/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

>>99140
Nazi propaganda was generally pretty good. There's a reason why students of film, media, communications, etc. still study Leni Reifensahl's work. But it's important to remember that while propaganda is necessary for a movement or government to succeed, it in and of itself is not what makes it successful. Propaganda only works if the target audience has experiences (ie exists under the right material conditions) that make its narrative both believable and appealing. In other words, propaganda does not create political movements, it only galvanizes and motivatges movements whose scope and nature is determined by material/class forces.

like Zizek points out, Nazi propaganda was just a pale imitation of soviet propaganda in reality. the reason it was effective was because Russia at that time represented different concrete material conditions as a viable alternative to the hellscape of the great depression. without this context I doubt its imagery would have carry the same weight.

Grace is secretly a fan of Juche.

>>92062
>>91988
Guillotine is so old-fashioned. Why don't use this machine & be done with it?

https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/fukouna-shoujo-03

Was it moral? No
Was it based? Yes

>>91012
Based

>>91009
Based but you need more
>>86863
Monarchs scums should dead
https://hanime.tv/videos/hentai/kaifuku-jutsushi-no-yarinaoshi-2

>>97294
>Saying this as though we don’t try our very best to preserve the architects from pre-history
You’re an actual retard Leninhat, holy shit

>>98695
what the fuck
Would socialist authorities permit this?

>>97839
That's exactly what I would want to happen

>>98037
Boojies don't care about aesthetics at all, they want all the proles to live in pods inside an ugly building surrounded by 50000 miles of urban sprawl. Booj architecture is designed to be alienating and ugly because it encourages you to do your transactions and leave instead of lingering about without consuming. When they do spend money on fancy architects, they almost exclusively commission postmodern horrors that people hate. This is to show that they can afford a fancy architect, to show they have "sophisticated" taste, and to boost their egos by forcing everyone to look at something jarring and ugly that is on THEIR property. They gain the greatest joy when they build these on top of a religious place or something else that once held sentimental value for many people (like a museum) because it makes them think they are better than the Christian god or the dirty masses who think they deserve a public place.
A socialist state should not be ugly and utilitarian, but should be designed to uplift the worker's consciousness and improve their morale by showing they are working to build for something greater instead of a cog building a private enterprise with little reward to themselves.

>>98863
Can socialists build temples of Theophilanthropy instead?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theophilanthropy

>>98966
I wish Billson Gates would run my dick

>>98975
how about I unite your momma jokes with the current year

The UN is an objective force created for a purpose in a specific time, drop the moralistic stuff. The UN is quite naïve and that’s why it’s incompetent, it’s idealistic but that isn’t inherently bad or good, it just is. Can the UN be made more useful objectively? Perhaps but it would require radically different structures of power of people more than willing to negotiate and cooperate. I have no doubts that each and every nation has leaders that want nothing more but the best for its people but in the real world people can be selfish and some power structures make it difficult to allow for negotiation. Even if America had Communists take power it would be naïve to think those Communists would be a force for good or whatever moralistic crap someone imagines it would be. Communists would make just as many mistakes as any other bourgeois democratic government. Governing is a learning experience, Communists would eventually adjust to the needs of its people and have to juggle that with the rest of the world, politics in a nutshell.

>>98548
They saved Africa at least

>>98984
Pol Potism is a bastardization of Marx's theories.

Pol Pot was not anprim. Read the pdfs on this page https://www.bannedthought.net/Cambodia/index.htm

>>98984
>Should I take the Pol Pot pill bros?
Yes. Pol Pot was the first leader in history to achieve lower phase communism.

>>98984
if you have balls

You should take the diarrhea pill, to get rid of all your negativity

I don't support losers who get fail AIDS

Take it to /b/, this board is already declining due to the influx of Bunkerchan rightoids, I don't want the catalog to be filled with shitposts.

READ https://www.bannedthought.net/Cambodia/index.htm

>>99024
More than 2000 nukes were detonated during the cold war

There have been zero (0) alien commies invasions

>>98998
ok

>>97962
Even sinister means left-handed in Latin…

>>97992
I'm a centrist.

>>98000
That's why you keep generating counterrevolutionary saboteurs within your parties. Take the problem serious and you will need to take on positions arrived at by left-communists.

If you unironically ever use the words 'left' or 'right' in a contemporary political context unless you are calling it out, you are enabling political ignorance.

>>97984
Michael Jordan is also the greatest basketball player of all the time, and him parlaying his money into becoming a porky is a little different from a self-replicating class of billionaire families over generations. That's all I'm saying.

Racism's modern manifestation is not tied to any particular history or tradition, and has everything to do with a modern, eugenicist order… which is basically what the Nazis' "Germanism" was. The Nazis get painted as "traditionalists" and advertise themselves as such, but a whole lot of the Nazi project was about reinventing the German national identity, was about creating a futurist society that creates these garish mockeries of past history as empty iconography. The whole Nazi social reformation was not really reactionary in practice, but presenting this distilled form of the past that emphasized ultraviolence and edited any aspect of the past culture that was inimical to the main political project, that would impede the ruling cartels and technocratic institutions. Witness the way the Nazis were working on scrubbing out any Christian history and promoting "positive Christianity", and beyond that promoting this distorted version of German paganism in their elite circles (something that was so absurd even Hitler distanced himself from it).

A lot of this stuff, of course, was imported straight from American race-theory, which itself was based on racialization as a pretext for the economic relations of slavery. It is impossible to really speak about racism against black Americans as anything but the legacy of slavery. Anti-Indian racism is a strong historical force and still exists today, but white Americans don't obsess about the racial inferiority of Indians or post statistics about Indian IQ scores. Modern racism against black people is entirely premised on a eugenic judgement, and appeals particularly to the most craven of the white race who want a quick win under the rules of eugenic society. The white race can't make a serious claim that the black race collectively wronged them, since the historical relationship was very, very one-sided. The Nazi race-ideology, being imported, was most obsessed with the eugenics project, even above their project of exterminating Judaism (which was justified not with eugenics, but because Jews were associated with communism and a historical betrayal; and the Nazis saw communism as an enemy because communism opposed their eugenic project, rather than their eugenic project being a pretext to attack communism). Eugenism as a social system relies on omnipresent sexual perversion as a rule, because of its obsession with the sex act and desire to control all aspects of human biology. Ordinary racism or bigotrPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>74666
Is this really only a burger thing tho? South Africa, Brazil, Colombia and other countries with very diverse racial demographics probably share similar bullshit beliefs

>>98516
It depends on how much eugenics penetrates those countries. They share a history of slavery or domination, but their attitude towards eugenics, and the institutions that rule, vary signficantly, as does the racial composition of those nations. White identity today in South Africa is a harder sell when whites are the minority race and the country is ruled by black people almost everywhere AFAIK.
The peculiar sexual pathology of racists is really the sexual pathology of eugenism. Eugenists that aren't particularly racist are just as perverse as their rightoid, /pol counterparts. Really, /pol's perversions are nothing more than a mirror image of the dominant perversion prevalent in liberal societies, to be harnessed to build a political base entirely on faggotry.

>>98137
>>98152
It's easy to be a liberal as a racist. For example, look at a /pol/fag who uses /tv/ all day talking about john oliver and "cuck kino" ironically. They're great at being liberals (and yes, they are actually liberals, not just larpers, they promote capitalism and are therefore liberal)
>>98161
I wonder, what ideology is whitney ryan?

>>98521
whatever it is, it wasn't liberal with what was written about how blacks ran the world to the ground.

>>97879
>becomes a satellite of the USSR
And that is bad because?

>>97229
"Your honour, I only killed one man, while there are people who killed several, dozens even. This means I did nothing wrong."

>>98662
The famine during the Great Leap was the last and was necessary. If they hadn't collectivized then China would've still been dependent on the Soviet Union.

>>97221
CIA is working over time in the consent factory to get people to hate on China.

>>98690
>then China would've still been dependent on the Soviet Union.
Good

>>98008
I think the key part is whether or not the state is actually engaging in the pursuit of revolution globally, or if it's simply accepted the state of things and made little attempt at transition towards socialism or conflict against the bourgeoisie. The USSR, even in it's regression, still made active attempts at the export of the revolution. China has not, and in fact has acted against it.

>>98047
>The USSR, even in it's regression, still made active attempts at the export of the revolution.
In a sense, yeah, but the argument against that is to claim the Soviets weren't really interested in exporting revolution but engaging in a kind of "social imperialism" to justify exploitation of poor countries, winning over allies in a losing/failed geopolitical struggle with the West, meddling in other countries' affairs, supporting some pretty shitty tinpot military dictatorships, and so forth.

I'm thinking of Mengistu where they'd take down signs from businesses and put up communist stuff when the Soviet diplomats flew in for a meeting just to make it look like they communists, when the reality it was a specific ethnic group that was calling the shots.

I don't know if that's true or not, just for the sake of argument, and I'm trying to work this out myself.

>>98064
>In a sense, yeah, but the argument against that is to claim the Soviets weren't really interested in exporting revolution but engaging in a kind of "social imperialism" to justify exploitation of poor countries, winning over allies in a losing/failed geopolitical struggle with the West, meddling in other countries' affairs, supporting some pretty shitty tinpot military dictatorships, and so forth.
Social imperialism is the stupidest concept to come out of the split. Something is either imperialism, or it is not. If the USSR was continually pursuing communist expansion, such a thing is simply what is proper for any socialist state to do. Of what you mentioned, only two are suspect, that being exploitation and the tinpot military dictators. And simply taking a state is not what I would define as exploitation in an imperialist sense, so really it's a question of who was supported and why. Meddling in other countries affairs is what should have done more though, no one is going to give you a pat on the back when bourgeoisie governments decide to collaborate with fascist paramilitaries to execute foreign revolutionaries and suspected citizenry, and your response is how morally self-assured you feel at not getting involved. The bourgeoisie proper of the world had no qualms in doing whatever was necessary to protect and expand their interests, and did so voraciously and collaboratively. Communists must be twice so.

>>97884
Bull fucking shit. Go check supreme soviet elections, you'll see non-party candidates always made up 1/3 or 1/4 of the elected deputies.

>>97877
Its not about ownership of MOP or abolition of private property but about planned economy = literally communism.