>>31035>posting like your average chantard>[descriptorinsult]The one I neglected to address didn't seem to have a core to address to.
>Treating your job as an identityArtist is a descriptor for someone who makes art, you're projecting you own discontent with your own consumed identity trying to frame it as such.
AI art that has fruit, as you put it, is when the artist behind it sees it as the best tool for what they wanted to make. It is a form of procedural art, not "the big evil robot that justifies me asking for lower commission prices from those making art by higher precision means"
>Most of them are liberalsUnmeasurable statistical assertion founded on vibes. Most of them are educated or have peers who are, leading to anti-status quo
leftist politics.
>Feel free to prove otherwise without handwaving it with "SEO", because being an artist isn't some mystical essence, anybody can be one.Just look at conventional online artist spaces, liberal and conservative artists are clearly a niche in a bubble from the rest, I never denied their existance. They are more hireable for making corpo stuff though.
>AI art won't replace artists because everyone using it is an artistWhen used for artistic purposes rather than marketing purposes, where the "AI vs. Artist" ramble stems from.
>special (derogatory)Man, it's been a while since I've heard this one.
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.