/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

I hate the “Western Civilization” narrative that conservatives and even many liberals persuade
Here are some gripes I have with it in no particular order:
#1 Why is Israel in the west even though it doesn’t touch any other “Western” countries?
#2 If Israel is in the West then how is this not just a euphemism for white supremacy?
#3 How is Russia not a part of western civilization?
#4 If this was real then why would communism be a threat to western civilization if it was made in the west?
#5 Why are “Western values” so good if the only reason the west was successful is because of colonialist violence?

>Made agrarian reform possible despite land grabbers
>Pushed a labour reform despite the opposition of big corporations and mainstream media outlets
>First president to denounce Palestinian genocide and cut ties with Israel
>blocked and targeted by Trump's administration and the US Congress
>Now in the OFAC Sanction List
>Calls himself a socialist
>Goes on long anti-US rant in public television
>Everything seems to be ready for a coup to happen

Is he on the way to become our modern-day Allende?

Ok, fellow humans, I have a question: how do I know which side is actually the true right side? The left keep saying that they are the righteous one, meanwhile the right say too that they are the real ones, ok, then how can I actually know which side of the political spectrum is right after all? I have this doubt. How can I know if the left or right are actually true and honest?

The rot in bourgeois society is all pervasive. It is to be found at the most fundamental level: the quantum level. We need to start by clearly and plainly stating: the Heisenberg-Bohr clique is wrong.
Let us not be mistaken; the mathematics of quantum physics as developed in the early 20th century is correct, within its presupposed assumptions and scales of interest of course. However, the so-called Copenhagen interpretation is wrong. It is as its name implies, only an interpretation, and a wrong one at that. Bohr and Heisenberg's conservative and anti-communist personal beliefs are well-known, this inevitably led them to wage war on the materialist conception of physics with fanatic vigour. When one moves beyond the level of pop-science and one delves into the details of this interpretation, specially its history, it is clear that Bohr and Heisenberg (mostly Bohr) behaved like goons in promoting their mystic interpretation and bullied materialist opponents such as De Broglie, Bohm and others. Even within their Copenhagen circle, they silenced and shunned self-avowed Marxists like Rosenfeld who raised pertinent questions about their interpretation. Marxists must not blindly take the word of pop-scientists and bourgeois Ivy League professors; Marxists must take the pain of reading and understanding the source material (the physics, the mathematics AND the socio-history). The Copenhagen Interpretation, in short, is the Hayek, the von Mises, the Milton Friedman equivalent of physics. It is to no surprise that old wolves like Einstein and Schrödinger were never convinced and kept howling materialist critiques at the idealist drivel. Comrades, let us take a pause from the endless IDpol, the endless revisionism v/s orthodoxy, the endless Bordiga v/s Pannekoek debates, and let us focus on the more important issue: the suffocation of correct materialist science in favour of idealist, metaphysical, quasi-religious 'science' promoted by often brilliant physicists who behave more like Gurus and Caliphs because of their conservative and reactionary personal beliefs.

Can there be progressive national struggles after the dissolution of the colonial system and the counter-revolution in the USSR?

An easy answer would be to simply point out thte palestian struggle. However besides the just side of the war from the side of the palestinian resistance
We can point out that the international attitudes towards the Israeli-Palestinian conflict can be classified into four main categories, that have antagonistic intrests that can be assimilited in the intra-imperialist struggles. First, the open supporters of Israel —the US, UK, NATO member states and leading EU powers (France, Germany)— who politically, militarily and economically support the Israeli state, the Euro-Atlantic axis. Second, the powerful capitalist states of the emerging Eurasian alliance, mainly Russia and China, which maintain a cautious stance, promoting the creation of an independent Palestinian state and a peaceful solution, but aiming to strengthen their own geopolitical and economic interests. Third, regional powers in the Middle East, such as Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Egypt and the United Arab Emirates, which sometimes cooperate and sometimes clash with the US and Israel, selectively supporting the Palestinians when it serves their interests. Saudi Arabia has suspended rapprochement with Israel, Turkey is reconsidering energy projects with Tel Aviv, while Egypt is concerned about refugee flows and the strengthening of Hamas. Finally, states such as Iran, Lebanon (through Hezbollah) and Syria are more directly involved, supporting the Palestinian resistance and maintaining an open conflict with Israel, making a generalized conflagration in the region possible.
It is obvious that the palestinian struggle does mot aim at socialist revolution but the formation of a state in general. That is necessary. However, can we say that it is progressive if the national struggle is not conmected with the social struggle? Can national indipendence even be achieved without socialism?

Imo, the delusions of multipolarism are dangerous.
They are traps against the formation of an independent peoples movement and end up assimilating any resistance against western imperialism in the intrests of the part of the national bourgeoisie that wants to allign with Russia and China. Most importantly, these delusiona conceal the eurasian imperialist camp that is begining to take form.
For example, the kicking out of french imperialism from the sahel zone isPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

Leftwinger Catherine Connolly wins Ireland presidential election by landslide
The prospect of Connolly succeeding President Michael D Higgins and serving a seven-year term at Áras an Uachtaráin, the presidential residence, thrills supporters. She speaks Irish, espouses equality and wishes to ringfence Irish neutrality from what she calls western “militarism”. She has likened Germany’s arms spending to the Nazi era and accused the UK and US of enabling genocide in Gaza.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/oct/25/catherine-connolly-ireland-presidential-election-leftwing

Croatia reintroduces military conscription as Europe worries about Russia-Ukraine war
Authorities will start calling conscripts born in 2007 for medical checkups by the end of the year. Conscripts will receive a salary, and conscientious objectors can choose civilian service instead, the HRT report said.
https://apnews.com/article/croatia-compulsory-military-service-ukraine-32c84a8c4afc8790bee82644d8366e46

Telegram and WhatsApp Access Restricted in 34 Russian Regions – Monitor
“Complaints about unstable performance of the messengers are increasing across Russia. Thirty-four regions have already reported losing the ability not only to make calls, but also to exchange messages,” Na Svyazi said Wednesday. State communications watchdog Roskomnadzor had already been restricting voice and video calls on the two apps since August, a move both companies criticized.
https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2025/10/22/telegram-and-whatsapp-access-restricted-in-34-russian-regions-monitor-a90903
https://archive.ph/0kxp4

Spain to buy US weapons for Ukraine, says it is ‘a reliable partner’
‘We are fulfilling our obligations and commitments,’ says PM Pedro Sánchez, underscoring the missions that Madrid contributes to. Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

It's a moot point to ask 'what is to be done' if the intellectual question is not adressed first. By intellectual I just mean someone who specializes in mental work.

If we are Leninists in any meaningful sense, then we know that the working class can only get to trade-union consiousness and that it needs and outside actor to link up the movement with communism. This actor historically speaking is usually the petty-bourgeois intellectual. But let us consider the question now in say the 'west'. Can you identify a (petty-)bourgeois intellectual or a group of them, someone with enough free time on their hands that has contributed theoretically and organizationally to the movement, someone who elaborated on the nature of our movement, who wrote our Credo? No.

But what you probably can imagine is the student intellectual, which is a weak surrogate of the actual communist intellectual, because a student is usually only a free intellectual for a limited time and then they either get a good paying job (if they are in STEM) and have the same material interest as imperialism (all techincal advancment is for the war machine) or are forced to reproduce bourgeois ideology (if they are in the humane arts) after they finish their studies.

There is 1) no actual communist intellectual worth their salt that can put into words what communist demands are and 2) there is absolutely no organic working class movement against capital that can link up with these communist demands, at some point. Criticizing the movement is useless because everything that has been criticized has been done so millions of times. Talking about organization now is talking about a student communist movement with ambigious demands, a tragical kind of '68, without a semblance of an working class movement in the background.

Sproadic political terrorism, historical nihilism, a general spirit of collapse, yet the machine goes on. We need a transitional programme. We desparately need a Plekahnov for the west, someone to elaborate Marxism to us. Without commited communist intellectuals we will just go blindly and fail again. Our movement demands firm basic theory, and I hope I don't have to convince you that eclecticism, anarchism and revisionism are to be found everywhere.

Without covid and the lockdowns, we would not know the following
>our lives mustn't be organized around our workplaces
>leisure time is good, actually
>the enviroment regenerates relatively quickly without industrial human activity
>a centrally coordinated global initiantive is possible
It's great. The lockdown showed us communism is possible. The schizos were right, but it a different way than they expected.

>ignoring the facts that roughly a third of global nukes/hypersonic ballistics would fail to even launch (and that’s a low estimate) or the fact that plenty would miss, the primary targets of the ones that would succeed in launching would be other missiles, silos, or relevant military infrastructure with civilian infrastructure a secondary target.
>even with the fraction of nukes that do hit civilian settlements, the actual initial death toll and destruction is limited to 0.5-5 million globally and concentrated destruction of core downtowns. Not dozens to hundreds of millions right away or full cities vaporized. Ignoring evacuation and emergency responses that already cushion death tolls, most cities today are heavy as shit and larger than ever. Any modern bomb powerful enough to leave only a crater of a dense city hundreds of kilometres in area is a weapon of fiction.
>don’t assume that an operation impossible situation is going to be some spectacle. For obvious logistical and communication reasons between launch teams, the duration such a war would last at minimum would be 36-48 hours rather than a couple minutes just so launch teams have enough time to aim and adjust their weapons properly. Youd have well more than enough time to escape or know when shits hitting the fan.
I’m not writing this to sound optimistic about nuclear war. Just cynical about the outcome of it given that the ecological and political fallout of a full scale war would be worse than the devastation itself. If you think the past 30 years haven’t seen NATO allied states and the eastern bloc face increasing political isolation from the rest of the planet, expect that increase to exponentiate with the number of world leaders and civilians pissed over why major cities are irradiated shitholes and why nuclear powers lack the professionalism to use restraint with WMDs.

Why isn't the European left more anti-Amerikkkan? The Amerikkkan empire is the main force holding back the rest of the world, including Europe, from socialism and revolution thorough covert support for reactionaries and capitalists. Amerikkkan troops in Europe are also massive rapists and criminals who abuse civilians.