>>819372>Claiming that "stuff needs stuff to exist" is a metaphysical assertion, not a self-evident logical tautology like A = A.Natural theology is argument for the existence of a god from how things are in the world (rather than being based on miracles, what it says in religious books ,and so on., which is the scope of "revealed " theology. )
. Specifically, natural theologians ask what causes change (.It's not just that stuff needs stuff to exist .) We know change happens, we can observe it. They claim that ultimately there must be a "prime mover" behind all changes, which is itself unchanging. Otherwise, there's an unending series of change agents, which doesn't start anywhere, which is the same as saying there's no cause of the changes we can observe.
Inb4 it's all flux and dialectics
but what causes the flux?
I know the answer.anons don't care. Fair enoigh, you don't need theology or gods to discern dialectics in the human society (or anything else.)