[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

"The anons of the past have only shitposted on the Internet about the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it."
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)
What is 6 - 2?

Check out our new store at shop.leftypol.org!

| Catalog | Home
|

File: 1764387252448.png (47.58 KB, 640x315, ClipboardImage.png)

 

I'm presently working on a translation of "Overview of the Historical Formation of the Haitian Nation" or "Aperçu sur la Formation Historique de la Nation Haïtienne''. This is considered one of the definitive works on Haitian history, written by Haitian communist Étienne Charlier. As far as I'm aware it has never been publicly archived or translated into english before. I might post more sporadically as I go.

Overview of the Historical Formation of the Haitian Nation
2nd Edition

Editor's Note
Les Éditions DAMI is pleased to present to the public, more than fifty years after the first edition, the re-edition of the book Overview of the Historical Formation of the Haitian Nation as it was written by Étienne D. Charlier in 1954. This book is an essential work for anyone who wants to understand the historical foundations of the Haitian Nation.
May the youth find answers here to their questions and reflect powerfully on the History of our country.
Our thanks go to Mrs. Ghislaine Rey Charlier, widow of Etienne D. Charlier, and to her sons André and Max, for the confidence shown in Les Éditions DAMI and for all the documents and information provided.
—Les Éditions DAMI Montreal, August 2009

Biography of the Author
Étienne Charlier was born in Aquin on June 12, 1904. Son of Danton Charlier and Gervrine Girault, both originally from l'Anse-à-Veau. Upon the death of his mother in 1906, Étienne was adopted by the couple Numa Cassy, whose wife was born Louise Charlier, who brought him to l'Anse-à-Veau. He remained there until September 1916. His studies, which began at the École Nationale de l'Anse-à-Veau, continued the same year in Port-au-Prince at the Petit Séminaire Collège St-Martial. Equipped with his second part baccalaureate, he entered the Port-au-Prince Law School directed by Dean Léon Nau. He obtained his law degree in 1927. He took an active part in the founding of la Nouvelle Ronde, which he managed after Antonio Vieux until the review ceased publication in April 1926.
He left for the Northern United States in September 1928 where he continued his legal studies at Columbia University. Then he went to Paris (France) in 1929, where he began a Doctorate in Law. He defended his thesis, On the arrangement of the principle of individual Freedom of Labor in French Law on May 30, 1932, at the Faculty of Law in Paris.Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
5 posts and 1 image reply omitted.

Man Haiti has to be one of the most continuously fucked over nations on earth. As a yinzer I live only a drive near a town called Charleroi (My great aunt who my grandpa ghosted in vice versa actually lives there) and a bunch of Haitians immigrated there and despite the fact that they actually benefited this dilapidated unheard of declining rust belt town everyone hated them.

>nation
yawn

>>2579242
It likely wont be possible, sadly. This work is still-in-print and Charlier's family controls the rights. While it's entirely possible that they'd give the project their blessing, this wouldn't be something I could just take straight to a publisher. My current plan is it archive it on Library Genesis and format a digital version which could be bound from home.

Preface (1954)

Relatively few in number have, concerning the formation of the nation, presented the results of their work, and that work has been fragmentary. But through their work the materiality of the facts is now established, the essential character of the events acquired, barring, as always, a few possible clarifications and details.

It was inevitable that, from these accumulated scattered materials, a general overview would emerge; where the interplay of all these fragments, succeeding one another and clashing according to a rhythm, could be shown to conform to the laws of history which condition the constants of social evolution since the organization of the first societies.

The author of this book devoted himself to this task. Here is the result of enormous labor. So many questions which, until now, remained obscure in their complexity or poorly explained in their causality, despite the efforts of researchers, are treated and analyzed here according to the strictest methods of modern information. The mechanism that was the secret driving force, under a myriad of appearances, whose processes disconcerted the shortsightedness of many commentators, is explained here.

With an unparalleled wealth of detail, colonial society is brought back to life, torn between the demands of a revolutionary period and the imperative of class interests. Hence its inconsistencies, its sycophantic concessions, a seesaw game that is merely the political representation of the contradictions inherent to a political system destined for the worms. Hence the tenacious, fierce struggle of a reactionary bourgeoisie braced in defense of its privileges against the rush of the enslaved masses determined to violently seize the end of their exploitation; against the rise of the freedmen seeking to complete, through the conquest of political rights, the status acquired through the power of money.

The clarity of this critique, sharpened by the objective methods of the laws of science, is manifest in the examination of this Southern War where, alongside a question of epidermal nuance which is certainly not to be minimized, there is inscribed an economic content of capital importance. This refers to the action of the two colonialist powers, the English and the Yankee, trying to secure their interests against the French, as well as the class struggle in Saint-Domingue which had reached a point of exasperation.

The tonPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>2579422
*Lechaud is referring to Toussaint L'Ouverture



File: 1764505692787.png (187.22 KB, 428x467, ClipboardImage.png)

 

>55.8% of the respondents say the Communist state itself was also good.

>66.2% of Romanians believe Communist leader Nicolae Ceaușescu was a "GOOD LEADER"


Any opinions?
4 posts omitted.

>>2578889
>% of nostalgia boomers in the big 25
SYBAU

>>2579271
66% of Romania is boomers?

He sucked
Yugoslavia, Bulgaria, and Chekoslokia at some points were the only really good eastern european socialist republics other then the USSR itself (and again that can only be appiled between 1922-1929 and 1958-1972).

>>2579162
trvke

regarding OP post, maybe i should look into ceausescu more since i always regarded him as the most subpar out of them all [gomunist leaders] due to le palace and questionable demographic policy

Anticommunist sentiment is heavy in Romania, it's basically considered standard fact that Nicolae was an idiot and a horrible leader. People mostly associate communism with the heavy austerity measures he enacted to get rid of that imf debt. Still it's a mixed bag, younger people are inundated with 30 years of anti communist nationalist ruling ideology, but they're not stupid either they can tell things aren't much better now either and getting worse. For older people it's a mix of that, their personal experience under the system, nostalgia and things being different and/or better back then.

I watched this movie from Romania that goes kind of into that situation. "I'm an old communist hag", would recommend if you want to get a sense of the more positive/nostalgic aspects of Romanian's view towards the communist era. Romania has a lot of good movies in general



File: 1764311390669.jpg (157.21 KB, 1008x665, Russia217.jpg)

 

Why do people use the industrialization and subsequent rise of the standard of living in Russia and China as proof of the success of socialism when neither countries were and are socialist. Socialism being defined as worker ownership of the means of production, as Marx defined, as opposed to state ownership and in the case of modern China with large parts of the economy privately owned. The success for these two countries is a testament to there size, abundance of resources and people. Germany was afraid of pre-revoultionary Russia and predicted by 1917 they would be no match for its growing might. China before the Second Sino-Japanese war was a lot more industrialized than people usually give it credit for, with most of its industrial base being destroyed by the war. And too give examples of two capitalist countries that being the United States and Germany. Both of them were able to surpass the United Kingdom due there larger access to resources and people. And not to mention the increased development of technology allowing industrializeing nations to catch up faster to their established piers. What allowed these countries to industrialize in the first place is a stable government and there ability to fight off foreign threats, which was not the case for Imperial Russia, Qing China and the ROC.
17 posts and 10 image replies omitted.

>>2577979
We are so far in front of Marx's time, communism is already possible. We do not need a period of state control and rapid technological development and concentration.

The industrialization project of the Soviet Union from the 30s to the 60s, centralized planning, late stage nation building in essence, inspired many poorer countries. Does not matter if socialistic, capitalistic, left or right wing.

>>2576288
typical ultra nonsense. communism isnt

< …worker ownership of the means of production, as Marx defined, as opposed to state ownership and in the case of modern China with large parts of the economy privately owned.


communism is the class dictatorship of the proletariat, where the means of production are collectively owned, a democratically elected series of workers councils being one such method of managing the collectively owned means of production.

your counterposing 'worker owned' and 'state owned' is charitably anarchist, uncharitably libertarian ancap, brainworms. the workers own the means of production through the mechanism of a proletarian government that is democratically elected, not ad hoc or individually, and this is what was the case in the USSR and is the case in China.

>>2579016
it does matter because it would have happen regardless if Russia was "communist" run or capitalist run as long there was a stable government and the means to protect against foreign capital

>>2578315
Oh okay, I wonder why Cuba, for instance, doesn't just hit the communist button. I mean it's that simple and easy and we're 'in front of Marx's time.' They have higher tech than the time of late 19th century Britain. No, that's not how it works. It's productive forces that drives changes to relations of production out of neccessity, not mental. Western countries aren't even in the socialist stage yet. And both Marx and Engels says going from the lower phase to the higher phase will be slow and gradual. Engels suggest it would take a long epoch. The state fades slowly because it becomes irrelevent.



File: 1764531317310.png (410.45 KB, 2753x1400, IMG_9634.png)

 

Why didn‘t the British colonize North America? Why did they leave such vast lands to a bunch of random persecuted people fleeing to America?

>Well they lost the war again them

Okay, but Great Britain didn‘t seem as interested in colonizing America anyways which is the point of my question.
7 posts and 2 image replies omitted.


>>2579336
Happy to help

>>2579344
I‘m not American breh

most intelligent ESL

>>2579139
The East coast of North America really was not remotely valuable in material terms compared to India or Africa.
Besides furs and wood it had no real resources that couldn't be gotten elsewhere easier and cheaper, plus we still had Canada, and we did colonise across Canada all the way across to the Pacific.
Americans simply overvalue what the colonies were worth massively because of their ego and because of the power the US now has.
Back then, the British saw the American colonies were a troublesome backwater that we could take or leave having control over.
It was a dumping ground for puritans and schizos who weren't wanted at home, and failures who had nothing to lose by starting over in a relative wilderness.
While the Yankees pretend they slayed a giant, Britain only fought against US independence half heatedly and barely managed a shrug when the war was concluded.
Plus the French were willing to arm American resistance to British rule, to the point of economically destroying themselves just to say "fuck you" to Britain.
Which as a matter of fact is unironically the main contributors to the spike in poverty which ultimately lead to the French Revolution.

t. Brit repeating what we were taught in A Level (High school diploma level) History class like a decade ago



File: 1764542051037-0.png (1.34 MB, 1024x768, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1764542051037-1.png (881.21 KB, 800x996, ClipboardImage.png)

 

Probably not in the next generation, or the one after. Maybe not even until the end of humanity. Who knows how long that will get.
Privacy is dead and your life is going to be fabricated when you become a nuisance, they will accuse you of things you never did and the brainwashed masses watching the content will believe it, millions of people will believe you are something you are not.
Yes I use buzzwords like masses, yes I am doing a generic relay of Edward Snowden's warnings and capitalist realism. Because its absolutely true.
All resistance will be crushed, the elite (lol funny buzzword) and their minions have a thousand ways to spy on you, they can probably read minds now, they have all kinds of surveillence. Its literally worse than 1984. And NO, neo-luddites, you are wrong, it was not the technology that made it this way, it was the humans, humanity itself let it get to this point. Its not civilization, it was humanity itself that was always this cruel.
I want to hide, I want to run, I want to scream, I want to cry and sometimes die BUT the chains of society bind me. I am Ebony Dark’ness Dementia Raven Way. I waved to Vampire. Dark misery was in his depressed eyes.
2 posts omitted.

>le west vs. le east
>"elites"
>le masses are le mindless sheeple
>Words,Ideas and Media are more influential than the economic base
>humans are….. LE BAD!!!
Idealism out of 10

>>2579372
Society is evil, humans are evil, evil means EVIL. They are so evil and the masses are so stupid and blind and deaf they do not see their own chains and have no feelings left. I buzz buzzwords but do you see? Things are bad now and they will be BAD for a long long time.

File: 1764542964865.png (95.77 KB, 474x474, ClipboardImage.png)

Hey marxists, most of the workers are lumpen and stupid, most of the workers are reactionary and conservative. Production doesnt rely on Marx's workers anymore its a gig economy like in David Graeber's book bullshit jobs, most workers are in the gig economy, workers are not the revolutionary subject anymore, society doesn't rely on Marx's defined "worker", Marx's "worker" does not exist anymore. Marx's class analysis is outdated. AI will replace workers and stuff!!

>>2579379
Max stirner is the missing peice of this puzzle you're struggling with.

>>2579387
Stirner wants chaos and chaos is bad, if everyone does whatever they want chaos happens and after chaos they start doing the same things society is doing again its the same evil things, so no, I dont need to read Max Stirner who is probably Engels in disguise making chaotic writings to divide and conquer



File: 1764542547146.png (189.52 KB, 641x417, IMG_9637.png)

 

If the proletariat is the historic subject then why are proletarians useless retards while most great socialist figures were not proletarian themselves, i.e. didn’t produce surplus labor value.

<Karl Marx

>Son of a lawyer
>Journalist, philosopher, political economist

<Friedrich Engels

>Part-owner of textile mills
>Factory manager

<Vladimir Lenin

>Son of a noble-rank civil servant
>Lawyer and professional revolutionary

<Leon Trotsky

Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

Read more

"Figures" don't do the logistics of revolution. They can plan, but they didn't build, move or maintain anything.

>>2579375
>implying communists, communism and the proletariat are separate from each other
>implying communism is about educated saviors helping the proletariat out of their good will
retarded thread

also most of the "great figures" in your shitty list are just that, bourgeois socialists, not even communists LOL



File: 1746038820559.webp (712.46 KB, 1024x682, 1745856527203.webp)

 

127 posts and 49 image replies omitted.

>>2578147
because the uniforms are cute, just put on the uniform and kick me already

>>2578104
>National Post



>>2579328
>>2579340
What did he do?



File: 1764537174271-0.png (1.1 MB, 892x672, PLA.png)

File: 1764537174271-1.png (1.06 MB, 891x592, PLA2.png)

File: 1764537174271-2.png (341.12 KB, 617x407, NikoPLA.png)

 

Since 2021 the Burmese Communist Party has re-armed and re-entered Burma both from across the border of China and by re-activating sympathetic Communists in the All Burma Federation of Student Unions (a process that started in 2017).

With the start of the civil war, they re-activated and are fighting in an alliance with the People's Defence Forces against the Tatmadaw.

The BCP/PLA follows the principles of Maoism. At the start they had ~1,000 soldiers under their command. Now it is said to be 3,000. They have a presence across most of northern Myanmar (Pale Township, Kan Duak, some areas near the capital, Mandalay, Shan State, Sagaing, Magway and Tanintharyi regions).

None of the territory appears to be governed by the BCP, they collect taxes but as of now have not yet formed liberated zones with their own socialist governance.

Please post any discussion or notes about PLA in Burma here.

Image 1 is from last year, 138 elephants were captured and were to be used for military purposes

Image 2 is from last September, in Northern Shan state during Operation 1027 (a lot of PDF ops are named with numbers for some reason)

Image 3 is Niko :)
3 posts omitted.

Are these the ones that uphold Xi Jinping thought or is that another one

>>2579290

That's the MNDAA.

PLA isn't hostile to China though (after all, they were hosted on the Chinese border during their exile)

>>2579291
> they were hosted on the Chinese border during their exile
Officially? Proofs? That would really shut the "China isn't helping the international left" crowd.

>>2579293

That is how Burmese sources have described it: https://ispmyanmarpeacedesk.com/eao/pla/

File: 1764540374590.png (1 MB, 800x600, ClipboardImage.png)

good thread anon
https://t.me/plaburmainfo
reposting this here for PLA telegram link



File: 1764278094563-0.png (725.02 KB, 1000x691, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1764278094563-1.mp4 (284.68 KB, 848x464, 1764277961276.mp4)

 

522 posts and 120 image replies omitted.

>>2579182
>who needs to be overthrown
YOUR
WESTERN
NATO
GOVERNMENT
FIRST

>>2579196
>most criticism of Putin itt is so pathetic I have no choice but to "defend" him even though I have absolutely no love for him irl.

Yeah, this.
<why isn't putin winning fast enough
<why doesn't putin nuke lvov
<why is putin killing THE WORKERS by waging war
<why is does putin seek compromise instead of pushing all the way to lisbon
<why isn't putin expanding the war by striking nato directly
And on and on. It's all so tiresome. And they're never, ever good faith questions or criticisms, just rhetorical bloviating.

>>2579182
he is gonna get couped by a schizo monarchist so hard

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cx2gylngx7go

>Around 36 missiles and nearly 600 drones were launched on targets across Ukraine overnight, officials said, killing three and injuring dozens of others.


>Ukraine's Air Force said it shot down 558 of the drones and 19 of the missiles.


I'm skeptical.

>>2579262
At least the rate of advance has increased significantly when compared to earlier this year. Russia is reconquering the corridor in northern Kharkov, that it held in the first few months of the war, and in the next couple of days, will finally conclude the full capture of the very first oblast since the start of the war. One of the only real disappointments, is how slow the Sumy advance has been. By the time the battle for Lyman is over, in ~4 months, going by the timeline shown up to now, Russia will have entered the last key city in the Donbass, which should take 2 to 3 months to clear, which means Donbass will be fully under Russian control in around 6-8 months. Anyways, out of the predictions I had for this year, about only 40% came true.



 

What is the point of horror when real life is infinitely more horrifying? Your average horror film is like watching the Teletubbies compared to a Mexican cartel torture/execution video. And I don't mean just the violence and suffering, I mean the casualness and banality. Or, to use another example, picture the scene of Roman mining slaves being literally worked to death because the profits of the mines were so large that human life became not worth maintaining, a level of greed that is perhaps unmatched even today.

Was horror unironically invented by sheltered people? What is the analysis?



Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]
[ 1 /2 /3 /4 /5 /6 /7 /8 /9 /10 /11 /12 /13 /14 /15 /16 /17 /18 /19 /20 /21 /22 /23 /24 /25 /26 /27 /28 /29 /30 /31 /32 /33 /34 /35 /36 ]
| Catalog | Home