/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

>>2561258
The PZPR gave them literacy and comfy housing in Silesia incomparison to their hovels in Brest. Oh the horror

>>2560261
They won't outlaw KPP because it's a honeypot and this is just a strategy to gain attention, they already did this before

>>2561267
You're an evil tankie.

>The report tracks over 21 million tonnes of crude oil and refined fuels delivered to Israel between November 2023 and October 2025, including jet fuel used for military aircrafts.
>Twenty-five countries delivered 323 shipments of crude oil and refined products to Israel, totaling 21.2 million tonnes.
>Azerbaijan (via Turkey) and Kazakhstan (via Russia) supplied around 70% of crude oil.
FUCK Russia and FUCK Ziggers.

>>2561456
What are your sources for that claim?

>>2551288
>Absolute majority of armenoids, like every judeochristian is a rabid zionist who jerk off too israhellas they see them as a neocrusader
Azerbaijan has an established relationship with Israel as well.
>armenoids are literally the only nation in the region not recognizing Palestine
This is just made up.
>in the 90s armenoids invaded azeri territory and did to them exactly what zionists are doing to palestinians.
Even if this was true it would not be an excuse for what they have done to Armenian citizens and Armenian cultural sites. Azerbaijan kills Armenian civilians with weapons provided by Israel and NATO help and no amount of twisting the truth can change that.

>>2551292
This is 1:1 an Israeli talking point.

>>2551696
No, armenoid irredentism is IDENTICAL to zionism tho
>>2553540
It's literally what these western leftists think. It """israelis""" start branding themselves as communists tomorrow they'd totally cheer on charring and starving palestinian babies

>>2553566
>It """israelis""" start branding themselves as communists tomorrow they'd totally cheer on charring and starving palestinian babies
You are closer to this than anyone else. Azerbaijan is killing babies, not Armenia.

>>2553566
>No, armenoid irredentism is IDENTICAL to zionism tho
What Armenian irredentism? For actual irredentist imperial expansionism see >>2550374

I remember watching some video and explanation for why rural people defecate in the open is ironically cultural believes about cleanness, nobody wants to dig and maintain latrines because it is considered dirty. As for city folk, I imagine if you live in a place with no plumbing you dont have other option.

>why are poor places literally shitholes
Insightful analysis

>>2560971
It seems to be the areas with lower percentages of Hindus have lower percentages of open defecation. The north has more Muslims, in the far east the people tend to be Christian or follow local beliefs and tend to look more like a Chinese person or a Thai, places like Kerala are probably more secular minded due to the influence of the communist parties. I also notice Goa has a very low percentage as well and a good chunk of its population is Catholic. Most likely less Hindus less open defecation.

>>2560961
India is a meme country, which is only kept together by Indians being really susceptible to filial pressure. India was basically under the reign of liberals and it's practically a fascist state now, with a law in place where reading books gets you into jail. Kerala is the most successful Indian state because the communists did land distribution, with the upper castes themselves desiring to give land away.
India is the definition of the nation of the lumpen-prole, and north Indians are gaslit into believing that Kerala has a Muslim majority or a major influence by them. Oh yeah, that's not talking about the elections in India are probably rigged, or how the "communists" go to astrologers, and that Indian politicians are using AI in order to govern, literally. Whenever the bubble pops, India is going to be bad, really, really, bad.
Plus, that's not just talking about how the few movements intended to reform Hinduism like the Arya Samaj practically collapsed and now only exist for inter religious marriages, and the remnants are just a bunch of cults. A lot of Indians believe in "love jihad", where Muslims will apparently seek out wives to convert them to Islam, and that the majority religion is apparently in danger, despite being about 80% of the country.
India is not just cooked, it's beyond cooked.

>>2562423
I think India will probably have a Nepal style revolution soon, the government is getting way too comfortable, and they'll probably collapse a few months they shut down the internet.

>>2560318
Well one argument against eugenics is it's impossible to know the future and what genes will be best in the ever changing environment, but socialists are all about planning so oh well. I guess there could be concerns about genetic stagnation if everyone chases the same ideals and then some random disease wipes us out like a monocrop.

"superior genes" aren't a thing

A healthy gene pool is a diverse gene pool. If you are culling "bad" genes you are running the risk of depleting reproductive viability.

>>2560318
The way I see it, it's putting the cart before the horse.

As much as I am a layman, I will not budge that the problems of capitalism can not be fixed with superior genes. For the same reasons I don't think that GMOs or "superfoods" are the key to ending hunger. And I don't think it reasonable to wait for the human species to transcend the need of nutrition through some world wide transhumanist project for the problem to be solved.

Another retard with inferior genes that doesn't understand how genes work

Epigenetics retard

>>2560481
the AIslop image really undermines the story, no?

>>2560721
All that workout just to get gassed out in boxing/ wrestling lmao

>>2560476
US South American wars. Nobody even knows why they happen. There is some process that looks like consensus building, and something that seems like it's manufacturing a pretext, but there's really nothing.

>>2560904
Interesting. 30/100 young adults want to leave. That's a higher number than I expected.

>>2560538
I hate that guy, but you are being hysterical surely hitler was marginally less bad by comparison

>>2560107
What if violence is necessary to create a better world?

>>2560109
It is

The point of political violence is to bring attention, whether its some retard mass shooter or lugigi the fact it happens shows the state cannot maintain control. Don't look at it being real revolutionary action, look at it more of a sign of collaping conditions.

Once again, Maupin is right.

problem is that the actually effective acts of individual violence are really hard to pull off
the average person who commits political violence is dumb and lazy, if they were rational enough to engage in effective acts they would also be rational enough to value self-preservation and not engage in the acts
there's only a handful of exceptions where someone really smart and calculating pulls off something big

>>2560206
I’m going to tell you exactly what I just told you, western political theory is framed around the individual and against collective responsibility, the most popular and the most radical ideas in both right-wing circles and left-wing circles revolve around that. Anecdotal evidence about opinions you’ve heard that ought to justify a refutation of collective responsibility be damned

>>2560090
Well you’ve done nothing to prove otherwise despite ample opportunity to do so over the past several decades

>>2557921
>resorting to "no we didn't say that" gaslighting
>meanwhile the average TWist post is about as bloodthirsty as a khorne bezerker
kek

He agrees!

like most capitalist organisations its riven with factions and competing fiefdoms

American elites HATE revisionism!

The CIA is AES because it convinced westards to support brown hitlers

>>2560202
>brown hitlers
Opposite of black marx theory?

>>2558881
So the world Capital System is made up of multiple nested hierarchies, starting with the hierarchies in the social division of labor (aka laborers with the task of commanding other laborers in the name of Capital) moving onto the hierarchies in the national capitalist market wherein workers are subordinated to the national market as a whole, then small capitals are outcompeted by and subordinated to larger and larger capital up to the entire national state as the top of this national capitalist hierarchy, with the state functioning as the executive apparatus for the entire national capitalist structure; the next set of hierarchy is that between the actual national states now and their respective national/transnational firms on the scale of the actual world market which again sorts as the smaller less powerful national capitals are subordinated to the larger ones that then subordinate themselves to supranational structures to compete with their global competitors, which, since the 19th Century, finally all come together to form increasingly complex and real globally integrating executive committees for global capital; think the Congress of Vienna, or the League of Nations, and now the United Nations; which primarily emerge to stabilize relations between the entire world capitalist power structure between imperial national states and their imperialist transnational firms

What is very important to grasp here is that these hierarchies are not stable, in fact they are also riven with antagonism all the way down, from top to bottom; from the antagonism in the labor force between the laborers acting solely as labour-powers and laborers operating as managers of capital, up to the antagonisms between small and large capitals, and the antagonisms between the various nations, and the imperialist blocs. Libertarians ultimately reflect the outlook of the petit bourgeois, the small capitalist; and yet whilst the development of the system progressively annihilates, then reconstitutes more subordinate than last, then annihilates again this class, it is nevertheless entirely reliant on the continuation of the system for the perpetuation of the system; thus a contradictory movement occurs; wherein the libertarian is forced to confront the entire world capitalist system wherein the class position determining his own consciousness is both reliant on but aPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

I watched an interesting video a while ago analyzing the causes behind America's war of independence, and it essentially boiled down to the fact that although both Britain and it's American colonies were well on the road to capitalist liberalism by the late 18th century, the British government had a dual role as botu the guarantor of the profits and property of the British ruling class, as well as the manager of a global empire. Meanwhile, the colonial governments in America only fulfilled that first role with respect to the colonial elites. This led to a contradiction wherein the British government was forced to temporarily work against the interests of the colonial rulers in America for the broader interests of its empire (e.g. tax them to pay for wars in Europe, maintain peaceful relations with Indigenous allies, fund new colonial ventures in India, etc.). I think that right wing anti-globalism and anti-interventionism (dare I say, anti-imperialism) in America is fuelled by a similar contradiction. Even if America's role as the head of a Western imperialist coalition is good for the collective Western bourgeoisie (and especially American bourgeoisie) as a whole, this doesn't mean it's good for all levels of it at all times. Imagine as an example a small time manufacturer that struggles to keep up with larger competitors at the best of times, when along comes free trade and those competitors can pick up and go to Mexico or China, thus cutting costs and becoming even more competitive. It's not hard to see how this could lead to the emergence of a movement which is hostile to the more international aspects of modern capitalism and the American empire, but still very much pro-capitalist.

>>2560020
this is quote a long video about british india, but a similar thing occurred there with two camps. mercantilists in the East India Company just wanted to cautiously collect tribute, make profit and do trade without expending too much money in wars, which could also affect stability.
Expansionists wanted to wage wars to conquer territories to gain even greater profit. but the mercantilists thought it was too costly, and didn't want to take responsibility for ruling vast lands and populations.

libertarians believe in selling everything that isn't nailed to the ground, their ideal state is literally a failstate like russia during the mid 90s

Because they are idealists who think the modern capitalist economy is "not real capitalism".

New thread: >>2560043

>>2559761
I don't think he gave up willingly, but repubs are now trapped playing defense as the enablers of the enablers unless they opt for transparency. The hacked emails aren't as damning as what's left of his curriculum vitae so more defectors are to be expected.

>>2559925
There’s gonna be massive backlash against republicans. Massie and MGT jumping ship shows they see the writing on the wall. This is going to end in some republicans being hung and rightfully so. They are the most craven of criminals and have been for decades. In a just society anyone that called themselves a Zionist would be removed from office and put on trial.

Unfortunately I’m afraid they’ll throw trump and possibly bill Clinton to the angry mob, give us gruesome Gavin in 2028 and it’ll be a repeat of Obama. It’s really important that we make sure that it is know the democrats and republicans are the same. It’s more obvious than ever that the dems are a fake opposition party complicit in the massive theft, fraud, bribery, treason, and child trafficking the republicans have been doing for decades.

>>2558849
This one? It's AI generated.

Genuine Question: Why do people (correctly) call out the fact that the US is irredeemable and founded on genocide of indigenous people and enslavement of Black people, but then explicitly or implicitly claim that said Black and Native people are exploiters of the third world, in order to imply that revolution is impossible in the US *even among black and native people*. In addition, why do the people opposing the claims of revolution being impossible in the US bring up the conditions of all working-class people in the US in general, instead of specifically that of Black and Native people. Idk, it seems like there used to be a coherent position on the left that revolution among *white* people specifically in the US was impossible, but that revolution among colonized people in the US was possible and necessary, but now it’s been subsumed into both of the positions I’m talking about. Also, it seems like a lot of people take the government propaganda that every single Native American died and there are none left today at face value in order to argue that *all* people in the US are unrevolutionary settlers, what’s up with that? Sorry, I know I’m being really reductive, this has just been bothering me for a really long time and I want some answers.