>>42443for purporting to hold to an ideology that incorporates dialectics, you really don't think dialectically.
this board was at its best when anti-communists (both of a rightoid and of a lib/socdem/demsoc/anarchist type) were present. this was also, incidentally, when it was at its best at pushing communism. you can't push communism from an insular circlejerk of underread pseuds - an open ended circlejerk of underread pseuds, on the other hand, can be very useful indeed. so long as you've read one more line than the other guy, you win. people used to flag their ideologies and argue for (unspokenly) the credibility of their flagposters against the other guys! people made OC that spread out into the wider internet! we had a good thing going and the first shot through its heart was the idiotic idea that this board needs a rigid line beyond being vaguely left wing and banning
tedious arguments from all sides, forcing the creation of new and novel arguments.
but let's be real, this place is circling the drain. who cares. i'm writing for an audience of 1, me, Cassandra.