/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

So, without any doubt, today, the greatest country on earth is China.
That is because, China managed to achieve proper Socialism, and has managed to distribute wealth among the people of its country quite adequately, not ideally, but in such a way that the country remains sufficient and does not collapse like other stupid "socialist" countries did. Not only did China manage to checkmate the Western capitalists and become a strong independent force of its own, but also it now works on establishing Socialism elsewhere and helping others.
As we all know, the USSR was retarded. It was really just an empire called a "union" of republics that, in reality, was just a rebranded Russian empire. Compared to the moder efforts of China, their global missions on helping 3rd world countries are nothing compared.
Today, the people of China are helping Africa. The Chinese are on a mission of liberating the African economies from the influence of the West. Since the West is retarded, we don't want that shit in Africa. Think it's finally time for the Africans to tell the Westerners to stop fucking with their money. Let the Africans follow the example of China. No other socialist country other than China, has ever achieved the absolute eradication of poverty like it was done under the current rule of Xi. I don't give a fuck about the angry retards that are going to pull up calling China revisionist, these are facts. If you think otherwise, you are not a Marxist.

https://english.mee.gov.cn/Resources/publications/Whitep/202101/P020210122374486901993.pdf

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/2/25/chinas-xi-declares-complete-victory-against-rural-poverty

How to go about making the Internet experience less US-centric?

My search results, news outlets, youtube and all are plagued with US politics. Idk and idc about Charlie Kirks.
But it goes deeper. Its about soft power.

English is the internets lingua franca, which is why im tempted to learn Esperanto or Mandarin.
Reddit is full of Burgers. So is stuff like BlueSky, YouTube…
All significant social media is Californian.
Pop culture – it's so UnitedStatesian.
ICANN was under US jurisdiction until 2016!
Contributing to localizing sites and other projects is also important.

Medium (language) we use to communicate matters.
I think we gotta connect with non-US communities to undermine the US hegemony.

I'd like to see more resources and ideas to make internet more international and less US-centric!

EU’s “Chat Control” will be forced to scan every message, photo, and file before it is encrypted on WhatsApp, Signal, Telegram, and other all other apps.
Politicians would be exempt. It is being sold as “child protection” but the EU’s own legal service warns that it violates fundamental rights. Once a backdoor into encryption exists, it is not just governments who can use it. Hackers, criminals, and hostile states can too.

Today (with real encryption): Message is locked on your phone. Not even WhatsApp, Signal, or Telegram (secret chat) can read it. Only the recipient can open it.
Under Chat Control: Your message is opened and scanned on your phone before encryption. If the scanning software believes it finds “prohibited” content, even by mistake, it is sent to the authorities.
Austria opposes the plan, but 19 EU countries already support it. If Germany joins them, the law could pass in October.

According to the campaign:
Mass surveillance: Every message, file, and image sent without suspicion would be automatically scanned.
Encryption undermined: End-to-end encryption would be weakened or broken, putting all communication at risk for everyone, not just criminals.
False positives: Innocent content such as jokes or holiday photos could be misidentified and trigger investigations.
Exemptions for politicians: Officials would be excluded under “professional secrecy” while normal citizens lose their privacy.
————————-
Personally I thought they already did that. I guess things will just get worse.

https://fightchatcontrol.eu/ (useless activist site, still detailing the decision)

are you kidding me I thought he came up with this

In a higher phase of communist society, after the enslaving subordination of the individual to the division of labor, and therewith also the antithesis between mental and physical labor, has vanished; after labor has become not only a means of life but life's prime want; after the productive forces have also increased with the all-around development of the individual, and all the springs of co-operative wealth flow more abundantly – only then can the narrow horizon of bourgeois right be crossed in its entirety and society inscribe on its banners: From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs!

I have dealt more at length with the "undiminished" proceeds of labor, on the one hand, and with "equal right" and "fair distribution", on the other, in order to show what a crime it is to attempt, on the one hand, to force on our Party again, as dogmas, ideas which in a certain period had some meaning but have now become obsolete verbal rubbish, while again perverting, on the other, the realistic outlook, which it cost so much effort to instill into the Party but which has now taken root in it, by means of ideological nonsense about right and other trash so common among the democrats and French socialists.

Quite apart from the analysis so far given, it was in general a mistake to make a fuss about so-called distribution and put the principal stress on it.

Any distribution whatever of the means of consumption is only a consequence of the distribution of the conditions of production themselves. The latter distribution, however, is a feature of the mode of production itself. The capitalist mode of production, for example, rests on the fact that the material conditions of production are in the hands of nonworkers in the form of property in capital and land, while the masses are only owners of the personal condition of production, of labor power. If the elements of production are so distributed, then the present-day distribution of the means of consumption results automatically. If the material conditions of production are the co-operative property of the workers themselves, then there likewise results a distribution of the means of consumption different from the present one. Vulgar socialism (and from it in turn a section of the democrats) has taken over from the bourgeois economists the consideration and treatment of distribution as independent of the mode of prodPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

Whats /leftypol/ take on President of Burkina Faso Ibrahim Traoré?

Is he a credible anti-imperialist actor?

Thread dedicated to /leftypol/ original content.
>Post original content you've made, or OC someone else recently made which you want to share.
<Or ITT collaborate on improving content already made.

If your original content is good enough, it would most likely be shared on the /leftypol/ twitter account!
Make sure to follow us and feel free to leave suggestions on this thread~
https://twitter.com/leftypol_org
https://nitter.net/leftypol_org

previous thread: >>1762168
>>>/leftypol_archive/1762168 (if it gets archived by mods)

New Booru:
https://lefty.pictures

MAKE SURE TO UPLOAD YOUR OC TO THE BOORU SO IT DOESNT GET PRUNED FOREVER!!!

Both in Syria and Nepal the state lost control of the entire nation. But instead of building the alternative, they select a new “democratic” government.

I blame this on modern anarchists who don’t prepare beforehand. Anarchists do not have enough popular support and momentum to get going. Why? Because of lack of discipline and not educating the masses.

The case of Syria is even more pathetic because Rojava is already there, and cooperation could be established.

I'm a new to this whole political spiel, I was wondering which political side (left-right) actually is truthful on how the world like work, if we don't uncover the truth and what's real, you end up like a schizo believing in bullshit, anyway how to I know which side of the political divide is actually the truthful side?

Imageboards have of course been filled with nazis for a fuck ton of time from even the start, but most people agree it mainly started when moot added /news/ then all the chudcels flooded the rest of the site, then created /pol/ and the rest is history.

With that being said, how do we realistically combat the mass grooming of people into nazism through imageboards? The sharty is becoming the new 8chan but with way more cultural influence on the wider internet and the rest of the population is filled with young children, we have already seen solomon (a mass shooter that was a black man yet he was also a white supremacist with sharty connections) commit a mass shooting. With that being said clearly a lot of these young men are isolated and angry, doxxing random literal WHOS because they are trans, or even doing raids that help the federal government because the site is influenced by glowies. They even raided our very booru 2 days ago, and ILLEGAL CONTENT was posted (this was done by foodist nazis not soyteens but still scary that it’s that prevalent with their raids).

And with the thought on raids we can see some of these young people are being groomed into actual pedophile nazi communities but the sharty staff and wiki are so up their asses that they can’t see they have ideological similarities with the nazi foodists and that’s why they surround them.

They have crushed /leftysoy/ and banned many leftists on their wiki including me, I think this is gonna evolve into something much worst if we don’t do anything.