[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

"The anons of the past have only shitposted on the Internet about the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it."
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)
What is 6 - 2?

Not reporting is bourgeois

| Catalog | Home
|

 

When you're high you can literally touch the dialectic. I want to know how much influence altered states have had on philosophy and Marxism in general. A lot of Marxist philosophical concepts make more sense under the influence.
15 posts and 2 image replies omitted.

>>2447046
>3:55
>he saw two familiar symbols, a hammer and a sickle
that wasn't the symbol for communism until around the october revolution

File: 1756271020239.png (1.25 MB, 1208x1444, ClipboardImage.png)


>>2448350
thank you for clarifying that the story about time travelling marx isnt accurate

>>2448350
The red flag was definitely a symbol though. Maybe he found familiarity in the simplicity of the symbols paired with the red banners.

>>2448350
>two familiar symbols
Familiar, not certain. \_(ツ)_/



File: 1756494770681.png (71.79 KB, 234x215, ClipboardImage.png)

 

Present is X, X is None∴
It ∴ until None, (X) is None and ∴
∴ into None, None is Not X.
None it is ∴ .
Waiting for None to disappear, if None disappears then ∴.
None is ∴ . None is X ∴.

>>2452620
X is None ∴ because if it weren't None ∴ it would cease to be X, this is the basis for this thought experiment.

∀ ∈ X, X = ∅ ∴ X

>>2452628
I call this the NEH formula. Or the "Nothing Ever Happens" formula.



File: 1756403739884.png (1.88 MB, 1080x2206, ClipboardImage.png)

 

🗽UNITED STATES POLITICS 🦅

<Another Shooting Edition


Thread for the hellish discussion related to the scourge of the earth, the destroyer of nations, the father of fascism, the enabler of ethnostates, the treatlerite tyrant, the protector of pedophiles, the exporter of ecocide, the captain of capitalism, the king of coups, the sultan of sanctions, the emir of the embargo, the autocrat of austerity, the doge of deregulation, the baron of busting unions, the prince of privatization, the lord of loan sharks, the patron-saint of proxy wars, the sponsor of settlers, the guarantor of genocides, the Divided $nakkkes of Amerikkka

🏈 💵 🌭 🍔

🛠️ Strike Tracker ⚒️
https://striketracker.ilr.cornell.edu/

🇺🇸 Deeds of the Burger Reich 🇺🇸
https://github.com/dessalines/essays/blob/main/us_atrocities.md

📺 Live News 📺
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
581 posts and 161 image replies omitted.

Need new thread



>>2452532
Every gun produced commercially in the US has a serial number + identification markings on the inside of the barrel that make it possible to trace bullets fired out of it to the exact gun used.

The whole point of 3d printed guns is that they can avoid these regulations.

File: 1756491056902.png (1.06 MB, 1280x957, ClipboardImage.png)

BREAKING BREAD >>2452545
BREAKING BREAD >>2452545
BREAKING BREAD >>2452545
BREAKING BREAD >>2452545
BREAKING BREAD >>2452545
BREAKING BREAD >>2452545
BREAKING BREAD >>2452545



File: 1756265424608.png (64.42 KB, 225x225, ClipboardImage.png)

 

All religious and spiritual art is communist because communism made it. All religious texts are fictional works by communists in the end of each text it says - This is all fake, be communist, read Marx, this is just for fun! and all temples are communist and all religious figures are actors for communist entertainment and didn't mean anything they did and all historical events and epic things attributed to religion are communist but happened just for fun and shouldn't happen again.

Think about it. We made all the great things because its art and not because its true, the truth is material reality. Also anything related to "God" is nothing. it means nothing, it is just stuff for fun but it should be ignored, just admired for aesthetics which ultimately are only fun for communists and can be destroyed for fun by communists and should not be taken seriously. If someone brings it up say "I created it" because you are communist.

Example:
"We have to pray for X"
Say I invented prayer. Prayer means nothing because I invented it and its boring now.
"Have you read the bible?"
Say I invented the bible, its just for fun, thank me later.
"Merhaba"
Say I invented Arabic, Islam and Mohammad and Allah I invented your people and language.
"Jewish culture"
I invented it, I invented jewish and culture. I invented jewish people and it was just for fun, you're not serious I made you just for fun.
"I just wanted to remind everyone who believes in Jesus to repent, have faith in him and what he did for us, and give your life to him"
Say I invented belief, believing, I invented Jesus, I invented repenting, I invented faith, I invented what he did and it was done just for fun, I invented life too and I just made it for fun, this is boring, you are boring.
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
4 posts and 4 image replies omitted.

>>2452405
Thus after gaining traction the usurping negators can gain ground by forcing the reaction of metaphysical superstition to abandon its symbols, altars, structure. This is not the act of destroying sacred ground, it is the ransacking of "sacredness" in the bold claim that the ransacking created it - that it belongs to who ransacked and further that it was made by them in the first place.
Deleuze & Guattari spoke of "deterritorialization" and yet never sought to instrumentalize it.
Not only that, but this is not exclusive to religious nonsense, I commend that the style of reactionaries and their beauty be usurped and may the next Red Army be in Hugo Boss, swastikas and any symbol that looks appealing - with a new attributed meaning put onto it. All of symbology, art and such superficial visuals that drive "holiness" be taken to the claim that communism drove world history's progress as the real movement against the present state of things - to attribute itself as the force of change, so that anyone who thinks of "change" immediately comes to see it as synonymous to communism. All of history and its processes of change can be told to be a product of the real movement against the present state of things (of communism) which ultimately lead them onto change and all barbaric acts to simply have been a "play" of no consequence to the present people - no deaths and suffering of the past need any recognition other than to be retold as a play - an act or play-pretend thing.

>>2452414
I need somebody to start an argument against this thread for it to be demonstrated, this is also the premise that teleology wins over the explanation of origin since history can really be falsified and modified simply by popular perception and records - as to have a broader effect.

>>2452417
I have no argument against this

If you want something to bounce off, here's a thought theology only really makes sense if you interpret it through a Marxist lens

>>2452420
Interpretation is not assertive, its an analysis of an apparent view we've already come to the first place - trying to point out the faulty structure (i.e. contradictions) which still persist in spite of the analysis rather than being able to push them over by asserting "we made it".

>>2452423
When we say "we made this" (even if we haven't truly made it) we lay more nonsense on top of the already nonsensical character of the structure, this is to me an apparent way to cause it to collapse or at the very least give ground.



 

All the other previous modes of production were brought about over the course of centuries. The replacement of slavery by feudalism and feudal decentralization of the disintegrated ancient slave empires took centuries to complete. Slavery was not overthrown by slave rebellions, but by local magistrates using legal codes to turn poor freemen and ex slaves into coloni which were the prototypes of serfs. Slave revolts and servile wars shook the ruling classes, but they were put down quickly and did not establish a new order. Then the re-centralizing and industrializing force of capitalism also took centuries to emerge, requiring political/economic developments that began during feudalism and carried on: The rise of merchants and mariners in breakaway republics, the colonization and genocide of the new world, the enclosure of commons in England, the bourgeois revolution in France, the prototypical corporate structures and joint stock companies created by the Dutch colonizers, and finally the industrial revolution in England. Just like slavery was not overthrown by slaves, Feudalism was not overthrown by peasants. In fact in some bourgeois revolutions, like France, peasants often played a counter-revolutionary role. All these changes were largely brought about by slow systemic changes out of the total control of any one class but involving all classes fighting over the steering wheel. The idea of a "revolutionary class" is almost in some ways the reproduction of the great man theory of history at a class level. History is driven by systems, not protagonists, collective or individual. Lower class political upheaval, when it happened, was often either directed (with varying success) by middle strata or crushed by ruling strata. Bourgeois transitions were top-down affairs in Prussia and Japan, though ambiguously so. The vast majority of slave revolts and peasant revolts failed, but there is a vulgarized idea that a world proletarian revolution is going to establish a new mode of production in a single cataclysmic event rather than the new mode of production emerging slowly from systemic changes beyond anyone's control as in all previous transitions between modes of production. There's only so much one can ignore the evidence of actual history in favor of treating any one class as the historical protagonist. There are modes of production, and they do change, but it is less certain whether "revolutions" inhPost too long. Click here to view the full text.
23 posts and 6 image replies omitted.

>>2448260
American military Keynesianism, they want to use AI
for weapons targeting, also propaganda. America needs increasing investments in military might and psyops to fight the resistance of workers in the periphery and the beginnings of resistance in the imperial core.

>>2448231
It's shit that nuclear fission is suppressed by big oil but I think it's more stuff like domestic labor and housing. IMO denser cities and less urban sprawl are a prerequisite for a socialist economy. This explains why America is so reactionary IMO.

>>2451430
the world was never a good place to live but damn dude. shit's so bleak.

>>2451898
Nah, the capitalists are desperate enough to push the fascism button in America, their global headquarters. It de-legitimizes capitalism on a global scale if America cannot support itself. I just think that there are too many flaws in American cultural hegemony to cover up with AI propaganda bots.

>History is driven by systems, not protagonists, collective or individual.
<gestures at nothing
>History is driven by the systems man, you gotta do nothing and just chill out bro…
What a load of hippie bullshit, kill yourself OP



File: 1754108821431.png (64.65 KB, 464x509, 14748 - SoyBooru.png)

 

why aren't you using TOR? you know we live in a constantly evolving surveillance state, right?
>Download TOR
>Add it as main browser
>get OrBot on your phone and keep the vpn on at all times
>never post your face on the internet
>never leave a trace
>create a new circuit whenever you change sites
ultimate guide to staying untraceable
27 posts and 6 image replies omitted.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IP_over_Avian_Carriers
the only way, unless your adversary has a hawk.

>>2418452
>Tor vulnerabilities are reported on in major news outlets and have been for years now. He should not have to make a technical argument for what is actual common knowledge.


every system has 'vulnerabilities'. but if you look at the vulnerabilities and manage them they're avoidable.

>>2419894
I paid off a local kid with a pellet gun to shoot all the hawks near my Pidgeon rookery.

>>2419894
You don't 'manage' "vulnerabilities" on a collander when it leaks vro

@King Lear, Is Anonymity a myth



File: 1756429094866.png (1.33 MB, 960x652, ysqtithnkoz51.png)

 

Brawl erupts in Mexico’s senate after debate over US military intervention to fight drug cartels
The scuffle followed a tense debate during which the governing Morena party and its allies accused the opposition Pri and Pan parties of calling for US military intervention in Mexico, a claim that both parties denied. Earlier this week, a senator from the Pan party had gone on Fox News and said that “help from the United States to fight the cartels in Mexico is absolutely welcome”. The issue has become particularly contentious in Mexico after Donald Trump reportedly authorized the use of military force targeting drug cartels deemed terrorist organizations in Latin American countries.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/aug/28/mexico-senate-fight-us-military-intervention-cartels

Paraguayan Drivers Demand Labor Guarantees in Transit Reform
The National Workers’ Union of Paraguay (CNT) warned about the lack of labor guarantees in the public transportation reform, denouncing that the bill proposes the outsourcing of services without ensuring stability, continuity, or respect for workers’ seniority. Union representative Ramón Ávalos explained that nearly 5,000 employees, including drivers and administrative and workshop staff, are uncertain about their future employment.
https://www.telesurenglish.net/paraguayan-drivers-demand-labor-guarantees-in-transit-reform/

More audios linking Karina Milei to Andis scandal leaked
Spagnuolo mentioned that Karina Milei was taking kickbacks from disability allowances, while he complained about his own salary, suggesting officials need to “get money from somewhere” to make ends meet. The former official claimed that the irregularities under him were deeper than those committed by previous administrations after suppliers were instructed to raise their prices and deliver the money to “the president's office.” Spagnuolo also mentions having WhatsApp messages from Karina Milei, who - he believed - would fall given the scandal.
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

Trump administration announces a $825 million arms sale to Ukraine
The State Department announced Thursday that it had notified Congress of the sale of extended-range attack munition missiles and navigation systems for Ukraine. The sale will cover 3,350 ERAM missiles, 3,350 GPS units, along with components, spare parts and other accessories, as well as training and technical support.
https://apnews.com/article/ukraine-us-weapons-sale-trump-russia-74e01123c0067d5fc160141e0cabf207

State DFL chair's text fueled tension after Fateh endorsement reversal
For some Fateh supporters, the message reinforces a belief that top party officials were eager to intervene on incumbent Mayor Jacob Frey's behalf after his convention defeat. That suspicion is at the heart of an intra-party feud that has erupted since the state party's rules committee revoked Fateh's endorsement. Carlbom told Axios the text "was purely about procedural mistakes that we would need to address, not a preference for or against any candidate."
https://www.axios.com/local/twin-cities/2025/08/27/dfl-carlblom-text-fateh-endorsement

Former Memphis police officers granted new trial in Tyre Nichols killing
Three former Memphis police officers who were convicted on federal charges related to the beating death of unarmed Black motorist Tyre Nichols have each been granted a new trial. U.S. District Judge Sheryl Lipman on Thursday ordered the new trials after finding that another judge held communications with federal prosecutors without defense lawyers present, giving the appearance of possible bias.
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/former-memphis-police-officers-granted-new-trial-tyre-nichols-killing-2025-08-29/

Top Human Rights Group Makes Case for Countries to 'Break Up' Big Tech
A report published Thursday by Amnesty highlights five tech companies: Alphabet (Google), Meta, Microsoft, Amazon, and Apple, whichPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

Tybna

The DSA Voted Against Zionism — But Will It Break from the Democrats?
Every rupture carries its shadow. In Chicago, the same convention that declared support for anti-Zionism also codified loyalty to the very party arming Israel. Resolution 7, “Principles for Party-Building,” reaffirmed DSA’s surrogate strategy, stating outright that an independent ballot line “is not the primary goal or an indication of political independence.” Resolution 18, adopted unanimously, pledged a massive push in the 2026 midterms on the Democratic ballot line and even created a committee to explore a DSA-backed campaign for the 2028 Democratic presidential primaries. This is no longer inertia about the “dirty break” — which is the term used to describe the DSA’s self-evidently “dirty” decision to stay in the Democratic Party for now and break at some undetermined point in the future. What was once justified as a temporary tactic has now hardened into the DSA’s long-term strategy — a consolidation made explicit in Resolution 18, which commits the organization to remain within the Democrats through 2028. The contradiction could not be sharper: even as the convention voted to strip Zionism from the organization’s politics, the leadership secured resolutions that bound the DSA more tightly to the very party financing genocide. Today, some sectors of the DSA’s leadership wrap themselves in more radical, anti-imperialist rhetoric than in 2023 — but beneath the new language lies the same reformist strategy: to keep the socialist Left tethered to the Democratic Party, one of the main pillars of imperialism. This debate over strategy isn’t abstract — it’s unfolding through real campaigns and real figures. Nowhere is that clearer than in the phenomenon of Zohran Mamdani. His mayoral campaign in New York electrified millions. For the first time in decades, a Democrat running for high office said “Free Palestine,” called Israel an apartheid state, and endorsed boycotts against Israel. And crucially, his campaign showed that Palestine is not separate from so-called “bread-and-butter” issues. People rallied to him because his campaign has fused the fight against genocide abroad with the fight against skyrocketing rents, precarity, and exploitation at home. The link is not rhetorical but material: the same state that sends billions to fund Israel’s bombs is the one slashing housing, healthcare, and education; the same ruling class that justifies ethnic cleansiPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

Thanks News Anon

Thank you for all the hard work news anon



File: 1756404000680.png (264.26 KB, 398x398, lenin2.png)

 

(From "The Other Lenin" by Alexander Maysuryan. Moscow: 2006.) (Майсурян А. А. Другой Ленин. М., 2006.)

Lenin's opinion towards Nechaev was closely intertwined with Lenin's opinion on the "revolting, yet genius" Dostoevsky. Lenin decided not to read "The Demons" […] Lenin admitted: ["Demons" is] Evidently reactionary filth, like Krestovsky's "Flock of Panurge", I have absolutely no desire to waste time on it. I have no need for such literature; what could it possibly give me? […] I have no free time for this garbage."

Lenin held the author's other works in no higher regard. On "The Brothers Karamazov" along with "Demons" he expressed himself in this way: "I am familiar with the content of both these pungent works, and that is more than enough for me. I just about began reading the "Brothers Karamazov" and then dropped it: the scenes in the monastery made me sick."

Lenin did, though, read the novel "Crime and Punishment". One of his comrades remarked to him in the heat of an argument:

"One could easily arrive at Raskolnikov's "All is permitted" at this rate."

"What Raskolnikov?"

"Dostoevky's, from "Crime and Punishment".

Lenin followed up with unbridled contempt: "All is permitted"?! So we have come down to the sentiments and petty words of a soppy intellectual wishing to drown revolutionary questions in moralising vomit. Just which Raskolnikov are you talking about? The one who whacked the old money-lending bitch, or the one who clapped his forehead against the ground in penitent hysterics at the market-place later on? Perhaps […] that sort of thing appeals to you? […]
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
6 posts omitted.

>>2451128
Even lenin had holidays and went on vacations you fucking hypocrite, or are you a professional revolutionary of any sort?

>>2451189
he just like me when I sperg out about overrated manga

>>2450940
>Lenin was repelled by overly close attention to the dark sides of human nature; he referred to this as "ugly imitation of the ugly Dostoevsky" in one of his letters. And he added, to explain himself: "It once fell on me to spend the night with a comrade ill with Delirium Tremens (Alcohol withdrawal), and once to "talk down" a comrade trying to commit suicide (after an attempt) and who consequently, in a few years, did end up killing himself… But in both cases these were small pieces of the lives of both comrades. But to seek out such "pieces" in life, in order to join them together […] means to paint horrors, to terrify both one's own imagination and the reader's".

Damn, that was honestly really nice of Lenin. The helping a comrade through with alcohol withdrawal bit. Shame that aspect of him isn't talked about that much.

>>2451189
I think Lenin was autistic sometimes based on anecdotes like these

I find it interesting how modern (mostly rightoid JP fags) like Demons but dislike House of the Dead, yet at the same time praise the Gulag Archipelago (when both books deal with the same topic and are written in the same style).



 

In the previous discussions with mates in leftypol, the most contentious part has been regarding Democracy.

The mainstream view on this forum is one of distrust towards Western electoral systems, holding that electoralism is nothing more than an art of misleading and deception, with greater preference for vanguardism.

Yet as a resident of China, a citizen who has been ruled by the vanguard all my life, I loathe the fact that the government fails to hear our songs and ignore our criticism and supervision.

Yeah, I can see, what is happening in Taiwan, where there is full of chaos and hardly something in progress. It's true that the western system is uneffcient and corrupt, but changeable and reviseable, different from autocracy.

Anyway, I'm sorry that a director, which you prefer, with great authority, has come into power already, in the USA, whose name is DJT.
Or, what you like is a director you like, instead of a director you dislike?
Then how can we make sure about it?

Power can change a person, from head to toes. You may like someone before ther're in charge, but you cannot take them down after they come into power. They may cheat, they may lie, but no way you can regret, withnot democracy.

How many MAGAs are there, who voted for Trump, and got upsetted by his behaviour and policy afterwards? Ones those believe in socialism and hope for a leader, is not that different from the Republicans, are they? They want a GOP, Grand Old Party as well. The mere diversity lies in the specific.
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
8 posts omitted.

Another thing that occurs to me is that Mao expected Deng to take over and do something different and was mostly ok with it; his major regret was not getting Big Letter Democracy into the constitution

>>2434829
Gosh, democracy! That sounds swell. So regular people can vote not to live by the party's dictates? or the great man's? No. But maybe not working in factories? Well of course not that's necessary. But maybe fewer working hours? Ohohoho. How about not being conscripted? If you're lucky.

>>2434829
The people ITT are morons, I agree with you OP, at least to an extent.

I've said it before, and I'll probably say it a million times more, but the problem with "representative" politics, including Western republicanism, is that they create two distinct political "classes", politicians, and regular people. Obviously some degree of authority is necessary, but it needs to be as minimal as possible. Otherwise, those with political power can and will use it to their own ends.

>no distinction between bourgeois "democracy" and proletarian democracy
>no commentary on the class character of a given system claiming to be democratic
>no historical understanding of democracy as limited freedom/suffrage with universal suffrage being only a recent historical innovation
>no understanding that there is illusory "democracy" (political campaigns for representation) in the public sector of the nation-state without there being not even the attempt at such an illusion in the workplace

just gonna copy paste a response i had to another anon:

Marx talks about bourgeois democracy being "shallow" and "vulgar."

>Even vulgar democracy, which sees the millennium in the democratic republic, and has no suspicion that it is precisely in this last form of state of bourgeois society that the class struggle has to be fought out to a conclusion — even it towers mountains above this kind of democratism, which keeps within the limits of what is permitted by the police and not permitted by logic.


https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1875/gotha/ch04.htm

>Every demand of the simplest bourgeois financial reform, of the most ordinary liberalism, of the most formal republicanism, of the most shallow democracy, is simultaneously castigated as an "attempt on society" and stigmatized as "socialism".


Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>2434829
if thise anon represents chinese general ethos we are fucked



File: 1756408783268.png (135.19 KB, 281x382, Kosolapov.png)

 

Letter from R.I. Kosolapov to the General Secretary of the CPSU Central Committee, "Comrade" M.S. Gorbachev (1986)
To the General Secretary of the Central Committee of the CPSU, Comrade M.S. Gorbachev

Dear Mikhail Sergeevich!

For several months now I have felt an urgent need for a frank conversation with you (even a brief one) about the nature and direction of the work of "Kommunist" in the current conditions. Usually the editor-in-chief of the magazine was invited for such a conversation by the newly elected General Secretary of the CPSU Central Committee.

Rumors persistently leak out from academic and literary, journalistic and even church circles, from foreign embassies about me as a "disgraced" editor, who "backed the wrong horse", came "out of place", etc. These rumors cannot help but make the Kommunist workers nervous and affect their attitude toward the editorial board. I must immediately note that I have never backed any "horses", have never attached myself to any "courts", have never belonged to any group, and have always considered myself a party man. All comrades who are impartial toward me, who have observed my behavior over the course of twenty years of work in the Central Committee apparatus, know this. The fact that I, like other party members, carried out the orders of the three previous general secretaries, cannot discredit me.

Of course, I did not contact you for career reasons. They have not played a role in my life. I am concerned with something else - maintaining the authority of the theoretical journal of the Central Committee of the CPSU, the trust in it of the readership that has grown in the last period, and the maximum use in the interests of the party of the potential of a talented, combat-ready team, which we have basically managed to put together over the past ten years.

Over the course of a quarter of a century, since my first major publication, in addition to the positive development of theoretical issues, I have had the opportunity to participate, to the best of my ability, in polemics against right and “left” opportunism, versions of Yugoslav and market socialism, Maoism, Czechoslovak revisionism, “Eurocommunism.” Against voluntary and involuntary burps of petty bourgeoisness, erroneous interpretations of current problems, which, alas, are still encountered, and sometimes intensified, in our press.

Thus, at the end of the 60s, I spoke outPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

awesome, another thread about pop history trivia from decades ago thats absolutely irrelevant to proletarians today lol

very interesting anon, appreciate you sharing

>>2451137
Letter from R.I. Kosolapov to the Chairman of the Council of Ministers of the USSR, Comrade N.I. Ryzhkov (1989)


To the Chairman of the Council of Ministers of the USSR, Comrade Ryzhkov N.I. (1989)


Dear Nikolai Ivanovich!

I and many of my colleagues are increasingly concerned about both the deterioration of the general state of the national economy and the growth of tension in society, as well as the incompetence of the recommendations of those scientists who have been turned into a monopolistic group of advisers to the top leadership of the party and the state. I am writing to you in this way because I can judge the subject professionally and know some of these people personally.

In essence, the model proposed by representatives of the academic school of economists boils down to the formation in our country, along with the necessary market for goods, also a free market for capital and labor. In social terms, this meant restoring the commodity character of labor and its bourgeois exploitation, undermining the right to work. The formation of a market as a comprehensive system with its inherent subsystems, attributes and institutions is a long and difficult matter. In the West, it took several centuries. Therefore, the hope that, having adopted the market model, we will quickly become one of the advanced countries, cannot be characterized otherwise than as utopian capitalism. At first, a powerful Western competitor "will certainly break our native industry" (Lenin). We will not become a prosperous Sweden or Australia, the FRG or Canada due to objective circumstances. At best, the USSR will be relegated to the position of Brazil or India in world economic relations for decades, with growing social contrasts and collisions (including the development of class struggle) within the country.

The incessant attacks on public property and planned economic management, on democratic centralism and the socialist state, the possibilities and advantages of which we have only partially used, are surprising and indignant. Taking advantage of our historical forgetfulness, some authors praise private property and profit, and claim the legitimacy of distribution not according to labor, but according to social agility. It is with bitterness that we have to Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

Can someone tldr please im retarded

>In my opinion, there can be only one way out (and it corresponds to what Lenin was worried about, and not to what is sometimes attributed to him): this is to bring all enterprises to production indicators for the range, assortment, and quality of products with strict responsibility for their profitability (break-even or profitability). This provision, by the way, is reflected in the draft of the new edition of the CPSU Program.
Into the trash it goes



Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]
[ 1 /2 /3 /4 /5 /6 /7 /8 /9 /10 /11 /12 /13 /14 /15 /16 /17 /18 /19 /20 /21 /22 /23 /24 /25 /26 /27 /28 /29 /30 /31 /32 /33 /34 /35 /36 ]
| Catalog | Home