/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

>The lawyer sounds like a lawyer
>The Georgian sounds like a Georgian
>The journalist that takes inspiration from actor’s sounds like an actor
>The guy that gives emotional and unhinged speeches sounds emotional and unhinged
>The guy who frequently wrote in somewhat flowery language sounds soft spoken and flowery
Astute analysis, OP

Weird how different HCM sounds between using Vietnamese and French.
https://youtu.be/7aBnz6GiT1g
https://youtu.be/OJJfxVaZK4w
One sounds like a military leader while the other sounds like a Parisian painter.
>>188786
He disarmed the workers and his own support base. While at the same time still send the Chilean army officer to be taught by the US, the same country that had been sabotaging his political career for literal decades! It’s practically suicide in policy.

>>185458
near the end:

"IT DOESN'T MATTER IF HE IS OR ISNT A MARXIST, IT DOESN'T MATTER IF HE IS OR ISNT A CHRISTIAN, IT DOESN'T MATTER IF HE HAS NO POLITICAL IDEOLOGY, THAT MAN HAS A RIGHT TO A JOB, AND WE OUGHT TO GIVE IT TO HIM!"

based

I'm a US born Mexiburger, but man I really, really admire Allende. I saw the Patricio Guzman Allende doc on him and it furthered my admiration for him. He really seemed to me to be a bright spot in what is often a very hopeless and bleak continent, and despite his bourg background he genuinely cared enough para el pueblo and his socialist project that he stuck it out in The Coin™ right until the bitter end.

I kind of want to grab a little Venceremos Allende sticker to slap on my laptop or something as a dogwhistle but that seems kind of autistic when I'm not Chilean

Oswald definitely was able to sound more menacing than Hitler.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3NqG2lAojNQ

Stalin would've been called ma'am by customer service if he called them lol

>>224984
False, that information is a vital part of the backstory of the World Communal Republic.

>>224979
Yet previously the means of culture was more centralized creating far larger cliques and less splits.

>>224989
okay… the I’ll go with the example of the beef between Something Awful and 4chan.

>>224988
ok

>>224997
I’m glad you conceded

>>222499
What's the sushi thing?

you realize libs do the same thing to Trump right?

>>222506
triggering conservatives is actually funny tho you fucking loser

>>224953
Saying retarded shit like “Haiti isn’t a shithole” and drinking soylent doesn’t actually “trigger conservatives”. Just the same as eating Goya beans doesn’t actually “trigger libs”. It’s so stupid.

>>222514
It just tastes like a turkey burger. Beef is still the best meat in the Animal kingdom. it will never go out of fashion.

>>221020
You should probably try reading Anwar Shaikh in order to despook yourself about neoclassical economics son.

>>224875
also Paul Cockshott

>Arguments consist of “No you(s)” over and over again
>Both posters arguing the other one knows nothing without presenting their own arguments
You love to see it folks

>>220989
what is the background of this image? is this some type of porn or is it a meme? i dont want to look it up myself but im curious

>>224743
>Most Poles, Romanians, Hungarians etc. I talk to argue that their corrupt government is just "the old communists coming back to power", that's why it's supposedly shitty.
And that's why I hate them. Excluding Pooland the other two were former Nazi allies for a reason. They are eternally reactionary and I hope they die in their shitholes.

>>223665
where do you think polls come from? what do you think the sample was? they almost definitely were not sampling from taliban sympathetic areas or population, or otherwise anti-US populations, and even if they did the people whos home is currently occupied by the US are probably not going to be eager to say "america is the greatest threat to world peace" in a survey carried out by westerners

/leftypol/'s worst theoretical failing is that it cannot into methodology so just takes anything with an air of technicality about it as accurate unless it seems to disagree with socialism, in which case it is simply Bad Guy Propaganda and theres nothing else to say about it

>>223672
>>224801
whoops this reply was meant for >>224486

>>224154
Burgers are incapable of understanding that communism is democratic and it makes me ANGERY.

>IP with only one post on it
nice try /pol/
saged for false-flagging

>>224762
Improvements in medicine and living standards led to lower death rates for diseases. But this chart does not show the rate at which diseases were contracted.
Have him voluntarily contract measles to own the libs if he doesn't want a vaccine. He probably won't die after all.

fag false flagging

>>224762
don't refute it. You want chuds to believe anything that will make them sick and hopefully kill them. You should go on /pol/ and convince them not to wash their hands or take showers too.

>>224762
>learntherisk.org
oh boy

Going to play In the Name of the People (人民的名义) in about 30 minutes on https://tv.leftypol.org/r/b

Going to play In the Name of the People (人民的名义) in about 10 minutes on https://tv.leftypol.org/r/b

Reading today's news live now
https://tv.leftypol.org/r/streaming

Streaming some theory & games for Marx's birthday, going to switch to the news at 22 UTC
https://tv.leftypol.org/r/streaming

>>224710
Based

>>223898
>Karl Marx wrote nothing more than a fan-fictions of Utopists works from centuries before him.
Marx wrote almost nothing about Socialism most of what he wrote where analysis about capitalism, he also wrote many polemics where he criticized bourgeois philosophy. Marx also was an epic shitposter if you read the letters wrote.

>>218465
>Didn't even adress it. No one else did. Yes, this is servility for failures.
Cope and seethe
http://gesd.free.fr/calculdeb.pdf
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/6062/1/

Lack of proper planning and development leading to shortages in non-industrial goods. The economic challenges of USSR and Maoist China are well known. Only the stupidest tankies will deny it.

>>218465
>XP
Please tell me anon how did you end up becoming such a massive faggot?

>>222766
Heavy industry is a requisite for socialism. The capital turnover is low so when Khrushchev relaxed constraints and encouraged profitability, it made the managers not want to invest in heavy industrial development because recouping costs would take longer
But in the 1930s we saw how a socialist state could overturn this law of capitalism, and prioritise heavy industry, with earth shattering still unparalleled results.

To be fair, isn’t this sort of like asking why being a communist isn’t illegal?

How long until people start getting abducted and used for crypto mining operations?

>>224139
>How long
until musk finishes neuralink
braincoin ?

>>222966

Blockchain is just a distributed ledger system, a neutral development in computer networking technology, but “cryptocurrency” is the attempt to use it to create digital cash, which has failed because whatever the prevailing currency is in a market is always more valuable as the fundamental medium of exchange because it’s the one the state requires payments in. And I’m not even trying to do some MMT shit directly, I don’t care here about what gives a currency value as a unit of account in general. It is just self-evident that there are lower socially determined transaction costs associated with dollars than any cryptocurrency. You need to switch your shit for dollars at some point to pay the government, which goes moreso for businesses, which are the primary nexus of transactions in the economy. If you risk your capital on a venture you don’t want to be audited or deal with legal troubles because you’ve got some ideological interest in Bitcoin or some variant. At most, you may start accepting Bitcoin to draw market share from those people, but you are constantly flipping it back into dollars. And given that Bitcoin is periodically rising in value, there are disincentives to actually spend it in transactions because it resembles a speculative asset. Why spend your Bitcoin when you can just use cash and hold the Bitcoin in case it goes up again, or goes up more in the case of bull runs?

But the less people attach it to real economic transactions because of how common sense and risk-free it is to just transact in dollars, the more it just appears as a zero-sum speculative asset. Feel free to try to make money off of it, but it’s just gambling in a game of musical chairs. People pivoted to calling it a “store of value”, but a store of value is a hedge against market volatility. It isn’t a get rich quick scheme. The market and Bitcoin are skyrocketing right now, which clearly points to it just being another speculative asset in an asset bubble. If the market tanks people are more likely to cash out of Bitcoin along with everything else in a panic to move to low-risk assets.

>>223729
Its power and money, nothing else. Its not hard to understand

Mostly the money, and sometimes the power.
But mostly the money

Sage this stupid crap. It is so stupid that I lost many brain cells.

>>223924
This is has to be the funniest thing I have seen in a long time.