[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

"The anons of the past have only shitposted on the Internet about the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it."
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)
What is 6 - 2?

Check out our new store at shop.leftypol.org!

| Catalog | Home
|

File: 1763030829095.png (398.33 KB, 680x453, GtgC9rkWcAAzVKd.png)

 

why are libertarians in western countries generally anti-NATO and skeptical of “the west”? i’ve noticed this a lot, especially in the u.s., libertarians who reject the entire post-WWII western order: nato, imf, cia, military, the whole thing. they see it as global bureaucracy and corporate imperialism, not “freedom.” curious what others think i think it's very interesting
5 posts omitted.

>>2558881
So the world Capital System is made up of multiple nested hierarchies, starting with the hierarchies in the social division of labor (aka laborers with the task of commanding other laborers in the name of Capital) moving onto the hierarchies in the national capitalist market wherein workers are subordinated to the national market as a whole, then small capitals are outcompeted by and subordinated to larger and larger capital up to the entire national state as the top of this national capitalist hierarchy, with the state functioning as the executive apparatus for the entire national capitalist structure; the next set of hierarchy is that between the actual national states now and their respective national/transnational firms on the scale of the actual world market which again sorts as the smaller less powerful national capitals are subordinated to the larger ones that then subordinate themselves to supranational structures to compete with their global competitors, which, since the 19th Century, finally all come together to form increasingly complex and real globally integrating executive committees for global capital; think the Congress of Vienna, or the League of Nations, and now the United Nations; which primarily emerge to stabilize relations between the entire world capitalist power structure between imperial national states and their imperialist transnational firms

What is very important to grasp here is that these hierarchies are not stable, in fact they are also riven with antagonism all the way down, from top to bottom; from the antagonism in the labor force between the laborers acting solely as labour-powers and laborers operating as managers of capital, up to the antagonisms between small and large capitals, and the antagonisms between the various nations, and the imperialist blocs. Libertarians ultimately reflect the outlook of the petit bourgeois, the small capitalist; and yet whilst the development of the system progressively annihilates, then reconstitutes more subordinate than last, then annihilates again this class, it is nevertheless entirely reliant on the continuation of the system for the perpetuation of the system; thus a contradictory movement occurs; wherein the libertarian is forced to confront the entire world capitalist system wherein the class position determining his own consciousness is both reliant on but aPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

I watched an interesting video a while ago analyzing the causes behind America's war of independence, and it essentially boiled down to the fact that although both Britain and it's American colonies were well on the road to capitalist liberalism by the late 18th century, the British government had a dual role as botu the guarantor of the profits and property of the British ruling class, as well as the manager of a global empire. Meanwhile, the colonial governments in America only fulfilled that first role with respect to the colonial elites. This led to a contradiction wherein the British government was forced to temporarily work against the interests of the colonial rulers in America for the broader interests of its empire (e.g. tax them to pay for wars in Europe, maintain peaceful relations with Indigenous allies, fund new colonial ventures in India, etc.). I think that right wing anti-globalism and anti-interventionism (dare I say, anti-imperialism) in America is fuelled by a similar contradiction. Even if America's role as the head of a Western imperialist coalition is good for the collective Western bourgeoisie (and especially American bourgeoisie) as a whole, this doesn't mean it's good for all levels of it at all times. Imagine as an example a small time manufacturer that struggles to keep up with larger competitors at the best of times, when along comes free trade and those competitors can pick up and go to Mexico or China, thus cutting costs and becoming even more competitive. It's not hard to see how this could lead to the emergence of a movement which is hostile to the more international aspects of modern capitalism and the American empire, but still very much pro-capitalist.

>>2560020
this is quote a long video about british india, but a similar thing occurred there with two camps. mercantilists in the East India Company just wanted to cautiously collect tribute, make profit and do trade without expending too much money in wars, which could also affect stability.
Expansionists wanted to wage wars to conquer territories to gain even greater profit. but the mercantilists thought it was too costly, and didn't want to take responsibility for ruling vast lands and populations.

libertarians believe in selling everything that isn't nailed to the ground, their ideal state is literally a failstate like russia during the mid 90s

Because they are idealists who think the modern capitalist economy is "not real capitalism".



File: 1763016377798.png (309.26 KB, 775x1024, ClipboardImage.png)

 

🗽 UNITED STATES POLITICS 🦅

<Epstein's Ghost Edition


Thread for hellish discussion of the Dying Burger Reich: Things are going to continue to happen in the stupidest ways possible that no one really takes seriously, where every single person compulsively reacts with either cynical grifting or useless panic and appealing to a political system of liberal democracy that is entirely dead and irrelevant. things will continue to get gradually worse, more people will lose their jobs and homes, the most destitute and marginalized will be oppressed by state-backed domestic terrorism, but the decay will simply continue and everyone who isn't actively being imprisoned and forced into slavery or outright exterminated will simply ignore it and maintain a cognitive dissonance of believing a civil war is happening while living their lives in a mostly normal fashion. The death of the United States will be slow, painful, and insufferably annoying and stupid. 🏈 💵
Death to the scourge of the earth, the destroyer of nations, the father of fascism, the enabler of ethnostates, the treatlerite tyrant, the protector of pedophiles, the exporter of ecocide, the captain of capitalism, the king of coups, the sultan of sanctions, the emir of the embargo, the autocrat of austerity, the doge of deregulation, the baron of busting unions, the prince of privatization, the lord of loan sharks, the patron-saint of proxy wars, the sponsor of settlers, the guarantor of genocides, the invader of islands, the Divided $nakkkes of Amerikkka™ 🌭 🍔

🛠️ Strike Tracker ⚒️
https://striketracker.ilr.cornell.edu/

🇺🇸 Deeds of the Burger Reich 🇺🇸
https://github.com/dessalines/essays/blob/main/us_atrocities.md
https://williamblum.org/essays/read/overthrowing-other-peoples-governments-the-master-list

📺 Glowie News 📺
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
623 posts and 179 image replies omitted.

New thread: >>2560043

>>2559761
I don't think he gave up willingly, but repubs are now trapped playing defense as the enablers of the enablers unless they opt for transparency. The hacked emails aren't as damning as what's left of his curriculum vitae so more defectors are to be expected.

>>2559925
There’s gonna be massive backlash against republicans. Massie and MGT jumping ship shows they see the writing on the wall. This is going to end in some republicans being hung and rightfully so. They are the most craven of criminals and have been for decades. In a just society anyone that called themselves a Zionist would be removed from office and put on trial.

Unfortunately I’m afraid they’ll throw trump and possibly bill Clinton to the angry mob, give us gruesome Gavin in 2028 and it’ll be a repeat of Obama. It’s really important that we make sure that it is know the democrats and republicans are the same. It’s more obvious than ever that the dems are a fake opposition party complicit in the massive theft, fraud, bribery, treason, and child trafficking the republicans have been doing for decades.

File: 1763205511769.png (888.44 KB, 1200x675, ClipboardImage.png)

>>2558849
This one? It's AI generated.

Genuine Question: Why do people (correctly) call out the fact that the US is irredeemable and founded on genocide of indigenous people and enslavement of Black people, but then explicitly or implicitly claim that said Black and Native people are exploiters of the third world, in order to imply that revolution is impossible in the US *even among black and native people*. In addition, why do the people opposing the claims of revolution being impossible in the US bring up the conditions of all working-class people in the US in general, instead of specifically that of Black and Native people. Idk, it seems like there used to be a coherent position on the left that revolution among *white* people specifically in the US was impossible, but that revolution among colonized people in the US was possible and necessary, but now it’s been subsumed into both of the positions I’m talking about. Also, it seems like a lot of people take the government propaganda that every single Native American died and there are none left today at face value in order to argue that *all* people in the US are unrevolutionary settlers, what’s up with that? Sorry, I know I’m being really reductive, this has just been bothering me for a really long time and I want some answers.



File: 1763100166278.png (5.17 MB, 1691x2622, ClipboardImage.png)

 

Is this what "theory" is? Some old guy droning on and on about banks, oil stocks and other shit I don't give a shit about? If that's the case, I'm out.

goodbye, and kill yourself on the way out

>>2559784
You must be at leat quasi literate to read theory, ameri-mutt

quality thread, 10/10 bait.

its the latest stage of capitalism btw

File: 1763149590181.png (112.24 KB, 250x400, ClipboardImage.png)

Okay, I listened Principles of Communism and it was much better experience. No droning on and on about figures that mean nothing to me. Just clear and precise writing. Maybe I'm back in.



 

Political implications of more Americans converting to Catholicism?

The American right was heavily associated with Evangelical idpol for the past 50 years. They became the cultural backbone of the GOP from the 80s to the late 2000s. Now it appears like a huge number of former Evangelicals are converting to Catholicism. I even know some ex-Mormons who are Catholic now.

At the same time, it seems like leftists are embracing Catholicism too. Remember when everyone was convinced Pope Francis was a secret socialist? Jacobin mag goes out of their way with appealing to Catholics as well (every other article of theirs is something along the lines of: “Move over pink-haired bipolar feminist queers, here’s why the Catholic Church are the REAL socialists!”). People like Dorothy Day are propped up even though her actual contributions to the American left were minimal and symbolic at best (the Catholic Worker also referred to the priests killed by /ourguys/ in Catalonia as “martyrs” which is disgusting). Not to mention, the Jacobin crowd seems very big on appealing to right-wing Catholic sentiments like complaining about birthrates being too low and proposing Bernie-style policies like universal healthcare to “fix” it, as if low birthrates are a problem to begin with.

But anyway, if Catholicism becomes a major cultural force in America in the next few years how do you see it affecting the political landscape?
359 posts and 48 image replies omitted.

>>2545410
i would describe this as a form of protestant catholicism, like the tradcath autism that promotes sola scriptura over the lived tradition of the church

>>2545429
TradCaths go by tradition as well. They simply believe Vatican II was illegitimate.

>>2545432
>the pope is infallible, until he isnt
seems inconsistent, which is why sedevacantism is equally sprawled. who is the "true" pope?

This shit is fucking hilarious.

>>2409326
i'm convinced 99% of these are just kids of latin american immigrants going through an identity crisis

>>2545410
>p-please continue financing my pedophile ring p-p-please



 

Any comrades from Utah here?

How do we fix this beyond fucked up state?

The LDS church runs everything here. Nearly every single little detail of the state’s culture is dictated by Mormonism. Mormon temples are the largest buildings in every city and town. Mormon bookstores are more numerous than most other stores, and old school soda shops are more numerous than cafes (Mormons prohibit coffee and tea but allow caffeinated soda for some reason). Multiple buildings, streets, and businesses are named after Mormon things (e.g. “Cumorrah Avenue”). Multi-level marketing companies are everywhere and sponsor things like stadiums (MLM companies are littered with Mormon moms).

The LDS church is basically run like a massive corporation. They are very good at missionizing and making new converts, plus Mormons tend to get married young and have bucketloads of kids. The average Mormon family has between 4-7 children. The point is, the LDS church is highly reactionary and rules over Utah with an iron fist, yet there is almost no internal resistance to it. “Utah” basically is the LDS church. And that’s not even mentioning the entire settler-colonial history of the church either, the mass slaughter of the indigenous that Mormons participated in to create the state of Utah and such.

With that said, how do we deal with this state’s politics if we are socialists living in it? There’s no way someone like AOC or Mamdani or any DSA candidate could ever win here. If there was ever a socialist candidate, they’d either have to ensure the Utah public that they’re a “good Mormon” (which would mean throwing away their principles and participating in a reactionary, settler-colonial theology) or seek to dismantle Utah culture outright by going against the grip of the LDS church, which would be political suicide.

I’m sorry, but I wish this fucking state didn’t exist. Trying to organize anything leftist here feels like a lost cause.
152 posts and 20 image replies omitted.

File: 1762185050028.png (970.17 KB, 960x644, ClipboardImage.png)

>>2547146
>>2547140
>he doesn't know about the indigenous tribes displaced by Mormon colonization
>he doesn't know that Brigham Young instituted the enslavement of Native Americans in Utah in 1852
>perhaps he knows about the reform the Church underwent in 1978.
>he doesn't know about the Mormon tour guides in Central America who falsify the history of colonized peoples.

>>2432932
The Utah question can be easily solved through gerrymandering and land back. Carve the state up with large swaths going to indigenous peoples with the rest being divided between Colorado and Nevada. Problem solved.

>>2547744
On the contrary, Utah is a perfect example of why the US needs to be split into 50 unique countries, maybe with a few borders redrawn here and there.

>>2559870
>US needs to be split into 50 unique countries
What will happen you have 50 different countries with their own armies, nuclear weapons and territorial ambitions?

>>2559870
The bigger states would end up eating up the smaller states or the smaller states would need form alliances with other small states to form bigger entities.



File: 1761654710497.png (824.88 KB, 1013x570, ClipboardImage.png)

 

The surveillance and general crackdown on muslims during the GWOT was fucking crazy. Look at some of these FBI guidelines for profiling "extremists" and justifying repression:

>Spreading religious fanaticism through irregular beards or name selection

Can't grow a suspicious beard or name your kid mohamed
>Wearing (or compelling others to wear) burqas with face coverings
Can't wear religious clothing
>Interfering with cultural and recreational activities, rejecting or refusing public goods and services such as radio and television.
Gotta listen to NPR I guess
>Publishing, printing, distributing, selling, producing, downloading, storing, reproducing, accessing, copying, or possessing articles, publications, audio or video with extremist content
Ridiculously vague
>Other speech and acts of extremism
Basically a justification to spy and harass anyone for any reason
27 posts and 6 image replies omitted.

>>2556272
> Frankly I'm surprised he even managed to get insurance that covered terrorist attacks, that's like getting flood insurance in Florida
you're surprised a billionaire was exempt from the usual limitations?


File: 1763108319128.png (1.27 MB, 1200x675, ClipboardImage.png)

All of those are rational and if you understood Islamic history you'd know that extreme Salafist/Wahhabist really only came out as a result of the British toppling the Ottoman empire by purposely aiding the most reactionary sects. That's always been the standard, disruptive foreign policy to enable the most reactionary sects to overthrow the more secular States. It happened in Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya…

>Spreading religious fanaticism through irregular beards or name selection

It's not that naming your kid Muhammad is illegal. It's that if you're born Kyle Brown and one day you suddenly grow a 5-foot beard and name yourself Ahmad Al-Bashur Muhammad, you put on a bright red flag.

>Wearing (or compelling others to wear) burqas with face coverings

First off, no they're not "religious clothing" like a Mormon's underwear. They're specific, cultural clothing from Arabia, that these radical sects started mandating as mandatory for all Muslims. Furthermore, it's not a "woman's choice" when they are forced into making that choice out of pain of social abandonment, torture, or death as is the case in the rural areas of particularly backwards regions. Burkas only became mandated in regions in the last 100 years. You don't care about women's rights if you defend Burqa because it is an emblem of patriarchal control and that's clear to anyone who isn't a bleeding heart, liberal guilt moron.

>Interfering with cultural and recreational activities, rejecting or refusing public goods and services such as radio and television.

I can't find this one anywhere because it needs to be elaborated on. I'll speak on what I think it means from your abstract.

This doesn't happen but it's theoretically about if Muslims started taking to the street demanding women to go home at a parade or whatever. People are free to be Muslim, but you can't impose that on people, and I would want the same thing done to Christians or Hindus.

>Publishing, printing, distributing, selling, producing, downloading, storing, reproducing, accessing, copying, or possessing articles, publications, audio or video with extremist content

No, anon. They cannot publish ISIS recruitment videos. This is idiotic to be angry about.
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

File: 1763108605979.png (784.19 KB, 846x486, ClipboardImage.png)

>>2559867
Forgot the other picture. But seriously, stop reducing all Islamic culture down to whatever liberal, revisionist ideal you have in your head. Regardless of the crimes the USA has committed – which mostly involves toppling secularizing leaders like what they did in Iraq – it doesn't mean that Jihadi John is misunderstood. There's been attempts within Muslim society to adopt some social democratic ideals, which involves some secularization and it should be defended against Wahhabi style oppression. Blindly defending that religious reaction means you don't actually care about the people and just have some terminal "anti-America" view even if it means ISIS executing people for singing.

>>2559867
Lol it literally is China's guidelines, the thread is a jebaiting. Though we know the US had some similarly harsh surveillance on Muslims especially in the years after 9/11



File: 1763100532356.png (293.14 KB, 1920x1080, ClipboardImage.png)

 


Post the videos fagget. Also nice job creating double theda

>>2559803
What are you talking about?



File: 1752196320744.png (2.07 MB, 2224x1668, IMG_0267.png)

 

THE IDEAL WINNING 2028 DEMOCRATIC PLATFORM

As a supporter of the Immortal Science of Marxism-Leninism-Maoism, the Highest Stage of Marxism, I obviously realize that the Democrats are a Controlled Opposition Party who exist to keep the Workers and Oppressed Nations/Internal Colonies of Naw Afrika, Aztlan, the First Nations, inside the U$ corralled and controlled, while the dominant ruling Crypto-Fascist Christian Zionist Nationalist MAGAtard Republicans transform the U$ into a Full-Blown Fascist Police State, which combined with the fact that the U$ is a Prison house of Nations, which treats the Black/New Afrikan, Hispanic/Chicano/Mestizo, and First Nations/Native American population like they are not U$ citizens (Trump ending birthright citizenship will probably transform this from a De facto to a De jure reality by officially stripping citizenship from most of these populations), with them essentially acting as a permanent domestic underclass with essentially no rights that are exploited for cheap labor and disproportionately suffer from Mass incarceration and police brutality, with their neighborhoods essentially under De facto occupation by militarized police, as New Afrika, Aztlan, and the First Nations, are Internal Colonies/Oppressed Nations inside of the U$, and their National Liberation should be the number one goal of U$ Communists as stipulated by Lenin’s principle of Self-Determination for all Oppressed Nations in their own SSR, which will happen once World War III escalates into a Global Nuclear War that will destroy the entire Global Capitalist-Imperialist System, thus allowing for a World Maoist PPW to create a Global USSR (all of the SSRs and SFSRs of the future Global USSR are pictured in the map I posted, with the former U$ Balkanized into a New African SSR that includes the Black/New Afrikan majority counties of the Black Belt, a Hispano-American SFSR that includes the Hispanic/Chicano/Mestizo majority counties in the U$ Southwest, along with the rest of the Spanish-speaking Multiracial regions of the Americas, while the White Settler majority regions in the rest of the former U$ becomes part of the Anglo-American SFSR, which also includes the English-speaking provinces of Canada, as Quebec will become its own SSR, with all the Native American reservations becoming ASSRs) to Place the Workers and Oppressed Nations of the World on the Shining Path to Communism, ✊😜🇨🇳🇰🇵🇨🇺🇵🇸🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️🚀☢️!

However, as I have stated many timPost too long. Click here to view the full text.
72 posts and 9 image replies omitted.

>>2493380
I don't really understand the meaning of the King Lear username in this satire. In the Shakespeare play, "King Lear divides his kingdom among the two daughters who flatter him and banishes the third one who loves him. His eldest daughters both then reject him at their homes, so Lear goes mad and wanders through a storm." What's the connection, is it just that both characters are crazy?

>>2546908
The Dialectical Materialist Marxist-Leninist-Maoist analysis that provides the foundation for my Social Democratic, Social Progressive, and Non-Interventionist “Ideal Winning 2028 Democratic Platform” is not satirical, it is a 100% serious elucidation of my sincerely held beliefs, and my username “King Lear” is both a homage to the fact that I believe Shakespeare‘s King Lear is the greatest work of literature ever written and a symbolic reference to the fact that King Lear was the first literary work with an explicitly Atheist theme, with Marx saying that “the criticism of Religion is the foundation of all criticism”, thus you could say that King Lear’s subtle attack on Religion in its Crypto-Atheistic theme of Nihilism and Hopelessness in a chaotic Godless world, was a very early vague and tenuous prerequisite for the Atheistic Dialectical Materialist philosophy of Marxism, which is why I feel that King Lear was the greatest work of Literature ever written, ✊😜🇨🇳🇰🇵🇨🇺🇵🇸🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️🚀☢️!

>>2546933
I was going to call satire until you actually explained the King Lear thing in a way that makes too much sense to be a joke

>>2525627
>“Tor” is a CIA/NSA/FBI Honeypot created by U$ Naval Intelligence, so I don’t think I need to say anymore about the merits of viewing “Tor” as some kind of “Anonymous” Internet, when in reality their are ZERO websites on the Internet that are not fully accessible to Glowies because the entire Internet itself emerged out of the U$ Military ARPANET project
LOW-ORBIT TRUTH RAY

Bump, ✊😜🇨🇳🇰🇵🇨🇺🇵🇸🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️🚀☢️!

>>2547121
Thanks for the compliment Comrade, anyone who reads King Lear against the grain realizes that it has a much deeper meaning than just being a parable about a crazy old King attempting to divide his Kingdom between his three daughters, 😂🤣✊😜🇨🇳🇰🇵🇨🇺🇵🇸🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️🚀☢️!

>>2547122
Thanks for the compliment Comrade, it is really quite absurd that the whole ARPENET thing has not clued in more people about who really controls the entire Internet, and it is even more asinine that these same people who have not figured out who runs the Internet, believe that the Naval Intelligence Honeytrap for dummies known as “Tor”, is “Anonymous” in any way, shape, or form, 😂🤣✊😜🇨🇳🇰🇵🇨🇺🇵🇸🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️🚀☢️!



File: 1762747150901.jpg (103.8 KB, 1007x763, 3YLwRmiX4w68BfzBVUyBBH.jpg)

 

have you ever come to the realization of the universal truth of dialectics for the first time? sounds a little retarded and maybe it is but i got really high and finally came to the realization of what dialectics actually meant, how so many of my recurring thoughts on emergent properties were actually just separate cases of the one most fundamental belief to materialism. and how many of my issues with society were born from the most elementary politic which comes from the most essential divide – the belief in a static world of essence, and the belief in an ever-changing world of emergent properties. analytic philosophy has destroyed the world
8 posts and 2 image replies omitted.

>>2555863
yeah its pretty based

>>2555881
underrated truth nuke

>>2557255
You talk like a certain weird Maoist who hangs around on chapo.chat and TrueAnon…

File: 1763104303698.jpg (88.12 KB, 693x1021, 1270830598305314.JPG)

>>2555863
a large population that leninizes its state and applies dialectical materialism is extremely overpowered. USSR did not stick to dialectical materialism unfortunately, it needed more contradictions..

>have you ever come to the realization of the universal truth

nope, never even came close and neither did you



 

LDP Election just finished up.
Abe used to dance around questions about whether or not Japan was the aggressor in WWII, saying things like, 'oh the historians are still debating that, we should hear out both sides of the debate,' while Takaichi openly says that it was a "war for security" and justified under self-defense.
She's also in love with the idea of war with China of course. There was one anon here who was adamant that Ishiba would be pushing for a Japan able to detach from its absolute dependence on the US and work more with China, but like the typical centrist he is, he just resigned to give way to this freak lmfao.
63 posts and 10 image replies omitted.

>>2508056
They don't want the PRC to control the maritime routes that go through Taiwan's waters

https://www.jcp.or.jp/akahata/aik25/2025-10-27/2025102701_01_0.html
Takaichi wants the US to place nuclear warheads on the Japanese islands.
>Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi revealed in her edited book “Study on National Power” (published by Sankei Shimbun Publishing) released last September that she had requested the deletion of Japan’s national policy, the Three Non-Nuclear Principles, from the country’s Three Security Documents, calling them “an obstacle.”
>According to the book, before the Three Security Documents—which serve as Japan’s “guidelines for a war-capable state”—were approved by Cabinet in December 2022, Takaichi considered the phrase in one of them, the National Security Strategy, that stated Japan would “uphold the Three Non-Nuclear Principles,” to be contradictory to another passage declaring that “the Japan–U.S. alliance, including the provision of extended deterrence (the nuclear umbrella), will continue to be the cornerstone of Japan’s security policy.”
>Even if Japan continues to uphold the principles of “not possessing” and “not producing” nuclear weapons, Takaichi wrote that, regarding the third principle—“not permitting the introduction (of nuclear weapons)”—she feared it could “become an obstacle in a situation where the ultimate choice would be between protecting the lives of citizens or maintaining the Three Non-Nuclear Principles,” and thus requested its deletion.

>>2539644
Casus belli for China? “Japan has WMDs”

>a Taiwan emergency is a Japanese emergency
Takaichi is begging for her own country to be turned into Ukraine. Why willingly militarily intervene against China? Actually, what do you expect to happen? Even if all of the Chinese generals were crayon-munchers and all of the Japanese generals were super-geniuses, China would still annihilate Japan. She really wants her country to be decimated.

>>2559785
She should go to Ukraine to see the effects of 300 geran drones every night. Then multiply that by 10 and imagine them flying to the much-denser Japan. Nah she doesn't care though she's probably a puppet with her kids in America like Lai



Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]
[ 1 /2 /3 /4 /5 /6 /7 /8 /9 /10 /11 /12 /13 /14 /15 /16 /17 /18 /19 /20 /21 /22 /23 /24 /25 /26 /27 /28 /29 /30 /31 /32 /33 /34 /35 /36 ]
| Catalog | Home