Ok hear me out, I'm scatterbrained so not sure how to explain this well.
Who's to say that a "techno-feudal" future wouldn't literally be techno-feudal? Is this really at odds with capitalism?
The Roman patrician class. Patrician comes from pater, pater meaning father. "Descendant of father". What father? Allegedly, the one of several that originally settled Rome. These fathers monopolized power over the presumed late-comer migrants to Rome who would become the plebs. To use an analogy, it's like how today you might immigrate somewhere but find yourself discriminated in employment and housing because you're not "one of them" even if you obtain citizenship. But on a smaller scale.
The power of a patrician did not necessarily come from being a "household name". Rather it is belonging to the
collective of "household names" that gave power. A bundle of sticks, if you will.
A ruling class. We are taught in schools however that the distinction between patrician and pleb faded. Did the ruling class fade? No, the ruling class became "the wealthy". Actually, the patricians were
already "the wealthy". The only thing that changed is that now, the plebs could become "the wealthy", too.
In other words, the bundle of sticks expanded to incorporate new "sticks". Why could the original fathers of Rome monopolize their power in the first place?
Because from the very start they were "the wealthy" relative to the late-comer migrants.
By the way, virtually the
exact same thing played out in Athens. The eupatridae were the Athenian equivalent of patricians.
The old Marxist tale is that capitalism defeated feudalism. Leaving aside the fact that "feudalism" is ill-defined. In vernacular conception, "feudalism" is rule of nobility. But as we've established, "nobility" (such as the patricians and the eupatridae) is older than Medieval Europe. Well, what the old Marxists wanted to say
really, is that the descendants of Medieval European nobles were defeated by the "bourgeoisie". This happened, right?
You might find two factoids interesting.
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.