https://filosofia.org/aut/001/1939tlc.htm#p05Go on and google translate that speech. He goes on praising Marx and largely agree with him but sees no contradiction with his own idealistic notion of the Fatherland and man which was just a mental illness due to his upper-class upbringing. Personally I think he was a hack but very smart.
Spain back then was barely out from being a feudal backwater so syndicalist and reactionary essentializing theories like anarchism were popular and with the proletariat not being as developed there wasn't that massive of a rift between the interests of the ruling class and a good chunk of the popular classes (peasants are inherently reactionary idgaf) for there to be a perceived existential threat, it was moreso to restore the natural order of things in a more integral fashion than the Italian/German futuristic aesthetics of burning everything down, though still just as radical it wasn't precisely alienating.
Falange was roots-fascism so to say closer to Sorel in many aspects with a human face like if Italian/Nazi fascism was the abstract "we're all the same race" falangism was like we're all the same family
But it was the only fascist tendency that properly mobilized workers instead of useless petty-bourg so it's worth taking into account. Like I unironically believe it had tangential influence on the political development of Castro due to the large spanish community in Cuba at the time (himself being part of) and it is a statement for the power of the Fatherland as a mobilizing force, Patria o Muerte itself sounds incredibly falangist