Let's say
>Your part of a team of six drivers, in the middle of a 4-lane interstate, at rush hour. Each lane is occupied by at least one car and with each row about 10-50m from eachother and having two cars on the lane adjacent to the one of the former row, forming a battlement pattern, similar to picrel. Each car is going half the speed of the surrounding traffic or less, so that each row drifts from one another as they get progressively slower relative to how dense the traffic is. As implied, this would effectively halt traffic, as traffic would be slowed down to about 4 m/s, and drivers will have to switch lanes often, making mistakes that cause more traffic.
>Alternatively, traffic can be blackaded altogether, but arrest is far more likely, in this case.
>This occurs three times, in each direction, ideally, as interstates can be quite expansive.
>This is done for every interstate, as well as every major street cutting in the middle a metropolitan area
>This is done either on random days, and/or with random roads being affected.
I would estimate that one would need about 10,200 drivers to operate nationwide, 2520 for the highways and the rest for every city with over 200,000 residents, but It'd probably only take about 200-500 for a particular area like DC or NYC.
The expected effect would be that while travel won't stop altogether, it would either cause a severe loss of productivity or increased unemploymemt, if not both, which would agitate people
Would you say that this would be effective in prompting a Gen. Str. or at least degrade the supply chains of the imperial core to the point of crisis? If not, Would it at least prompt some people to do permaculture or abolish the nuclear family.
Be honest.