/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

>Step in power
>Prove socialism works
>Create a perfect country
>The west gets so pissed they send your best friend to kill you
>To this day western liberal media and fascists don't dare to mention you because you were right about absolutely everything and doing so would expose their retarded ideology
I love this man

>ummm but china trades with israel THOUGH
>that's the same as the US giving israel unconditional military aid, free weapons, selling israel more weapons than all other countries combined, including the runners-up (germany and italy, NOT china)
>that's the same as US soldiers VOLUNTARILY signing up to die for israel in a country that abolished the draft decades ago
>i'm gonna ignore that china fights US-Israeli hegemony through subtle non-interventionist means
>i'm gonna demand that china be just as interventionist and imperialist as the USA, and if they refuse, that proves they're even more imperialist than the USA

did i get that right?

Sakaism, ethnic reductionism and mutipolar theory are now the mainstream opinion of the Western Left. There are divisions between them of course. Most importantly between the "US centric" and the "China centric". But it's safe to say that the new socialism of the fools is up and popular in the leftwing sects. How can communists work in this enviroment?

Moscow plans to send 2nd oil tanker to Cuba, Russian energy minister says
The announcement comes just two days after sanctioned Russian tanker Anatoly Kolodkin docked at the Cuban port of Matanzas laden with 730,000 barrels of oil, marking the first time in three months that an oil tanker reached the island. Experts have said that shipment could produce about 180,000 barrels of diesel, enough to feed Cuba’s daily demand for nine or 10 days.
https://apnews.com/article/russia-cuba-oil-tanker-us-energy-blockade-cfbe8565b665fa99117b449112621dfd

Costa Rica strikes deal to accept third country deportees from US
With the new agreement, Costa Rica seeks a closer alliance with Donald Trump’s government, which has been securing cooperation from other Central American countries in accepting deportees from other nations who have been detained by US immigration agents.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/apr/02/trump-costa-rica-deported-migrants-deal

Argentine Court Blocks Education Clause in Milei Labor Reform
Argentina’s courts have suspended a key provision in President Javier Milei’s labor reform that classified education as an “essential service,” effectively protecting teachers’ right to strike. The ruling follows earlier decisions invalidating 82 other articles of the reform.
https://www.telesurenglish.net/argentine-blocks-82-milei-labor-reform/

Israeli strikes kill 7 in southern Lebanon, Hezbollah targets ground troops
A separate Israeli strike in the early morning hours hit a two-storey building in Kfarsir, in the Nabatieh district, killing three people, the state-run National News Agency (NNA) reported. Further Israeli air raids were also reported in the towns of Yater, Harouf and Zebdine, destroying several homes.
https://www.aljazeera.com/Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

The Trump government is purging the U.S. military in the middle of a war. Almost a dozen generals have been fired,m including the head of the entire U.S. Army.

I genuinely dont think well ever live in a world
national, ethnic, racial, cultural and gender divides wont be more more important to people than class divide.
Why do people have to buy into all this bullshit?

<A nation is a historically constituted, stable community of people, formed on the basis of a common language, territory, economic life, and psychological make-up manifested in a common culture.

• Stalin, Marxism and the National Question
  
  

What exactly does he mean by "psychological make-up" here? Because from where I'm standing, people in the same nation are psychologically very different from one another, as individuals. I cannot imagine a single place on Earth where the individuals are psychologically the same, but maybe "psychological makeup" has some special Marxist-Leninist definition here that I'm not aware of. I'd like better help understanding what Stalin meant by this. Thank you in advance to anyone who is willing to help with this.

The most recent iteration of the No Kings protests represents a significant strategic convergence within the anti-capitalist bloc, marking what appears to be the broadest coalition participation to date across the United States. Preliminary reports from multiple jurisdictions indicate that while tactical unity was largely maintained during the march itself, significant ideological and strategic cleavages emerged regarding questions of praxis and mass leftist work.

>>The Contradiction in Methods

A dialectical tension manifested between two competing conceptions of revolutionary praxis. On one pole, the Marxist-Leninist organizations, including various NGOs, the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), and related leftist formations advocated for what might be termed traditional propaganda methods, vocal engagement with the masses, distribution of printed materials, and direct ideological recruitment through interpersonal discourse.

On the opposing pole, the more militant youth contingents, anarchist collectives, and Maoist cadres advanced a confrontational-accelerationist position. These elements sought to redirect the march toward sites of state power, anticipating and indeed, desiring police deployment of chemical agents and physical repression against a liberal crowd. This tactical divergence reflects deeper theoretical disagreements regarding the nature of consciousness-raising and the mechanisms of radicalization.

>>Ideological Foundations of the Split

The anarchist and Maoist position rests upon a critique of what they characterize as "bourgeois-reformist" methods of recruitment. From this perspective, the newspaper-style agitation and voluntary engagement favored by Marxist-Leninist organizations represents an obsolete mode of praxis that fails to recognize the material conditions necessary for genuine class consciousness. Instead, they advance a thesis of forced radicalization through confrontation, the position that liberal and petty-bourgeois elements must be compelled into direct conflict with state apparatuses, irrespective of their subjective willingness, as the necessary precondition for revolutionary consciousness.
This methodological schism, between voluntary recruitment through ideological persuasion versus coerced radicalization through state confrontation, generated observable antagonisms throughout the mobilization, suggestinPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

Before I start about whole topic of this post I would like to point out that this post mainly focus on Communists and not other tendencies among "radical leftism" because their justification may systematically vary and require different approach so I would like to keep it rather focused on concrete mindset in certain group of people.

Alot of people who become Communists today may have different reasons for their radical outlook of current state of things, but what fundamentally may cause for these people even to look critically at current state of things is definetly whole history of struggle between oppressed and oppressing and analysis itself on how even does this struggle effect people's state of being and how we as people can eventually build a movement which does opposse current state of things which as we know dynamically change in this whole history of struggle in name of class intrests.

But how does it even relate to Veganism?

Honestly it does very much relate in contemporary developed states because we live in very unique times where we as people (oppossed to third world countries) can consciously decide between consuming products which are result of animal exploitation and which aren't, but as we know Communism doesn't come from moralist standpoint as I pointed it out in first part of the post, but this fact isn't even about morality (or ethics) itself but it's about our reasoning in first place, we take certain analysis as something true and based on certain methodology we come to conclusion that class dominance (oppression) is something which can and even should be overcome in this whole history of struggle dynamic, but we can argue that slave fighting against laws which impose slavery on them is in their intrest, and we can go even further in Communist analysis that certain classes may share certain intrests in this whole history as for example early bourgeoisie fought against slavery because it was in their intrest, even tho they didn't share their status and conditions in state of things they found theirself.

Modern unconscious proletarians itself doesn't care about things like overthrowing or critiquing current state of things because they mostly lack any class consciousness, but proletarians who are class conscious (communists) Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

I deeply lament the Revisionist Deviation of the MPCP, as I consider Shining Path an ACTUAL org which DOES DO stuff-besides starbucks college discussions-
that said; are there pro-pol pot remnants, as well as active orgs fighting for correct non-revisionist communism eg; roberto vaquero for hoxha, in spain?
IS Cuba still defensible as orthodox marxism-leninism and if not; are there MLs *within* the cuban party?