[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

"The anons of the past have only shitposted on the Internet about the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it."
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)
What is 6 - 2?

Not reporting is bourgeois

| Catalog | Home
|

File: 1756749390196.jpeg (29.96 KB, 612x501, IMG_9801.jpeg)

 

What do you think about gun control?

Although nobody here likes the constitution I see many pro-Guns people here who argue against gun control.

Here is my take on gun control, The founding fathers put the 2nd amendment in the constitution so a revolution could happen if the government ever gets corrupted (Also so white mobs could drive Natives off of there land but my point still stands) and I see many people here think that thats a good idea despite disliking the constitution. I however don’t think that that is working. America is currently becoming a fascist dictatorship and nobody is trying to use their guns to overthrow Trump, because most people who have them like Trump and would rather use their guns to shoot Bud Light Cans, nine year old elementary school students, black church goers, Their wives, Latino mall shoppers, or themselves.

Yeah, supporting regulation of gun owner ship doesn't mean people can't have guns, also doesn't mean 1984 tyrannical dictatorship. And of course there are numerous historical examples of revolutions occurring where gun ownership was not prevalent or banned, and Americans are rather ironically revolution-avoidant despite that being the go-to argument against gun control in the states.

Repeal the NFA

>The founding fathers put the 2nd amendment in the constitution so a revolution could happen if the government ever gets corrupted
Well this is an irrelevancy today, because the army's repertoire of weaponry goes far beyond legal small arms and tactics have progressed beyond the two sides agreeing to show up in a field to line up and shoot at each other with the side with more men winning by default (idealistically presumed to be the citizenry rising up against tyranny), so any kind of successful revolution would still depend on the army joining the side of the revolutionaries.

From that perspective, there already is gun control in that you couldn't possibly buy anything that would give revolutionaries a fighting chance legally. So, I get the angle of the Socialist Rifle Association, but I also think already owning your own semi-auto AK constructed of various communist vintage, local reproduction and modern imported parts before revolution comes really makes little difference, you're still going to be dependent on at least some part of the military being sympathetic and bringing the big weapons and the expertise to use them.



File: 1756549314704-0.jpg (138.41 KB, 1000x905, 4819.jpg)

File: 1756549314704-1.jpeg (Spoiler Image,224.8 KB, 800x769, 0B016AA0-C598-4F88-9410-5….jpeg)

 

>be Hamas
>invades Israel after 70+ years of colonialism amd genocide
>warning 1: first intifada - results in the Oslo Accords
>second warning: Al-Aqsa intifada - Israel circumvents this by building security checkpoints in Gaza and erecting a border wall with the West Bank
>this creates a low intensity battle that Israel was able to extinguish easily with the sexurity checkpoints in Gaza and the border wall with the West Bank, which during then, Israel was raping Gaza hard with all Hamas being able to really do is lob rockets (to which only 30 reported deaths between 2008 and 2018)
>then during the Gazan Border protests where tens of thousands of Palestinians are killed and only one Israeli sniper was eliminated after they fired live ammunition on protesters with slings, Hamas decrees a third (and last) intifada that'll create a situation that Israel can't get out of
>after preparing for 5 years, enter Operation Al-Aqsa Flood
>Palestinians tasted justice for the first time since Israel took over after the end of the Second World War
>after the IDF finally responded, the remaining Palestinians decided they'd rather die than surrender, so the remaining insurgents were killed off
>then Gaza and West Bank come under siege, tens of thousands more civilians are killed, but not Hamas, and now Hamas has dragged Israel into an America in Afghanistan style situation after pulling a 9/11
>and becajse Israel's resources are stretched thin already, their reserves are exhausted because Israel has been under martial law since its inception, reservists aren't fighting and there's a troop shortage
Bravo.
41 posts and 27 image replies omitted.

>>2453585
Source or it didn’t happen

>>2455761
Not proving him wrong dude

>>2455761
???????????????

>>2455761
Does this mean we can post nazi interracial breeding porn next?

>>2455761
Please delete this



File: 1756663976638-0.png (141.03 KB, 707x525, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1756663976638-1.png (125.39 KB, 707x517, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1756663976638-2.png (89.34 KB, 707x459, ClipboardImage.png)

 

This is imperialism. A capitalist dictatorship bent on superexpoloiting their working classes. There are absolutely no parallels with the Great Purges in preperation for the anti-fascistic and anti-imperialist struggle a socialist dictatorship is about to engage in.


I think capitalism without imperialism is still bad. And even as bad.

>>2456237
theres no such thing as capitalism without imperialism

what is this OP even saying? that imperialism is bad? that superexploitation is bad? superexploitation is the direct result of investment, of being at the forefront of production. if you're not superexploiting your workers then you're either just on par with everyone else or underexploiting them, which is the same thing as squandering labor power. what is the connection to Xi's anti-corruption campaign?



 

I mean, aiding the US in funding a Cambodian genocidal nationalist to own the Soviet Union seems like good ol' imperialism to me. Is this one of the reasons why Marxist-Leninist states are infamous for putting geopolitics over the advancement of socialism worldwide? Honest question, has China apologised for its involvement in the Vietnam War?
47 posts and 6 image replies omitted.

Debt cancellation

What makes Vietnam socialist?

>>2455157
>Even 2025 Cambodia proclamation about genocide talks about numbers in thousands at most
the number of victims doesn't matter. it can be a genocide even if no one dies

>>2455176
That and internet schizo-ism. There were (from what I've read) Cambodian communists in the Khmer Rouge who were pro-Vietnamese or at least friendly / not hostile in the eastern zones but they got wiped out by Pol Pot's purges.

90% of China's involvement abroad was incredibly misguided and I will die on this hill. I don't care if you think the USSR are "social imperialists" on some level, actively engaging in foreign intervention across the world against revolutionary governments the USSR supported while in a circumstance of global capitalist encirclement is beyond stupid and a massive waste of resources and time. I should not have to read about a conflict and find China on the side aligned with the US as often as I do. Capitalists voraciously collaborated, communists didn't, and so communists died a slow death.



File: 1754603818240.jpg (98.57 KB, 548x760, 416657.jpg)

 

There is power in Marxism that you cannot find in other systems of ideas. Marxism is a totality; if you’re a committed Marxist, you can’t pick and choose where to apply it. You cannot have a bit of Marxism for breakfast and a bit of liberalism for lunch. Choosing to be a Marxist means examining every facet of the social world through a rigid system that rejects esotericism, magic, or religious thinking.

But when you step outside your Marxist bubble, you realize: people are fucking idiots. Not "idiots" meaning "stupid," but ἰδιώτης (idiotes), an Ancient Greek term for a private person indifferent to politics or public life. Most people refuse to see the connection between politics and their daily existence. They prioritize a "good" private life: a stable job, a wife who cooks and cleans, 1.8 children, maybe a dog, a home, and holidays twice a year (sorry, Americans, this is Europe). Young Marx (or Engels, I can't remember) once called this an "animal’s life": unreflective, driven by instincts the bourgeoisie instilled in workers. Tragically, this remains true 150 years later. The separation of private and public life poisons any cohesive society.

As capitalism’s crises deepen, bourgeois propaganda (mass media, PR) aggressively pushes unscientific, esoteric, and religious ideas. I told my family I’m a materialis - not chasing money, just rejecting spirits - and they got sad for me. Like I’m some empty husk because I don’t "feel" ghosts. It’s even more exhausting to explain that most "personal" thoughts aren’t original. Humans rarely have new ideas; we recycle old ones. Yet people resent being asked to examine their beliefs. They deny that their desires are manufactured by mass media, or that history predates them. Many cling to a nonexistent sentimental past or an idealized future. I’ve developed profound hatred for the state, family, private property, and religion. My mother understands my critiques of the state, religion, and property, but family is sacred to her. Explaining its evolution as a social structure is pointless. This mental block leads to a common schema: individual → family → nation. You see this everywhere. ("States are cities; cities are families.") Most people can’t grasp their own historicity.

This is why meaningful mass political action is nearly impossible today. As a Marxist, you must constantly fight: first, to stay sharp and avoid sinking into the swamp of bourgeois society; second, to drive change against bPost too long. Click here to view the full text.
66 posts and 19 image replies omitted.

>>2428134
yes hello vegan stalin here. the only practical way for veganism to be successful is by controlling production. as long as it remains a consumer activism movement it will always be a niche apolitical subculture, a market demographic.

File: 1756700270163-0.png (1.41 MB, 1021x674, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1756700270163-1.png (537.92 KB, 1000x466, ClipboardImage.png)

>>2454810
>I got into a hole the other day thinking about the pull of entertainers to Scientology, and had a napkin theory that there are certain things about it which acts as a cope and self-help philosophy for people who work in that specific industry, where they're under intense pressure to perform roles in front of other people, and can have their careers go kablooey in an instant. (A lot of it is about projecting confidence and overcoming fear and self-doubt: i.e. stage fright.) It's less interesting to ask "why is Scientology nonsense" (it is) than it is to ask how this thing developed as a social phenomenon embedded in a certain structure.
I mean and the fact that L Ron Hubbard said that great artists are like enlightened beings, and if you're a big celebrity they treat you like a god. If you're a nobody in Hollywood you might be desperate enough to join in the hope they'll be able to use their connections to get you roles. If you think about it, they just created the alternative to Judaism for White people in Hollywood. They even have this big headquarters in Hollywood they call the "Celebrity Center."

https://www.scientology.cc/about-us/inside-our-church/

>L. Ron Hubbard once said, “The world is carried on the backs of a few desperate men.” Unfortunately, it is these desperate few who are often the most neglected.


>It is for this reason that L. Ron Hubbard saw to the formation of a special Church of Scientology that would cater to these individuals—the artists, politicians, leaders of industry, sports figures and anyone with the power and vision to create a better world. That Church is Celebrity Centre International.


>Now one might argue that these individuals already have benefits that many will never have. But, ask any one of them—ask yourself—it can become a lonely world. Subject to the unusual pressures that come with prominence and responsibility, being looked upon under a microscope for good or bad—these are burdens others can’t imagine. Not to mention the counterattack such individuals are subjected to by those less ambitious who would rather fight to maintain a “status quo” than allow anoth
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>2456032
That reminds me however, when I registered an ASCAP account, I guess those bastards immediately sell your address, and all the stuff that started pouring in were for all different kinds of spiritual healing retreat weekends and shit.

Many aspects of tarot, astrology, and other 'magickal' structures aren't really metaphysical, at least no more than Jung's archetypes. Being able to interact with these tools gives you more variety in your perspective and view of the world. Metaphorical thinking tools.

>>2456036
I do this with freudian analysis



File: 1755537795842.mp4 (7.64 MB, 1080x1920, 3mv74Z-ON_vDv5ZD.mp4)

 

604 posts and 172 image replies omitted.


>>2442524
both are natlib

>>2442350
Um I call it u dismissing Ukrainian agency sweaty

>>2442524
>There is nothing more useless mass killing than this.
The same useless opinion as expound by Michael Harrington when he disowned Vietnam and the conflict it represented as a war between two sides the workers had no stake in
And of course the third campist became a first campist over time

reminder that grillpilled is in utg



 

This graph named, "Estimate % of 30-Year-Olds Who Are Married And Homeowners" is circulating on social media. The data is for the US. I have read several news stories about how Chinese Millennials have higher marriage and home ownership rates than their western contemporaries. I'm on the road away from my computer today so I would appreciate it if someone just threw the relevant data into numpy and made a graph with a blue line for the US and a red line for China. Keep the propaganda simple. Show young people that capitalism is cheating them out of a normal life.
6 posts and 2 image replies omitted.

>>2455670
*more likely to own

The incel-blackpill crowd were right afterall, only the rich Chad is living life, the rest are either quitting and becoming NEETs or just straight don't care

>>2455686
Wow you can't even read a spreadsheet. Before responding to this reply please fuck off for a while and think about how stupid you are.

>>2455670
you do know that the second column includes people from the first one too right ?
for exemple that means that in the third row,since 75 of people are both married and homeowners compared to 85 homeowners,only 10% of homeowners are single

>>2456010
I misread it I guess



File: 1756685655959.jpeg (343.29 KB, 828x657, IMG_0332.jpeg)

 

I finally realized that Unfortunately the west specifically America ,Canada are so connected via settler colonialism which is their essence to Zionism its self settler colonialism. that you can’t reform or change the power Zionism has because if Israel ends then America ends . So they will never give up their outpost of settler colonialism in the east and that you can’t fight Israel through America and Canada only the east can stop which is non colonial can stop the Zionist entity

>>2455823
not your blog.

>>2455838
are you retarded. OP didn't say anything about themselves. it's political. "nOt Ur BlOg" is just a screechy little thought terminating cliche that admits you have no real answer to them

>>2455857
>OP didn't say anything about themselves
Lets see…
>I finally realize
He did mentioned him not one but TWICE, the previous state (previously he had not realized) and his new state of knowing, he is documenting his personal transformation.
Also, his post is not a question, what do you want him to answer to OP?



 

594 posts and 246 image replies omitted.

File: 1756676312396-0.png (280.08 KB, 601x675, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1756676312396-1.gif (42.6 KB, 220x165, gasp-shock.gif)

oh, no… I thought Russia's economy was on the brink of collapse because muh refineries.

File: 1756676706683.jpg (102.77 KB, 1170x1139, bourgeois economics.jpg)

>>2455595
>workers
>having high wages
>low unemployment
>not a sign of impending apocalypse
Not too familiar with western economists, I see.

>>2455579
The clickbait title doesn't do the video justice. Basically it's an explanation of the restructuring the AFU is trying to implement and why even if successful it will likely be ineffective.

>>2455609
I don't think the poster who did the "phillips-model-vs-reality" understood what he drew on the right side of that picture.

>>2455657
NEW THREAD
>>2455657
NEW THREAD
>>2455657
NEW THREAD
>>2455657
NEW THREAD
>>2455657
NEW THREAD
>>2455657
NEW THREAD
>>2455657
NEW THREAD



File: 1756601527801-1.webp (114.65 KB, 1400x1100, image-asset.webp)

 

A few months ago, I was browsing another image board and got told about this place and how there were a bunch of smart people here.
I've always been a pretty left wing guy, but certainly not a communist. I was excited about a left wing image board because I use not PC language a LOT lmao (somehow this post is mostly clean though.) I had also just finished taking a college level economics course a few months prior. It isn't my major, but it was a requirement, so I felt that at least at the basic level I could judge mostly objectively.
Firstly: I never really saw any attempts at explaining the benefits of a purely communist system. This site has done a wonderful job of showing the benefits of the mixed economy that is modern China. Wealth inequality is much smaller than it is in the US, and the bottom 50% of China earns more than the bottom 50% of the US. What I wonder is whether that has more to do with the availability of manufacturing jobs (which are usually well paid and low skill) rather than system of economics. After all, US wealth inequality greatly increased during the 90s.
Either way, the Chinese have been able to massively improve their standards of living, so hats off to Xi.

Secondly: After the ICC inditement I had a bad opinion of Israel, but browsing here has made my opinion of them much worse. I don't know what needs to happen, but something's gotta give. The way Israel is abusing the lobbying system to get essentially unlimited aid is a huge problem within the American Capitalist system.

Thirdly: In USApol, people there often paint a bleak picture for the average American, and I agree. Things are bad right now. However, if you break it down by category, it becomes clear that housing is almost solely responsible for the standard of living of the average American going down. Picrel. But wouldn't just limiting the amount of residential property corporations can own fix this problem?
…or fuck it, Mao's method would actually work too.

Anyways, this place is certainly interesting to lurk in. I'm surprised I'm still here seeing as one of the first posts I saw was from Iron Felix. I had no idea what the fuck he was talking about.
2 posts omitted.

>I never really saw any attempts at explaining the benefits of a purely communist system
Wtf does that even mean you fucking retard kek, and looking at income (especially housing income) is the dumbest thing you can do to gauge the wellbeing of a population, has about as much validity as polling random on the streets how their day was.

>>2454442
Under purely communist system you mean government ownership of everything. I doubt it will come back ever (except for crisis countries), because communist country's property should be PUBLIC ALL-PEOPLE ownership, not state. State property was transitory, but it kind of got stuck for USSR because of revisionist nonsense. That said, we'll definitely see more planning being done, and fully planned economy by 2050 in China and elsewhere

>>2455075
What would you consider to be a better measure of the well-being of a population?

>>2455206
>>2454442
OP what i think you are kindof missing is the marxist analysis of capital which you wont get in undergrad econ 101 courses you have to read marx's capital which is somewhat a slog but if you get through it and understand it you will understand why Communists are opposed to markets and capitalism and what capital truly is. I recommend this reading guide:

https://la.utexas.edu/users/hcleaver/357k/357ksg.html

as its the best I've ever found for it.

and here's a link to Marx's capital

https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1867-c1/

Secondly with regards to specifically housing China does alot better job creating housing for its population and not because of some Ezra Klein neoliberal-YIMBY market bullshit. Yes supply needs to be increased but that's based on a whole of government approach not expecting private developers to build to the point of non-profitability instead of land banking and waiting for conditions to improve i.e. scarcity to return.

Secondly read this to understand why critiques of Planned economies i.e. the "purely communist system" are wrongheaded.
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>2455466
it's pseudointellectualism to think anyone who is a fellow traveller will immediately jump into capital, when the correct thing to suggest was either marx's 1) wages, prices and profit or wage labor and capital or cafiero's summary of capital.



Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]
[ 1 /2 /3 /4 /5 /6 /7 /8 /9 /10 /11 /12 /13 /14 /15 /16 /17 /18 /19 /20 /21 /22 /23 /24 /25 /26 /27 /28 /29 /30 /31 /32 /33 /34 /35 /36 ]
| Catalog | Home