/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

I've read it, and my opinion is that your poetry lacks rhyme and euphony in some parts. It had me wonder a little how it'd sound if the voice of a restless soul would recite it.

The sunset, a glorious sight
Its a pity it preludes the night

I Agree with the other anon, it could use more rhyming. But overall it's a nice poem with fun imagery and a neat message

I'm gonna have to sage unfortunately cuz this really should be in the OC thread

Cute poem but the message kinda loses its meaning since predators are necessary to maintain a sustainable pool of the preys in the ecosystem otherwise they devour their way to extinction, which shouldn't be the case with real societies. Predators in the wild are as as much of nature as the preys are and faces the same existential conditions as the critters they're munching on, thus making them a terribly analogy to the rulling class, those that don't even exist in the same material condition as the mass making them synonymous with another species entirely. A rabbit is ever so meek and weak for those that aren't are killed, it's a survival mechanism evolved entirely by chance under the terrorizing of larger animals, it's an inherent trait of the animal, no point in "going against it" for the anatomy is perfectly designed for such environment. We're are meager and agreeable by design for the elites weaponize starvation as a mean to cull out the intelligent ones during mass casualties events, since a more focused brain built costs more energy, as well as many other factors. This is somewhat true but in bad taste

>we are prey
speak for yourself, weakling.
(also i would look into biological mutualism to better understand ecosystems).

>>2429113
Cringe

>>2474972
Zeus?

n his "Contribution to the Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right" (1843) and, more explicitly, in its Introduction (published in 1844), Karl Marx argues that rights do not come from abstract ideas, God, nature, or reason (as claimed by philosophers like Hegel, Locke, or Rousseau). Instead, he posits a materialist and social origin:

Rights arise from the material conditions and social relations of a given society, and they primarily serve to protect the interests of the dominant economic class.

Marx's primary target is Hegel's idealist doctrine that the state (and its laws and rights) is the manifestation of rational ethical life (Sittlichkeit) and the highest expression of freedom.

Inversion of Hegel: Marx performs a "materialist inversion" of Hegel. For Hegel, the Idea (or Reason) develops and manifests itself in the family, civil society (the realm of economics), and finally the state. The state is the culmination and purpose of this development.

Marx's View: Marx argues that Hegel has it backwards. The state and its legal concepts (like rights) do not determine the structure of civil society; instead, the material realities of civil society—the economic relationships, the class structure, and the system of private property—give rise to and determine the form of the state and its laws.

To put it succinctly, in the Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Right, Marx argues rights come from:

The Material Base: The economic structure of society (e.g., capitalist private property) is the real foundation.

Social Relations: The relationships between classes (bourgeoisie vs. proletariat, lords vs. serfs) determine what needs to be legally protected.
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

Rights are part of the bourgeois concept of self that was created to protect private property. But the American constitution is supposed to limit the government's imposition of your 'natural rights,' so I always thought it sounded similar to how Walz framed Iran's concept of rights. A lazy demonization

>>2462088
My opinion is that that's based and theist anarchism pilled

>>2475162
good post

>>2467342
What about le crypto?

Gonna invite my friends to a casual, light-hearted movie night and then spring The New Pearl Harbor on them

Why celebrate the anniversary of US anointing its new Ostfront with its own blood?

>>2465636
What are the names of the people who the video says "you shouldn't listen to him him her her her etc"?

Drink soilent

>>2474889
yeah this would be better

>>2474900
💎

>>2474889
this, although if you are doing so do not say it on this thread

>>2474900
Was it any good? If you didn't send the cheese grater image then it wasn't really gay furry porn.

>>2475190
don't do it

BREAKING: BREAD >>2475202
BREAKING: BREAD >>2475202
BREAKING: BREAD >>2475202
BREAKING: BREAD >>2475202
BREAKING: BREAD >>2475202
BREAKING: BREAD >>2475202

>>2475190
based

bigado cigado digado figado gigado higado jigado kigado ligado migado nigado pigado qigado rigado sigado tigado vigado wigado xigado yigado zigado brigado crigado drigado frigado grigado prigado trigado bligado cligado fligado gligado pligado sligado spigado stigado skigado smigado snigado swigado spligado sprigado strigado skriga­do thrigado phigado shigado zhigado chigado thigado qrigado xrigado wrigado

>>2474186
What's funny is that there is no "left" in america, it's two sections of the right fighting ghosts

The US doesn't have a proletariat. There's only two classes in the US: the rich and the retards; bourgeoisie and temporarily embarrassed bourgeoisie. The Us population is a whole bunch of retarded lumpen npcs.

>>2473967
Perhaps the problem is that the U.S. is a highly capitalistic society based on individual self-interest. There is no sympathy for losers. If you're woke, you're a loser in 2025 because you lost the election, but the problem is – did these disagreements actually disappear? Did the people who oppose Charlie Kirk go away? Actually disagreements are inevitable so there needs to be basis for consensus and mutual trust. That has been weakened a lot. We're finding out that it doesn't work very well to be like "suck it, losers."

The state apparatus is also inherently violent. At the same time, the Constitution provides people with the tools to combat state violence, and perhaps this person identified Kirk with the American state. Perhaps the solution would be to arm Americans with small nuclear grenades to ensure mutually assured destruction. If everyone was equipped with a small nuclear bomb that triggers the moment you die, the blast wave would have also killed the shooter.

Depends. Reformist socialists like Democratic Socialists are often anti-gun much akin to liberals.
Even if you are a revolutionary socialist there is a massive gulf between an armed revolutionary vanguard or sensible legal ownership with sensible gun control measures versus whatever the fuck the USA is currently doing.
Plenty of European states like Finland and Austria have legal gun ownership, but you need to show a level of competence and sanity first.
America is a total outlier in terms of allowing any random crackhead neo-nazi to buy an assault rifle and gun down a school. I really think the average American cannot comprehend how different their gun culture is to any other place on Earth besides maybe Haiti and Somalia.

>>2473967
The age-old decision. Be subordinate to majoritarian rule by will or get whipped into subordination by force as they're most definitely armed aswell.

>>2473967
>>2474330
>>2474335
I will have to again leave a quote from Lenin here for those who are confused by clinging to the superstitions of the bourgeois state of not seeing the state as an instrument of one class to oppress another class and therefore are targets to be manipulated by opportunists:

<Secondly, civil war is just as much a war as any other. He who accepts the class struggle cannot fail to accept civil wars, which in every class society are the natural, and under certain conditions inevitable, continuation, development and intensification of the class struggle. That has been confirmed by every great revolution. To repudiate civil war, or to forget about it, is to fall into extreme opportunism and renounce the socialist revolution.

<Thirdly, the victory of socialism in one country does not at one stroke eliminate all wars in general. On the contrary, it presupposes wars. The development of capitalism proceeds extremely unevenly in different countries. It cannot be otherwise under commodity production. From this it follows irrefutably that socialism cannot achieve victory simultaneously in all countries. It will achieve victory first in one or several countries, while the others will for some time remain bourgeois or pre-bourgeois. This is bound to create not only friction, but a direct attempt on the part of the bourgeoisie of other countries to crush the socialist state’s victorious proletariat. In such cases, a war on our part would be a legitimate and just war. It would be a war for socialism, for the liberation of other nations from the bourgeoisie. Engels was perfectly right when, in his letter to Kautsky of September 12, 1882, he clearly stated that it was possible for already victorious socialism to wage “defensive wars”. What he had in mind was defense of the victorious proletariat against the bourgeoisie of other countries.

<Only after we have overthrown, finally vanquished and expropriated the bourgeoisie of the whole world, and not merely in one country, will wars become impossible. And from a scientiPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>2474912
The palm print will only really be of use if he gets booked for something else in the future. I don't think they scanned my forearms though.

>>2474989
sad.

>>2472801
it looks like the transhumanist shooter track is growing cold

>>2474986
Let’s hope it was a schizo rightoid shooter like the Trump guy

But what will rightoids do next?
>shoot up a mosque
>shoot up a bunch of immigrants
>blow up a church
>shoot Hasan
>shoot Sanders or Mamdani

One of the above is probably coming

>>2474713
This guy looks like Destiny, just slightly skinnier and with a lisp

>>2474004
>>2474372
/isg/ tards can't swallow the NEH pill
if you can't handle the heat stay out of the kitchen

>>2474247
Sorry I am retarded and didn't read the end of tour post and thought you were parodying NEH and saying that those are happenings.

>tfw my life hasn't changed in 8 years
Even the pandemic changed nothing for me

>>2473983
Neh today
Neh tomorrow
Neh forever

>>2474531
That is because you are loser, not because history is slow.

>>2474781
actually all the atrocity propaganda against communists was based and true and should happen again or something

>>2474801
Anarchist/leftist terrorism is on the rise. You'll get a lot of unironic people like you describe, and they'll be blowing up and shooting rich and politicians all the time soon

>>2473843
>HAMBOIGAHS
holy shit that takes me back

feliz nueve once

Can not dowload video

>>2473375
did he waked up in the end?

>The chickens came home to roost
FACT CHECK: Jeffrey Epstein's finance imperialist Zionist friends are innocent, actually the World Trade Center isn't a temple to globalist rape culture