/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

>>2756810
Not the WU you dumbass

>>2756807
having local support doesn't matter if you've been killed or forcibly separated from the people who support you

>>2756966
Again, irrelevant statement to the conversation you replied to.

Read from the top and try again.

And I'm not arguing, I'm saying this because comprehension is an actual important skill if you want to create a better world.

>>2755432
is this supposed to make me hate cars less?

Hi Anon, is this text taken from some book? I'm not sure what it means.

>>2758698
It's just a schizo and/or markov chain spammer.

I drew some smuggies several years ago.

>>2758389
yes. reactionaries are hypocrites. double standards and hypocrisy are the essence of wielding power. I am consistent on this point. to have power over someone is to be able to do whatever you want to them. This can be as severe as killing people but on the lower end of the spectrum it will manifest as bullying and humiliation. Their logic doesn't have to be consistent, they just have to be more powerful than you and cruel.

>>2755286
well, here's what i think from reading around 12 pages
i find it pretty interesting, especially when it comes to childhood and adulthood development and with frameworks
so far it seems very focused on one particular style/place/state of people but i haven't read the rest of it(i have it bookmarked to read for later)
the theory put forward intrigues me but the classification into a few separate domains like social, law, and finance seems a bit too narrow, there could be a lot more
the writing could see some improvement because some of it feels llm-generated (eg: this is not because x. it is because y) so it ruins the immersion sometimes

>>2755299
>seems very focused on one particular style/place/state of people
You'll have to expand on what you mean by this.

>the classification into a few separate domains like social, law, and finance seems a bit too narrow
Yes, I should include a derivation of these categories. They might be the most popular ones, but they seem arbitrary without a grounding.

>the writing could see some improvement because some of it feels llm-generated
It is, but let me explain how. I wrote the axioms, and I wrote the concepts. I then used an LLM to decompose, reorganize, and recompose. I do that as part of my process, which means the LLM is going to touch a lot of the file eventually and fuck up some of the verbiage.

I'm working on it like a codebase. The design, the section architecture, the model is mine. The details and the connections are created.

Also, I've made some updates to the paper, and will continue to do so.

Here's the latest draft: https://files.catbox.moe/u025jw.pdf

another ai slop thread

>>2758579
>The details and the connections are created.
Actually, this was wrong. Most of the details are main. Vague references to popular ideas (less controversial, less original assertions) may not be mine but take a far less important position in the paper.

>>2758593
>main
*mine
ugh

why do communists care if something makes sense from the KKKRISTIAN point of view?
is the marxism point of view not enough?
was it not enough to tolerate islamist animals? we have to accomodate for chirstcucks too now? what next? hindutva socialism?

>>2700101
Only Orthodox, Catholic, and Marionite are valid.

>>2680698
>Who created Christian Zionism? I have been studying the Bible recently and the topic and I cannot find anything in the New Testament that even hints at some future Jewish ethnic based kingdom. In fact zionism seems to contradict historic Christianity.

I think American Protestantism has become a distinct religious expression different from traditional global Protestantism. Maybe the most distinct characteristic of that American Protestantism is its millenarian "waiting for the end times" attitude. There are armies of people who believe in an Evangelical End Times in their lifetime in this Sorelian, mythic sense. Like these people genuinely think they'll live to see the earth open up, armies of angels and demons fighting each other, people disappearing, so on.

I cant stress the reality of this belief enough. Like there's a scene in the movie Red State by Kevin Smith where this murderous cult of evangelicals stop killing and immediately start losing their shit with joy when they think they hear the trumpets signaling Armageddon. If you talk to people who grew up in the background of a strict Seventh Day Adventist household about that scene, quite a few will say it viscerally, emotionally effected them, even after they've left their particular sect, because many have been trained from childhood to think "you'll hear those trumpets one day and the end times are coming."

The modern incarnation of Christian Zionism, functionally, is an attempt to hasten the end times. They've created a "checklist" of "prophecies" that they think must be fulfilled to usher in the end of days. One of those is that they imagine the modern nation-state of Israel must exist and all the Jews must go there and another temple must be built, and then Jesus will come back to end the world. But they'll see it as a time to rejoice because all the sinners: the whores, the fags, the papists, the muslims, the buddhists, the atheists, the drug addicts, and all the others will be dragged down to the fiery pits of Hell while they get to ascend to Heaven.

What's especially funny is that Trump personally fulfills a lot of the criteria for "Antichrist" but because these Christians are a modern Pharisees and emPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

>Cree Nation boy recovering from surgery mistreated and evicted from Winnipeg hotel
Neo-British vs Native over missing payment from the government after surgery

>>2757923
You make a variation of this autistic, low-effort, low-information thread every few months. Get a life.

>>2757923
The great and authentic revolutionaries of the world are two: Pol Pot and Gonzalo.

>>2758088
>>2758051
Wrong. Supporting the vetnamese social fascist colonizer devil puppet of soviet revisionism is like supporting israeli. You are epstein. You are zionist

>>2758478
Good, fuck Khmers and fuck Arabs

is inflation that much of a problem? Oh well, get fucked

holy fizzle

>>2756111
Also a dirty bomb that could kill that many 1000s of people would lethally irradiate the wearing before he could get to the target

whats going on here

>>2756111
> all concluded that you'd need around 300 to 400 kilos to make the smallest nuclear bomb.
where was this

The near future, yeah, maybe. But the near future is irrelevant. What's relevant is how convinced you are in socialism's inevitability. Leftists who only fight for socialism provided that they get to see it in their lifetimes are barely better than social democrats.

>>2756885
>girldads aren't men
clever ragebait

>>2756689
>pic
can i get the text without the image. it's good text

>>2758054

Used an text extractor, didnt double check all.

>You are being systematically robbed of the same opportunities which previous generations were entitled to by simple virtue of having been born in eras with lower global population.
>Proponents of malthusian-inspired deregulation propaganda aren't really worried about the Earth, knowing full well that it could easily support a much higher number of humans if political corruption, systemic inequality, and purposeful waste of resources were brought to heel.
>A meaningful career, life partner, family, house, car, and possibly even food & water can be dangled just beyond your grasp by strategic maneuvering of forces and organizations which you'll never see, and of whom you've likely never even heard. They consider you to be a kind of living, animate refuse, whose only use is the production of capital and the taxable income which follows.
>Your elected leaders are almost all fully aware of the scale of the upcoming social upheavals that this will cause, when enough of you realize that your impotent groaning and whing in public forums won't save you from your fate - one worse than that of a medieval peon who at least had the courage to rise up and murder their oppressors under desperate circumstances. Instead you'll permit them to withdraw even dignified modes of living, contrive diversionary scandal after scandal as though they were pre-prepared and drawn from a ready supply, turn you against your brothers and sisters, and consume farmed insect protein because you believe that it will halt the already irreversible climate change devastation caused by unchecked industry and suppression of clean energy tecchnology. Even worse, the half of you would rather suicide than fight to keep what's already been earned by your predecessors. If your ancestors could see you now, they'd spit in your worthless face.


makes a good copy pasta for sure

>>2758149
>>2756689
the view of the past presented here is rose tinted nonsense. most people didn't have a meaningful career, they just had no choice but to look for meaning in being the guy who moves boxes from line A to line B in the box factory. as for a family, the primary reason that is more difficult is because we've successfully won much of the war on boredom and on dire poverty. you are no longer compelled to find a partner as a means of not starving to death, and you are no longer compelled to find a partner as a means of fucking the boredom away. net result? - revealed preference, as economists call it? - people argue on 4chan dot org or twitter dot com instead of going out and finding someone. (indeed: how could overpopulation possibly explain a lack of partners? by definition there are more potential partners than ever!)
housing, granted, is an issue but the problem is not overall population but population distribution (and construction, but everyone knows about construction).
everyone wants to live in LA because it's cool and nobody wants to live in ohio because it's lame. (and so far as people have to live in ohio, they want to live in Columbus, not Rendville) net result: a bunch of wasted houses in podunk shitholes with no jobs, and a big deficit in coolsville USA.
car? not only do most have one, but they need one, which is itself the problem - the manipulation of unseen forces trying to screw over the reader - in any civilized country "you won't be able to own a car" would be no more inconvenient than "you won't be able to own a 2-in-1 VHS/TV combo unit"

>>2742033
To give a serious rebuttal: there's always a moment within reformist movements where the bourgeoisie stops cooperating and starts playing hardball. In those moments, reformists have always knuckled under and either lost power, or in the worst case implemented austerity themselves, betraying their own working-class base. Or they were killed like Allende in Chile, who allowed workers to be disarmed and refused to mobilize the proletariat for revolution until it was too late.

>>2758297
If we're talking a capitalist dictatorship anyway democracy is better than authoritarianism because workers can at least publicly organize and get concessions instead of leaving all the cards to the ruling class and being forced underground. There's a reason for operation condor and so on

Through Landsbergian hermeunitcs and the inversed sociological topology of the late Precariat, time.

>>2758303
>If we're talking a capitalist dictatorship anyway democracy is better than authoritarianism
Current day liberal "democracies" aren't democracy. Read Aristotle.

>>2742033
But there's lots of small, potentially tractable problems with that idea. What if you lose an election? haven't you considered that all political reforms create winners and losers, and the losers will fight against your changes?

It's much better if we follow my idea:
first, we non-specifically "Organize" - maybe we start a party (I'll be in charge, naturally) and then the party will "organize" by recruiting people. Then, well, ???, then a revolution will happen and we'll be the driving force in that revolution, winning it by ??? (universal acclaim of the proletariat, maybe), then we'll implement certain organizational structures and policies like ??? (idk the ussr did something), which will immanentize the eschaton, maybe give-or-take a showdown against the world superpowers depending on how i'm feeling that day.

>>2742120
This is a good thing and reflective of historical progress. Martial wank belongs with goat sacrifice on the dustbin of stupid things we did under worse material conditions. There is not one single dispute in the world that would be better solved by combat than by market competition, and market competition is itself so brutal that socialists and social democrats try to look past it.

>>2742141
I am coming to believe that the most practical reformist attitude is as follows: high-welfare libertarianism.
Most regulations are unnecessary, either entirely so or an attempt to solve by regulation what should really be resolved by tax and spending. The handful of regulations that are necessary can be retained easily.
Foreign policy should consist almost entirely of securing trade and bilateral immigration/visa agreements. The military should be cut to the bone, perhaps abolished depending on the country.
State owned enterprises can in many cases be privatized. The darkest secret of social democracy is that there is in-fact no reason to presuppose that an SOE has the public interest at heart more than any private company.

Post too long. Click here to view the full text.