[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo / 420 ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

"The anons of the past have only shitposted on the Internet about the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it."
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)
What is 6 - 2?

Check out our new store at shop.leftypol.org!

| Catalog | Home
|

 

I'm pretty skeptical of Michael Hudson kinds of narratives on financialization and rentiers. But I'm not really sure I properly understand how rent works. It seems to me that capitalism stagnates due to the falling rate of profit and not due to high rents and debts. If anything high rent and debt are mostly signs of a large amount of industrial development and a high demand for raw resources. I am particularly skeptical that investment into real estate is the cause behind deindustrialization. If anything the big real-estate investment trusts are a consequence of a worldwide larger and larger demand for raw resources due to the industrialization of the semi-periphery.

why looks for a clear chain of cause and effect when most phenomena have both many causes and many effects and even when A can be said to cause B, B can also be said to cause A in a feedback loop?

TFRP, absent anything else, doesn't really explain very well why capitalism would have periodic crises, much of what goes into the specifics of crises when they happen is an issue of finance. I don't believe Hudson puts finance at the primary driver of capitalism or what have you, he's focused on mid-level economics, which is, in capitalism, broadly handled through finance.

>>2846725
A demand for resources doesn’t automatically mean more jobs extracting such resources. If workers don’t have jobs, high rents/debts become an immediate issue.

Look at this graph https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/VAPGDPFI

Finance and real estate don't seem to be a very big component of GDP, nor do they appear to be increasing much.



 

Fuck this guy. I’m tired of seeing liberals and even “principled” leftists like Jacobin Mag prop him up as the greatest thing to happen to American leftism, like he’s sone kind of modern-Day William Z Foster.

In reality, Mamdani is a total fraud. He’s pandered to Zionists even before taking office. Then after taking office he’s sucked up to Chabad-Lubavitcher which is a satanic racist Jewish supremacist org with ties to the Russian mafia and Zionist entity. Why? He’s even thrown his own wife under the bus for working with Palestinian liberation activist Susan Abdulhawa. I guess he thinks kosher feelings outweigh Palestinian lives. He hasn’t done anything he’s promised in making NYC a cheaper and easier place to live. And yet delusional leftists still love and support him.

If Mamdani was truly principled he’d make it illegal to be a Zio in NYC. Semd police to monitor all synagogues for promoting Zionism. Track donations to the IOF from Jewish orgs. Fully divest NYC from the Zionist entity and all companies that do business with the Zionist entity. Get ICE to deport anyone with Zionist entity citizenship ( I hear there are a lot of them in Brooklyn and Queens). Ban AIPAC and all other pro-Zionist groups. Shut down businesses like Eichler’s which routinely sell Zionist products.

Mamdani ran on the basis of defying the Zionist Lobby so he needs to keep his promises.
322 posts and 55 image replies omitted.

>>2842294
Zohran Mamdani raped my father and killed my mother. Then he said heil Hitler. True story btw.

So is Mamdani good or bad for American leftism now that he’s been in office for over six months?

>>2838314
Besides the tunnels themselves, the bloody mattresses is certainly a point of suspision of something nutty and illegal.

Listen to Palestinians.

>>2846417
>account based in Israel



File: 1782011887432.mp4 (1.57 MB, 576x576, uiu2.mp4)

 

Post communist/general lefty edits ITT.
I will be dropping my collection, post any more you find
"I'm here for the aura and hype moments"
"I'm here for the aura and hype moments"
8 posts and 12 image replies omitted.

File: 1782024612180.mp4 (17.61 MB, 720x720, shroomlenin.mp4)


Why is this on leftypol? Shouldn't it be on /siberia/?


>>2846063
this is important praxis

>>2846063
there already is a thread like this on siberia
https://leftypol.org/siberia/res/769001.html



 

in herzog's 2016 documentary 'lo and behold', there's a part where he interviews a younger elon musk. it's incredibly ironic watching it now, 10 years later, considering how much has changed. back then, elon used to be a lot more 'normal.' sure, he still spoke with a bit of a stutter (maybe the autism causes this), but he could actually express himself. he was less erratic, he dressed normally, and for all intents and purposes, he just seemed like a slightly eccentric engineer.

cut to 2026: the guy is a total disaster. he's completely hooked on drugs, can't speak in public without getting high beforehand, acts like a fucking toddler, can't even put a proper suit on, and constantly embarrasses himself on a global stage.

but it’s not just him. if you look closer, this same exact pattern happened with trump. watch his old interviews from the 80s and you’ll see a genuinely well-spoken, sharp man. time skip to the 2020s and he’s also a junkie who speaks like an infant, partly due to old age and dementia, but the decline is undeniable. then look at the rest of the ruling class: CEOs, politicians, tech billionaires. there's this sharp, undeniable decay in their 'performance' over time. look at alex karp or mark zuckerberg. most of them are visibly fried, totally high, and completely detached from reality.

so why are all these powerful guys going off the deep end at the exact same time? what happened to their optimistic neoliberal ideology and all the talk about colonising mars or whatever bullshit?

think about it, these guys have access to the most terrifying data about the world, they probably know that we are absolutely, irrepairably fucked, in part due to climate change, and some other factors too, and they can't ignore it anymore, because it's actually biting us in our arse now, we are reaping some of the consequences right now!
it's kind of like the roman elites becoming more hedonistic and flamboyant as the empire fell, we are witnessing massive psychological collapse of the ruling class, we are fucked, they know that we are fucked, theres nothing they can do, they know that theres nothing we can do, and its driving them insane, and they might just be making things worse because why even bother?

this could be the most brutal blackpill about the world, the end is a lot nearer than you think when even porky is scared

What if the end is near, but only for western hegemony?
Chinese plutocrats and apparatchiks look fine as ever to me in 2026. Even putler looks somewhat put together despite being rejected by the western porkies he idolizes and stuck a in forever war.

>>2846151
>CEOs, politicians, tech billionaires. there's this sharp, undeniable decay in their 'performance' over time. look at alex karp or mark zuckerberg. most of them are visibly fried, totally high, and completely detached from reality.

>so why are all these powerful guys going off the deep end at the exact same time? what happened to their optimistic neoliberal ideology and all the talk about colonising mars or whatever bullshit?


the nazis were on drugs all the time too.

>the data is making them blackpilled


meh. maybe. or maybe they're just a bunch of nihilists on drugs surrounded by yes men who never tell them they're wrong, and they have more money than some entire small countries spend in a year.

These people have access to the best healthcare, doctors, fitness instructors, healthy food on the planet and they still end up like that. And they call poors lazy for not being fit.



File: 1781822987388-0.jpg (75 KB, 576x282, Slave Labor.jpg)

File: 1781822987388-1.jpg (78.72 KB, 582x195, Worst Countries.jpg)

 

I have been tracking societal factors which indicate exploitation and the list is in for the worst countries in the world.

These are countries which have a large amount of exploitative capitalists which exploit their workers abroad and loosely call themselves the international community.

There is many Asian countries which are climbing the index, then there is many tax havens which occupy this list. Surprisingly not all tax havens are on the list.
7 posts omitted.

>Surprisingly not all tax havens are on the list.
Literally every country in the list is a tax haven, including the United States: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_as_a_tax_haven

thank you for this based way of quantifying 'worst country'.

>>2845558
Ok but you have to ask if they are from paris

File: 1782057073635-5-0.png (189.3 KB, 1200x675, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1782057073635-0-1.png (484.54 KB, 1024x576, ClipboardImage.png)

>>2845558
>have a classy image abroad but they don't seem to embody it, more or less take advantage of it to boost their egos while being sleazeballs.
Americans have always known the truth. Our main stereotypes of Frenchmen is that they're rapey and they stink.

>The worst countries in the world
<look inside
<a bunch of offshore tax havens.



File: 1782055247497.png (1.45 MB, 1920x1920, IMG_3454.png)

 

It was historically progressive for the USA to have the Yankees defeat the dixies.

BUT it would have been historically progressive for the rest of the world if the dixies defeated the yankees.

only ultroids and libtards will fail to understand

Dixies were going to try and invade Cuba and the rest of the Caribbean down to Venezuela, how would this have been progressive?

>>2846140
>were going to try
yes and fail. just like their yankee brothers. the difference is that a dixie capitalist state would never rise to the heights of the yankee capitalist state - the supreme hegemon

>>2846143
You’re recycling the alt history bullshit that cute trans Shay was pushing, the idea that the confederacy winning would have meant a communist slave revolt and a Soviet aligned south



File: 1781061571224-0.png (Spoiler Image,152.84 KB, 1000x1000, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1781061571224-1.png (Spoiler Image,123.34 KB, 805x1200, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1781061571224-2.png (Spoiler Image,77.01 KB, 719x992, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1781061571224-3.png (Spoiler Image,121.7 KB, 1032x1364, ClipboardImage.png)

 

>reading about the Industrial Revolution and its consequences in the contemporary world
<mfw when I realize that Marx believed Communism would be possible because he mistakenly believed that industries would generate infinite resources, which would make the division of labor, the origin of social stratification, meaningless since there would be resources for everyone, unlike the systems of servitude prior to Capitalism where the division of labor had to exist to organize/maximize the production of resources since there were no industries and producing alone would not generate enough resources for a larger population to sustain itself
<mfw Marx did not realize that it is the very dynamics of the organization of the division of labor/classes and not the industries that generate infinite resources because equality of production produces absence of competition. Absence of competition produces absence of incentive for innovation. Absence of innovation produces absence of productivity. Absence of productivity produces nothing and is the reason why socialist regimes simply stagnate and need external intervention to maintain themselves(Rule 10)
12 posts and 2 image replies omitted.

>>2835489
>In practice, however, they generally produced less and faced shortages more frequently, only being surpassed by other countries where there was no even and post-Neolithic serfdom such as those in Africa, though they had modern technology (guns), they still used it for Neolithic purposes (Slavery).
This is what coombrainrot does to your noggin. Produced less lol. Clearly you did not do research. They produced A LOT, but sold it as exports.

>>2835795
>at the hands of the workers
<I mean the hands of the workers *representatives*

>>2835489
> If production were guided solely by social needs, socialist countries should have surpassed capitalist countries in consumer goods and material abundance
They did and still do ? Socialist countries historically have performed better at industrialization and scientific sectors given their original starting point. The lack of material abundance in consumer goods is simply due to the absence of priority given to these goods and socialist countries opting to plan almost entirely for industrialization

<Cuba has good literacy and healthcare compared to its neighbors

<China is world leader in EV and in manufacture
<The USSR pioneered space exploration and nuclear development

gunbuster fans are retarded, color me surprised




File: 1782016530293.jpg (74 KB, 2000x2000, 61sXd14jJoL.jpg)

 

First of all, if we were to have rights and a republic, we cannot have government that contradicts that. People say fascism is militarism. I disagree. Every major war over the last 80 years has been because of banks profiting off of war. WW1 taught bankers that war is good for business. During WW2, the isolationist movement that opposed US involvement stated that the founding fathers were against old world conflicts (which they were). Capitalism will always inevitably devolve into authoritarianism. "ANCAP" / non-libertarian socialists have libertarianism all wrong. What we're living in today is end-stage capitalism. The anti-federalists opposed the founding fathers because they feared they would become too powerful. However, I believe that the means of production should be owned by the people and not the government or private corporations.

Why are you not a libertarian socialist?

>>2845927
There' a reason every rich dipshit is a libertarian.

<You’ve got that eternal idiotic idea that if anarchy came it would come from the poor. Why should it? The poor have been rebels, but they have never been anarchists: they have more interest than anyone else in there being some decent government. The poor man really has a stake in the country. The rich man hasn’t; he can go away to New Guinea in a yacht. The poor have sometimes objected to being governed badly; the rich have always objected to being governed at all. Aristocrats were always anarchists.

– GK Chestton

>libertarianism
>collectivism
you have to pick one, anon.



File: 1779152496274-0.png (48 KB, 178x270, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1779152496274-1.png (51.57 KB, 180x270, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1779152496274-2.png (45.4 KB, 179x270, ClipboardImage.png)

 

Georgi Dmitrov:
>the open terrorist dictatorship of the most reactionary, most chauvinistic, most imperialist elements of finance capital.

Umberto Eco's 14 traits:
>cult of tradition, rejection of modernism, irrationalism/action for action’s sake, fear of difference, obsession with conspiracy, nationalism, glorification of struggle, contempt for weakness, selective populism, machismo, newspeak, treating dissent as treason.

Rajani Palme Dutt:
>Monopoly capitalism in crisis creating a dictatorship at the head of a manipulated petty bourgeois mass movement, resulting in the collapse of parliamentary liberalism under capitalism,

Normie Lib Political Science Definition:
>totalitarian authoritarian anti-liberal ultranationalism bulit on a myth of national rebirth, dictatorship, mass mobilization, and political violence

criticisms? thoughts?
179 posts and 32 image replies omitted.

if imperialism is the highest stage of capitalism
fascism is the highest stage of anti-communism

>>2845253
This. The only thing that actually unites them is terroristic repression of socialism and perhaps also autocratic government.

>>2845544
But libs also do it

bro what if trying to connect the fascisms together into one was a mistake. What if generic fascism doesnt exist? What if trying to make one generic fascism definition is doomed to failure and instead we should recognize the different fascsisms as seperate phenemona

>>2845797
Scratch a liberal and a fascist bleeds.



 

Why do people act as if “anti-Zionist Jews” are somehow better than overtly Zionist Jews, when nearly all “anti-Zionist” Jews are merely liberal Zios who adhere to the exact same narratives as overt Zios?

Believing Jews have any “connection” to Palestine is Zionist. Believing Jews are entitled to live in Palestine is Zionist. The “one-state solution” is just as settler-colonial as the “two-state solution” since it allows for illegal Zio settlers to remain in the lands they stole through colonialism and genocide.

Stop supporting these genocidal and colonial normalizers. Palestine is NOT South Africa but Algeria, and any true Palestine solidarity must call for the mass expulsion of every Jewish settler in Palestine. There is nothing they have that they didn’t acquire by theft and genocide. All of them must be removed for Palestine to be truly liberated.(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)

>>2845980
You had jews in Palestine even before zionism. The Ari synagogue was founded in the 1500s for exemple.

File: 1782033662253.webp (108.1 KB, 1200x775, Ironic.webp)

>>2845980
You have a PFLP flag even though the PFLP's position is for a one-state solution in which Jews would be welcome as equal citizens with the same rights as others while rejecting Israel's insistence that their war against Israel is a racial war aiming at eliminating every Jewish citizen and throwing him into the sea.

Jew derangement syndrome.

Based ban



Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo / 420 ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]
[ 1 /2 /3 /4 /5 /6 /7 /8 /9 /10 /11 /12 /13 /14 /15 /16 /17 /18 /19 /20 /21 /22 /23 /24 /25 /26 /27 /28 /29 /30 /31 /32 /33 /34 /35 /36 ]
| Catalog | Home