>>2241623i think of the law thencewise:
what is crime? that which is beyond law.
who makes law? those beyond the law.
(this is my schmittian understanding; i.e. "law" is just the crime of the state itself)
crime is defined by the law and law is defined by crime. without "crime", there would be no law, and no state. therefore, the state must create crime to defend law. this is the general paradox; the greater the law, the greater the crime.
>Really, who needs evil cults?i came to the conclusion a while ago, that one can only be truly evil if he acts in the name of the good, and conversely, one who defines himself as evil, is limited in his activity, by the boundaries of goodness. this is why christianity will always have more blood on its hands than satanism. again, more paradoxes.