350573206_Class_Demography_and_Gay_Politics_in_the_WestI've briefly read his text about 'gay politics' and all his sources (which exclaim that the avg. gay male receives 12% more money than straight one in the UK & gay males are less likely to raise children ) denotes to his final exclaim that the gay male spend lesser portions of his money to raise children. ( and this is le bad )
Before this exclaim, he uses a mathematical formula ( which confused me a little tbh ) for the rate of profit, which is
rate of profit = total profit / capital stock
Then he describes total profit P = (1-w) * N , where N is the working population and (1-w) is the fraction of profit made per working person ( 1 - his wage share )
He also uses more formulas like that but to be honest, it made me a little confused. His formula for the growth of the capital stock does not include population P , so at the end he says that population increase will increase the profit rate.
So , he claims that if the growth of the capital stock exceeds the rate of growth in total profit, the profit rates will decrease in a capitalist market economy. Resulting lesser investments, lesser employment etc. with using Japanese stagnation and crisis (in 2008s as i recall) as an example.
Idk if it's really a critique of how gays raise less children and use less money for children or the market economy in general, but he finishes his text with basically saying " we should increase our population if we want a steady rate of growth in profit, and when gays were opressed the population growth rate was higher cuz they would marry women"