[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

"The anons of the past have only shitposted on the Internet about the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it."
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)
What is 6 - 2?

Check out our new store at shop.leftypol.org!

| Catalog | Home
|

File: 1763293896567.jpg (68.79 KB, 791x1024, 1758644738914307m.jpg)

 

<Republic of Cuba
<Democratic People’s Republic of Korea
<People’s Republic of China
<Lao People’s Democratic Republic
<Socialist Republic of Vietnam
<Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela

Rest of the world is ruled by bourgeoisie and personal opinions and political positions are up to debate but not these countries. Dictatorship of the proletariat means that these countries are ruled by the proletariat and their representatives.
87 posts and 20 image replies omitted.

>>2645631
But I am a mutt too (castizo). Arentou implying Castizos are fully hwite?

File: 1768406482722.jpeg (5.14 KB, 183x275, 1768406262607.jpeg)

>Letter of Imam Khomeini,

>The Great Leader of the Islamic Revolution and Founder of the Islamic Republic of Iran,


>To President Mikhail Gorbachev, Leader of the Soviet Union


In the Name of Allah, the Compassionate, the Merciful

Your Excellency Mr. Gorbachev1, Chairman of the Presidium of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics

With due wishes for the happiness and prosperity of Your Excellency and the people of the Soviet Union.

Since your assumption of office there has been the impression that Your Excellency, in analyzing world political events, particularly those pertaining to the Soviet Union, have found yourself in a new era of reassessment, change, and confrontation; and your boldness and initiative in dealing with the realities of the world is quite likely to bring about changes that would result in upsetting the equations of power dominating the world. I have therefore found it necessary to bring certain matters to your attention.

Even if your new approach and decisions are merely used as a means to overcome the party crisis, and to solve some of the problems confronting your people, your courage in reappraising a school of thought that has for decades enchained the revolutionary youth of the world behind its iron curtain is indeed worthy of praise. If, however, you are considering taking a further step forward, the first thing that will ensure your success is that you re-evaluate your predecessors’ policy of obliterating God and religion from society2, a policy that has no doubt given the heaviest blow to the Soviet people. Rest assured that this is the only way whereby world problems can be dealt with realistically.
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

Peak leftist"com" moment right here: >>2563161

Read Bordiga.

Way to screw over The Republic of Nicaragua

>Uncritical support
Stopped reading.

Uncritical support is for (and I mean this in its proper medical definition) retards. No exceptions.



File: 1768628833778.jpg (32.92 KB, 818x312, G-Obb73WUAAvG-b.jpg)

 

Why do revisionists and infantiles get so hung up on concentric construction? It's a practical way of understanding people's war. The party should not be separated from its organs and the people, it needs to be part of each of them in order to understand them. Letting the army be controlled by non-party members is a bad idea. The PLA needs to be working within the mass orgs and the people as well, in order to formulate strategy. The mass orgs are how the party and organisation diffuse into the people. You need to think of the whole of revolutionary society as a single whole in order to properly understand its contradictions.

The issue with the diagram isn't so much the concentric construction, it's the 'Great Leadership' or 'Jefetura' being the center-point and not, as the CPP and CPI(Maoist), learned "collective leadership".
It unveils that the Gonzaloists are in fact another sect of dogmatists who were unable to critically analyze where the PCP-SL went wrong.
In short you're too lazy for success (scientific socialism), instead opting for an exciting little social club (adventurism). It is easily identified as left-revisionism by communists who aren't just LARPing. You're just as much of a problem as right-revisionists.



File: 1768078798402.png (499.61 KB, 762x598, ClipboardImage.png)

 

Did Marx ever once utter the word "revisionism?" If you think about it. Anti-revisionism is the ultimate revisionism because it is anti-dialectical. It stresses revisiting the "classics" of the numbered heads (however many you think are "worthy" of the title, 4 or 5 or 6) of Marxism-Leninism rather than scientifically studying the evolving world and coming up with New Theses. Marx and Engels were anti-dogmatic and stressed an evolving understanding of the system, yet so many of their followers today are "anti-revisionists" who think nothing (or at least nothing important) has changed since 1883.
29 posts and 14 image replies omitted.

>>2642229
So what is the Scientific (tm) Socialist way to distinguish between "Dogmatism" and "Revisionism?" Just loyalty to Marx and Engels? But Engels stresses evolution and context sensitivity in the OP quote, as does historical materialism in general. What is the unambiguous and indisputable way to tell the difference between someone applying Marxism correctly to their particular material conditions, and someone being an "opportunist/revisionist?" What is the unambiguous and indisputable way to tell the difference between someone being loyal to Marx/Engels and someone being overly "dogmatic?" These are not rhetorical questions. I see no clear methodology and I think the a significant amount of Communist infighting may be correlated with (not necessarily caused by) an inability to address these questions.

File: 1768252057441.png (424.51 KB, 897x896, ClipboardImage.png)

>>2640674
>Good job turning marx on his head

Turning Marx on his head is just RETVRNing to Hegel because Marx turned Hegel on his head.

We need to start meming on these elder scroll posters
They always post absolute dogshit all over /leftypol/

>>2651338
>no args, just butthurt

>>2651338
Deng won tho



File: 1768052374910.jpg (14.46 KB, 250x396, Althusser.jpg)

 

Teach me about him, I skimmed his Wikipedia article and saw two sections about his romantic life and mental illness which looked interesting.
Why isn't he more well known? What has he done? What did he believe in?
42 posts and 3 image replies omitted.

althussy

Why did he kill his wife though

>>2640554
OG leftypol user

>>2640567
I think he would've posted here if he had grown up in this era. Just going by the fact that he didn't have sex till he was 29 or something.

>>2639554
>>2639572
Still waiting on this one. Did anon lie?



 

ICE PROTESTS GENERAL
*ICE SHOOTS TWO PROTESTORS EDITION*

Everybody was wrong, ICE began shooting protestors only one day after the protests began. This Thursday afternoon, ICE agents shot two protestors and put them in critical condition in the city of Portland, Oregon.

>What will come of this?

<We don't know yet, but if you had to realistically guess, nothing probably.

Source: https://katu.com/news/local/ice-shoots-two-people-in-portlandoregon
306 posts and 68 image replies omitted.

>>2650300
Somehow doubt the libs would be bold enough to invoke the Black Panthers and give them actual guns especially when their messaging so far has been "please dont fight back you're just giving Trump an excuse to crack down" and other cuck shit

i'm not hearing anything about the protests. i guess things will just kinda stay as their air until the general strike or if ICE does something really stupid.

>>2650973
meanwhile, the representatives of the state are telling their constituents to just take it

>>2650300
>they seem like some kind of PR move by a lib agency
Wtf does that mean? Why would a lib agency want to tell people to get armed and defend themselves from the state?

File: 1768625938562-0.webp (94.08 KB, 640x657, IMG_7483.webp)

File: 1768625938562-1.jpeg (665 KB, 1170x1457, IMG_7484.jpeg)

The activist wasn't even trans btw



 

Who do you think the best head of state of all time was? You can pick whoever I just added those images above because I assumed that those would be the most common answers.
54 posts and 16 image replies omitted.

If we're talking as purely heads of state and not as revolutionaries:
Lenin died too early to really tell, so we can only speculate, but I think he would've been great.
Stalin was great, didn't understand dialectics but no major fuckups that were solely his fault.
Mao was great but went full retard in his later years, mars an otherwise great record. Was right to antagonize the now-revisionist USSR tho.

I don't know much about Castro, he was alright I guess, no fuckups, but not the same caliber as the aforementioned either.

>>2637368
Bismark

File: 1768236078370.jpg (5.38 KB, 202x249, 1758693808529353.jpg)

>>2641962
Lol, Lmao even. Mao's chosen successor Hua Guofeng started reforming and liberalizing before Deng

File: 1768237435249.png (157.87 KB, 1080x564, 1754729685327333.png)

>>2641984
>Stalin
>never understood dialectics
Mods, please send this piece of shit to gulag.

>picrel is from

Józef Maria Bocheński. Soviet Russian Dialectical Materialism. [Diamat]. 1963.

>>2638380
You can't handle the truth.



 

The graph going around showing "men becoming conservative" is hilarious because the female line is the one going nearly exponential whereas the male one just droops a bit.
101 posts and 15 image replies omitted.

>>2637180
You're a normie doing a trans LARP to get arthoe pussy.


>>2649961
It’s true, I’ve wasted so much time injecting horse steroids into my penis

File: 1768624500823.png (168.51 KB, 474x291, ClipboardImage.png)

Daily reminder that women have frequently demonstrated themselves to be a revolutionary subject, as a class.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women_in_the_Russian_Revolution

>>2649537
>>2649631
It's taken me the wisdom and zen of old age (25) to learn this; it's not even a chivalry thing. Buy food for people if you have the money for it. If they insist otherwise, ask them to buy the next round. Pub society.

Yes, society has systemic biases which disadvantage women. Consider them.
But let's misapply that logic; do you see White peoples buying drinks for Black peoples?



File: 1766918445601-0.png (115.18 KB, 335x338, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1766918445601-1.png (88.08 KB, 261x299, ClipboardImage.png)

 

The absolute state of the discourse on this board lately is pathetic. It’s almost 2026 and I’m still seeing "socialists" parroting CIA talking points like they’re reading from the Black Book of Communism. It’s time to filter the radlibs and the ultras who care more about moral purity than winning.

If we actually apply historical materialism instead of utopian wish-casting, it becomes obvious that Stalin and Deng aren't just "good" – they are the two greatest practitioners of Marxism in history because they did what Western leftists refuse to do: they prioritized the survival of the revolution over the approval of the bourgeoisie.

1. Stalin: The Shield
Stop crying about "authoritarianism" and read Losurdo. His Critique of a Black Legend completely exposes how the "millions dead" narrative is just recycled Nazi war propaganda that the West adopted during the Cold War. The "Holodomor" wasn't a genocide; it was a combination of kulak sabotage and cyclical drought that the Soviets eventually ended through collectivization. Stalin understood that you don't survive capitalist encirclement with good vibes. He took a country of wooden plows and turned it into a nuclear superpower in a single generation. He purged the fifth columnists because he knew a war of annihilation was coming. Without that "authoritarianism," the Wehrmacht would have wiped the Slavs off the map.

2. Deng: The Sword
The hate for Deng is even more embarrassing. You guys claim to care about the poor but hate the man who oversaw the greatest poverty alleviation program in human history? Deng understood that "poverty is not socialism." He developed the productive forces necessary to compete with the West. And regarding 1989: He saved China from the fate of the USSR. Tiananmen was a textbook color revolution, backed by Western NGOs and intelligence. Deng saw Gorbachev selling out to Pizza Hut and realized that sometimes you have to crush a counter-revolution to preserve the Dictatorship of the Proletariat. Because he had the spine to do that, China is now mogging the US economy while Russia spent the 90s getting looted by oligarchs.

TL;DR
Parenti said it best in Blackshirts and Reds: you people want a revolution without a revolution. You want a clean, safe process that never makes mistakes and never exercises power. That doesn't exist. Stalin secured the state; Deng secured the economy. If you reject them, you’re not Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
282 posts and 50 image replies omitted.

A CIA talking point just flew over my house

>>2615779
>You guys claim to care about the poor but hate the man who oversaw the greatest poverty alleviation program in human history
Uncritical support for comrades FDR and LBJ

>>2647795
And ᴉuᴉlossnW. And maybe hitler

File: 1768510632823.gif (5.26 MB, 498x280, true-truth-nuke.gif)


>>2646146
For which class?



File: 1767946074253.png (1.31 MB, 1024x1024, 916774883218.png)

 

he's completely BTFO'ed all arguments against Marx's Law of Value, he's empirically proven that Economic Planning is 100% possible with current data sets and modern computation, he's shown that current economic theory is based on complete woo that doesn't hold up to basic mathematical scrutiny or even basic logic.
The thing is, because all his online content is extremely complex, technical post-grad level university lectures, it's hard to get his idea's out there. Which I think why as Socialists, we should try present his arguments, theories and evidence in a far more presentable, digestable, ELI5 fashion for Normies.
What made classic Leftypol good is that we were able to present Socialist content for normies that would be shared by Zoomers and such. So I think a good project for us on this board, would be to work How the World Works (https://libgen.rocks/ads.php?md5=0f775aef8cbe24a8978e115669bfcdfb) into a decent Youtube series that explains how we can build a new economic order in the not too distant future.
80 posts and 9 image replies omitted.

>>2644593
>>2644676
>>2644912
Can you give a definition of how you understand "subjective idealism" and how that would apply to Cockshott? You are not just lying on the internet about having read the pdf you are posting and having read Cockshott's materialism book, right? Would you answer some questions about each book?

>>2651097
mechanical materialism is subjective idealism. or more precisely as lenin said it collapses into solipsism. if you want to know more just read MEC

another way to say it is anything that anything that is not dialectical materialism is necessarily some form of idealism. and cockshott openly and explicitly rejects dialectical materialism, which is the core foundation of marx's thought. so he is definitely not a communist by any measure and is much closer to a postmodern relativist than anything resembling a marxist.

HE SHOT WHAT?

>>2651305
>>2651306
Have you read the Materialism book by Cockshott? What have you read by Cockshott?

Why should I believe that you are doing anything else here than mashing buzzwords together?

I don't believe you have read the pdf you posted.



 

The Soviet Union opened its very first large toilet paper factory in… 1969
And toilet paper remained in deficit for the whole Soviet period, right until the end.
People would buy Pravda and Komsomol newspapers exclusively to use as toilet paper.
In 1981, a Soviet plane crashed and killed 16 Admirals and Generals because it was overloaded with hoarded toilet paper lol.
24 posts and 1 image reply omitted.

Posting in a bullshit thread. Anyway. I think a socialist society should actually put information on rolls of toilet paper. Maybe not Fidel's speeches, but factoids and vocabulary stuff.

>>2638942
>you think TP made in the first half of the 20th century was any better than newspapers? That stuff had splinters and shit in it. Also soviet newspapers were free.
This.

>>2639014
And this.

This thread should be archived and shown to victorious revolutionaries getting a bit teary-eyed in modern art museums as they contemplate the intellectual struggle of the working masses during the old period of the Dictatorship of the Bourgeoisie.

>The Soviet Union opened its very first large toilet paper factory in… 1969
Nice.

>>2639048
I believe Venezuela under Chavez actually printed pieces of the constitution on goods that went to the small grocery stores for the poor

that's why we support TPUSA here



Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]
[ 1 /2 /3 /4 /5 /6 /7 /8 /9 /10 /11 /12 /13 /14 /15 /16 /17 /18 /19 /20 /21 /22 /23 /24 /25 /26 /27 /28 /29 /30 /31 /32 /33 /34 /35 /36 ]
| Catalog | Home