War on Iran: Why the Islamabad talks failed What happened in Islamabad is not an isolated event, but rather part of a longer American strategy in the region. Indeed, the American-Zionist war on Iran did not emerge in isolation. It is the direct extension of a broader strategy that accelerated after October 2023, when Israel’s failure to achieve decisive outcomes in Gaza exposed the limits of military power and deterrence. Washington responded not by reassessing its regional posture, but by doubling down, expanding confrontation, tightening sanctions, and eventually moving towards direct military aggression against Iran. Iran entered the talks with a structured position. Through Pakistani mediators, it submitted a 10-point proposal intended to frame negotiations. The details were not publicly released in full, but the outline was clear: a cessation of hostilities, recognition of Iran’s rights under international law, phased sanctions relief, and reciprocal security guarantees. Initially, US President Donald Trump signalled that the proposal could serve as a basis for dialogue. That signal proved misleading. The US delegation did not engage the proposal as a negotiating framework; instead, it moved quickly to impose a separate set of demands. Within hours, the Iranian proposal was effectively sidelined. Reports from the meeting indicate that Trump personally dismissed the framework, instructing his team to proceed on the basis of American conditions. What followed was not a negotiation, but the imposition of American demands. The talks stalled at that point. The remaining hours were spent attempting to bridge a gap that had already become unbridgeable.
https://www.middleeasteye.net/opinion/war-iran-why-islamabad-talks-failedThe Left Needs an Alternative Cosmopolitanism Interview with Lea YpiThe standard critique of the liberal international order comes from the Right these days: the nation-state is supreme, global institutions are a racket, and cosmopolitan elites have sold out ordinary people. The standard defense comes from liberals who conflate the internationalism of the postwar order with the economic system it upholds and defend them both at once. Not satisfied with either position, political theorist Lea Ypi instead urges us to develop what she
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.