>>2343757in other words the whole of your critique of marx is that value is moral, which is subjective, which as has been pointed out previously, a political choice, and the refusal to clarify or delineate between the two different uses playing word games.
>i sympathise with this view from an opposite end, of lockean homesteadingwhich is certainly no less delusional than being a modern ancap, and has never historically resulted in genocide or justified atrocities
>and so rights belong to responsible tenants insteadindeed you would
>For him the dialectic movement is the dogmatic distinction between good and bad. https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1847/poverty-philosophy/ch02.htm>>2344300Ah! Thanks. It wasn't about debt but about something else: "Vulgar anthropocentrism" in Marx which is addressed by Cockshott in
>>2300773 this video and a different anon than me in this post
>>2301520I repost this here because i had posted it on the previous dead general, sorry for repeating the question
I want to learn economics, but i know i can't learn about the real economy from mainstream economics. This is why I, an ignorant, humbly ask of you people, who are wiser, to provide me some kind of non-bourgeoise manual for the foundations, or some kind of bibliography, and I'll truly bless you in my heart, comrades, i am completely lost in this subject. Some general guidance is also okay. I appreciate the youtube videos, but i like more to read, I am more used to seriousrly learn by studying a book and everyone who really wants to learn eventually must turn to them anyways. I see the bibliograpy also, but i feel like im too stupid to get into smith, ricardo and marx directly, as if i needed some context, but maybe im wrong, is that the first things i should read?
Stay strong and thank you very much for the attention!!!