/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

Hoxhaism, like other Scientific Socialist movements, had first emerged out of the ideological conflict during the middle-to-late potion of the 20th Century CE. During this time, Enver Hoxha, General Secretary of the Albanian Party of Labour, began to understand, and be critical of, the increasingly revisionist and opportunist rhetoric and polices of the leaders of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics after the death of J. Stalin. At this time, the powerful and harmonious socialist economy that was created as a result of the five-year plans of the 1930’s was slowly being metaphorically watered-down as Khrushchev and later Brezhnev ruled the USSR into the later part of the 20th century.

Enver Hoxha was further agitated by Mao Zedong’s “three worlds theory”; a revisionist and opportunist idea which ignored any sort of societal contradictions in favour of Mao’s immediate geopolitical ambitions. To quote Comrade Hoxha on the “three worlds theory”:

"[…] all of these terms which refer to the different political powers working in the world today conceal — and don't reveal — the class character of these political powers, the basic contradictions of our epoch, the predominant key problem on the national and international scale today, the grim struggle which is waged between the bourgeois-revisionist world on the one hand and socialism, the world proletariat and its natural allies on the other hand." (Enver Hoxha, Report to the 7th Party Congress of the PLA)

Enver Hoxha would seldom capitulate to Khrushchev’s careerism or Mao’s flunkeyism, however. Instead, he would later withdraw from the social-imperialist Warsaw Pact, and would end relations with the revisionist People’s Republic of China. Thus in the process, preventing the People’s Socialist Republic of Albania from becoming a vassal of either social-imperialist state or bloc.

Hence, from this ideological conflict emerged Hoxhaism – the continuation of Marxism and modernisation of Leninism for the international proletariat, free from the crass revisionism and careerism of the Khrushchevite-Brezhnevite Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, and the petite-bougeois pseudo-Marxism of the People’s Republic of China.

After Hoxha’s life concluded in 1985, a large amount of Communist Parties, many of which located in the Americas, have taken up Hoxha’s example resilience to revisionism and careerism.

Hoxhaism, as it exists in the present, is the most potent Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

>Was ruled by right-wing military dictatorship for a long time, Cracked on their left harder than any other MidEast nation
>Fought a decades-long war on the biggest socialist organizations in the middle east and civilians who support it in the surrounding countries. Literally assisted ISIS against them. Extensively appalling and appallingly extensive war crimes record.
>Absolute scourge to it's neighbors,
>Invaded a sovereign nation in 1974 and established a colonialist-settler society recognized by only them, 50% of northern Cypriots are settlers.
>NATO member, Begs for entry into EU, Dedicated member of ImperialCore
>Despite little foreign interference They had a long string of despotic, backward governments of every right-wing flavor retarding it's growth. Little regard for their own populace and drove millions of them into more developed nations.
>Supported the worst reactionary governments on the planet as long as they persecuted commies
>Half of the lands they inhabit belonged, Until very recently, to ethnic groups it either exterminated or currently persecuting, Purposefully neglecting minority areas.
>OVERWHELMINGLY nationalistic population, Not only deny but even justify their genocides and numerous other crimes done to the many nations who were once under it's rule. Vehemently racist towards numerous peoples
>Illegal to criticize or even acknowledge most of this

Why are they not hated as much as Israel?
They need a Mao-style revolution to clear all of this nonsense

I get why people dislike it most of the time; it's used by conservative parents to basically indoctrinate their children and socially isolate them, but thinking that makes homeschooling inherently bad is just like thinking all education is bad because bad people use it sometimes. A form of it could be very useful, especially for us Marxists who are often maligned by those controlling the current educational establishment. It's not like the current public school system is entirely flawless, with it often spewing anti-communist, pro-regime change, right-individualism, and pro-capitalist propaganda. If I had a kid, I wouldn't fully exclude them from public school, but I would perhaps add some sort of extra curriculum at home where I'd teach them Marxist theory, unbiased history of past socialist experiments that doesn't automatically default to (Mao killing 100 billion innocent kulaks in the gulags), and other useful things that may be discouraged elsewhere. I'd kind of be like homework but with studying Marx, Lenin, and even Franz Fanon and perhaps other leftist tendencies like anarchism since it's good to know what your opponents on the left think; marxists.org would be very useful for this, actually. This is especially relevant as it seems like reactionary forces, particularly in the United States, are trying to hijack the school system, such as Project 2025 or PragerU Kids.

What right do these irrelevant nobodies have to appoint themselves as the ambassadors of international Marxism Leninism? What the fuck have they achieved in their entire existence? Who are they to talk shit against the CCP and the KPRF, the largest communist parties on the planet? Where does their idiotic entitlement and arrogance come from?

Who's ready for COVID 2 : Electric Boogaloo?

https://www.nytimes.com/article/hantavirus-cruise-ship-outbreak-hondius.html

https://archive.is/20260506135406/https://www.nytimes.com/article/hantavirus-cruise-ship-outbreak-hondius.html

>Three passengers who were aboard the MV Hondius have died and four other people have been sickened — one critically — after showing symptoms of the rare disease, according to the World Health Organization. On Monday, the vessel’s operator, Oceanwide Expeditions, said that hantavirus had been confirmed in two of the cases.

>The C.D.C. cited a case fatality rate of up to 15 percent in Asia and Europe and up to 50 percent in the Americas.

Previous thread: >>2547894


Links:

Previous Thread Archives
Thread 1 https://archive.ph/ROnpO
Thread 2 https://archive.ph/f29Po
Thread 3 https://archive.ph/GZj20
Thread 4 https://archive.ph/ZHfse
Thread 5 https://archive.ph/PFHJH

Youtube Playlists
Anwar Shaikh - Historical Foundations of Political Economy
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLTMFx0t8kDzc72vtNWeTP05x6WYiDgEx7
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

Half baked thought written on my phone, based on half-remembered anthropology, so bear with me.
Class society came about as a result of division of labour, right? There were separate groups of people who performed administrative function, like organising large scale agerculture, or who monopolised violence in form of warrior class. As history marches on the social organisation gets more complex, demanding more division of labour, not less. This seems to be driven mostly by technological growth, people with distinct expertise are needed to maintain technological society. It is not a process that I see ending with transition to planned economy (or any other model I can think of).
Now I dont think division of labour neccessarly must lead to class distinction, after all different kinds of concrete labour are performed by people occupying the same position in socio-economic pyramid, and if we imagine a society where incomes are equal, all should be of the same class.
The one problem I see is with those who perform decision making function. To allow ourself a biological analogy, the brain of social organism. By virtue of their position, they are not only allowed to secure priviledges for themselves, and as such constitute themselves as a class, but arguably the position is priviledge in itself as it bestows the greatest amount of autonomy on individual.
So the question I have, is it possible to create society with no decision-making strata? Or, if not, how can this strata be made "virtuous", so they conduct themselves as a selfless civil servants, rather than acting for their own personal benefit?

Today is Karl Marx's birthday and I wanna make a statement about his theory of society and capitalism.

Marx's theory on history and the development of capitalism is based on these three core ideas:

1. historical and dialectical materialism
   
2. class struggle under capitalism is inevitable
   
3. labour theory of value and surplus value theory
   
   

a. Historical materialism is a good theory but reductionist.
The mode of production and class struggle is not the main driving factor of history.

b. capitalism adapts itself better than Marx's predicted

c. labour is important in defining the value of a product but it is also not the main defining factor of its price

Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

We all know that Jesus existed historically, I assume most of us don't think he was the son of God and stuff, but he still existed but just may have been a bit crazy, but was he a force good or not? At the time he existed I would say he was because despite the cooky stuff he still at the end of the day spread a message of empathy and compassion that many would call Pre-Marxist-Socialism, which is why the Romans killed him. Obviously after his death his teachings devolved into what it is now but many great people still used his teachings for good like John Brown and MLK.

Genel Türkiye siyaseti ile ilgili konuşun!

Li ser siyaseta giştî ya Tirkiyê biaxive!

Şıma qısey bıkı Poliya Turika!

Yurtişi siyaseti p'ara yoxaleps!

تحدثوا عن السياسة العامة في تركيا!