[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

"The anons of the past have only shitposted on the Internet about the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it."
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)
What is 6 - 2?

Not reporting is bourgeois

| Catalog | Home
|

File: 1752423615083.jpg (264.1 KB, 1220x940, 9655.jpg)

 

Economic conditions of the modern world are making it increasingly difficult for people to produce children. Men struggle to find wives. Those that do then find it difficult to sustain a family on a single wage, resulting in both parents having to work, resulting in less children. This is not a cultural/economic issue restricted to the Western world, as some claim, but a global issue of urbanised post-industrial societies. Both economic incentive programs and reactionary cultural movements attempting to bring back the traditional family have failed to significantly raise birthrates (see Korea, Russia, Hungary, China, etc.). Western states have attempted to use their comparatively higher wages to attract foreign workforce thus putting a bandaid over this issue but this solution has in turn caused many more problems, mainly due to cultural friction between the imported foreigners and natives. We can thus say that no solution to the depopulation crisis, that is both satisfactory and effective, currently exists.

But there is a solution that may soon become available.

A state could in theory move the responsibility of producing future generations directly onto itself, thus taking the burden away from the individual and putting it onto the collective.

How could this be done? In 2025 Japan unveiled the first artificial womb capable of sustaining mammalian life without a mother’s body. Full ectogenesis is already outside the realm of science-fiction and it will move to humans. It may very well become economically feasible for a state to mass produce human beings from donor genetic material. Combine this with state-funded child rearing and you have the recipe for a nation that can fully control its own population growth and adapt it to social, economic or geopolitical considerations so that it may at any time be exactly what it requires. A state that has no need for immigration. Furthermore production would be subsidiary to natural population growth, so if in a year the birthrate went up or down the government can then adapt artificial production to compensate.

The hurdles with implementing such a system are great, both because of ethical concerns certain sections of the population may raise and because such a system would take at least two to three decades after implementation to start bearing fruit and would be initially costly but if a state is able to achieve this feat the advantages it would have over its competitors would Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
19 posts omitted.

>>2386564
The ruling class has objections. You are not doing it if the ruling class doesn't want it, period. It's their state.

>>2386564
>waow like just seez the society XD
stunning and uniquely useful analysis

>SEIZE THE MEANS OF REPRODUCTION
taking retarded sloganeering to a whole new level

>a state
Surely you mean The State (international)

>>2386506
by your same logic, where are they gonna get the mercenaries with low birth rates



File: 1752530386420.png (4.69 KB, 392x262, IMG_0529.png)

 

Did Càleb máupin really do anything wrong? I feel like everything he did was ok. Maybe a grey area here and there. And most of it is probably just soro s and the deep state trying to get rid of an organic grassroots movement with potential
Picture unrelated bc I couldn’t think of what to post here
6 posts omitted.

>>2388706
There were receipts in the document exposing him.

>>2388198
>Diddy was convicted on far less.
If the feds gave a shit, CPI would have also been hit with a RICO. Not that I support the FBI but still. Maupin was clearly running a criminal org.

I feel sorry for him now that his career is basically over and even his former allies are all shitting on him ("that faggot Caleb Maupin" - Haz). Meanwhile Haz and Hinkle have started a far more successful org now kicking down on Maupin, which tells you something about their character as well.

>>2388749
it's all dialectical, comrade

>>2388749
I remember watching his live streams in 2021-2022 (pre-spankgate) and he would easily get 300+ people in his chats.

Now every time he goes live he gets less than 100.

He's done. Most of his YouTube videos get less than 1500 views. His bird has flown.



File: 1745415307552.jpeg (44.77 KB, 564x544, images (6).jpeg)

 

Can we admit that weed culture sucks and is actually destructive for society's well being?
Alcohol sucks too. Drugs shouldn't be banned but drug subculture is cringe. Drug addiction shouldn't be a culture. Psychoactive substances only increase mental health problems and are a detriment for your body. Not saying the end goal of life is to be productive but every stoner I know from high school has seriously failed to even achieve the most basic of everyday tasks such as cooking and self grooming. It's why the crusty stoner who reeks of sweat and pot is a well known stereotype.
332 posts and 60 image replies omitted.

this is what your black markets are funding btw:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIA_involvement_in_Contra_cocaine_trafficking

Legal cannabis is anti-fascist, I guess?
>>2332875
>you're responsible for impeding the revolution
If someone does a crime to you, and you react and do your own crime, they bear the responsibility for that harm

>>2329922
>Weed is only destructive to my motivation
This is only true if you get high before figuring out the purpose of the drug. If you have motivation before, and you plan on an activity, the weed tends to increase attention span and immersion. Great for college students, at least for certain majors.

>>2238387
immense coping

File: 1753052712385.png (641.08 KB, 800x922, ClipboardImage.png)

>>2388754
If you don't cope with smoke, you get on the rope.
>>2344537
>your black markets
Said black markets only exist because the war on drugs is not about stopping drugs but is in reality an economic system of intentionally created crime. They are only "black" since the ruling class have decided that keeping them under such a status is more profitable and acceptable for their own gain.

File: 1753052862883.mp4 (1.94 MB, 486x720, Officer_GARCIA.mp4)

>>2344523
>Calls out (unjustly stigmatized people who have nothing to be called out on)



File: 1751481166343.jpeg (27.13 KB, 334x450, image.jpeg)

 

17th July 1936

''How do the women in the Soviet Union stand towards the new abortion law?'
I would like to first point out the fact that it is an error to place the question of abortion in the foreground in the assessment of the June 27 law. The new law has another and very particular purpose: to give women an even greater possibility than before of combining motherhood with an occupation. Seven out of the eight articles of the law deal with the increased provisions for mother and child. With this law the Soviet state emphasises once again its principled position towards motherhood. Motherhood is not a private affair but a natural social function of women. From the first day of the existence of the Soviet state, Soviet legislation always emphasised the view that women have two primary tasks in the new society: to be active citizens of the state and at the same time not to neglect motherhood. But so that women can fulfill their occupation and citizen’s duty without disadvantage to motherhood, the state must make sure that motherhood is made easier in all possible ways, on the one hand by a broad network of social institutions for children‘s welfare (nurseries, kindergartens, children‘s colonies, homes for mothers, etc.), on the other hand by state material support for the mother, and finally by detailed legislation that governs the question of child support. The new law of June 17 is really a logical extension of this principle.

With this law the Soviet government takes on a huge material obligation in its budget, in order to accomplish the expansion of the institutions for the well-being of mothers and children and make accommodations for women, so that they can fulfill their two tasks without disadvantage to the one by the other.

But what does article 1) of the law mean, which abolishes the former law for the permissibility of abortions and forbids abortions?

The law about the permissibility of abortions was approved in 1920 in the Soviet Union under the pressure of specific unfavourable conditions that prevailed in the country at that time. The Civil War was not yet over. Severe economic living conditions prevailed and the main task for the country fighting for its freedom consisted in using all forces for the building of a new social order. Women as active citizens of the state had to take part, even if their maternal duties were thus left behind.

Although the government legally Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
56 posts and 1 image reply omitted.

>>2386162
learn to sage

>>2386162
Why are you so proud of being a cancer on a web forum? Is this really how you want to spend your free time and to interact with the internet?

>>2367330
>motherhood should not something that must be imposed by a state to reproduce workers and make more commodities for marxists

Yes it will you lib-cuck-fag because
<According to the materialist conception, the determining factor in history is, in the last resort, the production and reproduction of immediate life.
Engels, Origins Of The State, Private Property and The Family

And secondly zero Marxist states in their revolutionary periods allowed abortion. In fact it was only with the return of Revisionism and the ability to hire and fire (instead of a state allocated job to every citizen) that abortion had to be reinstituted as a "pressure valve" on a more de-stabilised and precarious proletariat subject to the whims of the market and with the return of a reserve army of labour (ie unemployment)
<But in future years there were setbacks for socialism in the USSR, and the growth of nationalism am revisionism. In the brief period following Stalin’s death in 1954, capitalism underwent a full-blown restoration consolidated by Khrushchov at the 20th Congress in 1956. Accompanying was a dramatic change in abortion law. The new capitalists needed lies again to oppress workers, and in 1955 they legalized abortion. But this time there was no political justification, as in the case of previous laws of 1919 and 1936. There was talk of “overpopulation” as well as the bourgeois individualist line of woman’s right to control her own body. The change was “interpreted as part of a general easing of restrictions on Soviet citizens.”[1]

<The Soviet law of 1955 was followed quickly by similar changes in the People’s Democracies of Eastern Europe, with the notable exception of Albania.[2] China also followed the Soviet example in 1957, but in China the new policy met with sharp criticism. Since 1954 the Ministry of Health had been encouraging birth control to deal with the “population explosion”. Late in 1957 there was widespread protest at the encouragement of abortion as a method of birth control, and more generally against the promotion of birth control itself. The Ministry of Health retreated: abortion and birth control dropped out of sight. This struggle was part of the fight against capitalist re
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>2366474
>thats possible, i suppose. but her political work and writing basically dropped off after her near-expulsion in the 20s, with a few exceptions like this one. it seems more likely that that was resignation than any active agreement
Her political work was being a Menshevik up until 1915.
Maybe Kollantai wasn't an authority on Marxism like Trots (for some reason) love to claim her as and was more of a mediocre-to-good Bolshevik cadre like millions of others.

>>2369739
>women should be allowed to choose when to have children
no. the proletariat chooses reproductive relation. these same fucking idiots preach bourgeois right to chose will cry all the same when the Communist State implement one child policy. Choice is bourgeois construct. The Party decide on scientific basis toward Communism, not the mere whims of some fucking idiots who arent even marxist-leninist like Kollontai tool of reaction



File: 1752457686098.png (1.6 MB, 1080x1398, ClipboardImage.png)

 

🗽UNITED STATES POLITICS 🦅

"STOP TALKING ABOUT EPSTEIN!" edition

Thread for the hellish discussion related to the scourge of the earth, the destroyer of nations, the king of coups, the sultan of sanctions, the emir of the embargo, the autocrat of austerity, the doge of deregulation, the baron of busting unions, the prince of privatization, the lord of loan sharks, the patron-saint of proxy wars, the sponsor of settlers, the guarantor of genocides, the Divided $nakkkes of Amerikkka

🏈 💵 🌭 🍔

🛠️ Strike Tracker ⚒️
https://striketracker.ilr.cornell.edu/

🇺🇸 Deeds of the Burger Reich 🇺🇸
https://github.com/dessalines/essays/blob/main/us_atrocities.md

📺 Live News 📺
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
605 posts and 133 image replies omitted.

BREAD >>2388126
BREAD >>2388126
BREAD >>2388126
BREAD >>2388126
BREAD >>2388126
BREAD >>2388126

>>2388121
I usually use maple syrup in place of simple syrup/sugar cubes. Then a nice bourbon (usually woodford reserve) followed by the orange zest (peeled over the cocktail to get more of the citrus flavor) and two cherries—usually Amarena. Sometimes I get a smidge of the cherry syrup in there.

>>2387955
idealism

>>2387599
I know, i was already suspicious with anything DSA related and you call me a fash for some reason and you still didn't expland what the fuck "external politics" was when i talking about DSA in 2019

File: 1753108444244-0.jpg (12.92 KB, 585x136, trump-epstein-list.jpg)

File: 1753108444244-1.jpg (14.52 KB, 589x164, patel-epstein-list.jpg)

File: 1753108444244-3.jpg (24.73 KB, 583x278, US-forum-posts.jpg)

These leaks from the Playground Forums website suggest a cover up and trying to make Trump being on the Epstein list into a positive thing

- https://archive.org/details/dark-web-playground-child-abuse-forum-leak-censored-posted-endchan-03.18.2025
- https://postimg.cc/gallery/4KZ0Jzk/c85de9af
- https://dump.li/a/29c72d#x



File: 1752517311995.png (108.35 KB, 602x193, ClipboardImage.png)

 

>take random photo of WW1 injury
>"the bolsheviks did this"
>1.2 million views

how are communists supposed to compete when a lie spreads around the world while the truth is still getting its shoes on?

>ummm who cares optics cuck just say we actually did all the atrocities and say that we'll do it again

>ummmmmm we make no excuses for the terror

haha very funny guys no but seriously
10 posts and 1 image reply omitted.

>>2387899 (you)
bait

Those are YouTube views, chances are maybe 100 real user watched it.

>>2387772
Banger quote

>>2387772
>"Marx couldn't predic-ACKK

>>2387719
Didnt happen but shoulve happened.



File: 1752193660711.png (163.75 KB, 710x365, image.png)

 

I have for a long time used council communists and left communists interchangeably, without ever looking deeply into whether they truly are similar or not. I am not knowledgeable enough to act as if I understand the intellectual jargon and prose of Bordiga and Pannekoek etc. So, can any good souls here tell me the differences between the two and similarities (if any) in simple language please?
Peace and love to all
82 posts and 9 image replies omitted.

>>2387727
>Bordigists were ultra-Leninists.
>anti-parliamentarian, against participating in bureaucratic trade unions, and generally against natlib
these are all anti-leninist possitions btw

>>2388311
Those are *anti-Stalinist positions, not anti-Lenin positions


>>2388511
There is no separation of Stalin from Lenin, they had fundamentally the same politics

Both of these stem from the fact that European revolution failed and they simply can’t cope with it. You don’t have a working class, you don’t have politics, and you never have.



File: 1750710913607.jpeg (32.87 KB, 412x550, image.jpeg)

 

Thank you for everything, Joseph <3
I have seen many interesting input from various anons on Stalin here, whether in the form of opinions, books, documentaries etc. They happen sporadically, scattered on different threads which rarely have anything to do with Stalin, ML or USSR. I figured a Stalin General Thread would be useful. A place where to share all things Stalin and discuss all things Stalin.
Though I am pro-Stalin, this is not a strictly Stalin-worship thread. Posts critical of Stalin too are welcome. I simply request that they are in good faith, and not just 'muh ML' trolls.
172 posts and 44 image replies omitted.

one of the coolest things about Stalin is that his name is basically russian for Joe Steel. another of the coolest things about stalin is that he was part of a gang that used armored cars to rob banks.

File: 1752399922130.png (Spoiler Image,17.24 KB, 360x360, ClipboardImage.png)

>koba thread
No, Cobson thread

File: 1752488058935.jpeg (29.25 KB, 442x478, image.jpeg)


>>2351285
For being on the right opposition AND on the ultra-left opposition at the same fucking time!
He was a contrarian for the sake of being a contrarian. You know, THOSE guys.

>>2354309
As far as reactionary fiction writers go, I prefer Tolkien over Solzhenitsyn.

>>2354629
The full title of his book is "The Gulag Archipelago: An Experiment in Literary Investigation"
Ever wonder why they leave out the second part? The one that unambiguously marks it as a work of fiction? Most people who love to cite him aren't even aware of that.



File: 1751637876710.jpeg (75.93 KB, 877x604, Gu9CrtTXAAEeFTc.jpeg)

 

What the fuck is happening in Chile and why is socialism having a comeback there. Did the working class just decide that shitlibbery and being right-wing is cringe?
99 posts and 12 image replies omitted.

>>2385880
You're right because workers turn out in Chile is non existent. Those who vote socdem are liberals and fascists.

>>2386567
I'm not being ironic in case western radlibs think I'm on their team

>>2386507
>there's plenty of things a president can do on their own.
Depends on the country. Not sure about Chile but at least here presidency is just ceremonial position and parliament has all the power.

File: 1752455640371.jpg (47.38 KB, 828x793, GvbW-GFXkAAKcg9.jpg)

>>2384009
>>2384591
>namedropping Lenin to support electoralism

>>2386502
>>2386507
I am not even an electoralist, just pointing out Boric is in this position not because of his personal or ideological choices, but because of the parliament given to him.



File: 1752491722492.png (747.15 KB, 622x993, ClipboardImage.png)

 

How does the phrase "he who does not work shall not eat" apply to people who realistically can't do any meaningful work i.e. severally mentally handicapped etc.? Are they just left to starve?

<he who [is able to work and] does not work shall not eat
Lenin:
>The socialist principle, "He who does not work shall not eat", is already realized; the other socialist principle, "An equal amount of products for an equal amount of labor", is also already realized. But this is not yet communism, and it does not yet abolish "bourgeois law", which gives unequal individuals, in return for unequal (really unequal) amounts of labor, equal amounts of products. This is a "defect" according to Marx, but it is unavoidable in the first phase of communism; for if we are not to indulge in utopianism, we must not think that having overthrown capitalism people will at once learn to work for society without any rules of law.

It doesn’t apply to people who can’t work, it applies to people who won’t work, I.e people who hitherto lived off of their capital and no, managing the profitability of their own capital and assets as a CEO or landlord doesn’t count.

>from each according to ability

>>2387265
That was just a rhetoric bro. Le lenin was quoting le bible to a majority rushan peasants, or something

>understanding the class struggle through sloganeering
its terminal



Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]
[ 1 /2 /3 /4 /5 /6 /7 /8 /9 /10 /11 /12 /13 /14 /15 /16 /17 /18 /19 /20 /21 /22 /23 /24 /25 /26 /27 /28 /29 /30 /31 /32 /33 /34 /35 /36 ]
| Catalog | Home