/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

Now this will be a funny thread.

Which side does leftypol support? The bourgeois police which is anti-EU or the medieval clerics who are pro-EU
>Armenian police have attempted to raid the seat of the country’s Apostolic Church, the country’s largest religion, in the city of Vagharshapat, leading to major clashes between clerics, church members and law enforcement.

https://swentr.site/russia/620613-police-clerics-clash-armenia/

>>2292002
Ye asked, and ye shall recieve
Talk about why you guys hate modern "east european (outside of russian and ukrainian)" politics and society or stuff to that effect

🗽UNITED STATES POLITICS 🦅
>Maomzedani Edition

Thread for the hellish discussion related to the scourge of the earth, the destroyer of nations, the king of coups, the sultan of sanctions, the emir of the embargo, the autocrat of austerity, the doge of deregulation, the baron of busting unions, the prince of privatization, the lord of loan sharks, the patron-saint of proxy wars, the sponsor of settlers, the guarantor of genocides, the Divided $nakkkes of Amerikkka™

🏈 💵 🌭 🍔

🛠️ Strike Tracker ⚒️
https://striketracker.ilr.cornell.edu/

🇺🇸 Deeds of the Burger Reich 🇺🇸
https://github.com/dessalines/essays/blob/main/us_atrocities.md

📺 Live News 📺
(sponsored by USAID)
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

The "famines" argument against socialism is ridiculous and can be debunked by thinking critically for a single minute.

Every major famine in a socialist country was the last of its kind. Yes there were absolutely preventable famines (e.g the 4 Pests Campaign), but they were generally the last famines to occur in those countries.

Capitalism causes ongoing famines in the 3rd world. Because of the tendency of the rate of profit to fall, capitalists need to offset this by increasing the rate of exploitation by lowering wages, done by moving the industrial heartland of the world from the west to Asia and Africa, paying people next to nothing. There are also easily preventable incidents here, mistakes are not exclusive to socialism because there's "no checks and balances", as seen with the Nestle anti-breast feeding campaign. "But they apologized and tried to fix it" so did China.

The millions who died "from socialism" are nothing compared to the casualties of capitalism. Of course there are casualties under socialism, it's the transitory mode of production between capitalism and communism. It still has to interact with the value-form because the revolution isn't global yet.

You will literally never hear an ancap/libertarian type even mention the 3rd world and you will never hear a liberal mention the third world outside of meaningless nothingburger moralism.

using "solidarity" to mean "left unity" is one of the worst rhetorical tricks leftists play. the bourgeoisie don't have "right wing unity", otherwise there'd be no proletarians who hold reactionary views because they'd have "unity" and not exploit those ones. what they have is CLASS unity. and most leftists are NOT proletarians. solidarity means unite the proletariat, not some nebulous "left"!

I cannot support China because














Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

>the killing of Brian Thompson
>violent and chaotic anti-American student protests
>Tesla burnings
>violent attacks on pro-life activists and other right-wingers
>arson attack on Gov Shapiro's home
>multiple assassination attempts on Trump
We have now entered an American Years of Lead without question.

A very special friend of ours warned us about this months ago and nobody listened.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qda4JY36BBA

Virility is pretty useful for everyone and I mean everyone regardless of whatever label they attach to themselves. Having the strength, determination, intellect, and mental resilience to force changes on your environment by your hands is by far one of the most influential means of fixing the world around you. Hell, virility is a progression from the weakness the earliest and I mean the earliest humans had to face with. To call virility reactionary and not an asset that can be used for progressive changes is counterproductive. If anything, there are objectively far too many people too physically and emotionally weak to help themselves, help other people, or organize any resistance against blatant oppression when faced with (surprisingly weak) oppressors.
After all, how many adults are physically strong enough to lift another person away from a dangerous situation? How many have the mental resilience needed to even clean themselves and their homes on their own? How many can handle just eating right and being able to recognize the need to share food with others?


The bourgeoisie isn’t invincible, I can confidently say that most of them are weaker than I am in terms of physical strength and mental resilience.
Anyways, I’m doing plyometric and endurance training again and I’m going to buy myself a cool vest to get some extra gains in power. You should too.

Was it libcoded when Marx wrote a letter to Abe Lincoln, congratulating him on his electoral victory? Would Marx have been excited about Zohran Mamdani winning?

TIL Lenin used to term his beliefs as 'revolutionary social democracy'. I was reading 'Hands off Rosa Luxemburg!'; the various opinions people have on Trotsky or Luxemburg aside, I was surprised to find that Lenin apparently spoke of his own beliefs this way given what social democracy is nowadays.

>“… from the beginning we declared (see One Step Forward, Two Steps Back): We are not creating a special ‘Bolshevik’ tendency; always and everywhere we merely uphold the point of view of revolutionary Social Democracy. And right up to the social revolution there will inevitably always be an opportunist wing and a revolutionary wing of Social Democracy”

Apparently it's just another one of those things that got co-opted over time and he switched explicitly to terming it communism after 1917 or so. I wonder what his motives were for calling it social democracy? I know it does not exactly matter what labels we stick on what, but I find looking at the history of terminology revealing