/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

>MUH BUTIFUL CULTURE, ONE BILLION DEAD BECAUSE OF COMMUNISM!!! COMMUNISM NO WORKEY! I INVENT THING I LIVE PROPERTY, NO HOUSE FENCE? I PAY THEY WORK!!!!!!!

I'm convinced whiney race reductionists are subhumans of some sort, they don't desire anything other than seclusion, extortion and aggression. They don't care about resource management at all instead think that trade is somehow essential to life "ITS LE HUMAN NATURE, PEOPLE AREN'T EQUAL!!!!" as if any sane communist would ever preach liberal slogans like "liberte egalite fraternite", of course people aren't equal and they have different abilities thus from each according to their needs to each according to their ability and he who does not work neither shall he eat, thus reward is based on merit and productivity. These race reductionists have no idea what the productive forces even are, they are subhuman and as such inferiors can only cry out about extermination moralizing whilst they themselves would like to be slave owners it is only "natural" to have them permanently set in labor camps where they can hang out in a "racially pure" community and do the hard work nobody else wants to since they reject civilization as a whole and fetishize splitting off or enslaving others, they can have it - in the camp. 1 billion dead? Clearly wasn't enough to wipe out these vermin.
Nonetheless communism is not a state of affairs to be established like they imagine since they cannot comprehend the sentence - communism is the real movement against the present state of things. All of humanity and civilization must work as one to develop the productive forces whilst thus so cautiously making sure everyone who obliges gets their needs fulfilled. Stormfags into camps. Only Communists can be Übermensch.

<Some German liberals and intellectuals, reflecting after the failure of 1848–49, argued that unlike the French, Italians, or Hungarians, Germans were too cultured, too educated, too law-abiding, and too civilized to sustain a violent, popular revolution. Instead of embracing decisive insurrection, they relied on parliamentary debate, legalistic resolutions, and appeals to monarchs’ goodwill.
<This idea appeared in memoirs and commentary of the time. For example:
<Heinrich von Gagern, president of the Frankfurt Parliament, lamented that Germans preferred discussion over action and were unwilling to accept the “barbarism” of street violence.
<Some liberal writers suggested that Germany’s strong tradition of philosophy and obedience to authority made people hesitant to risk disorder, claiming that their very “civilization” had paralyzed revolutionary will.
<Historians often cite this as a self-serving rationalization. A way for failed revolutionaries to save face, suggesting they lost not from weakness or division, but because they were too refined to fight effectively.

Why are Germs like this?

The extreme academic nature of groups like GSP (https://gegen-kapital-und-nation.org/en/) and their associates (Gruppen, Cristicuffs, etc) becomes readily apparent when they move from the realm of criticizing pure ideology, which they excel at, to more practical spheres. Pic related is a load of shit, for example.

Most low-wage earners are already painfully aware of the fact that they are cogs in a larger accumulation machine. The idea that a "proper critique of capitalism involves telling them about their position" (by pencil-pushing academics, no less) is completely detached from reality. There is not a single word about the practical consequences of being reserveless or the organs that proles associate with each other in to preserve themselves from the deleterious effects of competition. Consciousness is not mediated by struggle, they just need to read more essays!

< He wants to establish consciousness of this fact, that is to say, like the other theorists, merely to produce a correct consciousness about an existing fact; whereas for the real communist it is a question of overthrowing the existing state of things.
https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1845/german-ideology/ch01b.htm

Tomorrow a huge protest will be held in the capital of Serbia, Belgrade, protesting the government’s refusal to accept the demands made by the students, as well as protesting against general incompetence and corruption. From the student to the teacher, worker and pensioner, war veterans and children all around Serbia will gather together in this protest.
Is this really it? Some policemen announced that they won’t be going to work tomorrow and that they have no intention of beating up children. This might be the only chance that the opposition gets to forcefully remove the president from office.
The implications are obvious; a color revolution is in the works. Unlike the protests in Greece, the Serbian protests have no class character. The left is very weak, and the protest attendees range from neonazis to liberals and communists (most likely due to the fact the protests have been organized “apolitically”). The situation in Serbia is very volatile, and the validity of these protests need to be questioned more seriously, since no matter how much they deny it, this reeks of liberal infighting. Only time will tell what the consequences of these past few months will be, and whether this will be another October 5th or just a failed mass movement.

Regardless if it's concession to the capitalists, or that a portion of capitalists even want , it's the only path I see towards an eventual communistic society.

If classless, moneyless and stateless society is the goal, the only way to teach society is to voluntarily to do stuff without force, its to encourage them to do stuff even if they have a basic safety net and no state tells them what to do.

If UBI continues for centuries, I could see a society emerging that does away with money altogether and people just organize to do favours for each other instead of the system we have now.

So, without any doubt, today, the greatest country on earth is China.
That is because, China managed to achieve proper Socialism, and has managed to distribute wealth among the people of its country quite adequately, not ideally, but in such a way that the country remains sufficient and does not collapse like other stupid "socialist" countries did. Not only did China manage to checkmate the Western capitalists and become a strong independent force of its own, but also it now works on establishing Socialism elsewhere and helping others.
As we all know, the USSR was retarded. It was really just an empire called a "union" of republics that, in reality, was just a rebranded Russian empire. Compared to the moder efforts of China, their global missions on helping 3rd world countries are nothing compared.
Today, the people of China are helping Africa. The Chinese are on a mission of liberating the African economies from the influence of the West. Since the West is retarded, we don't want that shit in Africa. Think it's finally time for the Africans to tell the Westerners to stop fucking with their money. Let the Africans follow the example of China. No other socialist country other than China, has ever achieved the absolute eradication of poverty like it was done under the current rule of Xi. I don't give a fuck about the angry retards that are going to pull up calling China revisionist, these are facts. If you think otherwise, you are not a Marxist.

https://english.mee.gov.cn/Resources/publications/Whitep/202101/P020210122374486901993.pdf

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/2/25/chinas-xi-declares-complete-victory-against-rural-poverty

How to go about making the Internet experience less US-centric?

My search results, news outlets, youtube and all are plagued with US politics. Idk and idc about Charlie Kirks.
But it goes deeper. Its about soft power.

English is the internets lingua franca, which is why im tempted to learn Esperanto or Mandarin.
Reddit is full of Burgers. So is stuff like BlueSky, YouTube…
All significant social media is Californian.
Pop culture – it's so UnitedStatesian.
ICANN was under US jurisdiction until 2016!
Contributing to localizing sites and other projects is also important.

Medium (language) we use to communicate matters.
I think we gotta connect with non-US communities to undermine the US hegemony.

I'd like to see more resources and ideas to make internet more international and less US-centric!

EU’s “Chat Control” will be forced to scan every message, photo, and file before it is encrypted on WhatsApp, Signal, Telegram, and other all other apps.
Politicians would be exempt. It is being sold as “child protection” but the EU’s own legal service warns that it violates fundamental rights. Once a backdoor into encryption exists, it is not just governments who can use it. Hackers, criminals, and hostile states can too.

Today (with real encryption): Message is locked on your phone. Not even WhatsApp, Signal, or Telegram (secret chat) can read it. Only the recipient can open it.
Under Chat Control: Your message is opened and scanned on your phone before encryption. If the scanning software believes it finds “prohibited” content, even by mistake, it is sent to the authorities.
Austria opposes the plan, but 19 EU countries already support it. If Germany joins them, the law could pass in October.

According to the campaign:
Mass surveillance: Every message, file, and image sent without suspicion would be automatically scanned.
Encryption undermined: End-to-end encryption would be weakened or broken, putting all communication at risk for everyone, not just criminals.
False positives: Innocent content such as jokes or holiday photos could be misidentified and trigger investigations.
Exemptions for politicians: Officials would be excluded under “professional secrecy” while normal citizens lose their privacy.
————————-
Personally I thought they already did that. I guess things will just get worse.

https://fightchatcontrol.eu/ (useless activist site, still detailing the decision)

are you kidding me I thought he came up with this

In a higher phase of communist society, after the enslaving subordination of the individual to the division of labor, and therewith also the antithesis between mental and physical labor, has vanished; after labor has become not only a means of life but life's prime want; after the productive forces have also increased with the all-around development of the individual, and all the springs of co-operative wealth flow more abundantly – only then can the narrow horizon of bourgeois right be crossed in its entirety and society inscribe on its banners: From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs!

I have dealt more at length with the "undiminished" proceeds of labor, on the one hand, and with "equal right" and "fair distribution", on the other, in order to show what a crime it is to attempt, on the one hand, to force on our Party again, as dogmas, ideas which in a certain period had some meaning but have now become obsolete verbal rubbish, while again perverting, on the other, the realistic outlook, which it cost so much effort to instill into the Party but which has now taken root in it, by means of ideological nonsense about right and other trash so common among the democrats and French socialists.

Quite apart from the analysis so far given, it was in general a mistake to make a fuss about so-called distribution and put the principal stress on it.

Any distribution whatever of the means of consumption is only a consequence of the distribution of the conditions of production themselves. The latter distribution, however, is a feature of the mode of production itself. The capitalist mode of production, for example, rests on the fact that the material conditions of production are in the hands of nonworkers in the form of property in capital and land, while the masses are only owners of the personal condition of production, of labor power. If the elements of production are so distributed, then the present-day distribution of the means of consumption results automatically. If the material conditions of production are the co-operative property of the workers themselves, then there likewise results a distribution of the means of consumption different from the present one. Vulgar socialism (and from it in turn a section of the democrats) has taken over from the bourgeois economists the consideration and treatment of distribution as independent of the mode of prodPost too long. Click here to view the full text.