/siberia/ - Off-topic

>>730903
Damn… wtf is this made with? Scary

>>730738
>>730738
Its close, m8

>>731201
And this is why ALL women are WHORES

>>731204
I'm not against this post getting oranged, but why is posting the ragebait itself OK?

>>731275
>I'm not against this post getting oranged, but why is posting the ragebait itself OK?
this anon is two steps ahead of the game.
i suspect ragebait is left up because it drives "engagement" and lets reactionaries go mask off so mods can ban them

>>731201
I don't believe this story because when I give a woman head during foreplay I also finger her before using my penis at all. If someone with a micropenis was really being lied to by his gf like this, it would be a very obvious lie that fell apart immediately. What kind of "medical problem" would allow entry by fingers and tongue but disallow entry by micropenis? Nobody, not even a redditor on r/smalldickproblems would fall for this for more than a week, let alone fall for it for 3 fucking years. Obvious ragebait is obvious. I have more thoughts but I'll keep it to this.

>>731282
to clarify, i don't believe this story either because
>3 years
is way too fucking much for things like that but
>What kind of "medical problem" would allow entry by fingers and tongue but disallow entry by micropenis?
depends on how "micro" the penis is. if it's 2-4 times the circumference of a standard finger or a tampon, theoretically a woman with vaginismus could have issues with entry. or it could be a woman with a thick enough hymen (and a small opening inside it, or the hymen being of the septate kind - a stretch of skin in the middle bisecting the introitus) to cause pain on penetration attempts, enough for her to not proceed further

>>731145
Name Them Phaggod

>>731248
NTA, OP is correct, you're a faggot for denying ti

>>731261
>>731134
both of your moms would do me <3

>>731266
I'd do your mom and your dad and your siblings and your future children when they're of age

>>731267
>your future children when they're of age
bold of you to assume… wait they're technically your siblings then

>>730891
>smoking weed
Nothing. That's not a big deal for a teenage boy
>doing cocaine
Taking him aside and explaining very seriously why he should absolutely not do this, find out where he got it from, whom he knows who's doing it, probably make some phone calls to other parents, and dispose of any cocaine he has
>having a massive goon folder
Nothing. That's normal for a teenage boy
>showing interest in illegal hentai
There's no such thing as illegal hentai where I live, but I assume you mean lolicon. I'd be worried but I wouldn't do or say anything. Hopefully he'll grow out of it as he becomes older. When I was in middle school I was attracted to other middle schoolers but not anymore.
>hurting the family pet
I'd yell at him and punish him, maybe by taking away his computer or something
>being a nazi
This one I know for a fact he'll grow out of. I'll talk to him about it and explain why nazism is bad.
>being a league of legends addict
This is very unfortunate but I wouldn't do anything except make it known to him that he should spend his time more wisely.
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>731202
No it isn't. As long as you use a filter like a Chor-Boy. You get resin, which you can reekcook, which makes it even stronger. Even smoking tar with a filter hits better than foil.

Memes aside, the actual goals was the liquidation of the petite-bourgois class and the forcible sedentarisation + proletariatisation of many nomad populations of the Russian empire. These were concrete objectives that were fulfilled and the line going up was a side-effect of it.

i dub thee stalin first god of war and justice of esoteric communism

>great men and great villians drive historical processes
NGMI

>>731222
Not really because capitalism eats itself while the idea of communism always emerges within capitalism. You will perish eventually.

>>731247
So does everyone and everything else, this is no own.

Anti-corpoweb aktion is lolicon praxis. Make people aware of RSS feeds and useful / cool websites to spend time with instead of twitter, google, tiktok, etc…

>>730877
I heard the Dutch and Denmark had industries producing CP selling mags in newsagents

Agitate against censorship and expose anti lolicon moralizing for the cynical covering for reactionary activity that it is.

>>724908
>Do you really think that people who goon to drawings of 10 year olds in bikinis are not gonna eventually go towards the real deal due to all of the normalization?
You reactionaries have been saying this moral hygiene shit about everything you don't like since forever and it's never been true.

>>731025
>you are le heckin reactionary cuz you dont like child porn
kill yourself

>>731147
why do you post this scary woman degeso?

>>731147
we are charlie kirk actually

>>731192
cant be my face isnt that small

>>731188
Quote doesn't support your point, the middle strata don't constitute a class in themselves but hitch their wagons on the bourgeois interests

>>731157
>>731164
>>731180
>>731181

you commies and anarchists should start having gay sex instead of arguing with each other online smh

For the most part yeah. The two of them were just petty and that's why things wen't down how they did between them. A less petty version of them could've easily came to a synthesis.

uygha at least post what Lukac's argument here is so we can have a discussion.

Why would they write Lukács György's name in that way?

>>731224
yeah. post it, op

>>731255
Equally unjustified in my view is the legend widely disseminated in the West that if Trotsky had come to power there would have been a more democratic development than under Stalin. It suffices to think of the discussion on the trade unions in 1921 to understand that this is a pure legend. … I don’t want to deal with this problem at length. But it is certain that, in the years that followed, Stalin followed de facto … Trotsky’s line and not that of Lenin. If Trotsky later on sometimes reproached Stalin for appropriating his program, we can readily concede that he was in many respects right. It follows, according to my judgment of the two personalities, that what we today regard as despotic and undemocratic in the Stalin period has quite close strategic connections with the fundamental ideas of Trotsky. A socialist society under Trotsky’s leadership would have been at least as undemocratic as that of Stalin, but it would have faced the dilemma: a catastrophic policy or capitulation. … (The personal impressions which I received from my meetings with Trotsky in 1931 aroused in me the conviction that he as an individual was even more inclined to the “cult of the personality” than Stalin.) …

Let us return to the main subject. With his well-deserved victories in the discussions of the twenties the difficulties in Stalin’s position did not disappear. What was objectively the central problem, that of sharply accelerating the tempo of industrialization, was in all probability hardly to be resolved within the framework of normal proletarian democracy. It would be useless today to ask whether … Lenin would have found a way out. We can see in retrospect on the one hand the difficulties of the objective situation, and on the other the fact that to overcome them Stalin, as time went by, went farther and farther beyond the limits of what was strictly necessary. It must be the task of … Soviet science to bring to light the exact proportions. Closely bound up with this problem (but not identical with it) is that of Stalin’s position in the Party. It is certain that he built up little by little during and after the period of the discussions that pyramid of which I spoke at the beginning. But it is not enough to construct such a mechanism—it must be kept in continuous working order; it must always -react in the desiredPost too long. Click here to view the full text.