/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

Why can't we have a world where people with differing ideologies can just agree to live separately and not fuck with eachother? Why does everyone feel the need to "save", "liberate" or "civilize" other nations?

I'm not even picking on anyone in particular here, although there are obviously certain nations that are better than others in this regard (the difference between the US and China comes to mind), but overall it seems like every ideology's implicit end goal is to cover the whole earth. Why is that? I would say it's a result of material conditions blah blah blah, but it seems to go back to the dawn of civilization itself, which confuses me.

Imagine a big lemonade stand economy. 🍋

Capitalists (the lemonade stand owners) make lemonade each year.

Workers help make the lemonade and get paid with money (wages) to buy snacks and toys (MOS).

How it works:

At the end of the year, the owners have lemonade (C') and money (M').

They use some money (M) to buy new supplies (MOP: lemons, sugar) and pay workers (LP) for next year.

Workers spend their wages on snacks and toys (MOS), which buys back some lemonade.

Owners also use leftover money (m) to buy fancy stuff for themselves (like a new bike 🚴).
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

Zionazism seems schizo at first glance but it is just the logical endpoint of White supremacism, Christian supremacism, and European settler-colonialism: Jews have been knighted as "honorary" whites, and have been enlisted as crusaders against Muslims by white European Christians. It is an alliance of the two older Abrahamic faiths against the new one, and an alliance of the "true whites" and the "off whites" against the browns.

How should the secular international Communist left combat these powerful spooks? Or should they simply ignore it and focus on building the labor movement?

Is there a reason why Europe managed to conquer the world compared to every other continent? Other than the simple "Europeans are the superior species" reasoning?

this ends the argument that the american proletariat is an oppressed class that has any potential for class conciousness.
a million dollars from theater.

If you are in an organization that claims to adhere to the proletarian movement how many of the elements in the title does your organization adhere to? Do you go out with shitty cardboard signs and hippie beanie clothes like losers? Are participants in your org willing to adopt a uniformed look or do they reject uniformity in favor of individual choices? Can you all form a line adhering to height? Can you march in unison? Can you sing in unison? Can you handle the logistics to obtain uniforms? Can you design banners, uniforms, flags and have them produced? Do you print reading material? Do you know how to behave when handing out printed material? Do you know how to behave in front of agitators? Do you know how to give interviews? Do you know how to recruit? And many other questions.
It appears that most organizations, especially leftoid orgs are completely disorganized and glorify piglike behavior expecting praise and new recruits without putting in the necessary effort to hold a structured organization.
They often blame the lack of finances, the lack of members and dismiss any notion of uniformity. And even when finances are not a problem, they may refuse out of individualism "I don't like wearing suits" and such other excuses which are more common within the declassed and more liberal structures. Of course there are outliers, there are declassed organizations with suits. What about yours though? Do you even have the will to implement these crucial elements in your organization or would you rather dismiss and criticize them as being stuck up?
I remind that the very same institutions and bourgeoisie NGOs that dominate the social order already see the necessity in these elements as far as to emphasize their importance in managerial courses, logically if you want to compete with them for attention from the broader "public" you need to 1UP them. If you don't like it then have fun playing play-pretend with your gay ass libtarded idpol friends and running a small business on a legalized squat or some shit. But if you agree on the necessity of these things, what have you done to try to implement them OR how have you managed to implement them in your org?
This is assuming you're not in an insurrectionary organization / party and care about public appearances.

The way the reporters make the incident sound as if the father in this context just flat out overpowered the cop and his gun. Like, you cannot tell me that this guy somehow managed to not only win a fight but somehow get the strength to kill a dude with his bare fists and tank a bullet’s impact just off feelings of sheer concentrated unquestioned vengeance and hate. That sounds made up

As someone young (millennial) who only recently developed class consciousness and wants to do something (preferably libertarian flavor), where does the left stand?

I ask this because it feels like, even if we want to overthrow capitalism and create a new society, it’s too late and we here just to pick up the pieces of whatever is left. Often people say (even intellectuals) that unions or the labor movement has been destroyed. How exactly? What stops workers from coming together or why are unions so weak? Since we are new generations and the classical tradition has been lost or suppressed, what can we do? Is it objectively more difficult to organize or is it only lack of commitment? Something feels off. As if the entire movement is dead. Only little clusters here and there. Pic related.

Hello, people, I'm creating this thread so a person more knowledgeable than me can help.

So, lately I found out about some group of people on the web that defend a kind of scientific racism, things like I.Q, race and the relation between genes and behavior. The more I read about it more became clear the dangerous implications of those "findings", but I'm not versed on biology or psychology to have a full nuanced picture. Anyway, anyone know great books that show "the other side of the picture" about the relation of genes, I.Q, behavior and race?