/games/ - Games

furries+prison movie tropes+ infuriating rngesus+ all of martin scorsese's scripts+ nice soundtrack= this game

prison was too short but not empty prison was too short but not empty prison was too short but not empty

Napoleon once said something about fortifications mattering the most to the outcome of an invasion even more so than how an invasion was organized.

After reviewing footage of the current invasion in Congo, I realized that there was difference between capturing territory and securing it. I already knew that there was a distinction between the two terms, but the implications of that distinction only became obvious to me recently. Okay, but what does this have to do with RTS games?

Basically, I think game developers should reconsider the definition of capturing territory in these games to be more than just taking over land. Simply occupying land doesn’t necessarily mean any captured territory is actually secure. Without defence systems installed and any chance of internal rebellion suppressed, no territory has been really secured.

I think games like Paradox RTS games, Men of War, and warhammer should have a built in rebellion feature and an “unsecured debuff.” By leaving any invasive land much more vulnerable to be lost either due to internal strife from the player’s actions or from the fact that the territory captured isn’t really defended, the player is forced to make harder decisions about whether invading their neighbours is worth the potential costs and about how they should treat those they subjugated.

I think RTS games would be much more realistic, but that they would have a lot more to say about the nature of warfare.

Objectively the best kind of shooters

Sometimes I forget that the reason why the average warhammer fight doesn’t look like this is because the overwhelming majority of fights are between non augmented or genetically altered humans.

If there was a gene transfer program to make every human an ogryn that isn’t buff this fucking franchise would be xeelee tier levels of fucked up. Transhumanist sci fi will always be uniquely and conceptually horrifying

After the Activision buyout, Blizzard’s leading game designers would go on to ruin AAA gaming for millions of people. Personally, I think blizzard’s mentality for accessibility is what caused the problems.

Blizzard used to keep world of warcraft (WOW) easy. Old WOW used to be simple to learn and simple to play. The progression system was easy, so was the combat, and the quests were simple to understand. For most players, the game wasn’t too competitive and it was easy to make friends.

Milsims like Arma and Squad still have that “easy to learn, easy to make friends” kind of appeal. Even the early soulsborne series had that “simple in design, easy to find fun” appeal despite what the masochists claimed about the souls series. Most AAA games released by blizzard and other high-ranking studios abondoned this approach to game design.

Blizzard catered to the hardcore players too much and made WOW hard. I’m glad that the devs are going back on most of the changes, but the damage and legacy is all still there. Multiplayer shooters are worse than ever. It’s basically impossible to get into any new multiplayer game without being bombarded with endlessly convoluted systems and a hardcore player-base. Gaming is so much harder now. Even games that should feel easy like path of exile 2 play as if I need a manual again to understand what’s going on.

How can this series shift from a grimdark survival horror to a kid-friendly coomerbait seemingly at the snap of a finger? It's more tonally inconsistent than Sonic games frfr. And what's the point of the kid-friendly entries still being horror games? FNaF World was a self-aware spin-off at least, Security Breach straight out looks like Poppy Playtime or some shit.

Over the years, I’ve learned many things about multiplayer shooters. I’m here to share my tips. You don’t have to be good at aiming, movement, or teamwork to learn any of these skills.

>first and foremost: camp
Camping is objectively the only viable playstyle. Rushing and leaving yourself open ever is stupid and will make you lose your KDR arbitrarily. Let the idiots run into your line of fire, they deserve to die to campers.

>best setups
If your game has attachments, I recommend these
<always use tracerless rounds even if you suffer damage debuffs.
<equip a scope/sight and a suppressor
<if any machine pistols are optional, take them. They are better than missile launchers and shotguns

>never shoot in the open.
<If you’re in open terrain, crouch or lay prone; if you’re fighting in an urban map, always shoot within buildings; you’re aiming through a window, a wall, or a door, keep your in-game avatar standing parallel to the wall and not perpendicular to it; doing so makes you slightly less easy to hit than if your face was directly perpendicular to a window’s opening

>never reload or use explosives if you’re not fully behind cover.
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

>Bayonetta 2 gets Samus's Varia Suit instead of her Zero Suit
>Doom Eternal gets absolutely nothing
What was Nintendo thinking? Such a missed opportunity, The Zero Suit in Bayonetta 2 and a Doom x Metroid crossover make so much sense.

Anyone else here play this kino update? It fixed alot of issues I had with the base game, like the slow combat, the story is much clearer as well and learns into the schizo visuals the first game was lacking in which was nice

Why are gamers salesfags these days? Seems like everyone is obsessed with game popularity, like it's the only thing that matters is whether or not other people play the same games you do