[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

"The anons of the past have only shitposted on the Internet about the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it."
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)
What is 6 - 2?

Check out our new store at shop.leftypol.org!

| Catalog | Home
|

File: 1763714538397.mp4 (21.77 MB, 1920x1080, PetTheDonkey.mp4)

 

255 posts and 62 image replies omitted.

>>2574526
>This is not a threat but a simple statement of fact. Workers in Europe, Japan, South Korea and the US need jobs. We do not want our economic development to go into reverse. And even if we did not care, without exports, we will eventually run out of ways to pay China for our imports.

You will pay with your land and women, filthy westoid laowai. Either you embrace socialism like China did, or collapse into comrador kingdoms and warlords. March of progress is unstoppable, and time is the fairest judge of all; capitalism cannot survive socialism's unshackled might

Adapt or fucking die. Modern civilization is coming for your job, healthcare, housing, and clean air.

>>2574526
>The only good solutions lie with Beijing. It could take action to overcome deflation in its own economy, to remove structural barriers to domestic consumption, to let its exchange rate appreciate and to halt the billions in subsidies and loans it directs towards industry. That would be good for the Chinese people, too, whose living standards are sacrificed to make the country more competitive.

Pffft, yet another China understander. I bet he thinks that Chinese are worse off simply because their wages in exchange rate USDs is lower

>>2575451
>nooooo deflation is LE BAD, you should want everything to increase in price every year while wages don’t grow to match
>nooooo you can’t use the exchange rate system we constructed against us
>nooooo you can’t use subsidies only we can do that

Daily reminder that Xi drinks (((alcohol))). It's the liquid jew.

>>2575540
>nooooo deflation is LE BAD,
A layman would think that consumer goods getting cheaper is LE GOOD until they lose their job and have to sell their house. High deflation is bad for economic growth as spending/investments would decrease due to consumers/investors saving money by postponing spending until absolutely necessary. High inflation works the other way by forcing people spend money before goods/investments become even more costly. Money increases value during deflation and assets increase value during inflation and vice versa.
>you should want everything to increase in price every year
Central Banks have 2% inflation targets so there is less risk of deflation. 0% would be optimal but risk of runaway deflation forces these institutions to keep this safety margin.
>while wages don’t grow to match
Unions at least here negotiate wage increases to meet inflation or above it.



 

"turns out conservatives and reactionaries are just dumb after all" edition.

news:
- Your Party is suing itself, more at 11.
- The SNP and Plaid are going to form a "progressive alliance" somehow
- The government's going to do a switcheroo by raising income tax slightly and cutting national insurance to balance it out. (But they won't - follow this to its logical conclusion and scrap NI entirely)
- They're also considering cutting VAT on energy bills (which is the least efficient way of lowering bills you can imagine)
- The board of deputies asked Aston Villa for free footy tickets. In a worrying sign of rising antisemitism, Aston said nah.
- Labour is falling behind the Greens in the opinion polls as their strategy of copying Reform drives away their already-begrudging supporters without winning over any Reform voting reprobates. Nobody could have predicted this.
515 posts and 96 image replies omitted.

>>2575579
who is this knobend? why do we care what he has to say?

>>2575579
but he's completely right

>>2575596
he presents like an irritating middle class crackhead. that's what is important here.

>>2575594
engels 2

>>2575622
Engels queuing up outside the cornershop at 6am after the free-party to buy bicarbonate soda.



File: 1759855547742-1.png (585.86 KB, 1050x591, ClipboardImage.png)

 

NEVER FORGET THAT BEAUTIFUL DAY!

🇵🇸 PREVIOUSLY ON THE HOLY LAND 🇵🇸
>>2442214

————————
🚨 Live Happenings/Updates 🚨
Sites that have active live-blogs:
• Al-Jazeera: https://www.aljazeera.com/

• Middle East Eye: https://www.middleeasteye.net/israel-palestine-hamas-war-gaza-live-invasion

• The Guardian: https://www.theguardian.com/world/palestinian-territories

• Times of Israel: https://www.timesofisrael.com/topic/liveblog/ (trigger warning)
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
500 posts and 152 image replies omitted.

There will always be Communists who side with Lenin, Stalin, Mao, etc in general support for national liberation movements.
There will always be Communists who side with Luxemburg, Pannekoek, Bordiga, etc and oppose it for varying reasons.
And of course there will always be those who take a stance somewhere in-between on the national question, such as the followers of Trotsky.

We can argue the theoretical positions for the rest of our lives while quoting one pamphlet or another.
But regardless of the theoretical positions, all Communists are opposed to the ongoing genocide, settler colonialism, racial apartheid and we all support armed revolutionary resistance to imperialism. Even if we disagree on what the eventual state in Palestine should be like.
Instead of the autistic and pointless infighting which is fine during times of relative calm, during a time of crisis like the present isn't it better that we focus on more urgent matters and wider issues facing Palestine today which unite us?
Rather than this focus on the specifics of the character of the nation that ultimately emerges, which is something we currently have no influence over given most factions in Palestine are not Marxist but Islamist in nature?

Every day there are more stories of "Israeli" and American atrocities against the Palestinians, every day the situation on the ground changes.
This isn't the time for hypotheticals, we must deal with the situation as we find it.

>>2573839
>according to the Marxist-Leninist-Maoist principle of Self-Determination of all Oppressed Nations in their own SSR as articulated in Stalin’s “Marxism and the National Question” https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/stalin/works/1913/03a.htm and Lenin’s “The Socialist Revolution and the Right of Nations to Self-Determination” https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1916/jan/x01.htm , along with the National Delimitation Policy of the USSR https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_delimitation_in_the_Soviet_Union ,

Really bro, that's your reasoning? Your religious texts said we'll all live happily ever after?

>>2575177
Every second sentence Cutrone says is wrong. Literally NO ONE believed Hamas was ever going to win a military war against Isn’treal. The beauty of October )th was that it proved Zionism is a paper tiger.

>>2574696
As I have stated multiple times before, the USSR considered Traditional Physical Anthropology (ie. Craniometric Racial Typology) to be a legitimate Science and Soviet textbooks recognized Race as a Biological concept, with the massive caveat that they explicitly clarified that the Biological concept of Race has nothing to do with the Bourgeois Social construct of “Intelligence”, a Superstructural concept that constantly changes based on the needs of the Material Base (Mode of Production), with an individuals “Intelligence” being purely a result of their Environment/Upbringing/Material Conditions, so their is absolutely nothing wrong with modern Population Genetics (ie. The Autosomal DNA Ancestry Component Charts I posted) from the standpoint of Dialectical Materialist Marxism-Leninism-Maoism, in fact anyone who rejects Science is not a Real Communist (Marxist-Leninist-Maoist), and is instead either a White Evangelical Protestant Christian Zionist Nationalist Sexist Homophobic Racist Flat Earth Creationist Fascist Republican MAGAtard who wants to go back to the 19th century Dickensian Factory Towns, Women in the Kitchen, Sodomy laws, and Jim Crow, or a Postmodern Foucauldian Liberal Idealist Anarchist who wants everyone to live in a Hippie Commune, thus proving that the rejection of any Science (including Population Genetics) will prevent you from embracing the Immortal Science of Marxism-Leninism-Maoism, the Highest stage of Marxist Science, and begin traveling the Scientifically proven Shining Path to Communism, ✊😜🇨🇳🇰🇵🇨🇺🇵🇸🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️🚀☢️!

>>2575247
During the Global Maoist Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution in the future Global USSR, all those who reject the Immortal Science of Marxism-Leninism-Maoism, the highest stage of Marxism, including all Religious Clergy such as Priests/Ministers/Monks/Nuns/Imams/Rabbis (In the future Global USSR, all Religion will be Illegal and all Churches/Mosques/Synagogues/Temples/Pagodas will be Bulldozed/Burnt down) and all Fascists, Liberals, and Revisionists, will be arrested by the International Red Guards and forced to march through the streets wearing Dunce Caps and attend Struggle Sessions on their way to the Re-education camps where they will be Re-educated to embrace the Immortal Science of MaPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

File: 1764249745956.png (189.29 KB, 560x420, ClipboardImage.png)




File: 1760858697918.png (1.67 MB, 1400x759, KAM-uh-luh.png)

 

How do you think American liberal politics will play out once Trump is no longer in power?

For the past 10 years, the entire crux of the Democratic Party has been "STOP TRUMP". The average American Democrat or liberal now bases their political views solely on how much they hate Trump, MAGAts, "manosphere" podcasters, so-called "alt-right pipelines", and everything in between. They have no real principles and it shows.

The right-wing, on the other hand, believes it is creating a new world; it's a much worse world, but that's how they want it. This has caused liberals to prop up the old, dying system as a way of preventing it from collapsing into something worse. Now, we're seeing liberals who claim to be "left-wing" embrace everything from free trade agreements (on the basis Trump's tariffs need to be stopped) to hyper-consumerism (on the basis that spending money on fashion and makeup and mindless consumer goods helps maintain your "individuality" against Trump-era conformity) to literal junk food (in order to own RFK and MAHA). It doesn't take much to realize all of these were once things American liberals strongly opposed 20-25 years ago; I'm old enough to remember when "clean girl" no-makeup aesthetics, eating organic, and herbal medicines were leftist things.

American liberals are now pushing a culture of hyper-rationality and order to counter the mass chaos that has erupted in America under Trump. They hate ICE agents terrorizing communities but they hate the sporadic community defence and protests that pop up to beat back ICE even more. They hate the Luigi Mangiones and the Tyler Robinsons and the prospects of an American Years of Lead. They want everything to be "rational" and based on slow progression and linear shit. But this way is outdated. Trying to find the "middle path" doesn't work when capitalism is in a state of collapse. For the liberal, everything that doesn't fit their paradigm is "mysticism" which always equates to "fascism" and needs to be stamped out before it manifests into authoritarianism. But how can this hyper-rationalism win?

The same is true of foreign policy. Liberals insist on American soft power, which arguably won't work in a world post-Gaza where American support for the most documented genocide in recent history was on full display. Trump, on the other hand, is an old school imperialist who simply seizes whatever he demands without caring.

So where does that leave the DemocraPost too long. Click here to view the full text.
95 posts and 9 image replies omitted.

hopefully people will wake the fuck up and realize libtardism doesn't get them anything but fucked over each and everytime

I don’t think that there will be a strong liberal movement after Trump. The liberal base is practically all just demsocs except for boomers and unless you consider them to also be liberals then it’s pretty much over. Everyone is either a demsoc or a Nazi which is pretty bad because I don’t think that demsocs are the polor opposite of Nazis, I would consider the polor opposite of a demsoc to be an Eisenhower-style conservative and I would consider the polor opposite of Nazis to be Maoists, then again what would a Guevarist like me know? After all we all like to think we are in the center.

>>2526945
If the Dems could recover from the Vietnam debacle (Vietnam was a Dem project for most of America’s involvement) they can recover from the Gaza genocide
What they cannot recover from is their utter inability to improve anyone’s life in any way

>>2526850
>american liberalism after liberalism
Same old. Uniparty will continue to murder both americans and foreign victims of imperialism in the name of capital.

>How do you think American liberal politics will play out once Trump is no longer in power?
Those who aren't ready for socialism, particularly those not directly hit hard by the current repression, might just celebrate the 'victory' of Democrats (assuming they aren't overtly blocked from electoral power) and interpret it as the system working, validating their trust in US institutions, electoralism and the legal system. Honestly, a show-trial of Trump could kill a revolution.

But if socialists GTFO /leftypol/ and actually seize upon these grievances, they can inoculate people from liberalist claims of America working, if/when the Republicans face any roadblocks in the future.



 

196 posts and 75 image replies omitted.

Who's excited for more pauline kino?

>>2574299
>it's real
society of the spectacle

File: 1764244981809.png (5.21 KB, 341x85, ClipboardImage.png)

I know, it's reddit slop, but can't help laughing.

>>2574299
IMAGINE

A DYSTOPIAN FUTURE IN WHICH ANTHONY ALBINOSE

BECOMES

PRIME MINISTAH

File: 1764245711376.png (10.9 KB, 86x84, ClipboardImage.png)

>>2574299
god i want her to origami my cock



File: 1762212898779-0.png (97.95 KB, 1920x1080, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1762212898779-1.png (195.56 KB, 800x720, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1762212898779-2.png (400.25 KB, 1789x811, ClipboardImage.png)

 

Previous thread: >>2507158

Links:

Previous Thread Archives
Thread 1 https://archive.ph/ROnpO
Thread 2 https://archive.ph/f29Po
Thread 3 https://archive.ph/GZj20
Thread 4 https://archive.ph/ZHfse

Youtube Playlists
Anwar Shaikh - Historical Foundations of Political Economy
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLTMFx0t8kDzc72vtNWeTP05x6WYiDgEx7
Anwar Shaikh - Capitalism: Competition, Conflict and Crises
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLB1uqxcCESK6B1juh_wnKoxftZCcqA1go
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
150 posts and 53 image replies omitted.

>>2572946
i responded 👍
>>2572384
>he openly contradicts himself constantly and posts things that are objectively false and when corrected ignores it.
any examples? 🥱
>>2572884
>I do not believe that Marx thought that value ratios are equal to exchange-value ratios.
whats the difference? 🤔
exchange-value is "value in exchange" (Ax=By)
>>2572406
unfortunately, there are no primary sources i can find from shimomuran himself, but from secondary sources, he's described as a keynesian, so your description makes sense. the mainstream view is that savings represent future spending and so the increase of savings is an increase in future value. this is true, but only so far as it concerns its marginal and total content. the individual saver benefits by saving, yet if everyone saved, the individual would suffer, since the economy would shrink and thus there would be less to save for. in keynesian terms, this often refers to the "paradox of thrift":
<Every such attempt to save more by reducing consumption will so affect incomes that the attempt necessarily defeats itself. 
https://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/economics/keynes/general-theory/ch07.htm
we may then see keynes' view on the relationship between saving and investment:
>[i] Income = value of output = consumption + investment. [ii] Saving = income - consumption. [iii] Therefore saving = investment. [quantitatively]
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>2573131
>>2573131
thank you for your opinion on shimomuran economics.
Also I recommend reading prince of yen, or other works by richard werner. Hes the primary scholar who studies shimomuran economics

>>2573131
>any examples?
just the hundreds in all the previous threads

File: 1764150303901.jpg (52.57 KB, 614x640, bob.jpg)

>>2573807
>hundreds of examples
pick one.
>>2573578
no prob, bob. 👍

highlighting a difference between ancient economic conception versus the modern, as a difference between the role of the mechanical arts in relation to liberal arts.

first is the earliest text on formal economics, xenophon's "the economist" (360 B.C):
<Well, then, we agreed that economy was the proper title of a branch of knowledge, and this branch of knowledge appeared to be that whereby men are enabled to enhance the value of their houses or estates; and by this word "house or estate" we understood the whole of a man's possessions; and "possessions" again we defined to include those things which the possessor should find advantageous for the purposes of his life; and things advantageous finally were discovered to mean all that a man knows how to use and turn to good account. Further, for a man to learn all branches of knowledge not only seemed to us an impossibility, but we thought we might well follow the example of civil communties in rejecting the base mechanic arts so called, on the ground that they destroy the bodies of the artisans, as far as we can see, and crush their spirits.
https://www.fulltextarchive.com/book/The-Economist/
we may thusly compare this to the first modern text of formal political economy, antoine montchretien's "treatise" (1615):
<Among these three kinds of men are practised the effective arts, commonly called mechanical, having more regard to the hands that exercise them than to their own dignity… We note in mechanics the representations and images of the same prudence that shines in the liberal arts, in proportion to their greater or lesser merit… These are streams flowing from the same source and spreading incessantly through the necessities of human life […] Let us then consider the liberal and mechanical arts, where its light shines most brightly in so many rays; we will find them so necessary, useful and pleasant that the one we look at most will seem the most preferable […] I say this to shut the mouths of those who would accuse me of speaking to such high and exalted Majesties about things which they consider to be so low and mechanical…
>>>/edu/25139
what is present in montchretien is the esteem of equality between the liberal and mechanPost too long. Click here to view the full text.



File: 1764120396767.jpg (8.03 KB, 310x162, images.jpg)

 

The biggest rebutal I see in the eyes of the average person to "socialism" and "communism" is that it's utopic, that it relies on bad assumptions, that it doesn't work in reality etc. In essence, that we're advocating for something that can't be and that we have no alternative to capitalism.
And, to that effect, what are we even advocating for ? It appears to me that we have a bunch of different movements with many different goals that don't actually ressemble one another. Yet, despite this, very few of these movements have actual "models", it just seems like they want to reform or do a revolution for the sake of action rather than purpose.
Shouldn't we concentrate on clear objectives and goals before having all this talk about how marxism-leninism-maoism-gonzalo thought is superior to cybernetic-trotskism-councilism in achieving [we run into the problem here]?

>inb4 abolition of private property, abolition of capitalism, abolition of alienation

We can't actually base our objectives around these vagues goals though, or at least not at the current time and at the forefront. Abolition of private property doesn't mean anything if there's no framework to offer an alternative or to replace it. Marx laid us many goals but, given that he didn't specify what or how, shouldn't it be up to us to conceptualize the type of system which we want in accordance with the relevant theories he proposed.

Apart from small intellectuals scattered everywhere (Cockshott, Schweickart etc), there seems to be an evident lack of clear model that actually adresses the critique of marx's ambitions and dismisses its apparent utopianism.
2 posts omitted.

I'm not a communist anymore, all I know is that marxism is objectively the best ideology, more than that I don't care about le revolution that will come when I'm dead or too old to give a fuck.

File: 1764229020540-0.png (77.79 KB, 512x292, marxie.png)

File: 1764229020540-2.jpg (42.17 KB, 640x480, sddefault.jpg)

>>2573868
>What even is the endgoal that we want ?
It's when no iphone

File: 1764229124623-0.jpg (32.33 KB, 640x480, sddefault (2).jpg)

File: 1764229124623-1.jpg (65.49 KB, 640x480, sddefault (1).jpg)


>>2573868
Welfare state with strong man leader, proletarian wage labor and red flag.

>>2573868
1. Steps that fit our current stage of development

Right now the productive forces operate inside a market driven mode of production. This is the reality of our material conditions. Yet we can expand worker control through cooperatives and state owned firms competing on the same markets without any utopian great leap forward beyond material conditions that currently exist. The focus should be on clear, immediate gains for workers rather than arguments about distant future goals.

2. Steps that become possible as productive forces grow

As automation, data systems and planning tools advance, society can move toward more coordinated resource allocation. Labour time accounting and voucher systems become feasible once a substantial part of production is socialised through cooperative and state monopolies. These mechanisms cut wasteful competition and enable long term planning while still preserving responsibility and incentives through labour based accounting. This is an achievable intermediate stage even with current technology. Debates on full scale planning should remain secondary while communists should emphasise the first step and its direct benefits for workers.

3. Goals for a future only possible with abundant productive forces

We have to be honest that a money free and stateless society is not currently possible but it still remains a desirable long term goal that we can hope to reach as productive forces grow. Such goals would require near post-scarcity economical resources and nearly fully automated economic structure. Until then transitional forms such as labour vouchers and a minimalist state remain necessary. These long term aims should be clear to communists, but kept outside discuorse with workers. What matters now is demonstrating how the first practical steps increase worker control, security and most importantly living standards.



 

Can we talk about the new revelations about Noam Chomsky and Jeffrey Epstein?

>The prominent linguist and philosopher Noam Chomsky called it a “most valuable experience” to have maintained “regular contact” with Jeffrey Epstein, who by then had long been convicted of soliciting prostitution from a minor, according to emails released earlier in November by US lawmakers.


>Such comments from Chomsky, or attributed to him, suggest his association with Epstein – who officials concluded killed himself in jail in 2019 while awaiting trial on federal sex-trafficking charges – went deeper than the occasional political and academic discussions the former had previously claimed to have with the latter.


>Chomsky, 96, had also reportedly acknowledged receiving about $270,000 from an account linked to Epstein while sorting the disbursement of common funds relating to the first of his two marriages, though the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) professor has insisted not “one penny” came directly from the infamous financier.


>The emails disclosed on 12 November by the Republican members of the US House oversight committee generally detailed the correspondence Epstein had with political, academic and business luminaries, including the Bill Clinton White House’s treasury secretary Larry Summers and Steve Bannon, the longtime ally of Donald Trump. Further, they reveal Epstein and Chomsky were close enough to discuss musical interests and even potential vacations.


>Perhaps the most telling of the Chomsky-related documents in question was a letter of support for Epstein attributed to Chomsky with the salutation “to whom it may concern”. It is not dated, but it contains a typed signature with Chomsky’s name and citing his position as a University of Arizona laureate professor, a role he began in 2017, as first reported by the Massachusetts news outlet WBUR.


https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/nov/22/noam-chomsky-jeffrey-epstein-ties-emails

A couple of things:
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
83 posts and 13 image replies omitted.

>>2570854
I think it depends on how you see it.

Most likely approach is that Chomsky benefited somehow from the relationship. Either donations or networking (as proven). As such, hanging out and communicating with Epstein can be seen as “part of the job” rather than a personal relationship and approval of Epstein’s actions. In this case, overlooking his conviction is strategy, not approval.

On the other hand, we could assume a friendly relationship beyond mutual benefit. I find this unlikely. Men of their age, with such different interests would hardly become friends. Much less to the point of Chomsky approving Epstein’s deviant behaviors.

Another possibility is his wife Valeria pushed him towards Epstein for personal benefit, such as meeting Woody Allen.

His recommendation letter of Epstein is strange though. Not even his recommendation for Finkelstein was so flattery. We should keep in mind the possibility of it being written by AI

File: 1764122290642-0.png (5.09 MB, 2167x1480, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1764122290642-1.png (3.89 MB, 1718x1582, ClipboardImage.png)

>>2572475
should be samir amin instead of chomsky tbh, he collaborated with khieu samphan irl and knew some of the (future) CPK irl while they were in paris

>The analysis centers around the idea that underdevelopment is caused by colonial exploitation, which distorts the colony's economy so badly that it cannot develop. This theory of underdevelopment has been carried further by other Third World scholars, many of whom also studied in Paris during the 1950s and 1960s.

>In a recently published study, African [Egyptian] scholar Samir Amin, who studied with Khieu Samphan in Paris, explains why underdevelopment and mass poverty occur. Amin's thesis distinguishes between "central" and "peripheral" economies, which develop along entirely different paths.
>Khieu Samphan applies this theory to Cambodia, although its concepts were not completely formulated at the time he wrote.
<https://archive.org/details/IndochinaChronicle51-52Sept.-Nov.1976

Broke: Hegemony
Woke: Survival
Bespoke: Joining the hegemony for personal enrichment and calling it survival

How is this relevant to the left?

File: 1764241002743.png (48.21 KB, 643x287, ClipboardImage.png)

>>2570854
>chomsky
oy chill bro he just diddled gentile girls nothing to worry about brahski



File: 1764134565103.jpg (3.72 KB, 125x106, cringponytattoo.jpg)

 

>"I shouldn't be shamed for not living up to capitalist society's expectations of me, I should be allowed to be my authentic self without being criticized and I shouldn't have to change myself based on some arbitrary capitalist standard"

This seems to be the sentiment that dominates the minds of zoomers and most millennials that drives them towards the left whether we want to admit it or not. This is what makes a lot of younger people under 40 embrace anti-capitalist politics, question social norms that are the superstructure of modern capitalism, become anti-eugenics, embrace new identity groups, and so on. Look no further than Tumblr from the mid 2010s or TikTok today. My question is, why haven't any communist or socialist parties been able to gather these types of people up? The DSA's entire strategy is simply economistic "healthcare and unions" babble that they weaponize to push the Democrats further to the left. Yet we shouldn't forget that the millennial left (namely, the people who participated in the anti-war movement in the 2000s and Occupy in 2011-12) all folded into DSA by the end of the 2010s. So why can't the DSA bring in those frustrated zoomers from TikTok, the ones who make videos on queerness and unmasking autism and mental health and why nearly all romantic relationships are inherently predatory or whatever? Maybe if the people on that platform were in a political party they'd have actual pragmatic political goals.
28 posts and 1 image reply omitted.

>>2575356
We've been saying this for decades now.
>"education and awareness will move the overton window"
>"education and awareness will move the overton window"
>"education and awareness will move the overton window"
>"education and awareness will move the overton window"
>"education and awareness will move the overton window"

Rinse and repeat. When do things start changing for real?

>>2575163
This is by design. The capitalists put the ultimate distraction toy into every kid's hands so that they would become retarded and incapable of rebellion. Notice how actual socialist countries (China, Cuba, Vietnam, North Korea Belarus, etc.) ban their kids from using their phones during school time.

>>2575469
What capitalist country doesn't also do that?

>>2575466
>Rinse and repeat. When do things start changing for real?
When there's a politically organized leftist party in America that does more than tail the Democrats. A genuine socialist party could ban eugenics, ban ABA therapy and force autism acceptance on to the country. The Democrats won't.

>>2575163
The left you did all those things with achieved less than nothing. These kids may also achieve nothing, but at least they're failing differently. At least they haven't had a decade of smug self-satisfied failure to run on.

>>2575469
Although it will naturally vary from child to child, there are a substantial number of children for whom a phone is a more valuable learning tool than school itself. (Basically: those who'll use it to read wikipedia instead of watching tiktok. School is a comically inefficient way of educating people and a miserable, prison-like environment where the main thing you learn is how to exploit goodhart's law to credentialist ends. College is much better because it loses a lot of the prison-like elements, but it's still basically bad at what it does. You really can't get past goodhart's law when it comes to testing-with-consequences.)
If it was up to me they'd all be on computers (a much better device than a phone and one much better oriented to reading/writing seriously), but it is what it is.



File: 1764074047161.jpeg (359.66 KB, 1636x2048, h3vc591lsc3g1.jpeg)

 

Why did the British colonial system in India formalize and exploit an indigenous social system that posits a fundamental moral inequality between groups of people?

Would it have been better that the British impose the imperialist European values of universal human dignity and rights on their colonial subjects?
8 posts and 2 image replies omitted.

I clicked on this thread because I thought the OP pic was a logic puzzle. It's not a logic puzzle, so I have zero remaining interest in this thread.

>>2574194
You wouldn't have solved it anyway, pussy

>>2574194
it secretly is a logic puzzle

>>2573109
When you think about it, a chandal kid must cause the most seethe.

Because using that system made it easier to extract resources. If they actually cared about human rights they would have abolished the caste system like in Tibet, but obviously that was not the priority considering they squeezed the Indians so hard for food that the bengal famine happened.



Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]
[ 1 /2 /3 /4 /5 /6 /7 /8 /9 /10 /11 /12 /13 /14 /15 /16 /17 /18 /19 /20 /21 /22 /23 /24 /25 /26 /27 /28 /29 /30 /31 /32 /33 /34 /35 /36 ]
| Catalog | Home